Rubidium-82

Rubidium-82, ⁸²Rb
General
Symbol	82Rb
Names	rubidium-82, Rb-82
Protons	37
Neutrons	45
Nuclide data
Half-life	1.273 min
Parent isotopes	82Sr
Decay products	82Kr
Isotope mass	81.9182098 u
Spin	+1
Decay modes
Decay mode	Decay energy (MeV)
	Isotopes of rubidium ; Complete table of nuclides

Rubidium-82 (⁸²Rb) is a radioactive isotope of rubidium. ⁸²Rb is widely used in myocardial perfusion imaging. This isotope undergoes rapid uptake by myocardiocytes, which makes it a valuable tool for identifying myocardial ischemia in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging. ⁸²Rb is used in the pharmaceutical industry and is marketed as Rubidium-82 chloride under the trade names RUBY-FILL and CardioGen-82.

History

In 1953, it was discovered that rubidium carried a biological activity that was comparable to potassium.[1] In 1959, preclinical trials showed in dogs that myocardial uptake of this radionuclide was directly proportional to myocardial blood flow.[2] In 1979, Yano et al. compared several ion-exchange columns to be used in an automated ⁸²Sr/⁸²Rb generator for clinical testing.[3] Around 1980, pre-clinical trials began using ⁸²Rb in PET. In 1982, Selwyn et al. examined the relation between myocardial perfusion and rubidium-82 uptake during acute ischemia in six dogs after coronary stenosis and in five volunteers and five patients with coronary artery disease.[4] Myocardial tomograms, recorded at rest and after exercise in the volunteers showed homogeneous uptake in reproducible and repeatable scans. Rubidium-82 has shown considerable accuracy, comparable to that of ^99mTc-SPECT.[5][6] In 1989, the FDA approved the ⁸²Rb/⁸²Sr generator for commercial use in the U.S.[7] With increased ⁸²Sr production capabilities, the use of ⁸²Rb has increased over the last 10 years and is now approved by several health authorities worldwide.

Production

The decay of Rubidium-82, which undergoes positron emission.

Rubidium-82 is produced through beta plus decay from its parent nucleus, strontium-82. The generator contains accelerator produced ⁸²Sr adsorbed on stannic oxide in a lead-shielded column and provides a means for obtaining sterile nonpyrogenic solutions of RbCl(Halide salt form capable of injection). The amount (millicuries) of ⁸²Rb obtained in each elution will depend on the potency of the generator. When eluted at a rate of 50 mL/minute, each generator eluate at the end of elution should not contain more than 0.02 microcuries of strontium ⁸²Sr and not more than 0.2 microcuries of ⁸⁵Sr per millicurie of ⁸²RbCl injection, and not more than 1 microgram of tin per mL of eluate.[8]

Pharmacology

Mechanism of action

⁸²Rb has activity very similar to that of a potassium ion (K⁺). Once in the myocardium, it is an active participant in the sodium-potassium exchange pump of cells. It is rapidly extracted by the myocardium proportional to blood flow. Its radioactivity is increased in viable myocardial cells reflecting cellular retention, while the tracer is cleared rapidly from necrotic or infarcted tissue.[8]

Pharmacodynamics

When tested clinically, ⁸²Rb is seen in the myocardium within the first minute of intravenous injection. When the myocardium is affected with ischemia or infarction, they will be visualized between 2–7 minutes. These affected areas will be shown as photon deficient on the PET scan. ⁸²Rb passes through the entire body on the first pass of circulation and has visible uptake in organs such as the kidney, liver, spleen and lung. This is due to the high vascularity of those organs.[8]

Use in PET

Rubidium is rapidly extracted from the blood and is taken up by the myocardium in relation to myocardial perfusion, which requires energy for myocardial uptake through Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase similar to thallium-201. ⁸²Rb is capable of producing a clear perfusion image similar to single photon emission computed tomography(SPECT)-MPI because it is an extractable tracer. The short half-life requires rapid image acquisition shortly after tracer administration, which reduces total study time.[9] The short half-life also allows for less radiation experienced by the patient. A standard visual perfusion imaging assessment is based on defining regional uptake relative to the maximum uptake in the myocardium. Importantly, ⁸²Rb PET also seems to provide prognostic value in patients who are obese and whose diagnosis remains uncertain after SPECT-MPI.

⁸²Rb myocardial blood flow quantification is expected to improve the detection of multivessel coronary heart disease.[9] ⁸²Rb/PET is a valuable tool in ischemia identification. Myocardial Ischemia is an inadequate blood supply to the heart. ⁸²Rb/PET can be used to quantify the myocardial flow reserve in the ventricles which then allows the medical professional to make an accurate diagnosis and prognosis of the patient. Various vasoreactivity studies are made possible through ⁸²Rb/PET imaging due to its quantification of myocardial blood flow. It is possible to quantify stress in patients under the same reasoning.[10] Recently it has been shown that neuroendocrine tumor metastasis can be imaged with ⁸²Rb due to its ability to quantify myocardial blood flow (MBF) during rest and pharmacological stress, commonly performed with adenosine.[11]

Advantages

A comparison of SPECT and PET images from a 56-year-old woman with a history of obesity (BMI: 31.2 cm/kg2), hypertension, hyperlipemia, and type 2 diabetes complicated of retinopathy and kidney failure.[7]

One of the main advantages of ⁸²Rb is its availability in nuclear medicine departments. This isotope is available after 10-minute elution of a ⁸²Sr column; this makes it possible to produce enough samples to inject about 10–15 patients a day.[7] Another advantage of ⁸²Rb would be its high count density in myocardial tissue. ⁸²Rb/PET has shown greater uniformity and count density than ^99mTc-SPECT when examining the myocardium. This results in higher interpretive confidence and greater accuracy. It allows for quantification of coronary flow reserve and myocardial blood flow. ⁸²Rb also has an advantage in that it has a very short half-life which results in much lower radiation exposure for the patient. This is especially important as the use of myocardial imaging increases in the medical field. When it comes to patients, ⁸²Rb is beneficial to use when the patient is obese or physically unable to perform a stress test. It also has side effects limited to minor irritation around the injection site.[12]

Limitations

A serious limitation of ⁸²Rb would be its cost. Currently ^99mTc costs on average $70 per dose, needing two doses; whereas ⁸²Rb costs about $250 a dose. Another limitation of this isotope is that it needs a dedicated PET/CT camera, and in places like Europe where a ⁸²Sr/⁸²Rb generator is still yet to be approved that can be hard to find.[7]

gollark: I mean, of course it works, like all my code.

gollark: It works?!

gollark: ++magic py```python@bot.listen("on_message")async def lyric(msg): if msg.author.id == 319753218592866315: for thing in "🇲 🇺 🇹 🇪 🇩".split(" "): await msg.add_reaction(thing)```

gollark: Time to archive it forever!

gollark: Seems fine to me.

References

Love, WD; Burch, GE (1953). "A comparison of potassium 42, rubidium 86, and cesium 134 as tracers of potassium in the study of cation metabolism of human erythrocytes in vitro". Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine. 41 (3): 351–62. PMID 13035272.
Cairns, AB Jr; Love, WD; Burch, GE (1960). "The effects of acetylstrophanthidin on the kinetics of potassium and Rb⁸⁶ in the myocardium of dogs". American Heart Journal. 59 (3): 404–11. doi:10.1016/0002-8703(60)90303-3. PMID 13806832.
Yano, Y; Roth, EP (1979). "An alumina column ⁸²Rb generator". International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 30 (6): 382–385. doi:10.1016/0020-708X(79)90026-7.
Selwyn, AP; Allan, RM; L'Abbate, A; Horlock, P; Camici, P; Clark, J; O'Brien, HA; Grant, PM (1982). "Relation between regional myocardial uptake of rubidium-82 and perfusion: Absolute reduction of cation uptake in ischemia". American Journal of Cardiology. 50 (1): 112–121. doi:10.1016/0002-9149(82)90016-9. PMID 6979917.
Polte, CL; Burck, I; Gjertsson, P; Lomsky, M; Nekolla, SG; Nagel, E (2016). "Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography: a Clinical Perspective". Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports. 9 (3). doi:10.1007/s12410-016-9371-3.
Bateman, T; Heller, G; McGhie, A; Friedman, J; Case, J; Bryngelson, J; Hertenstein, G; Moutray, K; Reid, K; Cullom, S (2006). "Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: Comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT". Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. 13 (1): 24–33. doi:10.1016/j.nuclcard.2005.12.004. PMID 16464714.
Chatal, JF; Rouzet, F; Haddad, F; Bourdeau, C; Mathieu, C; Le Guludec, D (2015). "Story of rubidium-82 and advantages for myocardial perfusion PET imaging". Frontiers in Medicine. 2: 65. doi:10.3389/fmed.2015.00065. PMC 4566054. PMID 26442267.
"CardioGen-82 Rubidium Rb 82 Generator" (PDF). Bracco Diagnostics. 2000. Retrieved 27 March 2016. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
Yoshinaga, K; Klein, R; Tamaki, N (2009). "Generator-produced rubidium-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging—From basic aspects to clinical applications". Journal of Cardiology. 55 (2): 163–73. doi:10.1016/j.jjcc.2010.01.001. PMID 20206068.
Ziadi, MC; deKemp, RA; Williams, KA (2011). "Impaired Myocardial Flow Reserve on Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Predicts Adverse Outcomes in Patients Assessed for Myocardial Ischemia" (PDF). Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 58 (7): 740–748. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.01.065. PMID 21816311.
Hasbak, P; Enevoldsen, LH; Fosbøl, MØ; Skovgaard, D; Knigge, UP; Kjær, A (2015). "Rubidium-82 uptake in metastases from neuroendocrine tumors: No flow response to adenosine". Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. 23 (4): 840–2. doi:10.1007/s12350-015-0251-z. PMID 26358083.
Sampson, UK; Dorbala, S; Limaye, A; Kwong, R; Di Carli, MF (2007). "Diagnostic Accuracy of Rubidium-82 Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With Hybrid Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 49 (10): 1052–8. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.12.015. PMID 17349884.