Battle of the Ruhr
The Battle of the Ruhr of 1943 was a 5-month British campaign of strategic bombing during the Second World War against the Ruhr Area in Nazi Germany, which had coke plants, steelworks, and 10 synthetic oil plants. The campaign bombed 26 major Combined Bomber Offensive targets.[8] The targets included the Krupp armament works (Essen), the Nordstern synthetic-oil plant (Gelsenkirchen), and the Rheinmetal–Borsig plant in Düsseldorf. The latter was safely evacuated during the Battle of the Ruhr.[5] Although not strictly part of the Ruhr area, the battle of the Ruhr included other cities such as Cologne which were within the Rhine-Ruhr region[9] and considered part of the same "industrial complex".[4] Some targets were not sites of heavy industrial production but part of the production and movement of materiel.
Battle of the Ruhr | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of Strategic bombing during World War II | |||||||
The Möhne dam after Operation Chastise | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
|
| ||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
Arthur Harris |
Hermann Göring Josef Kammhuber | ||||||
Strength | |||||||
6 Groups of RAF Bomber Command 380 heavy and 160 medium bombers in March[4] |
radar warning static gun emplacements day and night fighters | ||||||
Casualties and losses | |||||||
RAF Bomber Command 5,000 RAF aircrew[6] USAAF: unknown | 21,000 dead[7] |
Although the Ruhr had always been a target for the RAF from the start of the war, the organized defences and the large amount of industrial pollutants produced that gave a semi-permanent smog or industrial haze hampered accurate bombing.[4][10][11] The Germans also built large-scale night-time decoys like the Krupp decoy site (German: Kruppsche Nachtscheinanlage) which was a German decoy-site of the Krupp steel works in Essen. During World War II, it was designed to divert Allied airstrikes from the actual production site of the arms factory.
Before the Battle of the Ruhr ended, Operation Gomorrah began the "Battle of Hamburg". Even after this switch of focus to Hamburg, there would be further raids on the Ruhr area by the RAF—in part to keep German defences dispersed, just as there had been raids on areas other than the Ruhr during the battle.[4]
Offence and defence
The British bomber force consisted mainly of the twin-engined Vickers Wellington medium bomber and the four-engined "heavies", the Short Stirling, Handley Page Halifax and Avro Lancaster. The Wellington and Stirling were the two oldest designs and limited in the type or weight of bombs carried. The Stirling was also limited to a lower operational height. Bombers could carry a range of bombs—Medium Capacity bombs of about 50% explosive by weight, High Capacity "Blockbusters" that were mostly explosive, and incendiary devices. The combined use of the latter two were most effective in setting fires in urban areas.
British raids were by night—the losses in daylight raids having been too heavy to bear. By this point in the war, RAF Bomber Command were using navigation aids, the Pathfinder force and the bomber stream tactic together. Electronic navigation aids such as "Oboe", which had been tested against Essen in January 1943,[1] meant the Pathfinders could mark the targets despite the industrial haze and cloud cover that obscured the area by night. Guidance markers put the main force over the target area, where they would then drop their bombloads on target markers. The bomber stream concentrated the force of bombers into a small time window, such that it overwhelmed fighter defences in the air and firefighting attempts on the ground. For most of the Battle of the Ruhr the Oboe de Havilland Mosquitoes came from one squadron, No. 109.[4] The number of Oboe aircraft that could be used at any time was limited by the number of ground stations.[4]
The USAAF had two 4-engined heavy bombers available: the Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress and Consolidated B-24 Liberator—neither of these American heavy bomber designs had a bomb bay suitable to carry the RAF's blockbuster bombs or anything comparable. USAAF raids were by daylight, the closely massed groups of bombers covering each other with defensive fire against fighters. Between them, the Allies could mount "round the clock" bombing. The USAAF forces in the UK were still increasing during 1943 and the majority of the bombing was by the RAF.
The German defence consisted of anti-aircraft weapons and day and night fighters. The Kammhuber Line used radar to identify the bomber raids and then controllers directed night fighters onto the raiders. During the battle of the Ruhr, Bomber Command estimated about 70% of their aircraft losses were due to fighters.[12] By July 1943, the German night fighter force totalled 550.[4]
Through the summer of 1943, the Germans increased the ground-based anti-aircraft defences in the Ruhr Area; by July 1943 there were more than 1,000 large flak guns (88 mm caliber guns or greater) and 1,500 lighter guns (chiefly 20 mm and 37 mm calibre).[6][13] This was about one-third of all anti-aircraft guns in Germany.[4] Six-hundred thousand personnel were required to man the AA defences of Germany.[4] The British crews called the area sarcastically "Happy Valley"[14] or the "valley of no Return".
Bombing operations
Date | Target location | |
---|---|---|
5 March | Essen | |
9/10 March | Ruhr | |
10/11 March | Essen and Mulheim | |
12/13 March | Essen | |
26/27 March | Duisburg | |
29/30 March | Bochum | |
3/4 April | Essen | |
8/9 April | Duisburg | |
9/10 April | Duisburg | |
26/27 April | Duisburg | |
30 April/1 May | Essen | |
17 May | Möhne and Eder Dams | |
4/5 May | Dortmund | |
13/14 May | Bochum | |
23/24 May | Dortmund | |
25/26 May | Düsseldorf | |
27/28 May | Essen | |
29/30 May | Wuppertal | |
11/12 June | Düsseldorf | |
12/13 June 1943 | Bochum | |
14/15 June | Oberhausen | |
16/17 June | Cologne | |
17/18 June | Cologne and Ruhr | |
19/20 | Cologne, Duisburg and Düsseldorf | |
21/22 June | Krefeld | |
22 June | Huls | |
22/23 June | Mülheim | |
24/25 June | Wuppertal | |
25/26 June | Gelsenkirchen, Nordstern oil plant | |
28/29 June | Cologne | |
9/10 July | Gelsenkirchen | |
25/26 July | Essen | |
30/31 July | Remscheid | |
During the battle other German targets received large attacks.
- Berlin 27/28 March, 29/30 March
- Stettin (now Szczecin in modern Poland) 20/21 April
Outcome
In his study of the German war economy, Adam Tooze stated that during the Battle of the Ruhr, Bomber Command severely disrupted German production. Steel production fell by 200,000 tons. The armaments industry was facing a steel shortfall of 400,000 tons. After doubling production in 1942, production of steel increased only by 20 percent in 1943. Hitler and Speer were forced to cut planned increases in production. This disruption resulted in the Zulieferungskrise (sub-components crisis). The increase of aircraft production for the Luftwaffe also came to an abrupt halt. Monthly production failed to increase between July 1943 and March 1944. "Bomber Command had stopped Speer's armaments miracle in its tracks".[24]
At Essen after more than 3,000 sorties and the loss of 138 aircraft, the "Krupp works...and the town...itself contained large areas of devastation", and Krupp never restarted locomotive production after the second March raid.[4]
Operation Chastise caused some temporary effect on industrial production, through the disruption of the water supply and hydroelectric power. The Eder Valley dam "had nothing whatsoever" to do with supplying the Ruhr Area.[25] A backup pumping system had already been put in place for the Ruhr, and Speer's Organisation Todt rapidly mobilized repairs, taking workers from the construction of the Atlantic Wall. The destruction of the Sorpe dam would have caused significantly more damage but since it was a stronger design less likely to be breached it was effectively a secondary target.
Notes and references
- Note a ^ According to Levine, there were few "very big industrial plants" suitable for specific targeting as was the case in Essen.[5]
- Staff. "Campaign Diary". Royal Air Force Bomber Command 60th Anniversary. UK Crown. Archived from the original on 7 June 2007. Retrieved 24 May 2007.
1943: January Archived 21 February 2006 at the Wayback Machine, February Archived 21 February 2006 at the Wayback Machine, March Archived 15 May 2007 at the Wayback Machine, April Archived 7 June 2007 at the Wayback Machine, May Archived 21 February 2006 at the Wayback Machine, June Archived 21 February 2006 at the Wayback Machine, July Archived 4 May 2009 at the Wayback Machine - Tooze 2006, p. 598. During the Battle of the Ruhr, Bomber Command severely disrupted German production. Tooze states steel production fell by 200,000 tons and the armaments industry was facing a steel shortfall of 400,000 tons. After doubling production in 1942, production of steel increased only by 20 percent in 1943. Hitler and Speer were forced to cut planned increases in production. This disruption caused the zulieferungskrise (sub-components crisis). The increase of aircraft production for the Luftwaffe also came to an abrupt halt. Monthly production failed to increase between July 1943 and March 1944. Tooze concludes; "Bomber Command had stopped Speer's armamanets miracle in its tracks".
- Frankland, Noble and Webster, Charles. The Strategic Air Offensive Against Germany, 1939–1945, Volume II: Endeavour, Part 4. Her Majesty's Stationery Office. London 1961, p. 141.
- Thompson, H L (1956), "Chapter 3: Bomber Command and the Battle of the Ruhr", New Zealanders with the RAF (Vol II)
- Levine, Alan J. The Strategic Bombing of Germany, 1940–1945. p. 53.
- Blank, Ralf (1994). "Part 1: "Battle of the Ruhr", March–July 1943". Historisches Centrum Hagen. Retrieved 22 January 2009.
- Beevor, Antony (2013). The Second World War. p. 487. ISBN 978-82-02-42146-5.
- Gurney, Gene (Major, USAF) (1962). The War in the Air: a pictorial history of World War II Air Forces in combat. New York: Bonanza Books. p. 113.
- Levine, Alan J. (1992). The Strategic Bombing of Germany, 1940–1945. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 51. ISBN 0-275-94319-4.
- Butt Report, 1941
- Bishop, Patrick Bomber Boys Fighting Back 1940–1945
- Brown, Louis: A Radar History of World War II CRC Press, 1999
- Blank. "Part 2: Large air defence in the Rhine-Ruhr area". Retrieved 21 January 2009.
- "Battle of the Ruhr" Australian War Memorial
- Davis, Richard D. (April 2006). Bombing of European Axis Powers. Air University Press. p. 109.
- Davis, Richard D. (April 2006). Bombing of European Axis Powers. Air University Press. p. 68.
- Staff. "Campaign Diary April 1943". Royal Air Force Bomber Command 60th Anniversary. UK Crown. Archived from the original on 7 June 2007. Retrieved 24 May 2007.
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 20 September 2008. Retrieved 27 January 2009.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- Staff. "Campaign Diary May 1943". Royal Air Force Bomber Command 60th Anniversary. UK Crown. Archived from the original on 29 May 2007. Retrieved 24 May 2007.
- Maynard p124
- Maynard p125
-
"8th Air Force 1943 Chronicles". Retrieved 25 May 2007.
1943: March, April, May, June, July - RAF History – Bomber Command 60th Anniversary "No. 8 (Pathfinder Force) Group" Archived 1 December 2008 at the Wayback Machine
- Tooze, The Wages of Destruction, London, Penguin, 2007(pbk), ISBN 978-0-14-100348-1 pp 597 – 8
- Speer, Albert (1970). Inside the Third Reich. Translated by Richard; Clara Winston. New York and Toronto: Macmillan. p. 34. ISBN 978-0-684-82949-4. LCCN 70119132.
References
- "Royal Air Force Bomber Command 60th Anniversary background". raf.mod.uk. Archived from the original on 12 October 2009.
- Maynard, John Bennett and the Pathfinders Arms and Armour London 1996 ISBN 1-85409-258-8