1988 Liechtenstein referendums
Three referendums were held in Liechtenstein during 1988.[1] The first two were held on 24 January and concerned increasing the number of members of the Landtag from 15 to 25 and a plan for company pensions. Both were approved by 51.7% of voters.[1] The third was held on 2 October on the construction of the Gnalp-Steg tunnel and was approved by 55.1% of voters.[1]
1988 Liechtenstein Landtag members referendum | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Referendum on increasing the number of Landtag members from 15 to 25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Location | Liechtenstein | |||||||||||||||||||||
Date | 24 January 1988 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
1988 Liechtenstein pensions referendum | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Referendum on a plan for company pensions | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Location | Liechtenstein | |||||||||||||||||||||
Date | 24 January 1988 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
1988 Liechtenstein Gnalp-Steg tunnel referendum | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Referendum on the construction of the Gnalp-Steg tunnel | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Location | Liechtenstein | |||||||||||||||||||||
Date | 2 October 1988 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Principality of Liechtenstein
|
---|
![]() |
This article is part of a series on the politics and government of Liechtenstein |
Results
Increasing the number of Landtag members from 15 to 25
Choice | Votes | % |
---|---|---|
For | 4,537 | 51.7 |
Against | 4,234 | 48.3 |
Invalid/blank votes | 211 | – |
Total | 8,982 | 100 |
Registered voters/turnout | 13,017 | 69.0 |
Source: Nohlen & Stöver |
Company pension plan
Choice | Votes | % |
---|---|---|
For | 4,496 | 51.7 |
Against | 4,196 | 48.3 |
Invalid/blank votes | 290 | – |
Total | 8,982 | 100 |
Registered voters/turnout | 13,017 | 69.0 |
Source: Nohlen & Stöver |
Construction of the Gnalp-Steg tunnel
Choice | Votes | % |
---|---|---|
For | 3,943 | 55.1 |
Against | 3,211 | 44.9 |
Invalid/blank votes | 188 | – |
Total | 7,342 | 100 |
Registered voters/turnout | 13,215 | 55.6 |
Source: Nohlen & Stöver |
gollark: It's also reasonably fast *and* not wildly unsafe!
gollark: Don't activate Windows. Windows bad.
gollark: Yes. I have no idea why you are showing people this.
gollark: > haskell is the only language that enforces separation between computation and effectsReally? Don't PureScript and probably other derivatives/similar languages do that?
gollark: I'm thinking it could include actual formatting, Unicode, headers, that sort of thing. As well as possibly decent autogen scripts allowing each sentence to be given its own header saying "Section 1, Clause 8" or something, and maybe even JS to dynamically edit the text a bit as you scroll.
References
- Dieter Nohlen & Philip Stöver (2010) Elections in Europe: A data handbook, p1175 ISBN 978-3-8329-5609-7
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.