Yorktown Formation
The Yorktown Formation is a mapped bedrock unit in the Coastal Plain of Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina. It is overconsolidated and highly fossiliferous.
| Yorktown Formation Stratigraphic range: Late Miocene to Middle Pliocene | |
|---|---|
 Outcrop of the Yorktown Formation at Carters Grove Bluffs along the James River | |
| Type | sedimentary |
| Unit of | Chesapeake Group |
| Sub-units | Sunken Meadow Member, Rushmere Member, Morgarts Beach Member, Moore House Member, Tunnels Mill Member |
| Underlies | Croatan Formation |
| Overlies | Eastover Formation |
| Lithology | |
| Primary | sand, clay |
| Other | shells |
| Location | |
| Region | Atlantic Coastal Plain of North America |
| Extent | Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina |
| Type section | |
| Named for | Yorktown, Virginia |
| Named by | Clark and Miller, 1906[1] |
Description
The Yorktown is composed largely of overconsolidated sand and clay with abundant calcareous shells, primarily bivalves.
Stratigraphy
The Yorktown unconformably overlies the Miocene Eastover Formation, and conformably underlies the Pliocene Croatan Formation.[2]
The Yorktown was divided into members by Ward and Blackwelder (1980). These are in ascending order: Sunken Meadow Member, Rushmere Member, Morgarts Beach Member, and Moore House Member.[3] The uppermost Tunnels Mill Member is recognized in Maryland only.
Notable Exposures
- Type Section: Yorktown, Virginia on southwest side of York River, York County
- Carters Grove Bluffs, north side of James River[4] 37°12′33″N 76°38′00″W
- Moore House Bluff, southwest side of York River, York County 37°13′25″N 76°29′14″W (very close to type section)
Age
Hazel (1971) revised the age of the Yorktown from Miocene to Late Miocene to Early Pliocene using ostracod biostratigraphy.[5] The age was revised by Gibson (1983) to extend into the Middle Pliocene based on foraminifera.[6] Further biostratigraphic work with ostracods and foraminifera was completed by Cronin (1991), which also summarized previous investigations.[7]
Fossils
- Bivalves, including Glycymeris subovata (see Glycymerididae), Chesapecten jeffersonius, Chesapecten madisonius, Mercenaria tridacnoides, Panopera reflexa,[8] Chama, Ensis, Striarca and Noetia (see Noetiidae), Cerastoderma, Dosinia, Mulinia, Kuphus (Shipworm), Panope (Geoduck), and the oyster Ostrea
- Gastropods, including Crucibulum, Calliostoma, Busycon, Turritella, and Crepidula
- Foraminifera, including the biostratigraphic marker species Dentoglobigerina altispira (see Globigerinida), Sphaeroidinellopsis, and Globorotalia puncticulata[9]
- Scleractinian corals, including Septastrea marylandica, Paracyathus vaughani (see Caryophylliidae), and Astrangia lineata
- Ostracods
- Bryozoans
- Barnacles, including Balanus
- Worms
- Sponges
- Birds, including the large pelican Pelecanus schreiberi.
- Whales, including the prehistoric sperm whale Scaldicetus.
Gallery
Coral growing on a Crepidula sp. (slipper snail) from the Yorktown Formation
Rushmere Member of the Yorktown Formation, with abundant Chama bivalves
Sunken Meadow Member of the Yorktown Formation
Balanus sp. (barnacles) from Carters Grove Bluffs outcrop, growing on a bivalve
gollark: Well, if they *ask* you to look up data on them.
gollark: > although I secretly prefer highly unethical bothI think this is in favour of my point.
gollark: You seem to also just advocate doxxing random people without telling them?
gollark: This is of course stupid because they're just presupposing that egoism/hedonism is "correct".
gollark: Nobody and Palaiologos or whatever also tried to justify the doxxing thing by saying that they're evil and morality is wrong or something.
References
- Clark, W.B., and Miller, B.L., 1906, Clay deposits of the Virginia coastal plain: Virginia Geological Survey Bulletin, no. 2, pt. 1.
- Pineda-Salgado, G., Schaaf, P., Aguilar-Piña, M., Solís-Pichardo, G., Vega, F.J. (2016). "Contribución al alcance estratigráfico de la Formación Agueguexquite (Mioceno), Veracruz, México". Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana. 68 (2): 187–197. doi:10.18268/BSGM2016v68n2a2.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
- Ward, L.W., and Blackwelder, B.W., 1980, Stratigraphic revision of upper Miocene and lower Pliocene beds of the Chesapeake Group, middle Atlantic Coastal Plain, IN Contributions to stratigraphy: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 1482-D, 61 p.
- Post-impact Effects of the Eocene Chesapeake Bay Impact, Lower York-James Peninsula, Virginia, 31st Annual Meeting, Virginia Geological Field Conference Archived June 10, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, Williamsburg, Virginia, Oct. 19 and 20, 2001, G.H. Johnson et al. (fieldtrip guidebook)
- Hazel, J.E., 1971, Ostracode biostratigraphy of the Yorktown Formation (upper Miocene and lower Pliocene) of Virginia and North Carolina: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 704, 13 p. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/pubs/pp/pp704
- Gibson, T.G., 1983, Key Foraminifera from upper Oligocene to lower Pleistocene strata of the U.S. central Atlantic Coastal Plain, IN Ray, C.E., ed., Geology and paleontology of the Lee Creek Mine, North Carolina, I: Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, no. 53, p. 355-454.
- Cronin, T.M., 1991, Pliocene shallow water paleoceanography of the North Atlantic Ocean based on marine ostracodes: Quaternary Science Reviews, v. 10, p. 175-188.
- Rader, E.K., and Evans, N.H., 1993, Geologic map of Virginia; expanded explanation: Virginia Division of Mineral Resources, 80 p.
- Dowsett, H.J., and Wiggs, L.B., 1992, Planktonic foraminiferal assemblage of the Yorktown Formation, Virginia, USA: Micropaleontology, v. 38, no. 1, p. 75-86.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.