Stefan–Boltzmann law

The Stefan–Boltzmann law describes the power radiated from a black body in terms of its temperature. Specifically, the Stefan–Boltzmann law states that the total energy radiated per unit surface area of a black body across all wavelengths per unit time ${\displaystyle j^{\star }}$ (also known as the black-body radiant emittance) is directly proportional to the fourth power of the black body's thermodynamic temperature T:

${\displaystyle j^{\star }=\sigma T^{4}.}$

See also: Black body, Black-body radiation, Planck's law, and Thermal radiation

Graph of a function of total emitted energy of a black body ${\displaystyle j^{\star }}$ proportional to its thermodynamic temperature ${\displaystyle T\,}$. In blue is a total energy according to the Wien approximation, ${\displaystyle j_{W}^{\star }=j^{\star }/\zeta (4)\approx 0.924\,\sigma T^{4}\!\,}$

The constant of proportionality σ, called the Stefan–Boltzmann constant, is derived from other known physical constants. The value of the constant is

${\displaystyle \sigma ={\frac {2\pi ^{5}k^{4}}{15c^{2}h^{3}}}=5.670373\times 10^{-8}\,\mathrm {W\,m^{-2}K^{-4}} ,}$

where k is the Boltzmann constant, h is Planck's constant, and c is the speed of light in a vacuum. The radiance (watts per square metre per steradian) is given by

${\displaystyle L={\frac {j^{\star }}{\pi }}={\frac {\sigma }{\pi }}T^{4}.}$

A body that does not absorb all incident radiation (sometimes known as a grey body) emits less total energy than a black body and is characterized by an emissivity, ${\displaystyle \varepsilon <1}$:

${\displaystyle j^{\star }=\varepsilon \sigma T^{4}.}$

The radiant emittance ${\displaystyle j^{\star }}$ has dimensions of energy flux (energy per unit time per unit area), and the SI units of measure are joules per second per square metre, or equivalently, watts per square metre. The SI unit for absolute temperature T is the kelvin. ${\displaystyle \varepsilon }$ is the emissivity of the grey body; if it is a perfect blackbody, ${\displaystyle \varepsilon =1}$. In the still more general (and realistic) case, the emissivity depends on the wavelength, ${\displaystyle \varepsilon =\varepsilon (\lambda )}$.

To find the total power radiated from an object, multiply by its surface area, ${\displaystyle A}$:

${\displaystyle P=Aj^{\star }=A\varepsilon \sigma T^{4}.}$

Wavelength- and subwavelength-scale particles,[1] metamaterials,[2] and other nanostructures are not subject to ray-optical limits and may be designed to exceed the Stefan–Boltzmann law.

History

In 1864, John Tyndall presented measurements of the infrared emission by a platinum filament and the corresponding color of the filament.[3] The proportionality to the fourth power of the absolute temperature was deduced by Josef Stefan (1835–1893) in 1879 on the basis of Tyndall's experimental measurements, in the article Über die Beziehung zwischen der Wärmestrahlung und der Temperatur (On the relationship between thermal radiation and temperature) in the Bulletins from the sessions of the Vienna Academy of Sciences.[4][5] A derivation of the law from theoretical considerations was presented by Ludwig Boltzmann (1844–1906) in 1884, drawing upon the work of Adolfo Bartoli.[6] Bartoli in 1876 had derived the existence of radiation pressure from the principles of thermodynamics. Following Bartoli, Boltzmann considered an ideal heat engine using electromagnetic radiation instead of an ideal gas as working matter.

The law was almost immediately experimentally verified. Heinrich Weber in 1888 pointed out deviations at higher temperatures, but perfect accuracy within measurement uncertainties was confirmed up to temperatures of 1535 K by 1897.[7] The law, including the theoretical prediction of the Stefan–Boltzmann constant as a function of the speed of light, the Boltzmann constant and Planck's constant, is a direct consequence of Planck's law as formulated in 1900.

Examples

Temperature of the Sun

With his law Stefan also determined the temperature of the Sun's surface.[8] He inferred from the data of Jacques-Louis Soret (1827–1890)[9] that the energy flux density from the Sun is 29 times greater than the energy flux density of a certain warmed metal lamella (a thin plate). A round lamella was placed at such a distance from the measuring device that it would be seen at the same angle as the Sun. Soret estimated the temperature of the lamella to be approximately 1900 °C to 2000 °C. Stefan surmised that ⅓ of the energy flux from the Sun is absorbed by the Earth's atmosphere, so he took for the correct Sun's energy flux a value 3/2 times greater than Soret's value, namely 29 × 3/2 = 43.5.

Precise measurements of atmospheric absorption were not made until 1888 and 1904. The temperature Stefan obtained was a median value of previous ones, 1950 °C and the absolute thermodynamic one 2200 K. As 2.57⁴ = 43.5, it follows from the law that the temperature of the Sun is 2.57 times greater than the temperature of the lamella, so Stefan got a value of 5430 °C or 5700 K (the modern value is 5778 K[10]). This was the first sensible value for the temperature of the Sun. Before this, values ranging from as low as 1800 °C to as high as 13,000,000 °C[11] were claimed. The lower value of 1800 °C was determined by Claude Pouillet (1790–1868) in 1838 using the Dulong–Petit law.[12] Pouillet also took just half the value of the Sun's correct energy flux.

Temperature of stars

The temperature of stars other than the Sun can be approximated using a similar means by treating the emitted energy as a black body radiation.[13] So:

${\displaystyle L=4\pi R^{2}\sigma {T_{e}}^{4}}$

where L is the luminosity, σ is the Stefan–Boltzmann constant, R is the stellar radius and T is the effective temperature. This same formula can be used to compute the approximate radius of a main sequence star relative to the sun:

${\displaystyle {\frac {R}{R_{\odot }}}\approx \left({\frac {T_{\odot }}{T}}\right)^{-2}\cdot {\sqrt {\frac {L}{L_{\odot }}}}}$

where ${\displaystyle R_{\odot }}$ is the solar radius, ${\displaystyle L_{\odot }}$ is the solar luminosity, and so forth.

With the Stefan–Boltzmann law, astronomers can easily infer the radii of stars. The law is also met in the thermodynamics of black holes in so-called Hawking radiation.

Effective temperature of the Earth

Similarly we can calculate the effective temperature of the Earth T_⊕ by equating the energy received from the Sun and the energy radiated by the Earth, under the black-body approximation (Earth's own production of energy being small enough to be negligible). The luminosity of the Sun, L_⊙, is given by:

${\displaystyle L_{\odot }=4\pi R_{\odot }^{2}\sigma T_{\odot }^{4}}$

At Earth, this energy is passing through a sphere with a radius of a₀, the distance between the Earth and the Sun, and the irradiance (received power per unit area) is given by

${\displaystyle E_{\oplus }={\frac {L_{\odot }}{4\pi a_{0}^{2}}}}$

The Earth has a radius of R_⊕, and therefore has a cross-section of ${\displaystyle \pi R_{\oplus }^{2}}$. The radiant flux (i.e. solar power) absorbed by the Earth is thus given by:

${\displaystyle \Phi _{\text{abs}}=\pi R_{\oplus }^{2}\times E_{\oplus }:}$

Because the Stefan–Boltzmann law uses a fourth power, it has a stabilizing effect on the exchange and the flux emitted by Earth tends to be equal to the flux absorbed, close to the steady state where:

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}4\pi R_{\oplus }^{2}\sigma T_{\oplus }^{4}&=\pi R_{\oplus }^{2}\times E_{\oplus }\\&=\pi R_{\oplus }^{2}\times {\frac {4\pi R_{\odot }^{2}\sigma T_{\odot }^{4}}{4\pi a_{0}^{2}}}\\\end{aligned}}}$

T_⊕ can then be found:

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}T_{\oplus }^{4}&={\frac {R_{\odot }^{2}T_{\odot }^{4}}{4a_{0}^{2}}}\\T_{\oplus }&=T_{\odot }\times {\sqrt {\frac {R_{\odot }}{2a_{0}}}}\\&=5780\;{\rm {K}}\times {\sqrt {696\times 10^{6}\;{\rm {m}} \over 2\times 149.598\times 10^{9}\;{\rm {m}}}}\\&\approx 279\;{\rm {K}}\end{aligned}}}$

where T_⊙ is the temperature of the Sun, R_⊙ the radius of the Sun, and a₀ is the distance between the Earth and the Sun. This gives an effective temperature of 6 °C on the surface of the Earth, assuming that it perfectly absorbs all emission falling on it and has no atmosphere.

The Earth has an albedo of 0.3, meaning that 30% of the solar radiation that hits the planet gets scattered back into space without absorption. The effect of albedo on temperature can be approximated by assuming that the energy absorbed is multiplied by 0.7, but that the planet still radiates as a black body (the latter by definition of effective temperature, which is what we are calculating). This approximation reduces the temperature by a factor of 0.7^1/4, giving 255 K (−18 °C).[14][15]

The above temperature is Earth's as seen from space, not ground temperature but an average over all emitting bodies of Earth from surface to high altitude. Because of the greenhouse effect, the Earth's actual average surface temperature is about 288 K (15 °C), which is higher than the 255 K effective temperature, and even higher than the 279 K temperature that a black body would have.

In the above discussion, we have assumed that the whole surface of the earth is at one temperature. Another interesting question is to ask what the temperature of a blackbody surface on the earth would be assuming that it reaches equilibrium with the sunlight falling on it. This of course depends on the angle of the sun on the surface and on how much air the sunlight has gone through. When the sun is at the zenith and the surface is horizontal, the irradiance can be as high as 1120 W/m².[16] The Stefan–Boltzmann law then gives a temperature of

${\displaystyle T=\left({\frac {1120{\text{ W/m}}^{2}}{\sigma }}\right)^{1/4}\approx 375{\text{ K}}}$

or 102 °C. (Above the atmosphere, the result is even higher: 394 K.) We can think of the earth's surface as "trying" to reach equilibrium temperature during the day, but being cooled by the atmosphere, and "trying" to reach equilibrium with starlight and possibly moonlight at night, but being warmed by the atmosphere.

Origination

Thermodynamic derivation of the energy density

The fact that the energy density of the box containing radiation is proportional to ${\displaystyle T^{4}}$ can be derived using thermodynamics.[17][18] This derivation uses the relation between the radiation pressure p and the internal energy density ${\displaystyle u}$, a relation that can be shown using the form of the electromagnetic stress–energy tensor. This relation is:

${\displaystyle p={\frac {u}{3}}.}$

Now, from the fundamental thermodynamic relation

${\displaystyle dU=T\,dS-p\,dV,}$

we obtain the following expression, after dividing by ${\displaystyle dV}$ and fixing ${\displaystyle T}$ :

${\displaystyle \left({\frac {\partial U}{\partial V}}\right)_{T}=T\left({\frac {\partial S}{\partial V}}\right)_{T}-p=T\left({\frac {\partial p}{\partial T}}\right)_{V}-p.}$

The last equality comes from the following Maxwell relation:

${\displaystyle \left({\frac {\partial S}{\partial V}}\right)_{T}=\left({\frac {\partial p}{\partial T}}\right)_{V}.}$

From the definition of energy density it follows that

${\displaystyle U=uV}$

where the energy density of radiation only depends on the temperature, therefore

${\displaystyle \left({\frac {\partial U}{\partial V}}\right)_{T}=u\left({\frac {\partial V}{\partial V}}\right)_{T}=u.}$

Now, the equality

${\displaystyle \left({\frac {\partial U}{\partial V}}\right)_{T}=T\left({\frac {\partial p}{\partial T}}\right)_{V}-p,}$

after substitution of ${\displaystyle \left({\frac {\partial U}{\partial V}}\right)_{T}}$ and ${\displaystyle p}$ for the corresponding expressions, can be written as

${\displaystyle u={\frac {T}{3}}\left({\frac {\partial u}{\partial T}}\right)_{V}-{\frac {u}{3}}.}$

Since the partial derivative ${\displaystyle \left({\frac {\partial u}{\partial T}}\right)_{V}}$ can be expressed as a relationship between only ${\displaystyle u}$ and ${\displaystyle T}$ (if one isolates it on one side of the equality), the partial derivative can be replaced by the ordinary derivative. After separating the differentials the equality becomes

${\displaystyle {\frac {du}{4u}}={\frac {dT}{T}},}$

which leads immediately to ${\displaystyle u=AT^{4}}$, with ${\displaystyle A}$ as some constant of integration.

Derivation from Planck's law

Deriving the Stefan–Boltzmann Law using the Planck's law.

The law can be derived by considering a small flat black body surface radiating out into a half-sphere. This derivation uses spherical coordinates, with θ as the zenith angle and φ as the azimuthal angle; and the small flat blackbody surface lies on the xy-plane, where θ = ^π/₂.

The intensity of the light emitted from the blackbody surface is given by Planck's law :

${\displaystyle I(\nu ,T)={\frac {2h\nu ^{3}}{c^{2}}}{\frac {1}{e^{h\nu /(kT)}-1}}.}$

where

• ${\displaystyle I(\nu ,T)\,}$ is the amount of power per unit surface area per unit solid angle per unit frequency emitted at a frequency ${\displaystyle \nu \,}$ by a black body at temperature T.
• ${\displaystyle h\,}$ is Planck's constant
• ${\displaystyle c\,}$ is the speed of light, and
• ${\displaystyle k\,}$ is Boltzmann's constant.

The quantity ${\displaystyle I(\nu ,T)~A~d\nu ~d\Omega }$ is the power radiated by a surface of area A through a solid angle dΩ in the frequency range between ν and ν + dν.

The Stefan–Boltzmann law gives the power emitted per unit area of the emitting body,

${\displaystyle {\frac {P}{A}}=\int _{0}^{\infty }I(\nu ,T)\,d\nu \int \cos \theta \,d\Omega \,}$

Note that the cosine appears because black bodies are Lambertian (i.e. they obey Lambert's cosine law), meaning that the intensity observed along the sphere will be the actual intensity times the cosine of the zenith angle. To derive the Stefan–Boltzmann law, we must integrate dΩ = sin(θ) dθ dφ over the half-sphere and integrate ν from 0 to ∞.

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {P}{A}}&=\int _{0}^{\infty }I(\nu ,T)\,d\nu \int _{0}^{2\pi }\,d\varphi \int _{0}^{\pi /2}\cos \theta \sin \theta \,d\theta \\&=\pi \int _{0}^{\infty }I(\nu ,T)\,d\nu \end{aligned}}}$

Then we plug in for I:

${\displaystyle {\frac {P}{A}}={\frac {2\pi h}{c^{2}}}\int _{0}^{\infty }{\frac {\nu ^{3}}{e^{\frac {h\nu }{kT}}-1}}\,d\nu }$

To evaluate this integral, do a substitution,

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}u&={\frac {h\nu }{kT}}\\[6pt]du&={\frac {h}{kT}}\,d\nu \end{aligned}}}$

which gives:

${\displaystyle {\frac {P}{A}}={\frac {2\pi h}{c^{2}}}\left({\frac {kT}{h}}\right)^{4}\int _{0}^{\infty }{\frac {u^{3}}{e^{u}-1}}\,du.}$

The integral on the right is standard and goes by many names: it is a particular case of a Bose–Einstein integral, the polylogarithm, or the Riemann zeta function ${\displaystyle \zeta (s)}$. The value of the integral is ${\displaystyle 6\zeta (4)={\frac {\pi ^{4}}{15}}}$, giving the result that, for a perfect blackbody surface:

${\displaystyle j^{\star }=\sigma T^{4}~,~~\sigma ={\frac {2\pi ^{5}k^{4}}{15c^{2}h^{3}}}={\frac {\pi ^{2}k^{4}}{60\hbar ^{3}c^{2}}}.}$

Finally, this proof started out only considering a small flat surface. However, any differentiable surface can be approximated by a collection of small flat surfaces. So long as the geometry of the surface does not cause the blackbody to reabsorb its own radiation, the total energy radiated is just the sum of the energies radiated by each surface; and the total surface area is just the sum of the areas of each surface—so this law holds for all convex blackbodies, too, so long as the surface has the same temperature throughout. The law extends to radiation from non-convex bodies by using the fact that the convex hull of a black body radiates as though it were itself a black body.

Energy density

The total energy density U can be similarly calculated, except the integration is over the whole sphere and there is no cosine, and the energy flux (U c) should be divided by the velocity c to give the energy density U:

${\displaystyle U={\frac {1}{c}}\int _{0}^{\infty }I(\nu ,T)\,d\nu \int \,d\Omega \,}$

Thus ${\displaystyle \int _{0}^{\pi /2}\cos \theta \sin \theta \,d\theta }$ is replaced by ${\displaystyle \int _{0}^{\pi }\sin \theta \,d\theta }$, giving an extra factor of 4.

Thus, in total:

${\displaystyle U={\frac {4}{c}}\,\sigma \,T^{4}}$

See also

• Wien's displacement law
• Rayleigh–Jeans law
• Radiance
• Zero-dimensional models
• Black body
• Sakuma–Hattori equation
• Radó von Kövesligethy

Notes

1. Bohren, Craig F.; Huffman, Donald R. (1998). Absorption and scattering of light by small particles. Wiley. pp. 123–126. ISBN 978-0-471-29340-8.
2. Narimanov, Evgenii E.; Smolyaninov, Igor I. (2012). "Beyond Stefan–Boltzmann Law: Thermal Hyper-Conductivity". Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics 2012. OSA Technical Digest. Optical Society of America. pp. QM2E.1. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.764.846. doi:10.1364/QELS.2012.QM2E.1. ISBN 978-1-55752-943-5.
3. • Tyndall, John (1864). "On luminous [i.e., visible] and obscure [i.e., infrared] radiation". Philosophical Magazine. 4th series. 28: 329–341. ; see p. 333.
   In his physics textbook of 1875, Adolph Wüllner quoted Tyndall's results and then added estimates of the temperature that corresponded to the platinum filament's color:
   • Wüllner, Adolph (1875). Lehrbuch der Experimentalphysik [Textbook of experimental physics] (in German). vol. 3. Leipzig, Germany: B.G. Teubner. p. 215.
   From (Wüllner, 1875), p. 215: "Wie aus gleich zu besprechenden Versuchen von Draper hervorgeht, … also fast um das 12fache zu." (As follows from the experiments of Draper, which will be discussed shortly, a temperature of about 525°[C] corresponds to the weak red glow; a [temperature] of about 1200°[C], to the full white glow. Thus, while the temperature climbed only somewhat more than double, the intensity of the radiation increased from 10.4 to 122 ; thus, almost 12-fold.)
   See also:
   • Wisniak, Jaime (November 2002). "Heat radiation law – from Newton to Stefan". Indian Journal of Chemical Technology. 9: 545–555. ; see pp. 551–552. Available at: National Institute of Science Communication and Information Resources (New Dehli, India)
4. Stefan, J. (1879). "Über die Beziehung zwischen der Wärmestrahlung und der Temperatur" [On the relation between heat radiation and temperature]. Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Classe (Proceedings of the Imperial Philosophical Academy [of Vienna]: Mathematical and Scientific Class) (in German). 79: 391–428.
5. Stefan stated (Stefan, 1879), p. 421: "Zuerst will ich hier die Bemerkung anführen, … die Wärmestrahlung der vierten Potenz der absoluten Temperatur proportional anzunehmen." (First of all, I want to point out here the observation which Wüllner, in his textbook, added to the report of Tyndall's experiments on the radiation of a platinum wire that was brought to glowing by an electric current, because this observation first caused me to suppose that thermal radiation is proportional to the fourth power of the absolute temperature.)
6. Boltzmann, Ludwig (1884). "Ableitung des Stefan'schen Gesetzes, betreffend die Abhängigkeit der Wärmestrahlung von der Temperatur aus der electromagnetischen Lichttheorie" [Derivation of Stefan's law, concerning the dependency of heat radiation on temperature, from the electromagnetic theory of light]. Annalen der Physik und Chemie (in German). 258 (6): 291–294. Bibcode:1884AnP...258..291B. doi:10.1002/andp.18842580616.
7. Massimiliano Badino, The Bumpy Road: Max Planck from Radiation Theory to the Quantum (1896–1906) (2015), p. 31.
8. (Stefan, 1879), pp. 426–427.
9. Soret, J.L. (1872) "Comparaison des intensités calorifiques du rayonnement solaire et du rayonnement d'un corps chauffé à la lampe oxyhydrique" [Comparison of the heat intensities of solar radiation and of radiation from a body heated with an oxy-hydrogen torch], Archives des sciences physiques et naturelles (Geneva, Switzerland), 2nd series, 44: 220–229 ; 45: 252–256.
10. "Sun Fact Sheet".
11. Waterston, John James (1862). "An account of observations on solar radiation". Philosophical Magazine. 4th series. 23 (2): 497–511. Bibcode:1861MNRAS..22...60W. doi:10.1093/mnras/22.2.60. On p. 505, the Scottish physicist John James Waterston estimated that the temperature of the sun's surface could be 12,880,000°.
12. See:
    • Pouillet (1838). "Mémoire sur la chaleur solaire, sur les pouvoirs rayonnants et absorbants de l'air atmosphérique, et sur la température de l'espace" [Memoir on solar heat, on the radiating and absorbing powers of the atmospheric air, and on the temperature of space]. Comptes Rendus (in French). 7 (2): 24–65. On p. 36, Pouillet estimates the sun's temperature: " … cette température pourrait être de 1761° … " ( … this temperature [i.e., of the Sun] could be 1761° … )
    • English translation: Pouillet (1838) "Memoir on the solar heat, on the radiating and absorbing powers of atmospheric air, and on the temperature of space" in: Taylor, Richard, ed. (1846) Scientific Memoirs, Selected from the Transactions of Foreign Academies of Science and Learned Societies, and from Foreign Journals. vol. 4. London, England: Richard and John E. Taylor. pp. 44–90 ; see pp. 55–56.
13. "Luminosity of Stars". Australian Telescope Outreach and Education. Retrieved 2006-08-13.
14. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report. Chapter 1: Historical overview of climate change science page 97
15. Solar Radiation and the Earth's Energy Balance
16. "Introduction to Solar Radiation". Newport Corporation. Archived from the original on October 29, 2013.
17. Knizhnik, Kalman. "Derivation of the Stefan–Boltzmann Law" (PDF). Johns Hopkins University – Department of Physics & Astronomy. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2018-09-03.
18. (Wisniak, 2002), p. 554.

References

• Stefan, J. (1879), "Über die Beziehung zwischen der Wärmestrahlung und der Temperatur" [On the relationship between heat radiation and temperature] (PDF), Sitzungsberichte der Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Classe der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften (in German), 79: 391–428
• Boltzmann, L. (1884), "Ableitung des Stefan'schen Gesetzes, betreffend die Abhängigkeit der Wärmestrahlung von der Temperatur aus der electromagnetischen Lichttheorie" [Derivation of Stefan's little law concerning the dependence of thermal radiation on the temperature of the electro-magnetic theory of light], Annalen der Physik und Chemie (in German), 258 (6): 291–294, Bibcode:1884AnP...258..291B, doi:10.1002/andp.18842580616