Kinetoplast

A kinetoplast is a network of circular DNA (called kDNA) inside a large mitochondrion that contains many copies of the mitochondrial genome.[1][2] The most common kinetoplast structure is a disk, but they have been observed in other arrangements. Kinetoplasts are only found in Excavata of the class Kinetoplastida. The variation in the structures of kinetoplasts may reflect phylogenic relationships between kinetoplastids.[3] A kinetoplast is usually adjacent to the organism's flagellar basal body, suggesting that it is tightly bound to the cytoskeleton. In Trypanosoma brucei this cytoskeletal connection is called the tripartite attachment complex and includes the protein p166.[4]

Electron micrograph of normal kinetoplast (K) of Trypanosoma brucei

Trypanosoma

In trypanosomes, a group of flagellated protozoans, the kinetoplast exists as a dense granule of DNA within the large mitochondrion. Trypanosoma brucei, the parasite which causes African trypanosomiasis (African sleeping sickness), is an example of a trypanosome with a kinetoplast. Its kinetoplast is easily visible in samples stained with DAPI, a fluorescent DNA stain, or by the use of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with BrdU, a thymidine analogue.[5]

Structure

The kinetoplast contains circular DNA in two forms, maxicircles and minicircles. Maxicircles are between 20 and 40kb in size and there are a few dozen per kinetoplast. There are several thousand minicircles per kinetoplast and they are between 0.5 and 1kb in size. Maxicircles encode the typical protein products needed for the mitochondria which is encrypted. Herein lies the only known function of the minicircles - producing guide RNA (gRNA) to decode this encrypted maxicircle information, typically through the insertion or deletion of uridine residues. The network of maxicircles and minicircles are catenated to form a planar network that resembles chain mail. Reproduction of this network then requires that these rings be disconnected from the parental kinetoplast and subsequently reconnected in the daughter kinetoplast.[5][6] This unique mode of DNA replication may inspire potential drug targets.

The best studied kDNA structure is that of Crithidia fasciculata, a catenated disk of circular kDNA maxicircles and minicircles, most of which are not supercoiled.[3] Exterior to the kDNA disk but directly adjacent are two complexes of proteins situated 180˚ from each other and are involved in minicircle replication.[1][2][5][6]

Variations

Variations of kinetoplast networks have also been observed and are described by the arrangement and location of their kDNA.

  • A pro-kDNA kinetoplast is a bundle-like structure found in the mitochondrial matrix proximal to the flagellar basal body. In contrast to the conventional kDNA network, a pro-kDNA kinetoplast contains very little catenation and its maxicircles and minicircles are relaxed instead of supercoiled. Pro-kDNA has been observed in Bodo saltans, Bodo designis, Procryptobia sorokini syn. Bodo sorokini, Rhynchomonas nasuta, and Cephalothamnium cyclopi.[3]
  • A poly-kDNA kinetoplast is similar in kDNA structure to a pro-kDNA kinetoplast. It contains little catenation and no supercoiling. The distinctive feature of poly-kDNA is that instead of being composed of a single globular bundle as in pro-kDNA, the poly-kDNA is distributed among various discrete foci throughout the mitochondrial lumen. Poly-kDNA has been observed in Dimastigella trypaniformis (a commensal in the intestine of a termite), Dismastigella mimosa (a free-living kinetoplastid), and Cruzella marina (a parasite of the intestine of a sea squirt).[3]
  • A pan-kDNA kinetoplast, like poly-kDNA and pro-kDNA, contains a lesser degree of catenation but it does contain minicircles that are supercoiled. Pan-kDNA kinetoplasts fill most of the mitochondrial matrix and are not limited to discrete foci like poly-kDNA. Pan-kDNA has been observed in Cryptobia helicis (a parasite of the receptaculum seminis of snails), Bodo caudatus, and Cryptobia branchialis (a parasite of fish).[3]
  • A mega-kDNA kinetoplast is distributed fairly uniformly throughout the mitochondrial matrix, but does not contain minicircles. Instead, sequences of kDNA similar in sequence to other kinetoplast minicircles are connected in tandem into larger molecules approximately 200kb in length. Mega-kDNA (or structures similar to mega-kDNA) have been observed in Trypanoplasme borreli (a fish parasite) and Jarrellia sp. (a whale parasite).[3]

The presence of this variety of kDNA structures reinforces the evolutionary relationship between the species of kinetoplastids. As pan-kDNA most closely resembles a DNA plasmid, it may be the ancestral form of kDNA.[3]

Replication

Figure 8. Illustration of the location of the antipodal protein complex relative to kinetoplast disk (above) and the migration of minicircle to these complexes for replication (below).

The replication of the kinetoplast occurs simultaneously to the duplication of the adjacent flagellum and just prior to the nuclear DNA replication. In a traditional Crithidia fasciculata kDNA network, initiation of replication is promoted by the unlinking of kDNA minicircles via topoisomerase II. The free minicircles are released into a region between the kinetoplast and the mitochondrial membrane called the kinetoflagellar zone (KFZ).[2][3][6] After replication the minicircles migrate by unknown mechanisms to the antipodal protein complexes that contain several replication proteins including an endonuclease, helicase, DNA polymerase, DNA primase, and DNA ligase, which initiate repair of remaining discontinuities in the newly replicated minicircles.[5]

This process occurs one minicircle at a time, and only a small number of minicircles are unlinked at any given moment. To keep track of which minicircles have been replicated, upon rejoining to the kDNA network a small gap remains in the nascent minicircles, which identifies them as having already been replicated. Minicircles that have not yet been replicated are still covalently closed. Immediately after replication, each progeny is attached to the kDNA network proximal to the antipodal protein complexes and the gaps are partially repaired.[1][6]

Figure 9. Illustration of kinetoplast rotation during minicircle replication.
Kinetoplast (K) divides first and then the nucleus (N) in dividing T. brucei

As minicircle replication progresses, to prevent the build-up of new minicircles, the entire kDNA network will rotate around the central axis of the disk. The rotation is believed to be directly connected to the replication of the adjacent flagellum, as the daughter basal body will also rotate around the mother basal body in a timing and manner similar to the rotation of the kinetoplast. By rotating, the minicircles of the daughter kinetoplast are assembled in a spiral fashion and begin moving inward toward the center of the disk as new minicircles are unlinked and moved into the KFZ for replication.[2][5][6]

While the exact mechanisms for maxicircle kDNA have yet to be determined in the same detail as minicircle kDNA, a structure called a nabelschnur (German for "umbilical cord") is observed that tethers the daughter kDNA networks but eventually breaks during separation. Using FISH probes to target the nabelschnur, it has been found to contain maxicircle kDNA.[5]

Kinetoplast replication is described as occurring in five stages, each in relation to the replication of the adjacent flagellum.

  • Stage I: The kinetoplast has not yet initiated replication, contains no antipodal protein complexes, and is positioned relative to a single flagellar basal body.
  • Stage II: The kinetoplast begins to show antipodal protein complexes. The flagellar basal body begins replication, as does the kinetoplast. The association of the replicating kinetoplast to the two basal bodies causes it to develop a domed appearance.
  • Stage III: The new flagellum begin to separate and the kinetoplast takes on a bilobed shape.
  • Stage IV: The kinetoplasts appear as separate disks but remain connected by the nabelschnur.
  • Stage V: The daughter kinetoplasts are completely separated as the nabelschnur is broken. Their structure is identical to that seen in Stage I.[5]

DNA repair

Trypanosoma cruzi is able to repair nucleotides in its genomic or kinetoplast DNA that have been damaged by reactive oxygen species produced by the parasite’s host during infection.[7] DNA polymerase beta expressed in T. cruzi is employed in the removal of oxidative DNA damages by the process of base excision repair. It appears that DNA polymerase beta acts during kinetoplast DNA replication to repair oxidative DNA damages induced by genotoxic stress in this organelle.[7]

gollark: I'm trying to actually find a log plot, but æææ network.
gollark: If I recall correctly, the line is roughly continuous since the industrial revolution on a logarithmic scale.
gollark: I see.
gollark: Did you send that twice as a deliberate stylistic thing or just network/Discord horrors?
gollark: Admittedly, inflation-adjusting the distant past might be slightly tricky.

References

  1. Shapiro TA; Englund PT (1995). "The structure and replication of kinetoplast DNA". Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 49: 117–43. doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195.001001. PMID 8561456.
  2. Shlomai J (2004). "The structure and replication of kinetoplast DNA". Curr. Mol. Med. 4 (6): 623–47. doi:10.2174/1566524043360096. PMID 15357213.
  3. Lukes J, et al. (2002). "Kinetoplast DNA Network: Evolution of an Improbable Structure". Eukaryotic Cell. 1 (4): 495–502. doi:10.1128/ec.1.4.495-502.2002. PMC 117999. PMID 12455998.
  4. Zhao, Z; Lindsay, M. E.; Roy Chowdhury, A; Robinson, D. R.; Englund, P. T. (2008). "P166, a link between the trypanosome mitochondrial DNA and flagellum, mediates genome segregation". The EMBO Journal. 27 (1): 143–54. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601956. PMC 2206137. PMID 18059470.
  5. Gluenz E, et al. (March 2011). "The kinetoplast replication cycle in Trypanosoma brucei is orchestrated by cytoskeleton-mediated cell morphogenesis". Molecular Cell Biology. 31 (5): 1012–1021. doi:10.1128/MCB.01176-10. PMC 3067821. PMID 21173163.
  6. Torri, A., et al. DNA Replication in Eukaryotic Cells. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. 1996. pages=1029–42. ISBN 0-87969-459-9
  7. Schamber-Reis BL, Nardelli S, Régis-Silva CG, Campos PC, Cerqueira PG, Lima SA, Franco GR, Macedo AM, Pena SD, Cazaux C, Hoffmann JS, Motta MC, Schenkman S, Teixeira SM, Machado CR (2012). "DNA polymerase beta from Trypanosoma cruzi is involved in kinetoplast DNA replication and repair of oxidative lesions". Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 183 (2): 122–31. doi:10.1016/j.molbiopara.2012.02.007. PMID 22369885.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.