2015 Aegon Championships – Doubles

Alexander Peya and Bruno Soares were the defending champions, but lost in the semifinals to Pierre-Hugues Herbert and Nicolas Mahut.
Herbert and Mahut went on to win the title, defeating Marcin Matkowski and Nenad Zimonjić in the final, 6–2, 6–2.

Doubles
2015 Aegon Championships
Champions Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Nicolas Mahut
Runners-up Marcin Matkowski
Nenad Zimonjić
Final score6–2, 6–2
Main article: 2015 Aegon Championships

Seeds
  1. Alexander Peya / Bruno Soares (Semifinals)
  2. Marcin Matkowski / Nenad Zimonjić (Final)
  3. Daniel Nestor / Leander Paes (Semifinals)
  4. Pierre-Hugues Herbert / Nicolas Mahut (Champions)

Draw

Key

Draw
First Round Quarterfinals Semifinals Final
1 A Peya
B Soares 		6 77
WC D Inglot
A Murray 		4 63 1 A Peya
B Soares 		6 6
F López
M Mirnyi 		4 7 [10] F López
M Mirnyi 		1 3
J Murray
J Peers 		6 5 [3] 1 A Peya
B Soares 		3 66
4 P-H Herbert
N Mahut 		7 6 4 P-H Herbert
N Mahut 		6 78
WC L Hewitt
T Kokkinakis 		5 3 4 P-H Herbert
N Mahut 		77 77
K Anderson
J Chardy 		77 7 K Anderson
J Chardy 		63 61
Q C Guccione
A Sá 		64 5 4 P-H Herbert
N Mahut 		6 6
M López
R Nadal 		6 6 2 M Matkowski
N Zimonjić 		2 2
M Raonic
É Roger-Vasselin 		4 4 M López
R Nadal 		63 4
R Bautista Agut
V Troicki 		63 6 [7] 3 D Nestor
L Paes 		77 6
3 D Nestor
L Paes 		77 3 [10] 3 D Nestor
L Paes 		3 68
J Isner
S Querrey 		6 77 2 M Matkowski
N Zimonjić 		6 710
S Bolelli
D Goffin 		2 63 J Isner
S Querrey 		3 6 [7]
G Dimitrov
S Wawrinka 		65 63 2 M Matkowski
N Zimonjić 		6 3 [10]
2 M Matkowski
N Zimonjić 		77 77

Qualifying

Seeds
  1. Chris Guccione / André Sá (Qualified)
  2. Pablo Andújar / Aisam-ul-Haq Qureshi (First round)

Qualifiers
  1. Chris Guccione / André Sá

Qualifying Draw
First Round Qualifying Competition
          
1 Chris Guccione
André Sá 		6 4 [10]
WC Jonathan Erlich
Colin Fleming 		2 6 [3]
1 Chris Guccione
André Sá 		4 6 [10]
Mahesh Bhupathi
Juan Sebastián Cabal 		6 3 [5]
Mahesh Bhupathi
Juan Sebastián Cabal 		7 6
2 Pablo Andújar
Aisam-ul-Haq Qureshi 		5 3
gollark: Anyway, point is that if any language is allowed, people have to be able to know *all* the ones in use to participate to some degree.
gollark: You are wrong, bismuth you.
gollark: No, I mean to judge who wrote some code, it's important to have a decent working knowledge of that language, right?
gollark: There's also an important meta-level point about how when people *complained* about palaiologos's choice, they did not decide to actually discuss the merits of it with the community and have a productive discussion but just insist they were right and run a nonsensical vote.
gollark: Python is very simple and most people can sort of write it ish.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.