1812 San Juan Capistrano earthquake

The 1812 San Juan Capistrano earthquake, also known as the Wrightwood earthquake, occurred on December 8 at 15:00 UTC in Alta California. At the time, this was a colonial territory of the Spanish Empire. Damage occurred at several of the missions in the region of Pueblo de Los Ángeles, including Mission San Gabriel Arcángel and Mission San Juan Capistrano, where 40 parishioners were killed during the collapse of a church at an early morning service. Tree ring and paleoseismic evidence show that there is a strong likelihood that the earthquake originated along the Mojave segment of the San Andreas Fault near Wrightwood, but other faults have been suggested as the cause.

1812 San Juan Capistrano earthquake
San Buenaventura
San Gabriel
San Juan Capistrano
San Diego
UTC time1812-12-08 15:00:00
USGS-ANSSComCat
Local dateDecember 8, 1812 (1812-12-08)
Local time07:00 [1]
Magnitude6.9 Mla [1]
7.5 Mw [2]
TypeUnknown
Areas affectedAlta California
New Spain
Total damageModerate [3]
Max. intensityVII (Very strong) – IX (Violent) [4][5]
Casualties40 killed [1]

Several studies in the 1980s placed the shock along the southern Newport–Inglewood Fault near the zone of highest reported intensity. This fault is near the coast and the most significant damage at the missions, but later work at trench sites along the San Andreas Fault excluded it for this large to very large shock. Dynamic rupture modelling made possible another proposal in the 2010s involving a dual rupture scenario with both the San Andreas and San Jacinto Fault Zones. Each of these studies worked with limited data, and the effects of the shock and various fault rupture details led to Mercalli intensities of VII (Very strong) to IX (Violent) being proposed. Magnitudes from 6.9 Mla on the low end to 7.5 Mw on the high end were also presented.

Tectonic setting
See also: Strike-slip tectonics and Transverse Ranges

The primary tectonic feature in California is the strike-slip San Andreas (SAF) system of faults that form part of the diffuse Pacific–North American plate boundary. This transform fault trends south-southeast through much of northern and central California, but turns more southeasterly at the southern end of the California Coast Ranges at a prominent restraining bend. Southeast of this bend the SAF borders the Mojave Desert then bisects the San Gabriel and San Bernardino Mountains at Cajon Pass, where the active San Jacinto Fault Zone diverges from the SAF. The San Jacinto Mountains and the Salton Sea lie between the two faults as they continue to the southeast towards the Mexico–United States border. The Newport–Inglewood Fault, a part of the San Andreas system that is positioned near the coast along the western extremity of the Los Angeles Basin, is a discontinuous strike-slip fault similar to the San Jacinto Fault.[6]

Earthquake
The Newport-Inglewood-Rose Canyon Fault Zone
The San Andreas Fault
The San Jacinto Fault Zone

Source fault
See also: Fault (geology)

In the 1980s several seismologists attributed the source of the event to the southern Newport–Inglewood Fault due to its proximity to the zone of greatest damage at Mission San Juan Capistrano. The northern portion of the fault was excluded as a potential source due to a lack of damage at San Buenaventura. Other more distant sources have also been proposed, including the Mojave segment of the SAF to the north of San Juan Capistrano, substantiated by tree distress evidence preserved in tree rings along the fault zone and paleoseismic evidence in an investigative trench at Pallet Creek. Another scenario was proposed after a researcher noted the great distance between the SAF and the zone of damage near the coast. After a paleoseismic investigation and simulations, it was proposed that a joint rupture of both the SAF and the San Jacinto Fault Zone to the southeast more closely matched the damage pattern than a SAF-only rupture.[7][8]

Newport–Inglewood Fault

In support of the southern Newport–Inglewood Fault as the source, Toppozada & Real 1981 presented a simple isoseismal map with one elongated ring oriented northwest–southeast roughly parallel to the coastline and centered on the fault. The single isoseismal (a line depicting an area of equal intensity) shows the intensity VII (Very strong) boundary for the event, which is an ellipse that includes Mission San Juan Capistrano, Mission San Gabriel Arcángel, and Mission San Fernando Rey de España at the extreme northwest end. From a modern-day perspective, this intensity level covers all of Orange County, most of southern Los Angeles County, and insignificant portions of San Bernardino, Riverside, and San Diego Counties. After analyzing the intensity data that were derived from the mission's minimal reports and by modeling ground conditions and known faults, Evernden & Thompson 1985 also singled out the southern Newport–Inglewood Fault as the source.[4][9]

San Andreas Fault

Influenced by the work of several dendrochronologists and a seismologist who examined trauma to trees near Wrightwood, Toppozada et al. 2002 came about in support of the SAF as the source. Jacoby, Sheppard, & Sieh 1988 gained a more thorough understanding of the most recent events and a potential rupture length of the SAF by investigating damage to trees, which been associated with intensity VIII (Severe) shaking within several kilometers of a source fault. Seventy trees were examined and nine of the trees along a 7.5 mi (12 km) section experienced some form of trauma beginning in 1813, including two with crown loss. All were within 66 ft (20 m) of the fault. Other sources for the damage were ruled out, including disease, lightning, wind, and fire. Severe shaking was also excluded because trees outside of this narrow zone would also have similar effects. The researchers' theory was that right-lateral displacement on the SAF had damaged their root systems.[2][10]

San Andreas and San Jacinto Faults

By the 2010s, the shift of attention from the Newport–Inglewood Fault to the SAF was cemented, with numerous other paleoseismic investigations validating that slip along the SAF, possibly as far north as Elizabeth Lake, was responsible for the event.[11]

Damage

Several of the Roman Catholic missions in the area experienced heavy damage. The bell structure at Mission San Gabriel Arcángel collapsed and at Mission San Juan Capistrano the Great Stone Church was destroyed and forty Native Americans were killed as the earthquake happened during the first service. The service was being held on a Tuesday, for the Feast of the Immaculate Conception celebration, which is universally celebrated every December 8.[1][12]

Intensity

Toppozada & Real 1981 shows the most conservative estimates for the intensity of the event, with Mission San Luis Rey and Mission San Diego both indicating that the shock was felt only, and no clarification of whether it was weak, light, or moderate. Well away from the proposed epicenter, the San Bernardino Valley may have experienced intensity VI (Strong) shaking, and a maximum intensity of VII was listed for Mission San Juan Capistrano, Mission San Gabriel Arcángel, and Mission San Fernando Rey de España. Mission San Buenaventura lay outside the ring, but is annotated with possibly also having experienced intensity VII effects. Stover & Coffman 1993 and the National Geophysical Data Center's Significant Earthquake Database both show a maximum intensity of VIII (Severe), but neither correlate intensity to location. The NGDC's Earthquake Intensity Database indicates that a maximum of IX (Violent) was experienced at San Gabriel and San Juan Capistrano.[5][3]

gollark: You should just transfer the server to me, so that I will.
gollark: I don't have mod powers.
gollark: Yes.
gollark: Yes, GTech™ actually uses infinite bases mostly.
gollark: Anyway, we are hoping that there will be no groups using ultraviolet/infrared/71TeV gamma rays in their flags until JPEG-XL comes out.

See also

References
  1. Stover, C. W.; Coffman, J. L. (1993), Seismicity of the United States, 1568–1989 (Revised), U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1527, United States Government Printing Office, pp. 72, 100
  2. Jacoby, Jr., G. C.; Sheppard, P. R.; Sieh, K. E. (1988), "Irregular Recurrence of Large Earthquakes Along the San Andreas Fault: Evidence from Trees" (PDF), Science, 241 (4862): 196–199, Bibcode:1988Sci...241..196J, doi:10.1126/science.241.4862.196, PMID 17841050
  3. National Geophysical Data Center / World Data Service (NGDC/WDS) (1972), Significant Earthquake Database (Data Set), National Geophysical Data Center, NOAA, doi:10.7289/V5TD9V7K
  4. Toppozada, T. R.; Real, C. R. (1981), Preparation of isoseismal maps and summaries of reported effects for pre-1900 California earthquakes (print), Open-File Report 81-262, United States Geological Survey, pp. 16, 33, 134–136
  5. NGDC, Earthquake Intensity Database: 1638–1985, National Geophysical Data Center
  6. Yeats, R. (2012), Active Faults of the World, Cambridge University Press, pp. 19, 80–83, 96–107, ISBN 978-0521190855
  7. Wilcox, K. (April 5, 2016), "Research reveals a dual fault threat", Civil Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, archived from the original on July 2, 2017
  8. Ellsworth, W. L. (1990). "Earthquake history, 1769–1989". The San Andreas Fault System, California – USGS Professional Paper 1515. United States Geological Survey. p. 157. ISBN 978-0607716269.
  9. Evernden, J. F.; Thompson, J. M. (1985), "Predicting Seismic Intensities" (PDF), Evaluating Earthquake Hazards in the Los Angeles Region—An Earth-Science Perspective, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1360, United States Geological Survey, pp. 178–180
  10. Toppozada, T. R.; Branum, D. M.; Reichle, M. S.; Hallstrom, C. L. (2002), "San Andreas Fault Zone, California: M≥5.5 Earthquake History" (PDF), Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 92 (7): 2574–2578, doi:10.1785/0120000614
  11. Lozos, J. C. (2016), "A case for historic joint rupture of the San Andreas and San Jacinto faults" (PDF), Science Advances, 2 (3): 196–199, Bibcode:2016SciA....2E0621L, doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500621, PMC 4803493, PMID 27034977
  12. Bolt, B. (2005), Earthquakes: 2006 Centennial Update – The 1906 Big One (Fifth ed.), W. H. Freeman and Company, pp. 33, 326, ISBN 978-0716775485
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.