Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act

The Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019 (HKHRDA)[1] (S. 1838; Pub.L. 116–76) is a United States federal law that requires the U.S. government to impose sanctions against Mainland China and Hong Kong officials considered responsible for human rights abuses in Hong Kong, and requires the United States Department of State and other agencies to conduct an annual review to determine whether changes in Hong Kong's political status (its relationship with mainland China) justify changing the unique, favorable trade relations between the U.S. and Hong Kong.[2][3][4][5] The passage of the bill was supported by pro-democracy activists in Hong Kong,[2] and in 2019 received near-unanimous support in Congress.[6]

Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019
Long titleAn act to amend the Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 and for other purposes.
Enacted bythe 116th United States Congress
EffectiveNovember 27, 2019
Citations
Public lawPub.L. 116–76
Statutes at Large113 Stat. 1161
Codification
Acts amendedUnited States–Hong Kong Policy Act
U.S.C. sections created22 U.S.C. §§ 5725–5726
U.S.C. sections amended22 U.S.C. § 5721
Legislative history

Initially introduced in 2014 following the Umbrella Movement and 2014 democracy protests in Hong Kong, the legislation was re-introduced to the next three successive Congresses, but did not gain a vote until 2019, following the 2019 Hong Kong extradition bill proposal and the ensuing protests against it.[7] A House version of the bill unanimously passed in the United States House of Representatives through a voice vote in October 2019.[8] In November 2019, the Senate version of the bill, with amendments that differ from the House bill,[9] unanimously passed the Senate on a voice vote.[10][11] The House accepted the Senate version of the bill later that month, sending it to the desk of President Donald Trump,[12] who signed it one week later.[13] The bill was accompanied by a companion bill restricting U.S. exports of crowd control devices to the Hong Kong police forces, which passed both chambers of Congress unanimously and signed by Trump on the same occasion.[14]

Legislative history

2014–2018

The bill was initially introduced in 2014 during the 113th Congress as an amendment to the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992,[15] following the Umbrella Movement and 2014 democracy protests in Hong Kong.[15][7][16] The House bill (H.R. 5696) was sponsored by Republican Representative Chris Smith (R-NJ),[17] while the Senate bill (S.2922) was sponsored by Sherrod Brown (D-OH).[18] The act stated that it was U.S. policy to: "(1) reaffirm the principles set forth in the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992; (2) support the democratic aspirations of the people of Hong Kong; (3) urge China's government to uphold its commitments to Hong Kong; (4) support the establishment by 2017 of a democratic option to nominate and elect the Chief Executive of Hong Kong, and the establishment by 2020 of democratic elections for all members of the Hong Kong Legislative Council; and (5) support freedom of the press."[18]

The act was reintroduced into the next two proceeding sessions of Congress: in the 114th Congress as H.R. 1159[19] and S. 3469,[20] and in the 115th Congress as H.R. 3856[21] and S. 417.[22]

2019

The 2019 Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act was introduced during the 116th Congress, and gained traction in light of the 2019 Hong Kong extradition bill proposal and the ensuing protests against it;[23] House bill (H.R.3289[3]) was sponsored by Jim McGovern (D-MA)[23] and Chris Smith (R-NJ) while the Senate bill (S.1838[24]) was sponsored by Marco Rubio (R-FL). Co-sponsors for the House bill included Tom Suozzi (D-NY), Scott Perry (R-PA), Brad Sherman (D-CA), and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA). Co-sponsors for the Senate bill included Jim Risch (R-ID), Bob Menendez (D-NJ), Ben Cardin (D-MD), Tom Cotton (R-AR), Angus King (I-ME), Ed Markey (D-MA), and Josh Hawley (R-MO).[23]

On October 15, 2019, the House version of the bill unanimously passed in a voice vote in the House of Representatives.[8][25]

On November 14, 2019, Senators Jim Risch and Marco Rubio began a process for the United States Senate to pass the legislation by unanimous voice vote.[8] The bill acquired 50 sponsors on November 18, 2019,[26] all but guaranteeing its passage. The bill passed the Senate via unanimous consent on November 19, 2019,[10] with amendments that differed between the two versions.[9]

On November 20, 2019, the House passed the Senate version of the Act[27] on a 417–1 vote.[28] Congressman Thomas Massie (R-KY) was the lone dissenting vote.[29] The House passed the Senate version in order to expedite the process.[2] The passage of the bills by both chambers sent the legislation to President Donald Trump.[2] In an appearance on Fox & Friends shortly after the bill's passage, Trump said that he might veto the bill, saying that it might impact his talks with China over the U.S.-China trade war, saying, "We have to stand with Hong Kong, but I'm also standing with President Xi [Jinping]; he's a friend of mine."[30] Trump signed the bill on November 27, 2019.[13] As he was signing the bill, Trump issued a signing statement hedging his support, saying that "certain provisions of the Act," which he did not specify, "would interfere with the exercise of the President’s constitutional authority to state the foreign policy of the United States," and that his administration would "treat each of the provisions of the act consistently with the president's constitutional authorities with respect to foreign relations."[31][32] In response, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer wrote, "Decency, humanity, and the rule of law compel you to enforce it. Stop playing games."[31]

Provisions of the act

The Act is divided into ten sections:

  • Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents
  • Sec. 2. Definitions
  • Sec. 3. Statement of policy
  • Sec. 4. Amendments to the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992
  • Sec. 5. Annual report on violations of United States export control laws and United Nations sanctions occurring in Hong Kong.
  • Sec. 6. Protecting United States citizens and others from rendition to the People's Republic of China.
  • Sec. 7. Sanctions relating to undermining fundamental freedoms and autonomy in Hong Kong.
  • Sec. 8. Sanctions reports.
  • Sec. 9. Sense of Congress on People's Republic of China state-controlled media.
  • Sec. 10. Sense of Congress on commercial exports of crowd control equipment to Hong Kong.[4]

The HKHRDA directed various departments to assess whether political developments in Hong Kong justify changing Hong Kong's unique treatment under U.S. law,[4] and specifically:

  • Requires the Secretary of State to issue an annual certification of Hong Kong's autonomy to justify special treatment afforded to Hong Kong by the U.S. Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992.[23]
  • Requires the President to identify, and impose sanctions against, persons responsible for the abductions of Hong Kong booksellers and journalists and those complicit in suppressing basic freedoms in Hong Kong, including those complicit in the rendition of individuals, in connection to their exercise of internationally recognized rights, to mainland China for detention or trial.[23] Sanctions against officials responsible for human rights abuses in Hong Kong would include asset freezes[33] under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act[4] as well as visa bans,[33] including the denial of visa applications to travel in the United States and the revocation of existing visas.[4]
  • Requires the President to issue a strategy to protect U.S. citizens and businesses from the risks posed by a revised Fugitive Offenders Ordinance, including by determining whether to revise the U.S.–Hong Kong extradition agreement and the State Department's travel advisory for Hong Kong.[23]
  • Requires the Secretary of Commerce to issue an annual report assessing whether the government of Hong Kong is adequately enforcing both U.S. export regulations regarding sensitive dual-use items and U.S. and U.N. sanctions, particularly regarding Iran and North Korea.[23]
  • Makes clear that visa applicants shall not be denied visas on the basis of the applicant's arrest, detention or other adverse government action taken as a result of their participation in the protest activities related to pro-democracy advocacy, human rights, or the rule of law in Hong Kong.[23]

The application of targeted sanctions directed by the Act is modeled after similar provisions in the Magnitsky Act and the Global Magnitsky Act.[34] Legal scholar Julian Ku notes that the sanctions provision of the HKHRDA "may be read to require the president to impose targeted individual sanctions" because the legislation states that the president "shall" impose sanctions against individuals determined to have violated the act's human rights provisions.[34] Ku notes, however, that because the HKHRDA "gives the president the power to 'determine' who has violated those human rights obligations" the president might 'refuse to designate anyone as an HKHRDA human rights offender, even if there is substantial evidence of that person's violations."[34] Ku suggests that "this legal ambiguity as to whether the president can simply refuse to designate anyone as violating the HKHRDA's targeted sanctions provisions could become an area of intrabranch conflict if the White House refuses to exercise its authority under this section."[34]

Reactions

U.S. newspaper editorials

The editorial boards of several U.S. newspapers called for passage of the Act, including USA Today,[35] The Dallas Morning News,[36] The New York Times,[37] New York Post,[38] The Boston Globe,[39] The Washington Post,[40] and The Wall Street Journal.[41]

Hong Kong pro-democracy movement

Hong Kong protesters against the extradition bill and members from the Hong Kong pro-democracy camp have called for the passage of the Act.[42] Activists Denise Ho and Joshua Wong appeared before the Congressional-Executive Commission on China (CECC) in September 2019 where they urged sitting congresspersons to support the bill and rejected the suggestion that the bill constituted an inappropriate U.S. involvement in another country's affairs.[43][44] Wong and his fellow Demosisto activist Jeffrey Ngo urged passage of the bill in a 2017 op-ed in the Washington Post.[45]

One day after the bill's passage on November 27, pro-democracy demonstrators in Hong Kong celebrated the new law and held a pro-American rally.[46] At the rally, held on U.S. Thanksgiving Day, Hong Kong pro-democracy activist Nathan Law called the law a "timely Thanksgiving present."[46] Thousands of activists at the "Thanksgiving Rally" waved American flags and sang The Star-Spangled Banner, the U.S. national anthem, expressing gratitude to the United States, Congress and President Trump for passing the law.[47]

Academics

Julian Ku, a legal scholar at Hofstra University School of Law, called the HKHRDA "redundant, but still worthwhile."[34] Ku wrote:

The president already possesses the legal authority to execute the sanctions powers granted to him by the HKHRDA. This redundancy does not make the HKHRDA meaningless.... But it does mean we should understand the law not as a grant of authority to the president, but as an effort to ensure the executive branch exercises all of its economic sanctioning powers to support the Hong Kong pro-democracy movement. For this reason, the real significance of the HKHRDA is not the granting of legal authority but instead the delivery of a political message. That message is that Congress will keep Hong Kong's pro-democracy movement a central issue in U.S.-China relations no matter what other bilateral issues (such as trade) arise and no matter who prevails in the next presidential election.[34]

Academics supporting the Act include Larry Diamond,[48] Tom Campbell,[49] Alexander Görlach,[50] and James Carafano.[51]

In a commentary on Lawfare, Alvin Y.H. Cheung noted that despite "vocal backing from some Hong Kongers, and widespread support within Congress, the bill was not nearly as popular with longtime China hands in the United States."[52] For example, Susan Thornton, a senior fellow at the Paul Tsai China Center at Yale University who previously served as acting Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs under the Trump administration, called the act a "huge mistake" that would hurt Hongkongers and play into the hands of Beijing.[53] Cheung was critical of this view, arguing that past U.S. policy toward Hong Kong had failed to stop the Chinese government from diminishing Hong Kong's autonomy and undercutting the "one country, two systems" principle.[52]

William Lam of the Chinese University of Hong Kong said that while Trump was unlikely to impose sanctions because of his interest in negotiating a U.S.-China trade deal, the protesters had "won a very important moral victory" given the law's near-unanimous passage through Congress.[54]

Business interests

The American Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong (AmCham) has said that anything that changes the status of Hong Kong 'would have a chilling effect not only on U.S. trade and investment in Hong Kong but would send negative signals internationally about Hong Kong's trusted position in the global economy."[55][1]

An analyst with the Eurasia Group[56] and academic at Peking University[54] both opined that the passage of the act did not affect the extant and concurrent negotiations between the United States and People's Republic of China to resolve their trade war.

Chinese and Hong Kong governments

China's Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang responded that the bill "fully reveals the ill intentions of some people in the United States to mess up Hong Kong and contain China's development."[57] The managing director of a Hong Kong pro-democracy group said through a statement sent to Newsweek that the foreign ministry's response showed that the PRC was "sensitive and susceptible to international pressure."[58] Beijing and state media in mainland China, such as the official Communist Party newspaper People's Daily, condemned the move and said the country would take countermeasures[6][59][60] with the editor-in-chief of the state-run, nationalistic Global Times, warning that China could bar the HKHRDA's drafters from entering mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau.[61][62] Experts said that Beijing's desire to prioritize a resolution to its trade war with the United States limited the retaliatory measures that it could (and eventually did) undertake.[54][62][63]

The Hong Kong government criticized the legislation, calling it "unnecessary and unwarranted"[1] and an interference into the internal affairs of Hong Kong;[64] this position was criticized by the act's supporters.[65][66]

Chinese retaliation following enactment of the HKHRDA

On December 2, 2019, the Chinese government retaliated against the U.S. for the passage of the HKHRDA by suspending visits of U.S. naval vessels and U.S. military aircraft to Hong Kong and by sanctioning several U.S.-based NGOs (including the National Endowment for Democracy, Human Rights Watch, Freedom House, the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, and the International Republican Institute), whom the Chinese government allege orchestrated the Hong Kong protests.[63][67] These steps were mostly symbolic.[63] During previous periods of heightened U.S.-China tensions, the Chinese government had previously suspended U.S. warships from visiting Hong Kong.[63][67] China also already tightly restricted the activities of foreign NGOs in China, particularly since 2016, and most of the NGOs sanctioned by China do not operate on the mainland.[63][67] A U.S. State Department official said that "false accusations of foreign interference" against U.S.-based NGOs were "intended to distract from the legitimate concerns of Hongkongers."[67]

In the aftermath of the HKHRDA's passage, officials denied entry to Macau to a number of Hong Kong residents, journalists, and foreigners, including the heads of the American Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong.[68][69][70]

U.S. Congress

The act received near-unanimous support in Congress,[6][7] and was seen as a "remarkable display of bipartisan unity" in an otherwise highly polarized political environment.[34]

In the House, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) described the HKHRDA as a reaffirmation of "America's commitment to democracy and human rights and the rule of law in the face of Beijing's crackdown."[71] House Foreign Affairs Committee chairman Eliot Engel (D-NY) and ranking member Michael McCaul (R-TX) both issued statements strongly supporting the act,[72][71] as did Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman Jim Risch (R-ID)[73] and ranking member Bob Menendez (D-NJ).[74]

Representative Chris Smith, one of the initial sponsors of the House bill, dismissed as "cowardly propaganda" the suggestion that passage of the act would bolster the Chinese government's efforts to depict the Hong Kong protests as "rioting" directed by the West.[7]

International

Following the passage of the HKHRDA in the United States, activists for Hong Kong democracy called upon Canada to adopt similar legislation.[75]

A bill to prohibit the commercial export of covered munitions items to the Hong Kong Police Force
Long titleA bill to prohibit the commercial export of covered munitions items to the Hong Kong Police Force.
Enacted bythe 116th United States Congress
Citations
Public lawPub.L. 116–77
Statutes at Large133 Stat. 1173
Legislative history

A separate bill, S. 2710, Pub.L. 116–77, passed by Congress at the same time as the HKHRDA, banned the export of certain types of crowd control munitions—specifically, "tear gas, pepper spray, rubber bullets, foam rounds, bean bag rounds, pepper balls, water cannons, handcuffs, shackles, stun guns, and tasers"—from the U.S. to the Hong Kong Police Force and Hong Kong Auxiliary Police Force. The legislation passed the House on a 417–0 and the Senate by unanimous consent.[76] President Trump also signed S. 2710 on November 27, 2019.[14] The act has a sunset clause providing that the prohibition expires one year after enactment.[76]

Aftermath

HKHRDA as a candidacy criteria in 2020 Hong Kong legislative election

HKHRDA has become one of the concerns regarding the candidacy criteria of the 2020 Hong Kong legislative election. Pro-democracy candidate Ventus Lau was being asked by the electoral officer Amy Yeung(楊蕙心) regarding his stance on HKHRDA. Yeung asked if Lau would continue urging the sanction of US towards Hong Kong, and judged that Lau was utilizing foreign power to influence Hong Kong. She continued by asking how Lau could fulfil the requirement of being loyal to HKSAR and the Basic Law. [77]

gollark: FEAR the possible GTech™ meme classifier/autoharvester engines.
gollark: Oh. Huh.
gollark: What is it doing?
gollark: Do they contain errors?
gollark: Does it matter if your error generation takes a few hours? Simply do not make errors.

See also

References
  1. Naomi Xu Elegant, The U.S. Senate Passed 2 Bills Supporting Hong Kong Protesters. But They Might Do More Harm Than Good Archived November 21, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Fortune (November 20, 2019).
  2. Yaffe-Bellany, David; Rappeport, Alan (November 20, 2019). "U.S. Bill Supporting Hong Kong Rights Heads to Trump's Desk". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 21, 2019. Retrieved November 21, 2019.
  3. "H.R.3289 – Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act". Archived from the original on September 12, 2019. Retrieved September 10, 2019 – via Congress.gov. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  4. Congressional Research Service. "S. 1838: Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019". Archived from the original on September 27, 2019. Retrieved September 27, 2019 – via GovTrack.us. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  5. Congressional Research Service. "H.R. 3289: Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019". Archived from the original on September 27, 2019. Retrieved September 27, 2019 – via GovTrack. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  6. Simon Denyer & Tiffany Liang, China says Trump is on 'edge of precipice' as Hong Kong rights bill hits his desk Archived November 22, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Washington Post (November 21, 2019).
  7. Brennan, David (September 9, 2019). "'Hong Kongers Should be Allies of the United States': Congress Urged to Enable Sanctions Against Chinese Officials who Threaten Territory's Autonomy". Newsweek. Archived from the original on September 29, 2019.
  8. "U.S. senators seek quick passage of Hong Kong rights bill". Reuters. November 14, 2019. Archived from the original on November 15, 2019. Retrieved November 15, 2019.
  9. Flatley, Daniel (November 19, 2019). "U.S. Senate Unanimously Passes Measure Backing Hong Kong". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on November 20, 2019. Retrieved November 19, 2019.
  10. Duehren, Andrew (November 19, 2019). "Senate Unanimously Approves Measure Backing Hong Kong Protesters". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved November 19, 2019.
  11. Cowan, Richard; Zengerle, Patricia (November 19, 2019). "U.S. Senate passes HK rights bill backing protesters, angers Beijing". Reuters. Archived from the original on November 20, 2019. Retrieved November 19, 2019.
  12. Cowan, Richard; Zengerle, Patricia (November 20, 2019). "U.S. House passes Hong Kong human rights bills". Reuters. Retrieved November 20, 2019.
  13. Cochrane, Emily (November 27, 2019). "Trump Signs Hong Kong Democracy Legislation That Has Angered China". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 28, 2019. Retrieved November 27, 2019.
  14. Wang, Christine (November 27, 2019). "Trump signs bills backing Hong Kong protesters into law, in spite of Beijing's objections". CNBC. Retrieved November 28, 2019.
  15. "The Future of Democracy in Hong Kong: Hearing Before the Congressional-Executive Commission on China" (PDF). GPO. November 20, 2014. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 27, 2019.
  16. "The Future of Democracy in Hong Kong". Congressional-Executive Commission on China. November 20, 2014. Archived from the original on September 27, 2019. Retrieved September 27, 2019.
  17. "H.R.5696 – Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act". November 13, 2014. Archived from the original on September 27, 2019. Retrieved September 27, 2019 – via Congress.gov.
  18. "S.2922 – Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act, 113th Congress (2013–2014)". Congress.gov. December 12, 2014. Archived from the original on September 27, 2019. Retrieved September 27, 2019.
  19. "H.R.1159 – Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act". March 20, 2015. Archived from the original on September 27, 2019. Retrieved September 27, 2019 – via Congress.gov.
  20. "S.3469 – Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2016". November 16, 2016. Archived from the original on September 27, 2019. Retrieved September 27, 2019 – via Congress.gov.
  21. "H.R.3856 – Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2017". November 29, 2017. Archived from the original on September 27, 2019. Retrieved September 27, 2019 – via Congress.gov.
  22. "S.417 – Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2017". February 16, 2017. Archived from the original on September 27, 2019. Retrieved September 27, 2019 – via Congress.gov.
  23. "Commissioners Reintroduce The Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act" (Press release). Congressional-Executive Commission on China. June 13, 2019. Archived from the original on August 23, 2019. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  24. "S.1838 – Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019". Archived from the original on September 27, 2019. Retrieved September 27, 2019 – via Congress.gov.
  25. Lipes, Joshua (October 15, 2019). "US House of Representatives Unanimously Pass Hong Kong Human Rights And Democracy Act". Radio Free Asia. Archived from the original on October 16, 2019. Retrieved October 15, 2019.
  26. "Details for S. 1838: Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019". GovTrack.us. Archived from the original on September 27, 2019. Retrieved November 20, 2019.
  27. Zilbermints, Regina (November 20, 2019). "House passes bill in support of Hong Kong protestors". The Hill. Archived from the original on November 21, 2019. Retrieved November 20, 2019.
  28. Flatley, Daniel; Sink, Justin (November 20, 2019). "Trump Expected to Sign Hong Kong Bill Despite China Threats". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on November 21, 2019. Retrieved November 20, 2019.
  29. Perano, Ursula (November 20, 2019). "House passes bill expressing support for Hong Kong protestors, rebuking China". Axios. Retrieved November 20, 2019.
  30. David J. Lynch, Trump says he might veto legislation that aims to protect human rights in Hong Kong because bill could affect China trade talks Archived November 22, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Washington Post (November 22, 2019).
  31. Emily Cochrane, Edward Wong & Keith Bradsher, Trump Signs Hong Kong Democracy Legislation, Angering China Archived November 28, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, New York Times (November 27, 2019).
  32. Statement by the President, White House Press Office (November 27, 2019).
  33. Explainer: U.S. Legislation on Hong Kong: What Does It Mean? Archived November 23, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Reuters (November 21, 2019).
  34. Julian Ku, The Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act Is Redundant, but Still Worthwhile, Lawfare (November 25, 2019).
  35. With Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act, U.S. Congress stands up to China Archived November 23, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, USA Today (November 21, 2019).
  36. "Why Congress Should Pass the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act". The Dallas Morning News. August 22, 2019. Archived from the original on August 29, 2019. Retrieved October 15, 2019.
  37. Editorial Board, Hong Kong Voted. Is Beijing Listening?, New York Times (November 25, 2019).
  38. "Hong Kong's hopes rest with Washington". New York Post. September 11, 2019. Archived from the original on September 27, 2019.
  39. "Hong Kong's fight for freedom is ours, too". The Boston Globe. June 19, 2019. Archived from the original on September 27, 2019. Retrieved September 27, 2019.
  40. "Congress needs to show the Hong Kong protesters it's on their side". The Washington Post. June 19, 2019. Archived from the original on September 27, 2019. Retrieved September 27, 2019.
  41. Editorial Board, Hong Kong's Freedom Message: Trump should sign Congress's rights and democracy legislation, Wall Street Journal (November 24, 2019).
  42. Some relevant sources include:
  43. Zengerle, Patricia (September 17, 2019). "Activists push U.S. Congress to pass Hong Kong bill". Reuters. Archived from the original on September 18, 2019.
  44. "Hong Kong's Summer of Discontent and U.S. Policy Responses". Congressional-Executive Commission on China. September 17, 2019. Archived from the original on September 23, 2019. Retrieved September 27, 2019.
  45. Joshua Wong & Jeffrey Ngo, Stand Up for Democracy in Hong Kong Archived October 23, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, New York Times (May 3, 2017).
  46. Berlinger, Joshua (November 28, 2019). "Protesters hail Trump's 'Thanksgiving present' for Hong Kong". CNN. Archived from the original on November 28, 2019. Retrieved November 28, 2019.
  47. Paul, Deanna (November 29, 2019). "Hong Kong protesters wave 'Swole Trump' posters at Thanksgiving rally". Washington Post. Archived from the original on November 29, 2019. Retrieved November 29, 2019.
  48. Diamond, Larry (August 19, 2019). "Why President Trump must keep speaking out on Hong Kong". The Hill. Archived from the original on October 8, 2019.
  49. Campbell, Tom (September 23, 2019). "Realpolitik and America's approach to Hong Kong". Orange County Register. Archived from the original on October 12, 2019.
  50. Görlach, Alexander (July 23, 2019). "Opinion: Hong Kong and the broken promise". Deutsche Welle. Archived from the original on July 24, 2019.
  51. Carafano, James. "James Carafano: China's next move after Hong Kong elections – Time for Beijing to get real (and smart)". FoxNews. FoxNews.
  52. Cheung, Alvin Y.H. (November 27, 2019). "What's Happening in Hong Kong: Not Weeping Until Seeing the Coffin". Lawfare.
  53. John Power. "U.S. passing Hong Kong human rights and democracy act will 'punish the wrong people,' says ex-Trump envoy". South China Morning Post/Politico. Archived from the original on October 10, 2019. Retrieved November 28, 2019.
  54. "As Beijing seethes, protesters celebrate Trump's signing of Hong Kong act". Los Angeles Times. November 28, 2019. Archived from the original on November 29, 2019. Retrieved November 28, 2019.
  55. "Explainer: U.S. legislation on Hong Kong: what does it mean?". Reuters. November 21, 2019.
  56. Nicolaci da Costa, Ana (November 28, 2019). "Will the US's Hong Kong rights law derail trade talks?". BBC News.
  57. Wong, Catherine; Jiangtao, Shi (September 26, 2019). "China lashes out at proposed US law". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on September 27, 2019. Retrieved September 28, 2019.
  58. Brennan, David (September 26, 2019). "China Threatens to 'Hit Back Forcefully' Against the U.S. as Hong Kong Support Bill Moves Through Congress". Newsweek. Archived from the original on October 12, 2019.
  59. "Beijing sends stern warning over HK bill". South Morning China Post. October 16, 2019. Archived from the original on October 17, 2019. Retrieved October 19, 2019.
  60. "China threatens 'strong countermeasures' if Trump signs bill supporting Hong Kong rights". Politico. Politico. October 17, 2019. Archived from the original on October 19, 2019. Retrieved October 19, 2019.
  61. Jessie Pang & Cate Cadell (November 28, 2019). "China warns U.S. over Hong Kong law as thousands stage 'Thanksgiving' rally". Reuters.
  62. Keith Bradsher, Javier C. Hernández & Alexandra Stevenson, China Condemns U.S. Over Hong Kong. That Won’t Stop Trade Talks Archived November 29, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, New York Times (November 28, 2019).
  63. Amy Qin, China Hits Back at U.S. Over Hong Kong Bill in a Mostly Symbolic Move Archived December 3, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, New York Times (December 2, 2019).
  64. Ng, Eileen (September 9, 2019). "Hong Kong tells US to stay out; students form protest chains". Associated Press. Archived from the original on October 16, 2019.
  65. Berlinger, Joshua (November 28, 2019). "Protesters celebrate a victory after Trump signs Hong Kong human rights act". CNN. Archived from the original on November 28, 2019. Retrieved November 28, 2019.
  66. "Hong Kong protests: China warns US over Human Rights and Democracy Act". BBC News. November 28, 2019.
  67. China bars U.S. military ships, aircraft from Hong Kong, sanctions U.S.-based NGOs Archived December 3, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Reuters (December 2, 2019).
  68. Joyce Zhou & Farah Master, Chinese leader Xi visits gambling hub Macau as nearby Hong Kong seethes Archived December 18, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Reuters (December 17, 2019).
  69. Alvin Lum, Heads of influential American business group in Hong Kong denied entry to Macau after opposition to extradition bill Archived December 18, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, South China Morning Post (December 7, 2019).
  70. Steven Lee Myers, In Macau, China Sees a Model for a Rebellious Hong Kong Archived December 18, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, New York Times (December 18, 2019).
  71. Haley Byrd, Hong Kong bills go to Trump after passing House and Senate Archived November 23, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, CNN (November 21, 2019).
  72. US Congress inches closer to passing Hong Kong human rights bill Archived October 14, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Al Jazeera (September 26, 2019).
  73. Doug Palmer, Senate passes bill in support of Hong Kong pro-democracy protesters Archived November 20, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Politico (November 19, 2019).
  74. Jonathan D. Salant, Trump gets bill championed by N.J. Republican to stand with Hong Kong protesters, NJ Advance Media (November 20, 2019).
  77. "【DQ 前奏？】何桂藍收選舉主任來信　據「抗爭派聲明」追問反對國安法、否決預算案". Retrieved July 25, 2020.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.