Scream for Me Brazil

Scream for Me Brazil is a live album by Bruce Dickinson, recorded in São Paulo, Brazil and released in 1999. The actual concert set list consisted of eighteen songs, but six of them were cut out from this release. The songs in question were three Iron Maiden songs; "Powerslave", "2 Minutes to Midnight" and "Flight of Icarus" as well as three of Dickinson's own songs; "Jerusalem", "Taking the Queen" and "Tattooed Millionaire". "Jerusalem" from this concert was later released on The Best of Bruce Dickinson compilation album in 2001.

Scream for Me Brazil
Live album by
Released2 November 1999
Recorded25 April 1999
GenreHeavy metal, hard rock
Length69:27
LabelAir Raid
ProducerRoy Z
Bruce Dickinson chronology
The Chemical Wedding
(1998)
Scream for Me Brazil
(1999)
The Best of Bruce Dickinson
(2001)
Professional ratings
Review scores
SourceRating
AllMusic[1]

Track listing

All songs written by Bruce Dickinson and Roy Z, except where noted.

No.TitleWriter(s)Original AlbumLength
1."Trumpets of Jericho" The Chemical Wedding, 19986:25
2."King in Crimson" The Chemical Wedding4:56
3."Chemical Wedding" The Chemical Wedding4:33
4."Gates of Urizen" The Chemical Wedding4:20
5."Killing Floor"Dickinson, Adrian SmithThe Chemical Wedding4:11
6."Book of Thel"Dickinson, Z, Eddie CasillasThe Chemical Wedding8:26
7."Tears of the Dragon"DickinsonBalls to Picasso, 19948:06
8."Laughing in the Hiding Bush"Dickinson, Z, Austin DickinsonBalls to Picasso4:01
9."Accident of Birth" Accident of Birth, 19974:18
10."The Tower" The Chemical Wedding7:41
11."Darkside of Aquarius" Accident of Birth7:32
12."Road to Hell"Dickinson, SmithAccident of Birth4:58

Personnel

gollark: Fearsome.
gollark: I might have to release apioforms from the beecloud.
gollark: It must comfort you to think so.
gollark: > There is burgeoning interest in designing AI-basedsystems to assist humans in designing computing systems,including tools that automatically generate computer code.The most notable of these comes in the form of the first self-described ‘AI pair programmer’, GitHub Copilot, a languagemodel trained over open-source GitHub code. However, codeoften contains bugs—and so, given the vast quantity of unvettedcode that Copilot has processed, it is certain that the languagemodel will have learned from exploitable, buggy code. Thisraises concerns on the security of Copilot’s code contributions.In this work, we systematically investigate the prevalence andconditions that can cause GitHub Copilot to recommend insecurecode. To perform this analysis we prompt Copilot to generatecode in scenarios relevant to high-risk CWEs (e.g. those fromMITRE’s “Top 25” list). We explore Copilot’s performance onthree distinct code generation axes—examining how it performsgiven diversity of weaknesses, diversity of prompts, and diversityof domains. In total, we produce 89 different scenarios forCopilot to complete, producing 1,692 programs. Of these, wefound approximately 40 % to be vulnerable.Index Terms—Cybersecurity, AI, code generation, CWE
gollark: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.09293.pdf

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.