2015 China Open – Men's Doubles

Men's Doubles
	2015 China Open
Champions	Vasek Pospisil ; Jack Sock
Runners-up	Daniel Nestor ; Édouard Roger-Vasselin
Final score	3–6, 6–3, [10–6]

Jean-Julien Rojer and Horia Tecău are the defending champions, but lost to Vasek Pospisil and Jack Sock in the semifinals.

Pospisil and Sock went on to win the title, defeating Daniel Nestor and Édouard Roger-Vasselin in the final 3–6, 6–3, [10–6].

Seeds

Jean-Julien Rojer / Horia Tecău (Semifinals)
Marcin Matkowski / Nenad Zimonjić (Semifinals)
Simone Bolelli / Fabio Fognini (First round)
Daniel Nestor / Édouard Roger-Vasselin (Final)

Draw

Key

Draw

First Round					Quarterfinals					Semifinals				Final

1	J-J Rojer H Tecău	3	6	[10]
	E Butorac S Lipsky	6	3	[4]	1	J-J Rojer H Tecău	6	6
	P Cuevas V Troicki	6	6			P Cuevas V Troicki	4	2
	R Bopanna J Isner	4	3							1	J-J Rojer H Tecău	3	4
3	S Bolelli F Fognini	6⁵	6	[9]							V Pospisil J Sock	6	6
	V Pospisil J Sock	7⁷	2	[11]		V Pospisil J Sock	6	6
WC	M Gong M Venus	6⁵	7⁸	[5]	WC	D Djokovic N Djokovic	4	1
WC	D Djokovic N Djokovic	7⁷	6⁶	[10]											V Pospisil J Sock	3	6	[10]
	D Goffin D Thiem	6	6											4	D Nestor É Roger-Vasselin	6	3	[6]
	D Marrero A Seppi	2	4			D Goffin D Thiem	3	4
	L Paes J Peers	6¹	6	[9]	4	D Nestor É Roger-Vasselin	6	6
4	D Nestor É Roger-Vasselin	7⁷	4	[11]						4	D Nestor É Roger-Vasselin	6	7¹²
	I Karlović Ł Kubot	4	6³							2	M Matkowski N Zimonjić	4	6¹⁰
	D Inglot R Lindstedt	6	7⁷			D Inglot R Lindstedt	6	6⁴	[7]
Q	J Knowle O Marach	3	4		2	M Matkowski N Zimonjić	4	7⁷	[10]
2	M Matkowski N Zimonjić	6	6

Qualifying

Seeds

Julian Knowle / Oliver Marach (Qualified)
Teymuraz Gabashvili / Lukáš Rosol (First round)

Qualifiers

Julian Knowle / Oliver Marach

Qualifying Draw

First Round					Qualifying Competition


1	Julian Knowle Oliver Marach	7	6

WC	He Yecong Qiu Zhuoyang	5	4
					1	Julian Knowle Oliver Marach	6	6

						Thomaz Bellucci Andreas Haider-Maurer	4	4
	Thomaz Bellucci Andreas Haider-Maurer	6	1	[10]

2	Teymuraz Gabashvili Lukáš Rosol	4	6	[7]

gollark: Also, they have native async/await syntax, although if the ES team were *cool* they would just implement do notation.

gollark: Yes, that's right. Promises are a monoid in the category of endofunctors.

gollark: Promises are very nice because MONAD.

gollark: Quite a lot of browser APIs are weirdly inconsistent, because they only came up with the whole "asynchronous" thing after a lot had already been done, and then a while after that the idea of promises, but they're still sticking with events a lot for some reason.

gollark: JS is what you get if you put 100 language designers in a room, remove the language designers and add a bunch of monkeys with typewriters and DVORAK keyboards, and then bring the actual language designers back but force them to stick with what the monkeys wrote and only make small changes and tack on extra features after the fact, and also the language designers don't agree with each other most of the time.

References

Main Draw

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.