1925 Liechtenstein referendums

Three referendums were held in Liechtenstein during 1925. The first on 13 September was on the subject of the Lawena power plant and was approved by 56.1% of voters.[1] The second and third were held on 13 December and concerned two proposals on civil order, the Gassner Initiative and a counterproposal from the Landtag.[1] The Landtag's proposal was approved by 81.7% of voters, whilst the Gassner Initiative was rejected by 89.1%.[1]

1925 Liechtenstein power plant referendum
Referendum on the Lawena power plant
LocationLiechtenstein
Date13 September 1925
Results
Votes %
Yes 957 56.13%
No 748 43.87%
Valid votes 1,705 92.41%
Invalid or blank votes 140 7.59%
Total votes 1,845 100.00%
Registered voters/turnout 2,167 85.14%
1925 Liechtenstein civil order referendum
LocationLiechtenstein
Date13 December 1925
Gassner Initiative
For
10.9%
Against
89.1%
Gassner Initiative rejected
Landtag counterproposal
For
81.7%
Against
18.3%
Landtag counterproposal approved
Principality of Liechtenstein
This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
Liechtenstein

Results

Lawena power plant

Choice Votes %
For95756.1
Against74843.9
Invalid/blank votes140
Total1,845100
Registered voters/turnout2,16785.1
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

Gassner Initiative

Choice Votes %
For17110.9
Against1,40089.1
Invalid/blank votes155
Total1,869100
Registered voters/turnout2,17985.8
Source: Nohlen & Stöver[a]

Landtag counterproposal on civil order

Choice Votes %
For1,29381.7
Against29018.3
Invalid/blank votes155
Total1,869100
Registered voters/turnout2,17985.8
Source: Nohlen & Stöver[a]

a The official figures for the two referendums in December are inconsistent and do not add up to the totals given.[1]

gollark: I'm libertarian on the Y axis, slightly right on the X axis, and progressiveish on the cultural (Z) axis!
gollark: There's a compass thing which has three axes, which is OBVIOUSLY the right amount.
gollark: BREAK THE SYSTEM! DO RANDOM WHATEVER!
gollark: What if the entire recent history of the server was orchestrated by someone trying to make a political point like "multiculturalism/immigration bad", or "multiculturalism/immigration good" with the new users and non-comprehension of injokes standing for this?!?
gollark: Because people do not want to be [REDACTED]ed.

References

  1. Dieter Nohlen & Philip Stöver (2010) Elections in Europe: A data handbook, p1171 ISBN 978-3-8329-5609-7
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.