Bestiary (Redgate Supplement)
 |
One or more images on this page are unattributed. Please include on this page the name of the artist or copyright holder, in addition to a link to the artist's website if available and appropriate. If you own this image, or it is covered by public domain, consider uploading the image to D&D Wiki. If the source of the image cannot be located or the copyright holder wishes for the image to not be on this page, then remove the image. For more information on copyright law, see D&D Wiki:Copyrights. |
| Redgate |
|---|
| Articles |
Add New Page |
Bestiary of Redgate
All of the following creatures can by found in the lands of Redgate with a Challenge Rating of 1/4th to 22.
There are many strange and magical creatures in Redgate.
Types of Creatures:
- Animal
- Subtype: Dire
- Elemental
- Fey
- Subtype: Aquatic Fey
- Giant
- Humanoid
- Magical Beast
- Plant
- Undead
- Vermin
Absent Creatures
Creatures you will not find in Redgate. However, these creatures can be used in very small numbers. And by small numbers I mean one at a time. They also should have very little impact on the world or its culture during your campaign as they never exceed a Challenge Rating of 20.
Types of Creatures:
Back to Main Page → 3.5e Homebrew → Campaign Settings → Redgate
gollark: YES!
gollark: ~ping
gollark: <@509849474647064576>
gollark: ```Y'allEver hear of a cool language?It goes a little likefibs = 0 : 1 : zipWith (+) fibs (tail fibs)Oh, you didn't understand that?ExactlyHaskell is the worstWorse than this verseIf you use Haskell, reverseI just rhymed reverse with verseHaskell is still worse than this verseThose who use Haskell, let me enlighten youHaskell is the only language that can't shine a light on youWhy? Because that's IO (oh)Haskell has a successor functionWhat a coincidence, because it sucksLet me introduce you to my friend FoopyFoopy's my own language, it's everything Haskell couldn't doHey, Foopy, my main man?Foopy: Yeah, dude?You suck too!Foopy is impossible to useFunctional programming's like boozeWith objects you can't loseHaskell's the worst, Foopy's the worst, OOP is the wayFP's the worstWorse than this verseIf you use FP, reverseI just rhymed reverse with verseFP is still worse than this verseLemme introduce some morePython, Rust, Ruby, these aren't choresRust's the ultimate high-level languageIt's taking the world by stormPython and Ruby are your Swiss army knivesAlways there when you need them mostThese languages are beautiful in their simplicityBeautiful in their complexityHaskell only has complexityUgly complexityHard to use, hard to learnHaskell is the worstWorse than this verseIf you use Haskell, reverseI just rhymed reverse with verseHaskell is still worse than this verse```From the Esolangs server.
gollark: I mean, it's probably right, but not much use.
This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.