Nanophotonics

Nanophotonics or nano-optics is the study of the behavior of light on the nanometer scale, and of the interaction of nanometer-scale objects with light. It is a branch of optics, optical engineering, electrical engineering, and nanotechnology. It often (but not exclusively) involves metallic components, which can transport and focus light via surface plasmon polaritons.

Part of a series of articles on
Nanoelectronics
Single-molecule electronics
Solid-state nanoelectronics
Related approaches
  •  Science portal
  •  Electronics portal
  •  Technology portal

The term "nano-optics", just like the term "optics", usually refers to situations involving ultraviolet, visible, and near-infrared light (free-space wavelengths from 300 to 1200 nanometers).

Background

Normal optical components, like lenses and microscopes, generally cannot normally focus light to nanometer (deep subwavelength) scales, because of the diffraction limit (Rayleigh criterion). Nevertheless, it is possible to squeeze light into a nanometer scale using other techniques like, for example, surface plasmons, localized surface plasmons around nanoscale metal objects, and the nanoscale apertures and nanoscale sharp tips used in near-field scanning optical microscopy (SNOM or NSOM)[1][2][3] and photoassisted scanning tunnelling microscopy.[4]

Motivations

Nanophotonics researchers pursue a very wide variety of goals, in fields ranging from biochemistry to electrical engineering. A few of these goals are summarized below.

Optoelectronics and microelectronics

If light can be squeezed into a small volume, it can be absorbed and detected by a small detector. Small photodetectors tend to have a variety of desirable properties including low noise, high speed, and low voltage and power.[5][6][7]

Small lasers have various desirable properties for optical communication including low threshold current (which helps power efficiency) and fast modulation[8] (which means more data transmission). Very small lasers require subwavelength optical cavities. An example is spasers, the surface plasmon version of lasers.

Integrated circuits are made using photolithography, i.e. exposure to light. In order to make very small transistors, the light needs to be focused into extremely sharp images. Using various techniques such as immersion lithography and phase-shifting photomasks, it has indeed been possible to make images much finer than the wavelength—for example, drawing 30 nm lines using 193 nm light.[9] Plasmonic techniques have also been proposed for this application.[10]

Heat-assisted magnetic recording is a nanophotonic approach to increasing the amount of data that a magnetic disk drive can store. It requires a laser to heat a tiny, subwavelength area of the magnetic material before writing data. The magnetic write-head would have metal optical components to concentrate light at the right location.

Miniaturization in optoelectronics, for example the miniaturization of transistors in integrated circuits, has improved their speed and cost. However, optoelectronic circuits can only be miniaturized if the optical components are shrunk along with the electronic components. This is relevant for on-chip optical communication (i.e. passing information from one part of a microchip to another by sending light through optical waveguides, instead of changing the voltage on a wire).[6][11]

Solar cells

Solar cells often work best when the light is absorbed very close to the surface, both because electrons near the surface have a better chance of being collected, and because the device can be made thinner, which reduces cost. Researchers have investigated a variety of nanophotonic techniques to intensify light in the optimal locations within a solar cell.[12]

Spectroscopy

Using nanophotonics to create high peak intensities: If a given amount of light energy is squeezed into a smaller and smaller volume ("hot-spot"), the intensity in the hot-spot gets larger and larger. This is especially helpful in nonlinear optics; an example is surface-enhanced Raman scattering. It also allows sensitive spectroscopy measurements of even single molecules located in the hot-spot, unlike traditional spectroscopy methods which take an average over millions or billions of molecules.[13][14]

Microscopy

One goal of nanophotonics is to construct a so-called "superlens", which would use metamaterials (see below) or other techniques to create images that are more accurate than the diffraction limit (deep subwavelength).

Near-field scanning optical microscope (NSOM or SNOM) is a quite different nanophotonic technique that accomplishes the same goal of taking images with resolution far smaller than the wavelength. It involves raster-scanning a very sharp tip or very small aperture over the surface to be imaged.[1]

Near-field microscopy refers more generally to any technique using the near-field (see below) to achieve nanoscale, subwavelength resolution. For example, dual-polarization interferometry has picometer resolution in the vertical plane above the waveguide surface.

Principles

Plasmons and metal optics
Main articles: Plasmon and Surface plasmon

Metals are an effective way to confine light to far below the wavelength. This was originally used in radio and microwave engineering, where metal antennas and waveguides may be hundreds of times smaller than the free-space wavelength. For a similar reason, visible light can be confined to the nano-scale via nano-sized metal structures, such as nano-sized structures, tips, gaps, etc. Many nano-optics designs look like common microwave or radiowave circuits, but shrunk down by a factor of 100,000 or more. After all, radiowaves, microwaves, and visible light are all electromagnetic radiation; they differ only in frequency. So other things equal, a microwave circuit shrunk down by a factor of 100,000 will behave the same way but at 100,000 times higher frequency. [15] This effect is somewhat analogous to a lightning rod, where the field concentrates at the tip. It is fundamentally based on the fact that the permittivity of the metal is very large and negative. At very high frequencies (near and above the plasma frequency, usually ultraviolet), the permittivity of a metal is not so large, and the metal stops being useful for concentrating fields.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of a five-element Yagi-Uda antenna consisting of a feed element, one reflector, and three directors, fabricated by e-beam lithography.[16]

For example, researchers have made nano-optical dipoles and Yagi–Uda antennas following essentially the same design as used for radio antennas.[17][18]

Metallic parallel-plate waveguides (striplines), lumped-constant circuit elements such as inductance and capacitance (at visible light frequencies, the values of the latter being of the order of femtohenries and attofarads, respectively), and impedance-matching of dipole antennas to transmission lines, all familiar techniques at microwave frequencies, are some current areas of nanophotonics development. That said, there are a number of very important differences between nano-optics and scaled-down microwave circuits. For example, at optical frequency, metals behave much less like ideal conductors, and also exhibit interesting plasmon-related effects like kinetic inductance and surface plasmon resonance. Likewise, optical fields interact with semiconductors in a fundamentally different way than microwaves do.

Near-field optics
Main articles: Near-field optics and Near and far field

If you take the Fourier transform of an object, it consists of different spatial frequencies. The higher frequencies correspond to the very fine features and sharp edges.

When light is emitted by such an object, the light with very high spatial frequency forms an evanescent wave, which only exists in the near field (very close to the object, within a wavelength or two) and disappears in the far field. This is the origin of the diffraction limit, which says that when a lens images an object, the subwavelength information is blurred out.

Nano-photonics is primarily concerned with the near-field evanescent waves. For example, a superlens (mentioned above) would prevent the decay of the evanescent wave, allowing higher-resolution imaging.

Metamaterials
Main article: Metamaterial

Metamaterials are artificial materials engineered to have properties that may not be found in nature. They are created by fabricating an array of structures much smaller than a wavelength. The small (nano) size of the structures is important: That way, light interacts with them as if they made up a uniform, continuous medium, rather than scattering off the individual structures.

gollark: Oh no.
gollark: Has anyone tested the offline mode by the way? I only did a bit of local testing.
gollark: It's simple; Arch good other OSes bad.
gollark: Slowly, but yes.
gollark: https://copy.sh/v86/

See also

References
  1. Pohl, D.W.; Denk, W.; Lanz, M. (1984). "Optical Stethoscopy: Image Recording with Resolution λ/20". Appl. Phys. Lett. 44 (7): 651–653. Bibcode:1984ApPhL..44..651P. doi:10.1063/1.94865.
  2. Dürig, U.; Pohl, D. W.; Rohner, F. (1986). "Near-Field Optical Scanning Microscopy". J. Appl. Phys. 59 (10): 3318–3327. Bibcode:1986JAP....59.3318D. doi:10.1063/1.336848.
  3. Betzig, E.; Harootunian, A.; Isaacson, M.; Kratschmer, E. (1986). "Near Field scanning optical microscopy (NSOM)". Biophys. J. 49: 269–279. Bibcode:1986BpJ....49..269B. doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(86)83640-2. PMC 1329633. PMID 19431633.
  4. Hewakuruppu, Y., et al., Plasmonic " pump – probe " method to study semi-transparent nanofluids Archived March 3, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, Applied Optics, 52(24):6041-6050
  5. Assefa, Solomon; Xia, Fengnian; Vlasov, Yurii A. (2010). "Reinventing germanium avalanche photodetector for nanophotonic on-chip optical interconnects". Nature. 464 (7285): 80–4. Bibcode:2010Natur.464...80A. doi:10.1038/nature08813. PMID 20203606.
  6. "Research Discovery By Ethiopian Scientist At IBM". Tadias Magazine. Retrieved 2010-03-15.
  7. "Avalanche photodetector breaks speed record". Physics World. Retrieved 2010-03-15.
  8. Themistoklis P. H. Sidiropoulos, Robert Röder, Sebastian Geburt, Ortwin Hess, Stefan A. Maier, Carsten Ronning, Rupert F. Oulton (2014). "Ultrafast plasmonic nanowire lasers near the surface plasmon frequency". Nature Physics. 10 (11): 870–876. Bibcode:2014NatPh..10..870S. doi:10.1038/nphys3103. hdl:10044/1/18641.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link) Press release Archived December 25, 2016, at the Wayback Machine
  9. Hand, Aaron. "High-Index Lenses Push Immersion Beyond 32 nm". Archived from the original on 2015-09-29. Retrieved 2014-09-27.
  10. Liang Pan et al. (2011). "Maskless Plasmonic Lithography at 22 nm Resolution". Scientific Reports. 1: 175. Bibcode:2011NatSR...1E.175P. doi:10.1038/srep00175. PMC 3240963. PMID 22355690.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  11. "IBM Research | IBM Research | Silicon Integrated Nanophotonics". Domino.research.ibm.com. 2010-03-04. Retrieved 2010-03-15.
  12. Vivian E. Ferry, Jeremy N. Munday, Harry A. Atwater (2010). "Design Considerations for Plasmonic Photovoltaics". Advanced Materials. 22 (43): 4794–4808. doi:10.1002/adma.201000488. PMID 20814916.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  13. Acuna, Guillermo; Grohmann, Dina; Tinnefeld, Philip (2014). "Enhancing single-molecule fluorescence with nanophotonics". FEBS Letters. 588 (19): 3547–3552. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2014.06.016. PMID 24928436.
  14. R. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Z. C. Dong, S. Jiang, C. Zhang, L. G. Chen, L. Zhang, Y. Liao, J. Aizpurua, Y. Luo, J. L. Yang, J. G. Hou (6 June 2013). "Chemical mapping of a single molecule by plasmon-enhanced Raman scattering". Nature. 498 (7452): 82–86. Bibcode:2013Natur.498...82Z. doi:10.1038/nature12151. PMID 23739426.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  15. Pohl, D. W. (2000). "Near Field Optics Seen as an Antenna Problem". Near Field Optics: Principles and Applications / The Second Asia-Pacific Workshop on Near Field Optics. Singapore New Jersey London Hong Kong: World Scientific. pp. 9–21. ISBN 981-02-4365-0.
  16. van Hulst, Niek. "Optical Nano-antenna Controls Single Quantum Dot Emission". 2physics. 2physics.
  17. P. Muehlschlegel, H.-J. Eisler, O.J.F. Martin, B. Hecht and D.W. Pohl (2005). "Resonant Optical Antennas". Science. 308 (5728): 1607–9. Bibcode:2005Sci...308.1607M. doi:10.1126/science.1111886. PMID 15947182.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  18. Daniel Dregely, Richard Taubert, Jens Dorfmüller, Ralf Vogelgesang, Klaus Kern, Harald Giessen (2011). "3D optical Yagi–Uda nanoantenna array". Nature Communications. 2 (267): 267. Bibcode:2011NatCo...2..267D. doi:10.1038/ncomms1268. PMC 3104549. PMID 21468019.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.