WSEV-FM

WSEV-FM (105.5 FM, "Mix 105.5") operates as Sevier County's only local FM radio station. While other stations are licensed to Sevierville, their studios are based in Knoxville, Tennessee.

WSEV-FM
CityGatlinburg, Tennessee
Frequency105.5 MHz
BrandingMix 105.5
SloganTennessee's New Mix
Programming
FormatHot AC
Ownership
OwnerEast Tennessee Radio Group, LP
Sister stationsWPFT
History
First air date1983
Former call signsWNKX (April–December 1987)
WSEV-FM (1987-1990)
WDLY (1990-2000)
Call sign meaningWe're SEVier County
Technical information
Facility ID17059
ClassA
ERP530 watts
HAAT322 meters
Transmitter coordinates35°42′13″N 83°33′57″W
Links
Websitemixx1055.com

History

WSEV-FM was originally licensed to Gatlinburg, Tennessee, as a sister to WSEV, although the studios for both stations were located in Sevierville, Tennessee. In 1990 the station was purchased, along with its AM sister station WSEV/930, by the Dollywood Broadcasting Company, a privately owned corporation whose owners included Dolly Parton; Orr & Earls Broadcasting, Inc., of Branson, Missouri; and other investors. Orr & Earls Broadcasting, Inc. was selected as the managing partner due to their success in managing Branson-area radio stations KRZK and KOMC. WSEV-FM's call letters were changed to WDLY to reflect the connection with Parton, and the design of the call letters incorporated the Dollywood theme park's butterfly logo. Its format was changed to country music. The station's slogans was "This Is Dolly's Station! 105.5 WDLY", "The Best Music! Dolly's Station! WDLY", and "Dolly's 105.5 WDLY". However, WDLY had a tough time competing against Knoxville's WIVK-FM and WOKI during the years they had a country format. After ten years as WDLY, the station was sold to East Tennessee Radio Group and the call sign reverted to WSEV-FM in May 2000. Its studios were moved from Middle Creek Road in Sevierville to Dumplin Valley Road in Kodak, Tennessee.

gollark: I think it's 10 times per challenge?
gollark: I have resigned myself to not having a T-shirt.
gollark: It seems to be working okay for me, although submission is a bit slow.
gollark: For #2 I just copied the problem description for Codex, and it produced a plausible looking but wrong solution, how useful.
gollark: It assumed `datetime` was in scope even though it wasn't, and outputted a wrong function signature too.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.