Protichnites

Protichnites is an ichnogenus of trace fossil consisting of the imprints made by the walking activity of certain arthropods. It consists of two rows of tracks and a medial furrow between the two rows. This furrow, which may be broken, set at an angle, and of varying width and depth, is thought to be the result of the tail region contacting the substrate.

Protichnites Temporal range: 530.0–457.5 Ma PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg N
The trackway Protichnites from the Cambrian of Blackberry Hill, Wisconsin
Trace fossil classification
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Arthropoda (?)
Ichnogenus:	†Protichnites Owen 1852
Ichnospecies[1]
Protichnites alternans Protichnites eremita Protichnites latus Protichnites lineatus Protichnites multinotatus Protichnites octo-notatus Protichnites septem-notatus

The first footprints on land

Sir Richard Owen, the noted British paleontologist and anatomist who coined the term “Dinosauria”, based Protichnites on trackways that were shipped to him from the Cambrian Potsdam Sandstone of Quebec.[2] He was correct in recognizing that these were the oldest known footprints on land, having been produced in intertidal and supratidal environments during what would now be called Cambrian times.[3]

The Protichnites makers

Owen first thought that these trackways were made by tortoises,[2] but new material convinced him that “articulates” (a group that included the arthropods) were responsible.[1] He further suggested a kinship with Limulus, the modern horseshoe crab. Additional material was collected in Quebec, Ontario, New York, Wisconsin, and Missouri for the next 150 years without a single fossil of the maker of these traces. Finally, body fossils of potential makers were found in two of the same quarries that preserved Protichnites from the Elk Mound Group of Blackberry Hill, Wisconsin, and the Potsdam Group of Melocheville, Quebec.[3] The animals, Mosineia macnaughtoni and Mictomerus melochevillensis, were euthycarcinoids, extinct arthropods that may have given rise to the mandibulates.[4] Fossils that clearly tie euthycarcinoids to Protichnites were then found at Blackberry Hill.[5]

It is possible that other extinct arthropods, such as members of the Aglaspidida, may also have produced some of these trackways. Trilobites have been suggested as well; however, no trilobites have been found thus far in the strata that contain this ichnogenus. Similar trackways are present in post-Cambrian strata; however, those are seldom referred to as Protichnites.

Possible mating behavior

It has been suggested that one form of Protichnites, P. eremita Form 1, may have been produced by an ambulating pair of individuals, as in amplexus. In this form, the medial furrow is discontinuous and each section is set at an angle, such that the series of medial imprints have a shingled appearance, as might result if the female were displacing her tail to minimize its interference with external fertilization. A second set of medial imprints observed in Form 1 is postulated to have been produced by the tail region of the male of the pair.[5] Protichnites eremita was originally interpreted as early evidence of hermit crab-like behavior.[6]

Relationship with Diplichnites

Differing only in the presence or absence of a medial furrow, Protichnites and Diplichnites trackways could both be produced by the same individual animal. In cases where the feet penetrate the sediment more deeply than does the tail, Diplichnites could be created on the underlying layer while Protichnites is being produced on the surface.[7][8]

References

1. Owen, 1852
2. Owen, 1851
3. Collette and Hagadorn, 2010
4. Ortega-Hernandez et al, 2010
5. Collette et al., 2012
6. Hagadorn and Seilacher, 2009
7. Goldring and Seilacher, 1971
8. Hoxie, 2005

Further reading

• Collette, J. H., K. C. Gass & J. W. Hagadorn (2012). "Protichnites eremita unshelled? Experimental model-based neoichnology and new evidence for a euthycarcinoid affinity for this ichnospecies". Journal of Paleontology. 86 (3): 442–454. doi:10.1666/11-056.1.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
• Collette, J. H.; J. W. Hagadorn (2010). "Three-dimensionally preserved arthropods from Cambrian Lagerstatten of Quebec and Wisconsin". Journal of Paleontology. 84 (4): 646–667. doi:10.1666/09-075.1.
• Goldring, R.; A. Seilacher (1971). "Limulid undertracks and their sedimentological implications". Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen. 137: 422–442.
• Hagadorn, J. W.; A. Seilacher (2009). "Hermit arthropods 500 million years ago?". Geology. 37 (4): 295–298. Bibcode:2009Geo....37..295H. doi:10.1130/G25181A.1.
• Hesselbo, S. P. (1989). "Trace fossils of Cambrian aglaspidid arthropods". Lethaia. 21 (2): 129–146. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1988.tb02064.x.
• Hoxie, C. T. (2005). "Late Cambrian arthropod trackways in subaerially exposed environments: Incentives to simplify a problematic ichnogenus". Unpublished B.A. Thesis: 1–89.
• C. T. Hoxie; J. W. Hagadorn (2005). "Late Cambrian arthropod trackways in subaerially exposed environments". Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Northeastern Section. 37: 12.
• Ortega-Hernandez, J., Tremewan, J., & Braddy, S. J. (2010). "Euthycarcinoids". Geology Today. 26 (5): 195–198. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2451.2010.00770.x.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
• Owen, R. (1851). "Description of the impressions on the Potsdam sandstone, discovered by Mr. Logan in Lower Canada". Geological Society of London Quarterly Journal. 7 (1–2): 250–252. doi:10.1144/GSL.JGS.1851.007.01-02.42.
• Owen, R. (1852). "Description of the impressions and footprints of the Protichnites from the Potsdam sandstone of Canada". Geological Society of London Quarterly Journal. 8 (1–2): 214–225. doi:10.1144/GSL.JGS.1852.008.01-02.26.
• N. E. Vaccari, G. D. Edgecombe & C. Escudero (2004). "Cambrian origins and affinities of an enigmatic fossil group of arthropods". Nature. 430 (6999): 554–557. Bibcode:2004Natur.430..554V. doi:10.1038/nature02705. PMID 15282604.

External links

• Discusses a major source of Protichnites trackways.