International Bioethics Committee

The International Bioethics Committee (IBC) of UNESCO is a body composed of 36 independent experts from all regions and different disciplines (mainly medicine, genetics, law, and philosophy) that follows progress in the life sciences and its applications in order to ensure respect for human dignity and human rights. It was created in 1993 by Dr Federico Mayor Zaragoza, General Director of UNESCO at that time. It has been prominent in developing Declarations with regard to norms of bioethics that are regarded as soft law but are nonetheless influential in shaping the deliberations, for example, of research ethics committees (or Institutional review board) and health policy.[1][2][3]

Universal Declaration on Human Genome and Human Rights

In 1993, the IBC was entrusted with the task of preparing an international instrument on the human genome, the Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights, which was adopted by the General Conference of UNESCO in 1997 and endorsed by the General Assembly of the United Nations in 1998. The main purpose of this instrument is to protect the human genome from improper manipulations that may endanger the identity and physical integrity of future generations. To this end, it recognizes the human genome as "the heritage of humanity" (Article 1), and declares "contrary to human dignity" practices such as human cloning (Article 11) and germ-line interventions (Article 24). In addition, the Declaration intends to prevent genetic reductionism, genetic discrimination, and any use of genetic information that would be contrary to human dignity and human rights.[4][5][6]

International Declaration on Human Genetic Data

In 2003, the IBC issued a second global instrument, the International Declaration on Human Genetic Data, which may be regarded as an extension of the 1997 Declaration. This document sets out a number of rules for the collection, use and storage of human genetic data. It covers, among other issues, informed consent in genetics; confidentiality of genetic data; genetic discrimination; anonymization of personal genetic information; population-based genetic studies; the right not to know one’s genetic make up; genetic counselling; international solidarity in genetic research, and benefit sharing.[7]

Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights

The last global instrument drafted by the IBC is the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, which has a much broader scope than the two previous documents. It aims to provide a comprehensive framework of principles that should guide biomedical activities, in order to ensure that they are in conformity with international human rights law.[8] The academic Thomas Alured Faunce has analysed this Declaration's non-binding social responsibility, technology transfer and transnational benefit principles which expressly apply to private and public corporations as well as states.[9] He has argued that it has promoted a normative intersection between international human rights law and bioethics as academic disciplines.[10][11]

gollark: Er, you need three diamonds.
gollark: Where it shines is in performing random useful tasks which there isn't dedicated hardware available for, linking together disparate systems (much more practically than redstone), working as a "microcontroller" to control something based on a bunch of input data, and entertainment-/decorative-type things (displaying stuff on monitors and whatnot, and music with Computronics).
gollark: For example, quarrying. CC has turtles. They can dig things. They can move. You can make a quarry out of this, and people have. But in practice, they're not hugely fast or efficient, and it's hard to make it work well in the face of stuff like server restarts, while a dedicated quarrying device from a mod will handle this fine and probably go faster if you can power it somehow.
gollark: I honestly don't think CC is particularly overpowered even with turtles. While it can technically do basically anything, most bigger packs will have special-purpose devices which are more expensive but do it way better, while CC is very annoying to have work.
gollark: Out of all the available APIs in _G the only ones I can see which allow I/O of some sort directly and don't just make some task you can technically already do more convenient are `fs`, `os`, `redstone`, `http`, and `term`. You can, at most, probably disable `http` and `redstone` without breaking everything horribly, and it would still be annoying.

References
  1. UNESCO IBC (last accessed 18 June 2009)
  2. Allyn Taylor (1999), "Globalization and Biotechnology: UNESCO and an International Strategy to Advance Human Rights and Public Health", American Journal of Law and Medicine, 25(4), 479-541.
  3. Roberto Andorno (2007), "The invaluable role of soft law in the development of universal norms in bioethics", Presentation at the Workshop: The implementation of bioethical principles. A comparative analysis". German Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Berlin, 2007
  4. UNESCO (11 November 1997). "UNESCO Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights". Retrieved 29 Aug 2010.
  5. Noelle Lenoir (1997), "UNESCO, Genetics and Human Rights", Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 7, 31-42.
  6. Shawn Harmon (2005), "The Significance of UNESCO’s Universal Declaration on the Human Genome & Human Rights", Script-ed. Online Journal of Law and Technology, 2(1), 18-47. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2006-10-01. Retrieved 2008-10-28.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  7. UNESCO (16 October 2003). "International Declaration on Human Genetic Data". Retrieved 29 August 2010.
  8. Roberto Andorno (2007), "Global bioethics at UNESCO: in defence of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights", Journal of Medical Ethics, 33, 150-154.
  9. Faunce TA and Nasu H. Normative Foundations of Technology Transfer and Transnational Benefit Principles in the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy , 0 : 1 – 26, 2009 doi:10.1093/jmp/jhp021. Archived 2011-06-11 at the Wayback Machine (last accessed 18 June 2009)
  10. Tom A. Faunce (2005), "Will international human rights subsume medical ethics? Intersections in the UNESCO Universal Bioethics Declaration", Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 173-178. Archived 2011-06-11 at the Wayback Machine (last accessed 18 June 2009)
  11. UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (last accessed 18 June 2009)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.