Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a form of heart failure in which the ejection fraction - the percentage of the volume of blood ejected from the left ventricle with each heartbeat divided by the volume of blood when the left ventricle is maximally filled - is normal, defined as greater than 50%;[1] this may be measured by echocardiography or cardiac catheterization. Approximately half of people with heart failure have preserved ejection fraction, while the other half have a reduction in ejection fraction, called heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).[1]

Diastolic dysfunction
SpecialtyCardiology

Risk factors for HFpEF include hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, smoking, and obstructive sleep apnea.

HFpEF is characterized by abnormal diastolic function: there is an increase in the stiffness of the left ventricle, which causes a decrease in left ventricular relaxation during diastole, with resultant increased pressure and/or impaired filling.[2] There is an increased risk for atrial fibrillation and pulmonary hypertension.

There is controversy regarding the relationship between diastolic heart failure and HFpEF.[3][4]

Signs and symptoms

Clinical manifestations of HFpEF are similar to those observed in HFrEF and include shortness of breath including exercise induced dyspnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea and orthopnea, exercise intolerance, fatigue, elevated jugular venous pressure, and edema.[5]

Patients with HFpEF poorly tolerate stress, particularly hemodynamic alterations of ventricular loading or increased diastolic pressures. Often there is a more dramatic elevation in systolic blood pressure in HFpEF than is typical of HFrEF.[6]

Risk factors

Diverse mechanisms contribute to the development of HFpEF, many of which are under-investigated and remain obscure. Despite this, there are clear risk factors that contribute to the development of HFpEF.

Hypertension, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and sedentary lifestyle have been identified as important risk factors for diverse types of heart disease including HFpEF. There is mechanistic and epidemiological evidence for a link between insulin resistance and HFpEF.[7]

This pro-inflammatory state may also induce changes in the vascular endothelium of the heart. Specifically, by reducing availability of nitric oxide, an important vasodilator and regulator of protein kinase G activity. As protein kinase G activity diminishes, cardiomyocytes undergo hypertrophic changes. Endothelial cells also are responsible for the production of E-selectin, which recruits lymphocytes into the tissue beneath the endothelium that subsequently release transforming growth factor beta, encouraging fibrosis and thus ventricular stiffening. Cardiac macrophages are thought to play an important role in the development of fibrosis as they are increased in HFpEF and release pro-fibrotic cytokines, such as IL-10.[8][9] Further investigation of the role of inflammation in HFpEF is needed.

Hypertension

Conditions, such as hypertension, that encourage increased left ventricular afterload can lead to structural changes in the heart on a gross, as well as a microscopic level. It is thought that increased pressure, in concert with a pro-inflammatory state (insulin resistance, obesity), encourage ventricular stiffening and remodeling that lead to poor cardiac output seen in HFpEF. There changes are a result of left ventricular muscle hypertrophy caused by the high pressure, leading to the left ventricle becoming stiff.

Ischemia

Ischemia, or inadequate oxygenation of the myocardium, is observed in a high proportion of HFpEF patients. This ischemia may be secondary to coronary artery disease, or a result of the previously described changes in microvasculature.[10] Ischemia can result in impaired relaxation of the heart; when myocytes fail to relax appropriately, myosin cross bridges remain intact and generate tension throughout diastole and thus increase stress on the heart. This is termed partial persistent systole. Ischemia may manifest in distinct ways, either as a result of increasing tissue oxygen demand, or diminished ability of the heart to supply oxygen to the tissue. The former is the result of stress, such as exercise, while the later is the result of reduced coronary flow.

Aging

Cardiac senescence, or cellular deterioration that occurs as part of normal aging, closely resembles the manifestations of HFpEF. Specifically, loss of cardiac reserve, diminished vascular compliance, and diastolic dysfunction are characteristic of both processes. It has been suggested[11][12] that HFpEF merely represents an acceleration of a normal aging process.

Senile systemic amyloidosis, resulting from accumulation of aggregated wild-type transthyretin as part of the degenerative aging process, is emerging as an important and underdiagnosed contributor to HFpEF with age.[13][14]

Other

Any condition or process that leads to stiffening of the left ventricle can lead to diastolic dysfunction. Other causes of left ventricular stiffening include:

  • Aortic stenosis of any cause where the ventricular muscle becomes hypertrophied, and thence stiff, as a result of the increased pressure load placed on it by the stenosis.
  • Diabetes
  • Age – elderly patients mainly if they have hypertension.

Causes of isolated right ventricular diastolic failure are uncommon. These causes include:

Pathophysiology

Gross structural abnormalities
In those with HFpEF, the left ventricle of the heart (large chamber on right side of the picture) is stiffened and has impaired relaxation after pumping blood out of the heart

Structural changes that occur with HFpEF are often radically different from those associated with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).[15] Many patients experience increased thickening of the ventricular wall in comparison to chamber size, termed concentric hypertrophy. This leads to increased left ventricular mass and is typically accompanied by a normal, or slightly reduced, end diastolic filling volume. Conversely, HFrEF is typically associated with eccentric hypertrophy, characterized by an increase in cardiac chamber size without an accompanying increase in wall thickness. This leads to a corresponding increase in left ventricular end diastolic volume.[16]

Cellular abnormalities

Cellular changes generally underlie alterations in cardiac structure. In HFpEF cardiomyocytes have been demonstrated to show increased diameter without an increase in length; this is consistent with observed concentric ventricular hypertrophy and increased left ventricular mass. HFrEF cardiomyocytes exhibit the opposite morphology; increased length without increased cellular diameter. This too is consistent with eccentric hypertrophy seen in this condition.

Changes in the extracellular environment are of significant importance in heart disease.[17][18] Particularly, regulation of genes that alter fibrosis contribute to the development and progression of HFrEF. This regulation is dynamic and involves changes in fibrillar collagens through increased deposition as well as inhibition of enzymes that break down extracellular matrix components (matrix metalloproteinases, collagenases). While early stage HFrEF is associated with a significant disruption of extracellular matrix proteins initially, as it progresses fibrotic replacement of myocardium may occur, leading to scarring and increased interstitial collagen.[19] Fibrotic changes in HFpEF are more variable. Though there is typically an increased amount of collagen observed in these patients it is usually not dramatically different from healthy individuals.[20]

Diastolic dysfunction
Wiggers diagram, depicting the cardiac cycle. Two complete cycles are illustrated.

Diastolic alterations in HFpEF are the predominating factor in impaired cardiac function and subsequent clinical presentation.[21] Diastolic dysfunction is multifaceted, and a given patient may express diverse combinations of the following: incomplete myocardial relaxation, impaired rate of ventricular filling, increased left atrial pressure in filling, increased passive stiffness and decreased distensibility of the ventricle, limited ability to exploit the Frank-Starling mechanism with increased output demands, increased diastolic left heart or pulmonary venous pressure.[21][22][23]

Diastolic failure appears when the ventricle cannot be filled properly because it cannot relax because its wall is thick or rigid. This situation presents usually a concentric hypertrophy. In contrast, systolic heart failure has usually an eccentric hypertrophy.[24]

Diastolic failure is characterized by an elevated diastolic pressure in the left ventricle, despite an essentially normal/physiologic end diastolic volume (EDV). Histological evidence supporting diastolic dysfunction demonstrates ventricular hypertrophy, increased interstitial collagen deposition and infiltration of the myocardium. These influences collectively lead to a decrease in distensibility and elasticity (ability to stretch) of the myocardium. As a consequence, cardiac output becomes diminished. When the left ventricular diastolic pressure is elevated, venous pressure in lungs must also become elevated too: left ventricular stiffness makes it more difficult for blood to enter it from the left atrium. As a result, pressure rises in the atrium and is transmitted back to the pulmonary venous system, thereby increasing its hydrostatic pressure and promoting pulmonary edema.[25]

End Diastolic Pressure Volume Relationship

It may be misguided to classify the volume-overloaded heart as having diastolic dysfunction if it is behaving in a stiff and non-compliant manner. The term diastolic dysfunction should not be applied to the dilated heart. Dilated ("remodeled") hearts have increased volume relative to the amount of diastolic pressure, and therefore have increased (not decreased) distensibility. The term diastolic dysfunction is sometimes erroneously applied in this circumstance, when increased fluid volume retention causes the heart to be over-filled (High output cardiac failure).[25]

Although the term diastolic heart failure is often used when there are signs and symptoms of heart failure with normal left ventricular systolic function, this is not always appropriate. Diastolic function is determined by the relative end diastolic volume in relation to end diastolic pressure, and is therefore independent of left ventricular systolic function. A leftward shift of the end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship (i.e. decreased left ventricular distensibility) can occur both in those with normal and those with decreased left ventricular systolic function. Likewise, heart failure may occur in those with dilated left ventricular and normal systolic function. This is often seen in valvular heart disease and high-output heart failure. Neither of these situations constitutes a diastolic heart failure.[25]

Stiffening of the left ventricle contributes heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, a condition that can be prevented with exercise.[26]

In diastolic heart failure, the volume of blood contained in the ventricles during diastole is lower than it should be, and the pressure of the blood within the chambers is elevated.[27]

Diastole
Main article: Diastole

During diastole, the ventricular pressure falls from the peak reached at the end of systole. When this pressure falls below the atrial pressure, atrio-ventricular valves open (mitral valve at left side and tricuspid valve at right side) and the blood passes from the atria into the ventricles. First, ventricles are filled by a pressure gradient but near the end, atria contract (atrial kick) and force more blood to pass into ventricles. Atrial contraction is responsible for around 20% of the total filling blood volume. (In atrial fibrillation, this additional 20% filling volume is lost and the patient may experience systolic heart failure symptoms).[28] Complete left ventricular filling is essential to maintain maximum cardiac output. Left ventricular filling is dependent upon ventricular relaxation and compliance, mitral valve area, atrio-ventricular gradient, atrial contraction and end-systolic volume. Diastole has four phases: isovolumetric relaxation, rapid filling, diastasis and atrial contraction. All of these phases can be evaluated by Doppler echocardiography.[25]

Non-diastolic dysfunction

Though HFpEF is characterized by a normal ejection fraction, this parameter is a rather poor index of the heart's contractile function.[29] Some studies have shown that metrics of load independent contractility (such as left ventricular stiffness) reveal diminished systolic function in HFpEF patients compared to healthy controls,[16] and are corroborated by tissue Doppler findings that reveal changes in longitudinal contraction and motion abnormalities.[30] While these systolic impairments may be minimal at rest, they become more exaggerated with increased demand, as seen in exercise.[31]

Pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dysfunction

Most HFpEF patients exhibit pulmonary hypertension which is significantly associated with increased morbidity and mortality.[32] Left atrial and pulmonary venous pressure increases in HFpEF due to diastolic insufficiency thus increasing pulmonary artery pressure. In patients with advanced HFpEF changes in the pulmonary vasculature may develop, leading to pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension.[33] Right ventricular dysfunction is also common in HFpEF patients, occurring in 20-35% of patients. This right ventricular dysfunction is more common in patients with more advanced HFpEF as well as those with pulmonary hypertension and lower ejection fractions.[34]

Heart rate

Cardiac output is dependent on stroke volume and heart rate. A significant portion (55-77%) of HFpEF patients are unable to increase heart rate to compensate for increased output demand (as in the setting of exercise); this is termed chronotropic incompetence.[35] Combined with the characteristic deficit in stroke volume observed in HFpEF patients, many individuals display poor exercise tolerance.[36]

Dyssynchrony

Non-simultaneous contraction of the left and right ventricle, dyssychrony, is present in up to 58% of HFpEF patients.[37] However, dyssynchrony is also common in HFrEF and its role in HFpEF in particular remains obscure. While therapies for dyssynchrony, such as biventricular pacing provide benefits to HFrEF patients, no benefit is appreciable in HFpEF patients at this time.[38]

Systemic abnormalities

Patients with HFpEF, in addition to cardiac abnormalities, display changes in skeletal muscle metabolism and in fat distribution and character. The importance of these changes is demonstrated in that stable, non-decompensated patients seem to benefit from exercise; specifically increased VO2 max and exercise tolerance. However, this benefit appears to be derived from changes in muscle and vasculature as opposed to directly on the heart, which displays minimal change in output following exercise training.[39]

Diagnosis

HFpEF is typically diagnosed with echocardiography. Techniques such as catheterization are invasive procedures and thus reserved for patients with co-morbid conditions or those who are suspected to have HFpEF but lack clear non-invasive findings. Catheterization does represent are more definitive diagnostic assessment as pressure and volume measurements are taken simultaneously and directly. In either technique the heart is evaluated for left ventricular diastolic function. Important parameters include, rate of isovolumic relaxation, rate of ventricular filling, and stiffness.

Frequently patients are subjected to stress echocardiography, which involves the above assessment of diastolic function during exercise.[40] This is undertaken because perturbations in diastole are exaggerated during the increased demands of exercise. Exercise requires increased left ventricular filling and subsequent output. Typically the heart responds by increasing heart rate and relaxation time.[41] However, in patients with HFpEF both responses are diminished due to increased ventricular stiffness. Testing during this demanding state may reveal abnormalities that are not as discernible at rest.[42]

Diastolic dysfunction must be differentiated from diastolic heart failure. Diastolic dysfunction can be found in elderly and apparently quite healthy patients. If diastolic dysfunction describes an abnormal mechanical property, diastolic heart failure describes a clinical syndrome. Mathematics describing the relationship between the ratio of Systole to Diastole in accepted terms of End Systolic Volume to End Diastolic Volume implies many mathematical solutions to forward and backward heart failure.

Criteria for diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction or diastolic heart failure remain imprecise. This has made it difficult to conduct valid clinical trials of treatments for diastolic heart failure. The problem is compounded by the fact that systolic and diastolic heart failure commonly coexist when patients present with many ischemic and nonischemic etiologies of heart failure. Narrowly defined, diastolic failure has often been defined as "heart failure with normal systolic function" (i.e. left ventricular ejection fraction of 60% or more). Chagasic heart disease may represent an optimal academic model of diastolic heart failure that spares systolic function.

A patient is said to have diastolic dysfunction if he has signs and symptoms of heart failure but the left ventricular ejection fraction is normal. A second approach is to use an elevated BNP level in the presence of normal ejection fraction to diagnose diastolic heart failure. Concordance of both volumetric and biochemical measurements and markers lends to even stronger terminology regarding scientific/mathematical expression of diastolic heart failure. These are both probably too broad a definition for diastolic heart failure, and this group of patients is more precisely described as having heart failure with normal systolic function. Echocardiography can be used to diagnose diastolic dysfunction but is a limited modality unless it is supplemented by stress imaging. MUGA imaging is an earlier mathematical attempt to distinguish systolic from diastolic heart failure.

No single echocardiographic parameter can confirm a diagnosis of diastolic heart failure. Multiple echocardiographic parameters have been proposed as sufficiently sensitive and specific, including mitral inflow velocity patterns, pulmonary vein flow patterns, E/A reversal, tissue Doppler measurements, and M-mode echo measurements (i.e. of left atrial size). Algorithms have also been developed which combine multiple echocardiographic parameters to diagnose diastolic heart failure.

There are four basic Echocardiographic patterns of diastolic heart failure, which are graded I to IV:

  • The mildest form is called an "abnormal relaxation pattern", or grade I diastolic dysfunction. On the mitral inflow Doppler echocardiogram, there is reversal of the normal E/A ratio. This pattern may develop normally with age in some patients, and many grade I patients will not have any clinical signs or symptoms of heart failure.
  • Grade II diastolic dysfunction is called "pseudonormal filling dynamics". This is considered moderate diastolic dysfunction and is associated with elevated left atrial filling pressures. These patients more commonly have symptoms of heart failure, and many have left atrial enlargement due to the elevated pressures in the left heart.

Grade III and IV diastolic dysfunction are called "restrictive filling dynamics". These are both severe forms of diastolic dysfunction, and patients tend to have advanced heart failure symptoms:

  • Class III diastolic dysfunction patients will demonstrate reversal of their diastolic abnormalities on echocardiogram when they perform the Valsalva maneuver. This is referred to as "reversible restrictive diastolic dysfunction".
  • Class IV diastolic dysfunction patients will not demonstrate reversibility of their echocardiogram abnormalities, and are therefore said to suffer from "fixed restrictive diastolic dysfunction".

The presence of either class III and IV diastolic dysfunction is associated with a significantly worse prognosis. These patients will have left atrial enlargement, and many will have a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction that indicates a combination of systolic and diastolic dysfunction.

Imaged volumetric definition of systolic heart performance is commonly accepted as ejection fraction. Volumetric definition of the heart in systole was first described by Adolph Fick as cardiac output. Fick may be readily and inexpensively inverted to cardiac output and ejection fraction to mathematically describe diastole. Decline of ejection fraction paired with decline of E/A ratio seems a stronger argument in support of a mathematical definition of diastolic heart failure.

Another parameter to assess diastolic function is the E/E' ratio, which is the ratio of mitral peak velocity of early filling (E) to early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E'). Diastolic dysfunction is assumed when the E/E' ratio exceed 15.[43]

Newer echocardiographic techniques such as speckle tracking for strain measurement, particularly for the left atrium[44], are becoming increasingly utilised for the diagnosis of HFpEF.

Treatment

Despite increasing incidence of HFpEF effective inroads to therapeutics have been largely unsuccessful.[45] Currently, recommendations for treatment are directed at symptom relief and co-morbid conditions. Frequently this involves administration of diuretics to relieve complications associated with volume overload, such as leg swelling and high blood pressure.

Commonly encountered conditions that must be treated for and have independent recommendations for standard of care include atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. There are particular factors unique to HFpEF that must be accounted for with therapy. Unfortunately, currently available randomized clinical trials addressing the therapeutic adventure for these conditions in HFpEF present conflicting or limited evidence.[46]

Specific aspects of therapeutics should be avoided in HFpEF to prevent the deterioration of the condition. Considerations that are generalizable to heart failure include avoidance of a fast heart rate, elevations in blood pressure, development of ischemia, and atrial fibrillation. More specific to HFpEF include avoidance of preload reduction. As patients display normal ejection fraction but reduced cardiac output they are especially sensitive to changes in preloading and may rapidly display signs of output failure. This means administration of diuretics and vasodilators must be monitored carefully.

HFrEF and HFpEF represent distinct entities in terms of development and effective therapeutic management. Specifically cardiac resynchronization, administration of beta blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are applied to good effect in HFrEF but are largely ineffective at reducing morbidity and mortality in HFpEF.[47][48] Many of these therapies are effective in reducing the extent of cardiac dilation and increasing ejection fraction in HFrEF patients. It is unsurprising they fail to effect improvement in HFpEF patients, given their un-dilated phenotype and relative normal ejection fraction. Understanding and targeting mechanisms unique to HFpEF are thus essential to the development of therapeutics.[49]

Randomized studies on HFpEF patients have shown that exercise improves left ventricular diastolic function, the heart's ability to relax, and is associated with improved aerobic exercise capacity.[50] The benefit patients seem to derive from exercise does not seem to be a direct cardiac effect but rather is due to changes in peripheral vasculature and skeletal muscle, which show abnormalities in HFpEF patients.

Patients should be regularly assessed to determine progression of the condition, response to interventions, and need for alteration of therapy. Ability to perform daily tasks, hemodynamic status, kidney function, electrolyte balance, and serum natriuretic peptide levels are important parameters. Behavioral management is important in these patients and it is recommended that individuals with HFpEF avoid alcohol, smoking, and high sodium intake.[51]

Pharmacologic therapy

Indications

Management of HFpEF is primarily dependent on the treatment of symptoms and exacerbating conditions. The role of specific treatments for diastolic dysfunction per se is as yet unclear.

Benefit

Currently treatment with ACE inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, beta blockers, and angiotensin receptor blockers are employed but do not have a proven benefit in HFpEF patients. Additionally, use of diuretics or other therapies that can alter loading conditions or blood pressure should be used with caution. It is not recommended that patients be treated with phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitors or digoxin.[5]

Agents
Mineralocorticoid recepetor antagonists

An antimineralocorticoid is currently recommended for patients with HFpEF who show elevated brain natriuretic peptide levels. Spironolactone is the first member of this medication class and the most frequently employed.[5] Care should be taken to monitor serum potassium levels as well as kidney function, specifically glomerular filtration rate during treatment.

Beta blockers

Beta blockers play a rather obscure role in HFpEF treatment though there is suggestion of a beneficial role in patient management.[52] Evidence from a meta-analysis demonstrated significant reductions in all cause mortality with beta-blocker therapy, though overall effects were driven largely by small, older trials of patients post-myocardial infarction.[53] Some evidence suggests that vasodilating beta blockers, such as nebivolol, can provide a benefit for patients with heart failure regardless of ejection fraction.[54] Additionally, because of the chronotropic perturbation and diminished LV filling seen in HFpEF the bradycardic effect of beta blockers may enable improved filling, reduce myocardial oxygen demand, and lower blood pressure. However, this effect also can contribute to diminished response to exercise demands and can result in an excessive reduction in heart rate.[55][56]

Beta-blockers are the first-line therapy: they lower the heart rate and thus give more time for ventricles to fill. They may also improve survival.[57] There is some evidence that calcium channel blockers may be of benefit in reducing ventricular stiffness. In some cases, (verapamil has the benefit lowering the heart rate).

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors

Likewise, treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, such as enalapril, ramipril, and many others, may be of benefit due to their effect on preventing ventricular remodeling but under control to avoid hypotension.[58] ACE inhibitors do not appear to improve morbidity or mortality associated with HFpEF alone.[56] However, they are important in the management of hypertension, a significant player in the pathophysiology of HFpEF.[59]

Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs)

ARB treatment results in an improvement in diastolic dysfunction and hypertension that is comparable to other anti-hypertensive medication.[60]

Diuretics

Diuretics can be useful if significant congestion develops, but patients must be monitored because they frequently develop low blood pressure.[58]

Experimental

The use of a self-expanding device that attaches to the external surface of the left ventricle has been suggested, yet still awaits FDA approval. When the heart muscle squeezes, energy is loaded into the device, which absorbs the energy and releases it to the left ventricle in the diastolic phase. This helps retain muscle elasticity.[61]

Prognosis

The progression of HFpEF and its clinical course is poorly understood in comparison to HFrEF. Despite this, patients with HFrEF and HFpEF appear to have comparable outcomes in terms of hospitalization and mortality.[1][62] Causes of death in patients vary substantially. However, among patients in more advanced heart failure (NYHA classes II-IV), cardiovascular death, including heart attacks and sudden cardiac death, was the predominant cause in population-based studies.[63]

Until recently, it was generally assumed that the prognosis for individuals with diastolic dysfunction and associated intermittent pulmonary edema was better than those with systolic dysfunction. In fact, in two studies appearing in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2006, evidence was presented to suggest that the prognosis in diastolic dysfunction is the same as that in systolic dysfunction.[1][64]

gollark: I REFUSE to consume alcoholols.
gollark: Okay. I can do stuff now.
gollark: For purposes.
gollark: AutoBotRobot WHEN?
gollark: Heavserverous assimilation successful.

References
  1. Owan TE, Hodge DO, Herges RM, Jacobsen SJ, Roger VL, Redfield MM (July 2006). "Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction". The New England Journal of Medicine. 355 (3): 251–259. doi:10.1056/nejmoa052256. PMID 16855265.
  2. Redfield, Margaret (10 November 2016). "Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction". New England Journal of Medicine. 375 (19): 1868–77. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1511175. PMC 4075067. PMID 27959663.
  3. Zile, Michael R. (2003). "Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: is this diastolic heart failure?". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 41 (9): 1519–1522. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00186-4. PMID 12742292. Retrieved February 16, 2012.
  4. LeWinter, Martin M. and Markus Meyer (November 2013). "Mechanisms of Diastolic Dysfunction in HFpEF: If It's Not One Thing It's Another". Circ Heart Fail. 6 (6): 1112–1115. doi:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000825. PMC 4558618. PMID 24255055.
  5. Yancy, CW; Jessup, M; Bozkurt, B; Butler, J; Casey Jr, DE; Drazner, MH; Fonarow, GC (October 2013). "2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines". Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Review). 62 (16): e147–239. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.019. PMID 23747642.
  6. Zakeri, R., Chamberlain, A. M., Roger, V. L., & Redfield, M. M. (2013). Temporal relationship and prognostic significance of atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction: a community-based study. Circulation, CIRCULATIONAHA-113.
  7. Witteles R. M., Fowler M. B. (2008). "Insulin-Resistant Cardiomyopathy. Clinical Evidence, Mechanisms, and Treatment Options". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 51 (2): 93–102. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.021.
  8. Lim, Gregory B. "Macrophages promote cardiac fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction." (2018).
  9. Hulsmans, Maarten; Sager, Hendrik B.; Roh, Jason D.; Valero-Muñoz, María; Houstis, Nicholas E.; Iwamoto, Yoshiko; Sun, Yuan; Wilson, Richard M.; Wojtkiewicz, Gregory (2018-02-05). "Cardiac macrophages promote diastolic dysfunction". Journal of Experimental Medicine. 215 (2): 423–440. doi:10.1084/jem.20171274. ISSN 0022-1007. PMC 5789416. PMID 29339450.
  10. Mohammed, S. F., Majure, D. T., & Redfield, M. M. (2016). Zooming in on the Microvasculature in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
  11. Maeder M. T., Kaye D. M. (2009). "Heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 53 (11): 905–918. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.007.
  12. Lam, C. S., Donal, E., Kraigher‐Krainer, E., & Vasan, R. S. (2011). Epidemiology and clinical course of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. European journal of heart failure, 13(1), 18-28.
  13. González-López E, Gallego-Delgado M, Guzzo-Merello G, de Haro-Del Moral FJ, Cobo-Marcos M, Robles C, Bornstein B, Salas C, Lara-Pezzi E, Alonso-Pulpon L, Garcia-Pavia P (7 October 2015). "Wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis as a cause of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction". Eur Heart J. 36 (38): 2585–94. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv338. PMID 26224076.
  14. Mohammed SF, Mirzoyev SA, Edwards WD, Dogan A, Grogan DR, Dunlay SM, Roger VL, Gertz MA, Dispenzieri A, Zeldenrust SR, Redfield MM (April 2014). "Left ventricular amyloid deposition in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction". JACC Heart Fail. 2 (2): 113–22. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2013.11.004. PMC 3984539. PMID 24720917.
  15. Nieminen, M. S., Böhm, M., Cowie, M. R., Drexler, H., Filippatos, G. S., Jondeau, G., ... & Rhodes, A. (2005). Executive summary of the guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of acute heart failure. European heart journal, 26(4), 384-416.
  16. Borlaug B. A., Lam C. S., Roger V. L., Rodeheffer R. J., Redfield M. M. (2009). "Contractility and ventricular systolic stiffening in hypertensive heart disease: insights into the pathogenesis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 54 (5): 410–418. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.013. PMC 2753478.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  17. Segura, A. M., Frazier, O. H., & Buja, L. M. (2014). Fibrosis and heart failure. Heart failure reviews, 19(2), 173-185.
  18. Kong P., Christia P., Frangogiannis N. G. (2014). "The pathogenesis of cardiac fibrosis". Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 71 (4): 549–574. doi:10.1007/s00018-013-1349-6. PMC 3769482.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  19. van Heerebeek L., Borbély A., Niessen H. W., Bronzwaer J. G., van der Velden J., Stienen G. J., Paulus W. J. (2006). "Myocardial structure and function differ in systolic and diastolic heart failure". Circulation. 113 (16): 1966–1973. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.587519.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  20. Borbély A., van der Velden J., Papp Z., Bronzwaer J. G., Edes I., Stienen G. J., Paulus W. J. (2005). "Cardiomyocyte stiffness in diastolic heart failure". Circulation. 111 (6): 774–781. doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000155257.33485.6d.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  21. Aurigemma G. P., Gaasch W. H. (2004). "Diastolic heart failure". New England Journal of Medicine. 351 (11): 1097–1105. doi:10.1056/nejmcp022709.
  22. Baicu C. F., Zile M. R., Aurigemma G. P., Gaasch W. H. (2005). "Left ventricular systolic performance, function, and contractility in patients with diastolic heart failure". Circulation. 111 (18): 2306–2312. doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000164273.57823.26.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  23. Oh J. K., Hatle L., Tajik A. J., Little W. C. (2006). "Diastolic heart failure can be diagnosed by comprehensive two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 47 (3): 500–506. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.032.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  24. Eric J. Topol; Robert M. Califf (2007). Textbook of cardiovascular medicine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. pp. 420–. ISBN 978-0-7817-7012-5. Retrieved 16 November 2010.
  25. Hurst 2001, pp. 658–60.
  26. Bhella PS, Hastings JL, Fujimoto N, Shibata S, Carrick-Ranson G, Palmer MD, Boyd KN, Adams-Huet B, Levine BD (2014). "Impact of lifelong exercise "dose" on left ventricular compliance and distensibility". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 64 (12): 1257–1266. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.062. PMC 4272199. PMID 25236519.
  27. Crowley, Leonard V. (2013). An Introduction to Human Disease: Pathology and Pathophysiology Correlations. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. p. 323. ISBN 9781449632403. Retrieved 16 August 2014. In this condition, called diastolic heart failure, the volume of blood contained in the ventricles during diastole is lower than it should be, and the pressure of the blood within the chambers is elevated.
  28. Estafanous 2001, p. 562.
  29. Kawaguchi M., Hay I., Fetics B., Kass D. A. (2003). "Combined ventricular systolic and arterial stiffening in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction". Circulation. 107 (5): 714–720. doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000048123.22359.a0.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  30. Yip G., Wang M., Zhang Y., Fung J. W. H., Ho P. Y., Sanderson J. E. (2002). "Left ventricular long axis function in diastolic heart failure is reduced in both diastole and systole: time for a redefinition?". Heart. 87 (2): 121–125. doi:10.1136/heart.87.2.121.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  31. Borlaug, B. A., Kane, G. C., Melenovsky, V., & Olson, T. P. (2016). Abnormal right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling with exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. European heart journal, ehw241.
  32. Lam C. S., Roger V. L., Rodeheffer R. J., Borlaug B. A., Enders F. T., Redfield M. M. (2009). "Pulmonary hypertension in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a community-based study". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 53 (13): 1119–1126. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.11.051. PMC 2736110.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  33. Dixon, D. D., Trivedi, A., & Shah, S. J. (2016). Combined post-and pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Heart failure reviews, 21(3), 285-297.
  34. Gorter, T. M., Hoendermis, E. S., van Veldhuisen, D. J., Voors, A. A., Lam, C. S., Geelhoed, B., ... & van Melle, J. P. (2016). Right ventricular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. European journal of heart failure, 18(12), 1472-1487.
  35. Borlaug B. A., Olson T. P., Lam C. S., Flood K. S., Lerman A., Johnson B. D., Redfield M. M. (2010). "Global cardiovascular reserve dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 56 (11): 845–854. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.077. PMC 2950645.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  36. Abudiab Muaz M; et al. (2013). "Cardiac output response to exercise in relation to metabolic demand in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction". European journal of heart failure. 15 (7): 776–785. doi:10.1093/eurjhf/hft026. PMC 3857919.
  37. Yu C. M., Zhang Q., Yip G. W., Lee P. W., Kum L. C., Lam Y. Y., Fung J. W. H. (2007). "Diastolic and systolic asynchrony in patients with diastolic heart failure: a common but ignored condition". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 49 (1): 97–105. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.022.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  38. Wang J., Kurrelmeyer K. M., Torre-Amione G., Nagueh S. F. (2007). "Systolic and diastolic dyssynchrony in patients with diastolic heart failure and the effect of medical therapy". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 49 (1): 88–96. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.023.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  39. Haykowsky M. J., Brubaker P. H., Stewart K. P., Morgan T. M., Eggebeen J., Kitzman D. W. (2012). "Effect of endurance training on the determinants of peak exercise oxygen consumption in elderly patients with stable compensated heart failure and preserved ejection fraction". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 60 (2): 120–128. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.055.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  40. Erdei T, Aakhus S, Marino P, Paulus WJ, Smiseth OA, Fraser AG (2015). "Pathophysiological rationale and diagnostic targets for diastolic stress testing". Heart. 101 (17): 1355–60. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2014-307040. PMID 26001845.
  41. Borlaug, B. A., Kane, G. C., Melenovsky, V., & Olson, T. P. (2016). Abnormal right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling with exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. European heart journal, ehw241.
  42. Dhakal B. P., Malhotra R., Murphy R. M., Pappagianopoulos P. P., Baggish A. L., Weiner R. B., Lewis G. D. (2015). "Mechanisms of Exercise Intolerance in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection FractionCLINICAL PERSPECTIVE". Circulation: Heart Failure. 8 (2): 286–294. doi:10.1161/circheartfailure.114.001825. PMC 5771713.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  43. Germing, A.; Gotzmann, M.; Schikowski, T.; Vierkötter, A.; Ranft, U.; Krämer, U.; Mügge, A. (2011). "High frequency of diastolic dysfunction in a population-based cohort of elderly women - but poor association with the symptom dyspnea". BMC Geriatrics. 11: 71. doi:10.1186/1471-2318-11-71. PMC 3219735. PMID 22047619.
  44. Telles, F.; Nanayakkara, S.; Evans, S.; Patel, H.; Mariani, J.; Vizi, D.; William, J.; Marwick, T.; Kaye, d. (2019). "Impaired left atrial strain predicts abnormal exercise haemodynamics in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction". European Journal of Heart Failure. 21 (4): 495–505. doi:10.1002/ejhf.1399. PMID 30652393.
  45. Zheng, Sean Lee; Chan, Fiona T; Nabeebaccus, Adam A; Shah, Ajay M; McDonagh, Theresa; Okonko, Darlington O; Ayis, Salma (March 2018). "Drug treatment effects on outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis". Heart. 104 (5): 407–415. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311652. PMC 5861385. PMID 28780577.
  46. Noncardiac comorbidities in heart failure with reduced versus preserved ejection fraction. Mentz RJ, Kelly JP, von Lueder TG, Voors AA, Lam CS, Cowie MR, Kjeldsen K, Jankowska EA, Atar D, Butler J, Fiuzat M, Zannad F, Pitt B, O'Connor CM. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec;64(21):2281-93. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
  47. Zheng, Sean Lee; Chan, Fiona T; Nabeebaccus, Adam A; Shah, Ajay M; McDonagh, Theresa; Okonko, Darlington O; Ayis, Salma (March 2018). "Drug treatment effects on outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis". Heart. 104 (5): 407–415. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311652. PMC 5861385. PMID 28780577.
  48. Iwano, H; Little, WC (July 2013). "Heart failure: what does ejection fraction have to do with it?". Journal of Cardiology (Review). 62 (1): 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.02.017. PMID 23672790.
  49. Nanayakkara, S; Kaye, DM (October 2015). "Management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a review". Clinical Therapeutics (Review). 37 (10): 2186–2198. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.08.005. PMID 26385583.
  50. Gielen, S; Laughlin, MH; O'Conner, C; Duncker, DJ (January–February 2015). "Exercise training in patients with heart disease: review of beneficial effects and clinical recommendations". Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases (Review). 57 (4): 347–55. doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2014.10.001. PMID 25459973.
  51. Hummel S. L., Seymour E. M., Brook R. D., Kolias T. J., Sheth S. S., Rosenblum H. R., Weder A. B. (2012). "Low-Sodium Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Diet Reduces Blood Pressure, Arterial Stiffness, and Oxidative Stress in Hypertensive Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection FractionNovelty and Significance". Hypertension. 60 (5): 1200–1206. doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.112.202705.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  52. Effects of vasodilation in heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction implications of distinct pathophysiologies on response to therapy. Schwartzenberg S, Redfield MM, From AM, Sorajja P, Nishimura RA, Borlaug BA. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jan;59(5):442-51.
  53. Zheng, Sean Lee; Chan, Fiona T; Nabeebaccus, Adam A; Shah, Ajay M; McDonagh, Theresa; Okonko, Darlington O; Ayis, Salma (March 2018). "Drug treatment effects on outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis". Heart. 104 (5): 407–415. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311652. PMC 5861385. PMID 28780577.
  54. Randomized trial to determine the effect of nebivolol on mortality and cardiovascular hospital admission in elderly patients with heart failure (SENIORS). Flather MD, Shibata MC, Coats AJ, Van Veldhuisen DJ, Parkhomenko A, Borbola J, Cohen-Solal A, Dumitrascu D, Ferrari R, Lechat P, Soler-Soler J, Tavazzi L, Spinarova L, Toman J, Böhm M, Anker SD, Thompson SG, Poole-Wilson PA, SENIORS Investigators . Eur Heart J. 2005;26(3):215.
  55. Impaired chronotropic and vasodilator reserves limit exercise capacity in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction. Borlaug BA, Melenovsky V, Russell SD, Kessler K, Pacak K, Becker LC, Kass DA. Circulation. 2006 Nov;114(20):2138-47. Epub 2006 Nov 6.
  56. Effect of enalapril on congestive heart failure treated with diuretics in elderly patients with prior myocardial infarction and normal left ventricular ejection fraction. Aronow WS, Kronzon I. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71(7):602.
  57. Zheng, Sean Lee; Chan, Fiona T; Nabeebaccus, Adam A; Shah, Ajay M; McDonagh, Theresa; Okonko, Darlington O; Ayis, Salma (March 2018). "Drug treatment effects on outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis". Heart. 104 (5): 407–415. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311652. PMC 5861385. PMID 28780577.
  58. Hurst 2001, p. 709.
  59. A meta-analysis of the effects of treatment on left ventricular mass in essential hypertension. Klingbeil AU, Schneider M, Martus P, Messerli FH, Schmieder RE . Am J Med. 2003;115(1):41.
  60. Solomon SD, Janardhanan R, Verma A, Bourgoun M, Daley WL, Purkayastha D, Lacourcière Y, Hippler SE, Fields H, Naqvi TZ, Mulvagh SL, Arnold JM, Thomas JD, Zile MR, Aurigemma GP (2007). "Effect of angiotensin receptor blockade and antihypertensive drugs on diastolic function in patients with hypertension and diastolic dysfunction: a randomised trial". Lancet. 369 (9579): 2079. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60980-5.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  61. "Israel's CorAssist Keeps a Weak Heart Pumping".
  62. Outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a population-based study. Bhatia RS, Tu JV, Lee DS, Austin PC, Fang J, Haouzi A, Gong Y, Liu PP. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(3):260.
  63. How do patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction die? Chan MM, Lam CS. Eur J Heart Fail. 2013 Jun;15(6):604-13. Epub 2013 Apr 21.
  64. Bhatia RS, Tu JV, Lee DS, et al. (July 2006). "Outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a population-based study". N. Engl. J. Med. 355 (3): 260–69. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.545.5532. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa051530. PMID 16855266.

Bibliography
Classification


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.