Daniel Collyer

Daniel Collyer (b Little Shelford August 25, 1848;[1] d Dedham, Essex 25 July 1924[2]) was Archdeacon of Malta from 1903 until 1905.[3]

Collyer was educated at Rugby School and Clare College, Cambridge; and ordained in 1871.[4] After a curacy in Falkenham[5] he was Vicar of Castle Acre[6] then West Newton.[7] He was Chaplain at Hyeres from 1890 to 1893; and then at Cannes[8] until his appointment as Archdeacon. After his return from the Mediterranean he was the Incumbent at Wymondham[9] then Bobbington.[10]

Notes
  1. Alumni Cantabrigienses Vol. ii. Chalmers – Fytche, p102 (19440 Online version at the Internet Archive
  2. The Rev. D. Collyer The Times (London, England), Tuesday, Jul 29, 1924; pg. 14; Issue 43716
  3. Crockford's Clerical Directory 1908 p298 London: Horace Cox, 1908
  4. Ordinations The Times (London, England), Thursday, Dec 28, 1871; pg. 9; Issue 27258
  5. ECCLESIASTICAL INTELLIGENCE Hampshire Advertiser (Southampton, England), Saturday, November 01, 1873; pg. 2; Issue 2857. British Library Newspapers, Part II: 1800-1900
  6. PREFERMENTS AND APPOINTMENTS Bristol Mercury (Bristol, England), Friday, October 5, 1883; Issue 11043. British Library Newspapers, Part I: 1800-1900
  7. Ecclesiastical Appointments The Times (London, England), Thursday, Oct 04, 1883; pg. 12; Issue 30942
  8. PREFERMENTS AND APPOINTMENTS Bristol Mercury (Bristol, England), Friday, July 28, 1893; Issue 14107. British Library Newspapers, Part I: 1800-1900
  9. Ecclesiastical Intelligence. The Times (London, England), Saturday, Sep 16, 1905; pg. 5; Issue 37814
  10. Bobbington Village


gollark: And value that over actual money.
gollark: Which I suppose can make some sense if you assume that it's "rational" in that people... like surprises, or something, but...
gollark: People *play the lottery*, too.
gollark: People somehow can't accept positive-sum games.
gollark: > A core proposition in economics is that voluntary exchanges benefit both parties. We show that people often deny the mutually beneficial nature of exchange, instead espousing the belief that one or both parties fail to benefit from the exchange. Across 4 studies (and 7 further studies in the Supplementary Materials), participants read about simple exchanges of goods and services, judging whether each party to the transaction was better off or worse off afterwards. These studies revealed that win–win denial is pervasive, with buyers consistently seen as less likely to benefit from transactions than sellers. Several potential psychological mechanisms underlying win–win denial are considered, with the most important influences being mercantilist theories of value (confusing wealth for money) and naïve realism (failing to observe that people do not arbitrarily enter exchanges). We argue that these results have widespread implications for politics and society.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.