Seething
Seething is a small village in Norfolk, England, about 91⁄2 miles south east of Norwich. Known as 'Seechin' in Tudor England, it covers an area of 6.78 km2 (2.62 sq mi) and had a population of 341 in 141 households at the 2001 census,[1] the population increasing to 365 at the 2011 Census.[2]
Seething | |
---|---|
![]() Seething St Margaret | |
![]() ![]() Seething Location within Norfolk | |
Area | 6.78 km2 (2.62 sq mi) |
Population | 365 |
• Density | 54/km2 (140/sq mi) |
OS grid reference | TM318977 |
Civil parish |
|
District | |
Shire county | |
Region | |
Country | England |
Sovereign state | United Kingdom |
Post town | NORWICH |
Postcode district | NR15 |
Police | Norfolk |
Fire | Norfolk |
Ambulance | East of England |
Its church, St Margaret, is one of 124 existing round-tower churches in Norfolk.
Seething Airfield, formerly RAF Seething, is located to the south of the village.
Notes
- "Seething parish information". South Norfolk Council. 4 January 2006. Archived from the original on 7 November 2007. Retrieved 20 June 2009.
- "Parish population 2011". Retrieved 5 September 2015.
gollark: Speaking more generally than the type system, Go is just really... anti-abstraction... with, well, the gimped type system, lack of much metaprogramming support, and weird special cases, and poor error handling.
gollark: - They may be working on them, but they initially claimed that they weren't necessary and they don't exist now. Also, I don't trust them to not do them wrong.- Ooookay then- Well, generics, for one: they *kind of exist* in that you can have generic maps, channels, slices, and arrays, but not anything else. Also this (https://fasterthanli.me/blog/2020/i-want-off-mr-golangs-wild-ride/), which is mostly about the file handling not being good since it tries to map on concepts which don't fit. Also channels having weird special syntax. Also `for` and `range` and `new` and `make` basically just being magic stuff which do whatever the compiler writers wanted with no consistency- see above- Because there's no generic number/comparable thing type. You would need to use `interface{}` or write a new function (with identical code) for every type you wanted to compare- You can change a signature somewhere and won't be alerted, but something else will break because the interface is no longer implemented- They are byte sequences. https://blog.golang.org/strings.- It's not. You need to put `if err != nil { return err }` everywhere.
gollark: Oh, and the error handling is terrible and it's kind of the type system's fault.
gollark: If I remember right Go strings are just byte sequences with no guarantee of being valid UTF-8, but all the functions working on them just assume they are.
gollark: Oh, and the strings are terrible.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.