Tribalism

Tribalism is a way of being, or a set of attitudes, associated with living in a small group of closely related people, with an implied cultural and ethnic uniformity. Many traditional tribes have referred to themselves using an ethnonymFile:Wikipedia's W.svg meaning "people" or "human beings." Quite often they use less flattering language to describe groups of people outside the tribe.

How the sausage is made
Politics
Theory
Practice
Philosophies
Terms
As usual
Country sections
File:Flag of France.svg File:Flag of India.svg File:Flag of Israel.svg File:Flag of Japan.svg File:Flag of South Korea.svg
v - t - e
When people have tried everything and have discovered that nothing works, they will tend to revert to what they know best—which will often be the tribe, the totem, or the taboo.
Christopher Hitchens

In popular culture, tribalism connotes chauvinistic othering: the belief, or tendency to accept, that a group that includes you is superior or should be favored over other groups. Often this includes demonization of groups that are seen as opposed in some way, and a tendency to sympathize with people who share certain traits with you over those who do not.

While many in the Western world think tribalism is archaic, it remains a vital force in people's lives throughout the world, governing social conduct, political and militia alliances, and women's rights.

Islamic culture

Tribalism through arranged marriages to hold land became accepted practice in many Islamic societies. Islamic law intensely governs personal relationships, and the concept of corporations never developed. In the Western world, the concept of MortmainFile:Wikipedia's W.svg developed to hold title for land held by churches whose stewardship passed to successive generations while ownership remained with the church. From this came the idea of a corporation,[citation needed] a collective perpetual entity with the legal rights of a person whose overseers hold fiduciaryFile:Wikipedia's W.svg responsibilites and not necessarily exclusive ownership rights. Under shariah no such corporate law exists other than rights to the holdings of mosques and religious property.[1]

State formation

One theory of socio-political evolution suggests that tribalism comprised an intermediate step on the road of state formation - starting with family groups and moving through forming clans and tribes and chiefdoms and ending up with empires, nation-states and federal conglomerates like Canada or Mexico. Take the idea with a grain of salt.

"Our" achievements

One aspect of tribalism that pops up in a variety of contexts is a tendency to try to share in the credit for the achievements of other members of a group with which one identifies, without having put in any of the work - most often by misusing the pronoun "we". This is a common occurrence in sports fans who say "We won" instead of "My preferred team won while I stared at the screen from my recliner".[2] Interestingly, one doesn't hear "we lost" nearly as often.

Less innocuously, this "self-conflation with high achievers" phenomenon can also manifest in nationalism and national and cultural pride, when one gleans a feeling of personal superiority on account of others of the same nationality who have done a service to the country,[3] or when one states that "we invented" something without actually having done so, on the basis that the inventor was of the same culture. A blatant example of this variant was provided by Donald Trump who boasted "We write symphonies";[4] we have yet to hear of his symphonic output. A quote by Arthur Schopenhauer, equally applicable to both cultural and racial pride, comes to mind: "The cheapest sort of pride is national pride; for if a man is proud of his own nation, it argues that he has no qualities of his own of which he can be proud; otherwise he would not have recourse to those which he shares with so many millions of his fellowmen."

gollark: "Common sense is that which is obvious to us and not others."
gollark: Well, as I said earlier, ubq did choose to leave and could also have not left.
gollark: Oh look, palaiologos decided to just post in the place where they cannot be responded to after saying they would leave.
gollark: See, you should have elected me, I would never do this.
gollark: I guess palaiologos was blatantly lying about the community involvement in major decisions thing?

See also

References

This article is a stub.
You can help RationalWiki by expanding it.
This article is issued from Rationalwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.