2002 Liechtenstein referendums

Three referendums were held in Liechtenstein during 2002.[1] The first two were held on 10 March on amending the constitution on sustainable transport and raising money for the "Little Big One" musical festival, both of which were rejected by voters.[1] The third was held on 29 September on the law on land-use planning and was rejected by 74.3% of voters.[1]

2002 Liechtenstein sustainable transport referendum
Referendum on amending Article 20 of the constitution
LocationLiechtenstein
Date10 March 2002
Results
Votes %
Yes 4,767 45.48%
No 5,714 54.52%
Valid votes 10,481 97.33%
Invalid or blank votes 288 2.67%
Total votes 10,769 100.00%
Registered voters/turnout 16,671 64.6%
Results by municipality
  Yes     No
2002 Liechtenstein Little Big One referendum
Referendum on raising funds for the Little Big One music festival
LocationLiechtenstein
Date10 March 2002
Results
Votes %
Yes 3,621 34.20%
No 6,968 65.80%
Valid votes 10,589 98.34%
Invalid or blank votes 179 1.66%
Total votes 10,768 100.00%
Registered voters/turnout 16,671 64.59%
Results by municipality
  Yes     No
2002 Liechtenstein land use planning referendum
Referendum on the law on land-use planning
LocationLiechtenstein
Date29 September 2002
Results
Votes %
Yes 2,620 25.73%
No 7,561 74.27%
Valid votes 10,181 98.37%
Invalid or blank votes 169 1.63%
Total votes 10,350 100.00%
Registered voters/turnout 16,805 61.59%
Results by municipality
  Yes     No
Principality of Liechtenstein
This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
Liechtenstein

Results

Amendment to the constitution regarding sustainable transport

Choice Votes %
For4,76745.5
Against5,71454.4
Invalid/blank votes286
Total10,769100
Registered voters/turnout16,67164.6
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

Raising funds for the Little Big One music festival

Choice Votes %
For3,62134.2
Against6,96865.8
Invalid/blank votes181
Total10,768100
Registered voters/turnout16,67163.9
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

Land use planning law

Choice Votes %
For2,62025.7
Against7,56174.3
Invalid/blank votes169
Total10,350100
Registered voters/turnout16,80561.6
Source: Nohlen & Stöver
gollark: I kind of want smart home things, but I have no actual usecase and the maintenance burden it would add to my mess of scripts and infrastructure would likely be bad.
gollark: There are the naïve enthusiastic people who go buy consumer IoT devices and them replace then when they inevitably stop being supported, the grizzled sysadmin/developer types who have seen the horrors of modern computing and don't trust it, the mystical few who are competent enough to run their own stuff and have it work, and people who want to be/think they are that but who spend all their time recompiling the kernel on their smart fridge.
gollark: https://pics.me.me/i-work-in-it-which-is-the-reason-our-house-41514357.png
gollark: There are multiple kinds of tech enthusiast.
gollark: A lot of the time you're just doing boring drudgery integrating other already-existing things, which will soon be significantly automated I think. Sometimes you actually need to spend time thinking about clever algorithms to do a thing, or how to make your thing go faster, or why your code mysteriously doesn't work, which is harder.

References

  1. Dieter Nohlen & Philip Stöver (2010) Elections in Europe: A data handbook, p1177 ISBN 978-3-8329-5609-7
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.