Era of Fragmentation

The Era of Fragmentation (སིལ་ཆད་དུ་འཆད་པ) was an era of disunity in Tibetan history lasting from the death of the Tibetan Empire's last emperor, Langdarma, in 842 until Drogön Chögyal Phagpa gained control over the three provinces of Tibet in 1253. During this period, the political unity of the Tibetan Empire collapsed following a civil war between Yumtän (Yum brtan) and Ösung (’Od-srung),[1] after which followed numerous rebellions against the remnants of imperial Tibet and the rise of regional warlords.[2]

Map showing major religious regimes during the Era of Fragmentation in Tibet
Part of a series on the
History of Tibet
See also
 Asia portal •  China portal

Civil war and the decline of imperial Tibet
Main article: Tibetan Empire

The last emperor of the unified Tibetan Empire, Langdarma, was assassinated in 842-846, by either a Buddhist hermit or a monk named Pelgyi Dorje of Lhalung.[3][4] The assassination left two possible heirs, Yumtän and Ösung, to fight for the throne, leading to a civil war. The successors of Ösung controlled the region of Ngari, while the successors of Yumtän controlled the Ü region.[5] The son of Ösung was Pälkhortsän (Dpal 'khor brtsan) (865–895 or 893–923), who would sire two sons, Trashi Tsentsän (Bkra shis brtsen brtsan) and Thrikhyiding (Khri khyi lding), also called Kyide Nyigön (Skyid lde nyi ma mgon) in some sources. Thrikhyiding migrated to the western Tibetan region of upper Ngari (Stod Mnga ris) and married a woman of high central Tibetan nobility, with whom he founded a local dynasty that would go on to create the kingdoms of Purang-Guge, Maryul, and Zanskar.[6] This civil war weakened the political authority of the Tibetan monarchy,[7] dissolving Tibet into separate tribes and small kingdoms.[5]

Revolts and warlords

The dissolution of a centralized empire allowed Tibetan peasants, dissatisfied with the political turmoil, to rebel against regional governments. These uprisings split imperial Tibet into a multitude of separate, autonomous kingdoms, each ruled by a local warlord.[5] The warlords constantly fought for political dominance, utilizing private armies and military fortresses.[5] Between 842 and 1247, no central authority was in control of Tibet and small kingdoms like Maryul emerged.[8] The period ended with the Mongol conquest of Tibet and subsequent Yuan rule of Tibet.

Traditional accounts of the period focus on religion. The Era of Fragmentation is depicted as a low point in the development of Tibetan Buddhism, with the Buddhist monastic order facing persecution and exile. Monastic Buddhism was alleged to have only persevered in Amdo, then largely dominated by non-Tibetan peoples, and would not be conquered by a Tibetan polity until the 10th century.[2]

According to this account, during the reign of Langdarma, three monks fled to Mt. Dantig in Amdo. Their disciple Muzu Selbar (Wylie: mu zu gsal 'bar ), later known as the scholar Gongpa Rapsel (Wylie: dgongs pa rab gsal , 953-1035[9]), was responsible for the renewal of Buddhism in northeastern Tibet. The students of Rapsal are said to have returned to Ü-Tsang, where they re-introduced monastic Buddhism. Modern historians contest traditional views of the era, arguing that Buddhism was in fact widespread during the period, and that regional political authorities shared a close relationship with Buddhist monastic leaders.[2]

gollark: I am within my rights under a ridiculously stretched interpretation of the rules to do this.
gollark: No.
gollark: I INVOKE IT.
gollark: RULE FOUR.
gollark: HA!

See also

References

Citations
  1. Shakabpa 2010, p. 173.
  2. Schaik & Galambos 2011, p. 4
  3. Beckwith 1987, pp. 168-169.
  4. Stein 1972, pp. 70-71
  5. Shakabpa 2010, p. 177
  6. Petech 1977, pp. 14-16.
  7. Samten Karmay in McKay 2003, p. 57
  8. Fisher, Margaret W.; Rose, Leo E.; Huttenback, Robert A. (1963). Himalayan Battleground: Sino-Indian Rivalry in Ladakh. Praeger. p. 18 – via Questia.
  9. "dgongs pa rab gsal". Tibetan Buddhist Resource Center. Tibetan Buddhist Resource Center.

Sources
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.