Floods in Bihar

Bihar is India's most flood-prone state, with 76% population in the North Bihar living under the recurring threat of flood devastation.[1][2] Bihar makes up 16.5% of India's flood affected area and 22.1% of India's flood affected population.[3] About 73.06% of Bihar's geographical area, ie 68,800 square kilometres (26,600 sq mi) out of 94,160 square kilometres (36,360 sq mi), is flood affected. On an annual basis, they destroy thousands of human lives apart from livestock and assets worth millions.[4][2] In total, they have claimed 9,500 lives since the government started publishing figures in 1979.[5] North Bihar districts are vulnerable to at least five major flood-causing rivers during monsoonMahananda River, Koshi River, Bagmati River , Burhi Gandak River and Gandak – which originate in Nepal. Some south Bihar districts have also become vulnerable to floods from Son, Punpun and Phalgu rivers.[6] The 2013 flood affected over 5.9 million people in 3,768 villages in 20 districts of the state.[7] 2017 flood affected 19 districts of North Bihar killing 514 people.[8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and affecting 1.71 crore people.[15][16][17][18]

Yearly flood deaths from 1979 to 2017
YearHumansOther animals
20191885755
20181476643
20171521792
201612545383
20131201140
20082534845
20071287126
20063631
2005584
20048853272
2003251108
20024891450
2001231565
20003362568
1999243136
1998381187
1997163151
1996222171
19952913742
19949135
1993105420
19924
19915684
19903676
198926
19885229
198714015302
1986134511
19858320
198414390
19833621
19822514
19811811
19806742
19791450

History

Reason for flooding

Geographically Nepal is a mountainous region. When heavy rains occur in the mountains of central and eastern Nepal the water flows into the major drainages of Narayani, Bagmati, and Koshi rivers. As these rivers cross into India they flow into the plains and lowlands of Bihar and break their banks. To protect the Koshi River dam as well as the Koshi Barrage Pool's embankments, Indian engineers who are in charge of the dam in Nepal, further open the dam's gates which can cause flooding down river in Bihar. In 2008 during a high flow episode a breach in the East Koshi afflux embankment above the dam occurred and the Koshi river, known as the Sorrow of Bihar, picked up an old channel it had abandoned over 100 years previously near the border with Nepal and India. Approximately 2.7 million people were affected as the river broke its embankment at Kusaha in Nepal, submerging several districts of Nepal and India. 95% of the Koshi's total flowed through the new course.

Embankments

A recent fact finding report for the Kosi floods of 2008, prepared by a civil society organization by various experts like Dr. Sudhir Sharma, Dr. Dinesh Kumar Mishra, and Dr Gopal Krishna, highlighted that although India has built over 3000 km of embankments in Bihar over the last few decades, the flooding propensity has increased by 2.5 times during the same time period, not to mention that embankments failed during each major flooding event.

The Fact Finding Mission recently released a report titled Kosi Deluge: The Worst is Still to Come, in which it stressed that embankments straitjacket the river. In the case of the Kosi, it found that because of siltation the river bed was in fact several feet higher than the adjoining land. The high and low lands separated by embankments have created a situation where the low lands have become permanently waterlogged. Sixteen per cent of the land mass of north Bihar is subject to permanent waterlogging.

In 1954, when the Bihar flood policy was first introduced, Bihar had approximately 160 km of embankments. At this time, the flood-prone area in the state was estimated to be 2.5 million hectares. Upon the completion of the system of embankments, 3,465 km of embankments had been constructed and were administered by the Water Resources Department (WRD). However, the amount of flood-prone land increased to 6.89 million hectares by 2004.

Deforestation

Deforestation in the catchment area has led to increase in the silt content of the river flow. The total catchment area of the Kosi is excluding the catchment areas of its two important tributaries, the Kamla and the Bagmati . These tributaries of the Kosi are important in themselves and are generally dealt with separately. Out of the total catchment of the Kosi, only are located in India and the rest lie in Nepal and Tibet. The river's catchment area at Triveni in Nepal is . The average rainfall in the upper catchment of the Kosi is while in the lower areas it is 1,323 mm. The average annual silt load of the river is 92,400 acre feet (114,000,000 m3).

Farakka Barrage

The period has caused serious interception in the dynamic equilibrium of the river hindering the natural oscillation of the river within its meandering belt. The meandering belt of Ganges in Malda and Murshidabad is 10 km wide. The water level of the Ganges rose about 8 m upstream of the Farakka barrage. The river which flowed in a South Easterly course between Rajmahal and Farakka during early decades of this century has now formed a mighty meander loop concentration to accommodate the additional discharge accumulated due to the barrage. Due to the obstruction caused by the Barrage each year nearly 640 million tonnes of silt is accumulated in the riverbed.[19] In the last three decades this has resulted in the accumulation of nearly 18.56 billion tonnes of silt.

Farakka barrage has led to following problems upstream of the barrage:

  • Interception of the flow channel/ changed from straight to oblique
  • Sedimentation (640 x106 metric tonnes/ year)
  • Reduction of the cross-sectional area
  • Declining slope of the long profile
  • Widening of the river and increasing length
  • Increase in flood frequency and magnitude

A Central Water Commission (CWC) report on Bihar floods in 2016 said that Farakka Barrage, even in the worst scenario can impact areas only up to about 42 km upstream, due to back water effect.[20] Patna is located about 400 km on the Ganga's upstream. The report blamed heavy banana plantation on the river bank between Patna and Bhagalpur as one of the reasons for the floods, based on the assessment of 100 years of floods in the Ganga. CWC report stated that the sedimentation in Ganga in Bihar is basically due to huge sediment load contributed from its northern tributaries- Ghaghra, Gandak and Kosi. The flood affected area in Bihar was 25 lakh hectares in 1954 when the length of all embankments in Bihar was 160 km, but the flood affected area increased to 72.95 lakh hectares in 2016 with the construction of 3731 km of embankments.[21]

Affected rivers

North Bihar is a playfield of eight major rivers. All these rivers end up in Ganges.

Statistics

Total Affected and Damaged in Bihar due to flood 1979–2006[22][23]
YearDistrictBlocksPanchayatVillageHuman
(in 100,000)
Animal
(in 100,000)
Total Area
(in 100,000 ha)
Cropped area
(in 100,000 ha)
Crop Damaged
(in 100,000 INR)
House AffectedPublic Property Damaged
(in 100,000 INR)
2006146337595910.890.11.810.87706.6318,6378,456.17
200512815621,46421.045.354.61.351,164.505,538305
2004202112,7889,346212.9986.862713.9952,205.64929,773103,049.60
2003241721,4965,07776.0211.9615.086.16,266.1345,2621,035.16
20022562,5048,318160.1852.5119.699.451,149.61419,01440,892.19
2001221941,9926,40590.9111.711.956.526,721.79222,07418,353.78
2000332132,32712,35190.188.098.054.438,303.70343,0913,780.66
1999241501,6045,05765.6613.588.453.0424,203.8891,8135,409.99
1998282602,7398,347134.730.9325.1212.8436,696.68199,6119,284.04
1997261691,9027,04369.6510.1114.716.555,737.66174,3792,038.09
1996291952,0496,41767.336.611.897.347,169.29116,1941,035.70
1995261771,9018,23366.298.159.264.2419,514.32297,7652,183.57
1994211121,0452,75540.1215.036.323.55,616.3333,876151.66
1993181241,2633,42253.526.6815.6411.3513,950.17219,8263,040.86
19928191704145.560.750.760.2558.091,2810.75
1991241371,3364,09648.235.139.84.052,361.0327,324139.93
1990241621,2594,17839.572.78.733.211,818.8811,009182.27
198916746521,82118.790.354.711.65704.887,74683.7
1988231811,6165,68762.340.2110.523.954,986.3214,759150.64
1987303826,11224,518286.6233.2547.525.767,881.001,704,999680.86
1986231891,8286,50975.8XXXX19.187.9710,513.51136,7743,201.99
1985201621,2455,31553.09XXXX7.944.383,129.52103,279204.64
1984232393,20911,154135XXXX30.515.8718,543.85310,4052,717.72
1983221381,2244,06042.41XXXX18.135.782,629.2538,679258.14
1982151101,1123,70846.8145.149.323.239,700.0068,242955.33
1981212012,1387,36769.4774.8312.617.717,213.1975,776XXXX
1980211931,8697,01074.45XXXX17.869.437,608.43118,507XXXX
197913110XXXXXXXX37.38XXXX8.062.741,901.5227,816XXXX
gollark: Well, I would actually.
gollark: <@151391317740486657> Monitors are superior to pathetic „signs„.
gollark: Okay, just tell me tomorrow, the virtual keyboard is annoyinger than I thought.
gollark: Ah.
gollark: Yep. Adding.

See also

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.