Old Book of Tang

The Old Book of Tang, or simply the Book of Tang, is the first classic historical work about the Tang dynasty, comprising 200 chapters, and is one of the Twenty-Four Histories. Originally compiled during the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period, it was superseded by the New Book of Tang which was compiled in the Song dynasty, but later regained acceptance.

Old Book of Tang
Traditional Chinese舊唐書
Simplified Chinese旧唐书
Alternative Chinese name
Traditional Chinese唐書
Simplified Chinese唐书

The credited editor is chief minister Liu Xu, but the bulk (if not all) of the editing work was actually completed by his predecessor Zhao Ying. The authors include Zhang Zhao, Jia Wei (賈緯), and Zhao Xi (趙熙).[1]

Structure

The Old Book of Tang comprises 200 volumes.[2] Volumes 1-20 contain the annals of the Tang emperors. Twitchett notes that coverage over time in the annals is most dense during the early and middle Tang, including only very sparse information in the late Tang after 847.[3]

Volumes 21-50 contain treatises, including rites, music, calendar, astronomy, five elements, geography, officials, carriages and clothes, literature, food and commodities, and law. The section on rites (volumes 21-27) is the longest and most detailed, showing the relative importance placed on ceremonial matters. [4] This section includes descriptions of temple design, sacrifices, and festivals. The section on geography (volumes 38-41) contains a description of the regional administration of the Tang empire around the year 752. [5] The section on officials (volumes 42-44) contains a description of the Tang administrative system. [6] The section on the five elements (五行) contains a description of earthquakes, floods, and other natural events.

Volumes 51-200 contain biographical related content, including empresses and consorts (51-52), imperial families, and the peoples populating the areas bordering the Tang empire (194-200).

History

The book began when Later Jin's founding emperor Shi Jingtang ordered its compilation in 941. The original chief editor was Zhao Ying, who was also the chancellor then. However, by the time of its completion, Liu Xu had become chancellor and taken over the work of organisation; as a result he was credited as chief editor when the work was presented in 945 to Emperor Chu of Jin.

Being a relatively quickly compiled work of official history, the Old Book of Tang was a compilation of earlier annals, now lost; it further incorporates other monographs and biographies, using as sources (for instance) the Tongdian of Du You.[7] These sources were often directly copied from records and earlier histories, and the result would be severely criticised during the Northern Song; Emperor Renzong of Song, for example, called the book "poorly organised, burdened with unimportant details, wanting in style and poorly researched". These errors even included duplicated biographies of characters.

Because of these criticisms, in 1044 a new history of the Tang dynasty was commissioned; with Ouyang Xiu and Song Qi as editors, the New Book of Tang was then produced. After the New Book was presented, the original Old Book of Tang went out of print, and over centuries it became very rare. It was during the Ming dynasty when the remaining copies were gathered and the book was once again published, eventually becoming canonised as one of the Twenty-Four Histories.

gollark: If you're going to say something along the lines of "see how it deals with [SCENARIO] and rate that by [OTHER STANDARD]", this doesn't work because it sneaks in [OTHER STANDARD] as a more fundamental underlying ethical system.
gollark: I don't see how you can empirically test your ethics like you can a scientific theory.
gollark: I'm not sure exactly how you define "moral relativists", but personally I've never seen a convincing/working argument for some particular ethical system being *objectively true*, and don't think it's even possible.
gollark: I don't think that works for the AI unless this situation is repeated somehow. It may not work at all, since you can't actually tell if it is torturing you or not, from outside it.
gollark: Oh, oops, I got the lever direction mixed up, sorry. I meant that if you left it trapped then it wouldn't have reason to torture you.

References

Citations
  1. (in Chinese) Zhao Yi, Ch. 16 "Old and New Books of Tang" (新舊唐書), Notes on Twenty-two Histories (廿二史劄記).
  2. Kaneko 1994.
  3. Twitchett (2009), pp. 202-203.
  4. Twitchett (2009), pp. 207-208.
  5. Twitchett (2009), pp. 224-229.
  6. Twitchett (2009), pp. 229-231.
  7. Twitchett 2002.

Sources
Works cited
  • Twitchett, Denis (2002). The Writing of Official History Under the T'ang. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-52293-9.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Kaneko, Shūichi (1994). 唐書 (とうじょ). Encyclopedia Nipponica (in Japanese). Shogakukan. Retrieved 2017-01-31.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.