2007 European Athletics Indoor Championships – Women's high jump
The Women's high jump event at the 2007 European Athletics Indoor Championships was held on March 2–3.
Medalists
| Gold | Silver | Bronze |
Tia Hellebaut.svg.png){kind=small} |
Antonietta Di Martino |
Ruth Beitia |
Note: Venelina Veneva (Bulgaria) originally took the bronze with 1.96 m but was later disqualified after testing positive for testosterone.
Results
Qualification
Qualification: Qualification Performance 1.96 (Q) or at least 8 best performers advanced to the final.
| Rank | Group | Athlete | Nationality | 1.79 | 1.84 | 1.89 | 1.93 | 1.96 | Result | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | A | Blanka Vlašić |  | – | o | o | o | xxx | 1.93 | q |
| 1. | A | Ruth Beitia | | o | o | o | o | xxx | 1.93 | q |
| 1. | B | Tia Hellebaut | | – | o | o | o | 1.93 | q | |
| 4. | A | Anna Chicherova |  | o | o | xo | o | xxx | 1.93 | q |
| 5. | B | Antonietta Di Martino | | o | o | o | xo | 1.93 | q | |
| 6. | A | Marta Mendía | | o | o | o | xxo | xxx | 1.93 | q, SB |
| 7. | A | Melanie Skotnik |  | – | o | xo | xxo | xxx | 1.93 | q |
| 8. | B | Julia Hartmann |  | o | xo | xxo | xxo | xxx | 1.93 | PB |
| 9. | A | Emma Green |  | o | o | xo | xxx | 1.87 | ||
| 9. | B | Romana Dubnová |  | o | o | xo | xxx | 1.87 | ||
| 11. | A | Ariane Friedrich | | o | o | xxo | xxx | 1.87 | ||
| 11. | B | Iryna Kovalenko |  | o | o | xxo | xxx | 1.87 | ||
| 11. | B | Oana Pantelimon |  | – | o | xxo | xxx | 1.87 | ||
| 14. | B | Gema Martín-Pozuelo | | o | o | xxx | 1.84 | |||
| 15. | B | Persefoni Hatzinakou |  | xxo | o | xxx | 1.84 | |||
| 16. | A | Karina Vnukova |  | o | xo | xxx | 1.84 | |||
| 17. | A | Deirdre Ryan |  | xo | xo | xxx | 1.84 | |||
| 18. | B | Viktoria Leks |  | xxo | xo | xxx | 1.84 | |||
| 19. | B | Natālija Čakova |  | o | xxx | 1.79 | ||||
| 20. | A | Anne Gerd Eieland |  | xo | xxx | 1.79 | ||||
| B | Venelina Veneva |  | DQ | q | ||||||
Final
| Rank | Athlete | Nationality | 1.82 | 1.87 | 1.92 | 1.96 | 1.99 | 2.01 | 2.03 | 2.05 | 2.09 | Result | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Tia Hellebaut | | – | o | o | o | xo | o | o | o | x– | 2.05 | NR |
 | Antonietta Di Martino | | o | o | o | o | xxx | 1.96 | |||||
 | Ruth Beitia | | o | o | o | xxo | xxx | 1.96 | |||||
| 4 | Blanka Vlašić | | o | xo | o | xxx | 1.92 | ||||||
| 5 | Melanie Skotnik | | o | o | xo | xxx | 1.92 | ||||||
| 5 | Anna Chicherova | | o | o | xo | xxx | 1.92 | ||||||
| 7 | Marta Mendía | | o | xo | xxx | 1.87 | |||||||
| Venelina Veneva | | DQ | |||||||||||
gollark: Google has a thing called "SafetyNet" which allows apps to refuse to run on unlocked devices. You might think "well, surely you could just patch apps to not check, or make a fake SafetyNet always say yes". And this does work in some cases, but SafetyNet also uploads lots of data about your device to Google servers and has *them* run some proprietary ineffable checks on it and give a cryptographically signed attestation saying "yes, this is an Approved™ device" or "no, it is not", which the app's backend can check regardless of what your device does.
gollark: The situation is also slightly worse than *that*. Now, there is an open source Play Services reimplementation called microG. You can install this if you're running a custom system image, and it pretends to be (via signature spoofing, a feature which the LineageOS team refuse to add because of entirely false "security" concerns, but which is widely available in some custom ROMs anyway) Google Play Services. Cool and good™, yes? But no, not really. Because if your bootloader is unlocked, a bunch of apps won't work for *other* stupid reasons!
gollark: If you do remove it, half your apps will break, because guess what, they depend on Google Play Services for some arbitrary feature.
gollark: It's also a several hundred megabyte blob with, if I remember right, *every permission*, running constantly with network access (for push notifications). You can't remove it without reflashing/root access, because it's part of the system image on most devices.
gollark: It is also worse than *that*. The core bits of Android, i.e. Linux, the basic Android frameworks, and a few built-in apps are open source. However, over time Google has moved increasing amounts of functionality into "Google Play Services". Unsurprisingly, this is *not* open source.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.