1925 Liechtenstein referendums
Three referendums were held in Liechtenstein during 1925. The first on 13 September was on the subject of the Lawena power plant and was approved by 56.1% of voters.[1] The second and third were held on 13 December and concerned two proposals on civil order, the Gassner Initiative and a counterproposal from the Landtag.[1] The Landtag's proposal was approved by 81.7% of voters, whilst the Gassner Initiative was rejected by 89.1%.[1]
1925 Liechtenstein power plant referendum | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Referendum on the Lawena power plant | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Location | Liechtenstein | |||||||||||||||||||||
Date | 13 September 1925 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
1925 Liechtenstein civil order referendum | ||
---|---|---|
Location | Liechtenstein | |
Date | 13 December 1925 | |
Gassner Initiative | ||
Landtag counterproposal | ||
Principality of Liechtenstein
|
---|
This article is part of a series on the politics and government of Liechtenstein |
Results
Lawena power plant
Choice | Votes | % |
---|---|---|
For | 957 | 56.1 |
Against | 748 | 43.9 |
Invalid/blank votes | 140 | – |
Total | 1,845 | 100 |
Registered voters/turnout | 2,167 | 85.1 |
Source: Nohlen & Stöver |
Gassner Initiative
Choice | Votes | % |
---|---|---|
For | 171 | 10.9 |
Against | 1,400 | 89.1 |
Invalid/blank votes | 155 | – |
Total | 1,869 | 100 |
Registered voters/turnout | 2,179 | 85.8 |
Source: Nohlen & Stöver[a] |
Landtag counterproposal on civil order
Choice | Votes | % |
---|---|---|
For | 1,293 | 81.7 |
Against | 290 | 18.3 |
Invalid/blank votes | 155 | – |
Total | 1,869 | 100 |
Registered voters/turnout | 2,179 | 85.8 |
Source: Nohlen & Stöver[a] |
a The official figures for the two referendums in December are inconsistent and do not add up to the totals given.[1]
gollark: I'm libertarian on the Y axis, slightly right on the X axis, and progressiveish on the cultural (Z) axis!
gollark: There's a compass thing which has three axes, which is OBVIOUSLY the right amount.
gollark: BREAK THE SYSTEM! DO RANDOM WHATEVER!
gollark: What if the entire recent history of the server was orchestrated by someone trying to make a political point like "multiculturalism/immigration bad", or "multiculturalism/immigration good" with the new users and non-comprehension of injokes standing for this?!?
gollark: Because people do not want to be [REDACTED]ed.
References
- Dieter Nohlen & Philip Stöver (2010) Elections in Europe: A data handbook, p1171 ISBN 978-3-8329-5609-7
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.