Wong Tung & Partners

Wong Tung & Partners is an international architecture, planning and design firm established in Hong Kong in 1963. It has offices in Hong Kong, Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and Chongqing.

Wong Tung & Partners
IndustryArchitecture
Founded1963
Headquarters,
China
Additional offices in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and Chongqing
ServicesArchitecture, Interior Design, Urban Design and Planning
Number of employees
400+
Websitewww.wongtung.com
Tencent Headquarters

Wong Tung & Partners provides multi-disciplinary services in architecture, interiors, planning and urban design. The firm has over 250 architectural professionals and personnel in Hong Kong and more than 150 staff in Mainland China. Their projects include Urban Design and Planning, Large Scale Mixed Use Developments, Super Highrises, Large Scale Residential Developments, Hotels, Healthcare, Retail Centres, Hi-Tech Headquarter, throughout Southeast Asia, Middle East, North America and the People's Republic of China.[1]

The Firm also founded Zhong Tian Wong Tung International Engineering Design Consultants Co., Ltd., a joint-venture Grade A Design Institute in China.

In 2013, the firm ranked 54 on the WA100 (World Architecture 100) list of largest architectural practices in the world.[2]

Recent Projects

  • Kai Tak Cruise Terminal, Hong Kong, 2013 (in association with Foster + Partners)[3]
  • Tencent Headquarters, Shenzhen, China, 2011 (Competition entry)[4][5][6]
  • Sino Portuguese Trade Center, Macau SAR, China, 2017 (Competition Entry)[7]
  • Changsha IFS Tower T1, Changsha, China
  • Chongqing IFS, Chongqing, China
  • Trade & Industry Tower, Kai Tak, Hong Kong
  • Victoria Skye, Kai Tak, Hong Kong

Major Projects

gollark: Basically everyone would be wiped out in a few... months?
gollark: I don't think you've understood quite how extremely terrible it would be if that was the case.
gollark: You probably should, as bad viruses are in fact bad.
gollark: Markets seem to be the best way around to allocate most resources right now, as long as they're managed reasonably. The alternatives people have seem to generally involve either centrally planning stuff, which is maybe computationally hard and has bad incentives, having some communal system and hoping people get along, which doesn't scale, or voting on things, which has the central planning issues plus exciting new ones.
gollark: I see.

References


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.