Environment Court of New Zealand

The Environment Court of New Zealand (Māori: Te Kōti Taiao o Aotearoa) is a specialist court for plans, resource consents and environmental issues. It mainly deals with issues arising under the Resource Management Act, meaning that it covers a wide range of potential future effects of planning applications, which can include such areas as traffic congestion, noise/pollution emissions and social and commercial consequences, rather than just the 'ecological' aspects that could be implied by the 'environmental' term.

Environment Court of New Zealand
Te Kōti Taiao o Aotearoa (Māori)
Established1996
LocationAuckland, Wellington and Christchurch
Authorized byResource Management Act 1991
Appeals toHigh Court of New Zealand
Websiteenvironmentcourt.govt.nz
Principal Environment Court Judge
CurrentlyJudge L J Newhook
Since2011
This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
New Zealand
Constitution
 New Zealand portal

History

The history of independent appeal courts addressing environmental matters began with the establishment of Appeal Boards under the Town and Country Planning Act 1953. The first planning appeals were heard in February 1955. The Appeal Boards were replaced by the Planning Tribunal following the passing of the Town and Country Planning Act 1977.[1]

The Environment Court replaced the Planning Tribunal as a result of the Resource Management Amendment Act 1996.[2]

Jurisdiction

The Environment Court has a substantially larger role than the Planning Tribunal, with expanded functions and powers over planning, resource consents and enforcement. Virtually all important processes and decisions under the Resource Management Act 1991, such as regional policy statements, regional and district plans, resource consents and Water Conservation Orders, may be appealed to the Environment Court.[3]

In particular, the Environment Court hears appeals on decisions on applications for resource consent on a 'de novo' basis. The Environment Court does not review the decision: it hears any evidence it requires and makes its own decision, which replaces that of the local authority. It focuses on "the merits and substance of the particular decision at issue, not the deliberative process of the executive authority that made the initial decision."[4]

The Environment Court also has the power to make declarations that interpret the law under the Resource Management Act.

The Environment Court has the status and powers of a District Court, so it can conduct prosecutions and enforcement of the Resource Management Act through civil or criminal proceedings.[5]

The Environment Court also has functions under other statutes:

  • Forests Act 1949 – Appeals about felling native beech forests,
  • Local Government Act 1974 – Objections to road stopping proposals,
  • Public Works Act 1981 – Objections to the compulsory taking of land,
  • Transit New Zealand Act 1989 – Objections regarding access to limited access roads,
  • Crown Minerals Act 1991 – Administration of existing privileges,
  • Electricity Act 1992 – Disputes about land access to existing works,
  • Historic Places Act 1993 – Appeals about historic and archaeological sites,
  • Biosecurity Act 1993 – Appeals about regional pest strategies,
  • Maori Commercial Aquaculture Claim Settlement Act 2004 – Appeals against allocation decisions of regional councils.[6]

Decisions of the Environment Court may only be appealed to the High Court of New Zealand on a point of law.[7]

Structure

The Environment Court is a single court, but it has no centralised courthouse and it sits in courthouses across the country. Judges for the court are permanently stationed in Wellington, Auckland, and Christchurch, but they travel to other centres on circuit as needed.

gollark: ```PotatOS OS/Conveniently Self-Propagating System/Sandbox/Compilation of Useless Programs We are not responsible for- headaches- rashes- persistent/non-persistent coughs- virii- backdoors- spinal cord sclerosis- hypertension- cardiac arrest- regular arrest, by police or whatever- death- computronic discombobulation- loss of data- gain of data- frogsor any other issue caused directly or indirectly due to use of this product. Best viewed in Internet Explorer 6 running on a Difference Engine emulated under MacOS 7. Features:- Fortunes/Dwarf Fortress output/Chuck Norris jokes on boot (wait, IS this a feature?)- (other) viruses (how do you get them in the first place? running random files like this?) cannot do anything particularly awful to your computer - uninterceptable (except by crashing the keyboard shortcut daemon, I guess) keyboard shortcuts allow easy wiping of the non-potatOS data so you can get back to whatever nonsense you do fast- Skynet (rednet-ish stuff over websocket to my server) and Lolcrypt (encoding data as lols and punctuation) built in for easy access!- Convenient OS-y APIs - add keyboard shortcuts, spawn background processes & do "multithreading"-ish stuff.- Great features for other idio- OS designers, like passwords and fake loading (set potatOS.stupidity.loading [time], est potatOS.stupidity.password [password]).- Digits of Tau available via a convenient command ("tau")- Potatoplex and Loading built in ("potatoplex"/"loading") (potatoplex has many undocumented options)!- Stack traces (yes, I did steal them from MBS)- Backdoors- er, remote debugging access (it's secured, via ECC signing on disks and websocket-only access requiring a key for the other one)- All this useless random junk can autoupdate (this is probably a backdoor)!- EZCopy allows you to easily install potatOS on another device, just by sticking it in the disk drive of another potatOS device!- fs.load and fs.dump - probably helpful somehow.```
gollark: <@236628809158230018> https://pastebin.com/RM13UGFa
gollark: It, um, teaches you not to trust any OSes?
gollark: Not even Windows is this crazy… yet.
gollark: PotatOS is actually unique and quite complex.

See also

References

  1. Politics and Planning: The Independence of the Environment Court – Judge John Bollard, New Zealand Planning Institute 2007 Conference, Wednesday 28 March 2007
  2. Environment Court (from the Ministry of Justice website)
  3. Birdsong, Bret (October 1998). "Adjudicating Sustainability: The Environment Court and New Zealand's Resource Management Act" (PDF). p. 18. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 February 2008. Retrieved 25 December 2007.
  4. Birdsong, B. (1998), page 22.
  5. Birdsong, B. (1998), page 77.
  6. Legislation and Resources Archived 29 August 2008 at the Wayback Machine, Environment Court of New Zealand website. Retrieved 7 January 2008.
  7. Section 299 Resource Management Act 1991 (New Zealand)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.