2013 HP Open – Doubles
Raquel Kops-Jones and Abigail Spears were the defending champions, but lost in the semifinals to Samantha Stosur and Zhang Shuai.
Kristina Mladenovic and Flavia Pennetta won the title, defeating Samantha Stosur and Zhang Shuai in the final, 6-4, 6-3.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2013 HP Open | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 6-4, 6-3 |
Seeds
Raquel Kops-Jones / Abigail Spears (Semifinals) Kristina Mladenovic / Flavia Pennetta (Champions) Varvara Lepchenko / Zheng Saisai (Quarterfinals, withdrew) Anabel Medina Garrigues / Sílvia Soler Espinosa (First round)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Draw
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | w/o | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 2 | [11] | ![]() ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 6 | [9] | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 78 | 3 | [5] | |||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 66 | 6 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 77 | ![]() ![]() | 0 | 66 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 64 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 76 | 6 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 65 | 2 | WC | ![]() ![]() | w/o | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 2 | [5] | 3 | ![]() ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 62 | 6 | [10] | WC | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 3 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 2 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 |
gollark: My visualization's only 2D for now, but I have progressive axis data so it *could* be made 3D if I could be bothered to do that (3D is haaaard).
gollark: https://lucasnorth.uk/sapply/ is one which has *three* axes, and is therefore better.
gollark: That's the uncool test.
gollark: The link to the political compass test thing or my visualization?
gollark: I do need actual numbers, although I suppose I could just put it down as, what, -5 5?
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.