Lornay
Lornay is a commune in the Haute-Savoie department in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region in south-eastern France.
Lornay | |
---|---|
The Château of Lornay | |
Location of Lornay | |
Lornay Lornay | |
Coordinates: 45°55′01″N 5°54′09″E | |
Country | France |
Region | Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes |
Department | Haute-Savoie |
Arrondissement | Annecy |
Canton | Rumilly |
Intercommunality | Rumilly Terre de Savoie |
Government | |
• Mayor (2014–2020) | Laurence Kennel |
Area 1 | 9.65 km2 (3.73 sq mi) |
Population (2017-01-01)[1] | 560 |
• Density | 58/km2 (150/sq mi) |
• Urban | 25,728 |
Time zone | UTC+01:00 (CET) |
• Summer (DST) | UTC+02:00 (CEST) |
INSEE/Postal code | 74151 /74150 |
Elevation | 295–1,025 m (968–3,363 ft) |
1 French Land Register data, which excludes lakes, ponds, glaciers > 1 km2 (0.386 sq mi or 247 acres) and river estuaries. |
Geography
The Fier forms the commune's eastern border.
gollark: It seems to be if you use the WRONG version, is the thing.
gollark: Apparently, if you integrate the "characteristic function of the rational numbers" (1 if rational, 0 otherwise) from 0 to 1, you will attain 1, because x is always rational (because b - a is 1, and all the partitions are the same size), even though it should be 0.
gollark: For another thing, as I found out while reading a complaint by mathematicians about the use of Riemann integrals over gauge integrals, if you always take the point to "sample" as the left/right/center of each partition *and* the thing is evenly divided up into partitions, it's actually wrong in some circumstances.
gollark: For one thing, the sum operator is very bee there because it does not appear to be counting integers.
gollark: It's wrong and abuse-of-notationy however.
References
- "Populations légales 2017". INSEE. Retrieved 6 January 2020.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Lornay. |
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.