1988 Liechtenstein referendums

Three referendums were held in Liechtenstein during 1988.[1] The first two were held on 24 January and concerned increasing the number of members of the Landtag from 15 to 25 and a plan for company pensions. Both were approved by 51.7% of voters.[1] The third was held on 2 October on the construction of the Gnalp-Steg tunnel and was approved by 55.1% of voters.[1]

1988 Liechtenstein Landtag members referendum
Referendum on increasing the number of Landtag members from 15 to 25
LocationLiechtenstein
Date24 January 1988
Results
Votes %
Yes 4,537 51.73%
No 4,234 48.27%
Valid votes 8,771 97.65%
Invalid or blank votes 211 2.35%
Total votes 8,982 100.00%
Registered voters/turnout 13,017 69%
1988 Liechtenstein pensions referendum
Referendum on a plan for company pensions
LocationLiechtenstein
Date24 January 1988
Results
Votes %
Yes 4,496 51.73%
No 4,196 48.27%
Valid votes 8,692 96.77%
Invalid or blank votes 290 3.23%
Total votes 8,982 100.00%
Registered voters/turnout 13,017 69%
1988 Liechtenstein Gnalp-Steg tunnel referendum
Referendum on the construction of the Gnalp-Steg tunnel
LocationLiechtenstein
Date2 October 1988
Results
Votes %
Yes 3,943 55.12%
No 3,211 44.88%
Valid votes 7,154 97.44%
Invalid or blank votes 188 2.56%
Total votes 7,342 100.00%
Registered voters/turnout 13,215 55.56%
Principality of Liechtenstein
This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
Liechtenstein

Results

Increasing the number of Landtag members from 15 to 25

Choice Votes %
For4,53751.7
Against4,23448.3
Invalid/blank votes211
Total8,982100
Registered voters/turnout13,01769.0
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

Company pension plan

Choice Votes %
For4,49651.7
Against4,19648.3
Invalid/blank votes290
Total8,982100
Registered voters/turnout13,01769.0
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

Construction of the Gnalp-Steg tunnel

Choice Votes %
For3,94355.1
Against3,21144.9
Invalid/blank votes188
Total7,342100
Registered voters/turnout13,21555.6
Source: Nohlen & Stöver
gollark: It's also reasonably fast *and* not wildly unsafe!
gollark: Don't activate Windows. Windows bad.
gollark: Yes. I have no idea why you are showing people this.
gollark: > haskell is the only language that enforces separation between computation and effectsReally? Don't PureScript and probably other derivatives/similar languages do that?
gollark: I'm thinking it could include actual formatting, Unicode, headers, that sort of thing. As well as possibly decent autogen scripts allowing each sentence to be given its own header saying "Section 1, Clause 8" or something, and maybe even JS to dynamically edit the text a bit as you scroll.

References

  1. Dieter Nohlen & Philip Stöver (2010) Elections in Europe: A data handbook, p1175 ISBN 978-3-8329-5609-7
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.