Interpretive bias

Interpretive bias or interpretation bias is an information-processing bias, the tendency to inappropriately analyze ambiguous stimuli, scenarios and events.[1] One type of interpretive bias is hostile attribution bias, wherein individuals perceive benign or ambiguous behaviors as hostile. For example, a situation in which one friend walks past another without acknowledgement. The individual may interpret this behavior to mean that their friend is angry with them.

Anxiety

It has been hypothesized that individuals with anxiety are more likely to experience interpretive bias.[2] One study considered the interpretation of neutral facial expressions in individuals with high and low social anxiety and found that socially anxious participants perceived neutral faces as negative regardless of the context.[2] In contrast, the study found that non-anxious participants only showed interpretive bias in situations that created anxiety, rather than as a function of their personality.[2]

Homographs

Another studied considered how anxiety influenced which meaning of homographs was chosen. Homographs are words with at least two meanings.[1] They found that anxious personalities are more likely to produce threatening interpretations.[3] Another study found that interpretive bias depends on subsequent controlled processes.[4]

gollark: Hmm, I think I'll turn on all the privileged intents to spite them.
gollark: AutoBotRobot still uses the old gateway or something and thus gets all data ever.
gollark: There is of course absolutely no way they can check.
gollark: (it's very expensive)
gollark: Permanently and forever to the public bitcoin blockchain.

See also

References
  1. Mathews, A. & MacLeod, C. (2005). "Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders". Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 1: 167–195. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143916. PMID 17716086.
  2. Yoon, K.L. & Zinbarg, R.E. (2008). "Interpreting neutral faces as threatening is a default mode for social anxious individuals" (PDF). Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 117 (3): 680–685. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.117.3.680. PMID 18729619.
  3. Grey, S. J. & Mathews, A.M. (2009). "Cognitive bias modification – Priming with an ambiguous homograph is necessary to detect an interpretation training effect". Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 4 (2): 338–343. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.01.003. PMID 19249014.
  4. Calvo, M.G. & Castillo, M.D. (1996). "Predictive inferences occur on-line, but with delay: Convergence of naming and reading times". Discourse Processes. 22 (1): 57–78. doi:10.1080/01638539609544966.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.