2002 World Rhythmic Gymnastics Championships
XXV World Rhythmic Gymnastics Championships were held in New Orleans, United States from 10th to 14 July 2002. The competition was open to groups only and the designated apparatuses were Ribbon and Ball & Rope.
2002 World Rhythmic Gymnastics Championships | |
---|---|
Location | |
Start date | 10 July 2002 |
End date | 14 July 2002 |
Competitors
There were participants from 25 countries including [1]Belarus, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Cuba, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine and United States.
Medal winners
Event | Gold | Silver | Bronze |
---|---|---|---|
All-around |
|||
5 ribbons |
|||
3 balls + 2 ropes |
Results
Group all-around
Rank | Nation | 5 |
3 |
Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
23.500 | 25.550 | 49.050 | ||
22.950 | 24.725 | 47.675 | ||
22.100 | 25.300 | 47.400 | ||
4 | 22.750 | 24.300 | 47.050 | |
5 | 21.550 | 24.000 | 45.550 | |
6 | 22.600 | 22.350 | 44.950 | |
7 | 21.250 | 21.925 | 43.175 | |
8 | 20.850 | 21.250 | 42.100 | |
9 | 21.000 | 20.550 | 41.550 | |
10 | 19.850 | 21.300 | 41.150 | |
11 | 19.700 | 21.400 | 41.100 | |
12 | 19.650 | 21.325 | 40.975 | |
13 | 19.650 | 20.500 | 40.150 | |
14 | 18.850 | 19.100 | 37.950 | |
15 | 18.200 | 19.600 | 37.800 | |
16 | 18.700 | 18.950 | 37.650 | |
17 | 18.150 | 18.725 | 36.875 | |
18 | 17.100 | 19.000 | 36.100 | |
19 | 15.500 | 18.475 | 33.975 | |
20 | 14.200 | 15.200 | 29.400 |
Group 5 ribbons
Rank | Nation | T Score | A Score | E Score | Pen. | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8.000 | 8.050 | 7.775 | 0.50 | 23.325 | ||
8.000 | 8.050 | 7.500 | 0.60 | 22.950 | ||
7.700 | 7.850 | 7.600 | 0.50 | 22.650 | ||
4 | 7.300 | 7.800 | 7.600 | 0.50 | 22.200 | |
5 | 7.300 | 7.650 | 7.200 | 0.50 | 21.650 | |
6 | 6.800 | 7.700 | 7.000 | 0.50 | 21.000 | |
7 | 5.700 | 7.400 | 7.100 | 0.50 | 19.700 | |
8 | 6.300 | 6.800 | 6.450 | 0.50 | 19.050 |
Group 3 balls + 2 ropes
Rank | Nation | T Score | A Score | E Score | Pen. | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8.100 | 7.950 | 8.400 | 24.450 | |||
7.900 | 7.900 | 7.800 | 23.600 | |||
7.500 | 8.300 | 8.200 | 0.50 | 23.500 | ||
4 | 8.000 | 7.500 | 7.875 | 23.375 | ||
5 | 7.800 | 7.700 | 7.975 | 0.50 | 22.975 | |
6 | 7.900 | 6.650 | 8.125 | 22.675 | ||
7 | 7.700 | 7.850 | 6.625 | 0.70 | 21.475 | |
8 | 6.800 | 7.150 | 7.725 | 0.50 | 21.175 |
gollark: For just ASCII, `~`.
gollark: M.2 and SATA aren't comparable.
gollark: A 2.5"/SATA one like what you had before is probably fine and would be cheaper.
gollark: You can get faster NVMe ones, but cheaper ones will just be SATA like a 2.5" SSD. I don't think NVMe disks are currently worth it for most people anyway.
gollark: M.2 drives are not actually always faster.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.