Operation Burnham

Operation Burnham was a joint military operation undertaken by the New Zealand Special Air Service and elements of the Afghan Crisis Response Unit and International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan's Tirgiran Valley on 21–22 October 2010. Operation Burnham became the subject of the investigative journalists Nicky Hager and Jon Stephenson's book Hit & Run: The New Zealand SAS in Afghanistan and the meaning of honour, which alleged that New Zealand forces had committed war crimes against civilians in the Naik and Khak Khudday Dad villages.[1][2][3]

This article is about the operation in Afghanistan. For the operation in Vietnam, see List of allied military operations of the Vietnam War (1969).

Operation Burnham
Part of the War in Afghanistan
Date21–22 October 2010
Location
Tirgiran Valley, Afghanistan
Result Failure to capture Taliban targets
Belligerents
 New Zealand
 Afghanistan
 United States		 Taliban insurgents
Strength
60-70 NZSAS
Afghan Crisis Response Unit
3 or more helicopters		 Unknown
Casualties and losses
1 NZSAS injured Unknown

Though the New Zealand Defence Force initially denied that the operation had occurred in those villages, they subsequently confirmed that NZSAS forces had entered one of the villages mentioned in the book.[4][5][6] Media and public interest led to calls for an official inquiry, which was rejected by the-then Prime Minister Bill English.[7][8] In April 2018, Attorney-General David Parker of the Labour-led coalition government announced that the Government would be holding an inquiry into Operation Burnham and the allegations in Hit & Run.[1][9] In December 2018, the New Zealand Government confirmed that they would be holding an inquiry but that it would be held behind closed doors.[10][11]

Background

New Zealand military involvement in Afghanistan

During the War in Afghanistan, elements of the New Zealand Defence Force were deployed to Afghanistan's Bamyan Province in September 2003 as part of the New Zealand Provincial Reconstruction Team and remained there until 2012. The New Zealand PRT provided regular military patrols across the province, advised and supported the provincial governor, and participated in developmental projects.[12][13] In addition, the elite New Zealand Special Air Service (NZSAS) saw action during the United States–led invasion of Afghanistan between December 2001 and November 2005.[14]

According to the investigative journalists Nicky Hager and Jon Stephenson, the New Zealand provincial reconstruction team also gathered intelligence about groups and elements who were hostile to the International Security Assistance Force including the Taliban insurgency. While Bamyan province was relatively quiet during the early 2000s, New Zealand forces encountered a string attacks from 2008 onwards including roadside bombs in March and November 2008, and an ambush involving guns and rocket-propelled grenades in June 2009.[15] Between September 2009 and 31 March 2012, the NZSAS was deployed as part of counterinsurgency operations in the greater Kabul region in support of the Afghan Interior Ministry's Crisis Response Unit (Task Force 24).[16][17][18][19] During their second deployment, NZSAS forces operated from Camp Warehouse, a military base on the eastern outskirts of Kabul.[20]

On 3 August 2010, Lieutenant Tim O'Donnell of the Bamyan provincial reconstruction team was killed by a roadside bomb while his unit was traveling through Karimak village.[21] While there had been similar attacks in the previous two years, this one had resulted in the first New Zealand combat death in the Afghanistan War. According to Hager and Stephenson, O'Donnell's death generated an outpouring of grief, anger, and desire for retribution among New Zealand military personnel stationed in Afghanistan. As a result, New Zealand forces decided to hunt down the perpetrators behind O'Donnell's murder.[22]

Operational planning

According to Hager and Stephenson, New Zealand Defence Force and New Zealand Security Intelligence Service (NZSIS) intelligence officers used a mixture of local Afghan informants and an electronic eavesdropping station at Kiwi Base in Bamyan to gather intelligence on a list of nine suspected "Mujahideen" fighters: Maulawi Naimatullah, Qari Miraj, Abdullah Kalta, Qari Musa, Maulawi Alawuddin, Maulawi Anwar, Abdul Ghafar, Islmuddin, and Qari Latif. Three of the insurgents—Maulawi Naimatullah, Abdullah Kalta, and Maulawi Anwar—came from Naik village in the Tirgiran Valley. A fourth insurgent, Abdul Ghafar, came from Khak Khuday Dad village in the Tirgiran valley. NZSAS officers lobbied the United States military authorities to add these Afghan fighters to the Joint Prioritized Effects List, a capture or kill list for coalition personnel based in Afghanistan.[23]

Planning for Operation Burnham took place during the first weeks of August 2010. The NZSAS's Afghan partners, the Crisis Response Unit, were briefed about the operation but were not informed about the destinations being targeted. According to Hager and Stephenson, the Chief of the NZDF Lieutenant-General Jerry Mateparae and the Defence Minister Wayne Mapp visited the NZSAS base Camp Warehouse during that period and were privy to the final stages of the preparations for Operation Burnham. Mapp and Mateparae also briefed Prime Minister John Key about the planned operation by telephone. The authors have asserted that the Prime Minister gave approval for Operation Burnham to go ahead. Lieutenant-General Mateparae and NZSAS senior officers also watched a live video of Operation Burnham.[24] In addition, the NZSAS lobbied for a US surveillance plane to conduct a surveillance flight over the Tirgiran valley prior to Operation Burnham. They also made arrangements for US Apache helicopter gunships to provide aerial support during the raids.[25]

According to Hager and Stephenson, Operation Burnham followed the blueprint used for many special forces operations in Afghanistan. The raid would involve encircling the target location with troops, including spotters and snipers on high lookouts, and then sending assault teams to storm the buildings in order to capture or kill the targets. Anyone who tried to escape would be picked off by the surrounding snipers or by Apache helicopter gunships. Operation Burnham's targets were the three insurgents: Maulawi Naimatullah and Abdullah Kalta of Naik; and Abdul Ghafar of Khak Khuday Dad. The authors speculated that the raid was named after Burnham Camp near Christchurch, where Lieutenant O'Donnelll had been based.[26]

The raid

Hager and Stephenson's version

Hager and Stephenson's version of the events of Operation Burnham is covered in the third chapter of their 2017 book Hit & Run. On the evening 21 August 2010, 60–70 NZSAS and Afghan CRU troops traveled in two US Chinook helicopters from Camp Warehouse to Kiwi Base in Bamyan province. After midnight, the two helicopters flew to the Tirgiran Valley; with one heading to Naik and the other heading to Khak Khuday Dad. In addition, a third US Blackhawk helicopter, carrying NZSAS troops, arrived in the Tirgiran Valley as the advanced guard. According to interviews of former NZSAS and CRU personnel by Hager and Stephenson, most of the personnel involved in Operation Burnham were NZSAS personnel with the Afghan personnel being there for back up and to provide an "Afghan face" to the operation, so that it could be officially claimed that the raid was a joint Afghan and coalition operation.[27]

Around 12:30 am on 22 August, the Blackhawk helicopter landed several NZSAS sniper teams near Khak Khuday Dad and Naik villages, which moved to their lookout points. About 1 am, the first Chinook helicopter arrived at Khak Khuday Dan and landed its assault force. The NZSAS and CRU troops reportedly exchanged fire with individuals believed to be insurgents. Shortly later, Apache gunships bombarded the village's buildings. According to Hager and Stephenson, the NZSAS and CRU commandos did not attempt to stop the attack. They also did not search the houses or check if any of the inhabitants needed assistance. Instead, they received orders by radio to travel to the next target Naik.[28]

Shortly after 1 am, the second Chinook landed at the edge of Naik village. The NZSAS and CRU troops were divided into assault teams consisting of five to ten persons who were dispatched to different targets in the village. The assault teams assigned to Abdullah Kalta and Maulawi Naimatullah's houses found that their targets had escaped. Unable to capture or eliminate the targets, the NZSAS commandos instead destroyed the insurgents' houses and the home of Naimatullah's father, who reportedly disapproved of his son's involvement in the Taliban. The NZSAS troops found only civilians including elderly people, women, and children in the remaining houses in the village. NZSAS forces also seized some ammunition including bullets and rocket-propelled grenades and later destroyed the building they were being housed in.[29] According to Hager and Stephenson, the insurgents had already retreated to the high pastures, following a long-standing Mujaheddin practice dating back to the Soviet–Afghan War of retreating to the mountains following hit-and-run attacks on Soviet forces.[30]

Following the ground assault, US Apache helicopters strafed Naik village. Hager and Stephenson have asserted that the NZSAS troops had called the helicopters in despite knowing that there were no insurgents in the village and suggest that the commandos were motivated by a desire to avenge O'Donnell's death. One of the NZSAS commandos was reportedly wounded seriously when a wall hit by an Apache rocket collapsed on him. The wounded NZSAS commando was evacuated by his comrades aboard the Blackhawk helicopter. Two men fleeing Naik village were also shot down by an Apache helicopter. According to Hager and Stephenson, the Afghan CRU commandos encountered wounded civilians from Khak Khuday Dan and provided medical assistance. However, the NZSAS troops did not attempt to render medical assistance to the civilians. About two hours after 1 am, the NZSAS and CRU troops evacuated aboard their helicopters and returned to Camp Warehouse in Kabul.[31]

NZDF version

In response to further Official Information Act requests by the New Zealand Herald newspaper and other media, the New Zealand Defence Force released an info pack outlining the NZDF's official account of the events of Operation Burnham on 14 March 2018. The NZDF claimed that Operation Burnham had taken place at Tirgiran village instead of Naik and Khak Khuday Dad as claimed by Hager and Stephenson. At 0030 on 22 August 2010, two helicopters carrying NZSAS and Afghan Crisis Response Unit personnel had landed on the outskirts of Tirgiran village under covering fire provided by Coalition aircraft.[2]

According to the NZDF report, the Coalition aircraft soon detected several armed insurgents taking up positions on high ground and within Tirgiran village which were deemed a threat to Coalition helicopters and ground forces. At 0054, the targets were identified as direct participants in the hostilities and coalition aircraft were given permission to engage the insurgents. Those engagements took place in an area southwest of the landing zone. The NZDF report noted that rounds from a Coalition aircraft had missed their target and struck two buildings. The report speculated that civilian casualties may have resulted from these rounds hitting the two buildings.[2]

The NZDF report asserted that the Coalition forces had made a "callout" to the villagers through an interpreter informing them of their presence and general intention. The report also acknowledged that Coalition forces had entered a residence in Tirgiran Village. NZDF eventually agreed, 352 days after first claiming that "NZDF troops never operated in the two villages identified in the book.[32][33] Though Coalition forces had failed to capture the insurgent "targeted for capture", they managed to seize a significant cache of weapons including one rocket-propelled grenade launcher, a bipod, five rocket propelled grenade rocket motor, several rounds of ammunition and magazines, a leather pistol holster, and an AK-47 assault rifle. The NZDF report also claimed that NZSAS forces had shot an individual subsequently identified as an insurgent.[2]

The NZDF report also denied Hager and Stephenson's claims that NZDF forces had destroyed a house in Tirgiran village, deliberately set fire to houses or any personal possessions, and call in Coalition aircraft to deliberately destroy houses. As Coalition forces withdrew, the Afghan interpreter had addressed the village by loud-hailer. An ISAF information pamphlet was also circulated and the ground forces were airlifted out by 0345. The NZDF report claimed that one house had caught fire when debris from the destruction of the insurgents' weapons and ammunition had fallen on the roof, setting the highly combustible roofing material alight. The NZDF report also claimed that a second house had been destroyed by an unattended cooking fire.[2]

The NZDF report acknowledged that one NZSAS soldier had been injured when a wall and part of a roof had fallen on him while entering the building. However, it disputed Hager and Stephenson's claim that the injury was the result of the house wall falling after being deliberately damaged by Coalition aircraft fire. At approximately 0245, the NZSAS casualty was evacuated from Tirgiran village by helicopter. While the NZDF report emphasized that NZSAS personnel were unaware of civilian casualties during the course of operation, it stated that a joint ISAF-Afghan government investigation had attributed civilian casualties to a gunsight malfunction, which had caused the rounds to miss their target and strike two buildings.[2]

Casualties

The NZSAS-led strike team only sustained one casualty when a commando nicknamed "Mo" was wounded by falling debris from a collapsed wall. He was reportedly evacuated to the United States Air Force military hospital at Ramstein Air Base in Germany and was later awarded a medal.[34]

According to an Independent Directorate of Local Governance document cited by Hager and Stephenson, six Afghan villagers were killed during Operation Burnham on 22 August 2010; with two of the deceased being killed in the outskirts of Naik village. The dead included a three-year-old girl named Fatima, the daughter of Khadija and Abdul Khaliq, who was killed by shrapnel from helicopter fire. In addition, fifteen villagers were wounded in Khak Khuday Dad village by either shrapnel or bullet wounds.[35]

A total of twelve houses were destroyed during Operation Burnham; with six being in Khak Khuday Dad and the remaining six being in Naik village.[36]

Fatalities

The six Afghan civilians killed were:

Name Age Village Occupation Notes
Abdul Qayoom[37] Unknown Khak Khuday Dad[37] Farmer[38] Left behind a wife and four children[38]
Abdul Faqir[37] 27 years old[38] Khak Khuday Dad[37] Farmer[38] Killed by shrapnel[39]
Fatima[37] 3 years old[38] Khak Khuday Dad[37] Nil Killed by shrapnel[38]
Mohammad Iqbal[37] 55 years old[40] Naik[40] Farmer[40] Killed by bullets from Apache gunships; father of Maulawi Naimatullah
Abdul Qayoom[37] Teens or early twenties[40] Naik[37] Farmer[40] Bullet wounds; son of Mohammad Iqbal[41]
Islamuddin[37] Unknown Khak Khuday Dad[37] School teacher[42] Bullet wounds[42]

Wounded

The fifteen wounded Afghan civilians were:

Name Age Village Occupation Notes
Bibi Khadija[37] Unknown Khak Khuday Dad[37] Mother[38] Wounded by helicopter shrapnel[38]
Abdullah[37] 7 years old[38] Khak Khuday Dad[37] Nil Son of Abdul and Khadija Khaliq[38]
Bibi Hanifa[37] 4 years old[38] Khak Khuday Dad[37] Nil Daughter of Abdul and Khadija Khadija[38]
Bibi Zuhra[37] 28 years old[38] Khak Khuday Dad[37] Unknown Wife of Abdul Qadus[38]
Bibi Aziza[37] Unknown Khak Khuday Dad[37] Nil Daughter of Abdul Qadus[38]
Naimatullah[37] 10 years old[38] Khak Khuday Dad[37] Nil Son of Abdullah Qadus; hit by shrapnel[38]
Bibi Amir Begum[37] Unknown Khak Khuday Dad[37] Nil Wife of Abdul Razaq; hit by Apache fire[39]
Bibi Hafiza[37] 14 years old[39] Khak Khuday Dad[37] Nil Daughter of Abdul Razaq; hit by Apache fire[39]
Bibi Fatima[37] Unknown Khak Khuday Dad[37] Nil Daughter of Abdul Razaq; hit by Apache fire[39]
Bibi Fatima[37] Unknown Khak Khuday Dad[37] Nil Daughter of Abdul Khadus[38]
Said Ahmad[37] Unknown Khak Khuday Dad[37] Unknown Son of Said Mohammad[37]
Noor Ahmad[37] Unknown Khak Khuday Dad[37] Unknown Son of Said Mohamad[37]
Mohammad Iqbal[37] Unknown Khak Khuday Dad[37] Unknown Son of Said Ahmad; hit in the back by shrapnel[43]
Deen Mohammad[37] Unknown Khak Khuday Dad[37] Village elder and farmer[44] Son of Said Ahmad[37]
Gul Andam[37] Unknown Khak Khuday Dad[37] Unknown Daughter of Mohammed Iqbal; suffers mental illness as a result of bombardment[37]

Aftermath

Initial media coverage and official responses

Following Operation Burnham, the International Security Assistance Force issued a press release on 23 August 2010 stating that Afghan National Security Forces and coalition forces had conducted a combined operation in the Baghlan Province on Sunday morning resulting in 12 dead insurgents and the capture of weapons including a rocket-propelled grenade launcher, several rocket-propelled grenades, and several boxes of small arms ammunition. The news release claimed that two Taliban commanders had been the targets of the operation. The report also claimed that the Afghan and coalition forces were attacked by numerous insurgents upon arriving in the target area. The combined coalition forces had fought back and used loud speakers to call on the occupants to exit the buildings. The press release also asserted that the operation had disrupted Taliban activity in the province and maintained that no civilians had been killed or injured during the operation.[45][46]

The first media report on Operation Burnham was a Dari language news report by the Pajhwok News Agency on 23 August 2010 which reported that six civilians, including a woman and an infant, had been killed in an operation by international forces in Tirgiran's Tala wa Barfak District. The Pajhwok report also quoted the ISAF press release's that 12 armed opponents were killed.[47] On 24 August, The New York Times's Dexter Filkins reported that a team of investigators from the American-led coalition forces were heading to northeast Afghanistan to investigate reports by local officials that a nighttime by NATO commandos had left eight civilians and 12 wounded. Filkins also mentioned that Afghan civilians had been killed in a raid by special forces in the village of Naik on 22 August.[48] On 28 August, a Dari report on the Azari Radio website reported that hundreds had demonstrated in Tala wa Barfak calling for the prosecution of international forces who had killed and injured more than 20 civilians in the village of Tirgiran.[49]

In response to media coverage, the ISAF Joint command and Afghan authorities conducted an investigation into the events in Tirgiran valley. On 29 August, an ISAF press release reported that a joint assessment team had determined that several rounds of ammunition from coalition helicopters had fallen short, missing the intended target and instead striking two buildings, which it speculated may have resulted in civilian casualties. The report emphasized that insurgents were using one of the buildings as a base of operations. The ISAF press release attributed the accidental short rounds to a gun site malfunction. US Air Force Brigadier General Timothy M. Zadalis, the ISAF Joint Command director of plans and projects, expressed regret at the possible civilian loss of life or injury.[50][51] While the report promised a fuller investigation, Hager and Stephenson have contended that the investigation was never conducted and the issue was covered up.[52]

On 20 April 2011, Defence Minister Wayne Mapp confirmed during an interview with Television New Zealand (TVNZ) journalist Guyon Espiner that the NZSAS had been involved in hunting down the Taliban insurgents behind Lieutenant Tim O'Donnell's death last year.[53][54] In response, the New Zealand Defence Force issued a press release confirming that NZ forces had participated in a Coalition operation against insurgents in the Bamyan province. The press release claimed that nine insurgents were killed during the operation but claimed that allegations of civilian casualties were unfounded.[55] Hager and Stephenson disputed the NZDF's account of the events at Tirgiran Valley and speculated that Mapp had either been deceptive or been deliberately misled by defence officials.[56]

On 30 June 2014, Māori Television's current affairs programme Native Affairs aired a story called "Collateral Damage", which investigated Operation Burnham. Jon Stephenson interviewed two Afghan villagers named Said Ahmad and Mohammed Iqbal from Tirgiran village who claimed that a joint NZ-US-Afghan operation in August 2010 had left 21 civilians dead or wounded. They also asserted that there were no insurgents in the village on the night of the operation. "Collateral Damage" also included a statement from the New Zealand Defence Force standing by its earlier 2011 press statement and that it would be making no further comment.[57] In response to the documentary, Prime Minister Key issue a public statement asserting that no Afghan civilians had been killed during the 2010 NZSAS "revenge mission." Key's remarks were challenged by Stephenson, who defended his report.[58]

Successive NZSAS operations and withdrawal

According to Hager and Stephenson, the NZSAS had obtained video footage from a local informant of the insurgent leaders Naimatullah, Qari Miraj, Abdullah Kalta, Anwar and Abdul Ghafar attending the funerals of the villagers killed during Operation Burnham in Naik. The authors have also asserted that the killing of civilians during the raids created unease and discomfort. among New Zealand and Afghan military personnel and officials. About ten days after Operation Burnham, the NZSAS and CRU troops conducted a second punitive raid on Naik village using a Chinook and a Blackhawk helicopter. According to SAS troops interviewed by the authors, NZSAS troops destroyed several houses which the villages had rebuilt.[59]

In January 2011, NZSAS forces detained the insurgent Qari Miraj in Kabul and handed him to the National Directorate of Security (NDS), Afghanistan's primary intelligence agency. According to Hager and Stephenson, the NDS had a reputation for torturing and abusing prisoners; which had led the British authorities in December 2008 to order that its military stop transferring prisoners to the NDS. Miraj subsequently confessed to his involvement in insurgent activities, allegedly under torture, and was imprisoned at Kabul's Pul-e-Charkhi prison.[60] In response, an NZDF report rejected Hager and Stephenson's allegation that Qari Miraj had been mistreated while in New Zealand military custody. The report asserted that NZDF personnel had not detained Miraj but had searched him before transferring him to the NDS detention facility.[2] In May, the NZSAS organized the targeted killings of Alawuddin and Qari Musa, two men alleged to have been involved in the August 2010 attack that claimed O'Donnell's life.[61]

On 31 March 2012, the NZSAS contingent withdrew from Afghanistan. However, twelve personnel remained at the ISAF Special Operations Forces Headquarters in intelligence and planning roles. Later that year, NZSAS operatives managed to track down the insurgent Abdullah Kalta to a small village called Karimak by monitoring his cellphone. Acting on this intelligence, Kalta was killed by a bomb from a US aircraft or drone on 21 November. This attack also claimed five others. After news of the NZSAS operation leaked to the media, Prime Minister Key and the Defence Force Chief Lieutenant-General Rhys Jones issued public statements defending the NZSAS's intelligence and military operations in Afghanistan.[62][63][64] Kalta was also believed to be the mastermind behind a roadside bomb that killed three New Zealand soldiers Lance Corporal Jacinda Baker, Private Richard Harris and Corporal Luke Tamatea in Bamyan province in August 2012.[63]

In April 2013, the New Zealand provincial reconstruction team withdraw from Bamyan province, ending New Zealand's involvement in the War in Afghanistan.[65][66] Hager and Stephenson have claimed that Operation Burnham inflamed local hostility against the ISAF forces and Afghan government and boosted sympathy for the Taliban. Citing a local source, the authors have alleged that the Taliban controlled 95 percent of the Tala wa Barfak district including the Tirgiran Valley in 2016. One local village leader Mullah Shafiullah, who had worked as an informant for the New Zealand forces, was also assassinated by a Taliban road bomb in 2011.[67]

The Hit & Run book and responses

On 21 March 2017, the investigate journalists Nicky Hager and Jon Stephenson released their book Hit & Run: The New Zealand SAS in Afghanistan and the meaning of honour. Hit & Run examined the NZSAS's role during the events of Operation Burnham in August 2010, drawing upon interviews with NZ military personnel, Afghan civilians, and soldiers. The book alleged that NZSAS troops had been involved in the killing of civilians during Operation Burnham and that this had been covered up by the New Zealand Defence Force.[68] Hager and Stephenson called for a full, independent inquiry into the events of Operation Burnham.[69] To publicize their book and calls for an inquiry, the authors also created a website called "Hit and Run."[70]

Nicky Hager is a controversial investigative journalist who had previously written several books on various topics including New Zealand's signals intelligence agency the Government Communications Security Bureau and the alleged collusion between the center-right National Party and right-wing bloggers.[71][72] He had previously touched upon the events of Operation Burnham in a 2011 book called Other People's Wars, which criticized New Zealand's involvement in the War on Terror.[73] Jon Stephenson is a war correspondent who had previously settled a lawsuit with the NZDF concerning his investigation of NZSAS troops transferring detainees to the Afghan detainees.[74]

Media and public responses
Berrigan House, a Catholic Worker House of Hospitality at Victoria University of Wellington displaying a banner reading 'SAS RAID: NZDF - led by LIARS!'

Hit & Run generated considerable from the New Zealand media, blogosphere, and several public figures.[7] The New Zealand Herald investigative journalist David Fisher commented that if Hager and Stephenson's account could be proven accurate, it should spell an end to the SAS's "aura of secrecy" since the elite unit had misused it. Fisher also called for an inquiry be held "to find out where the truth lies."[75] Meanwhile, Danyl Mclauchland observed that Hager and Stephenson's book was based on interviews on disenchanted defence staff who disliked the SAS's alleged culture of secrecy, elitism and unaccountability.[76] Similar, Fairfax New Zealand editor observed that the authors had obtained high-level access to senior government and defence officials.[77]

The University of Otago law professor Andrew Geddis opined that civilian casualties including the death of three-year old Fatima undermined public trust in the NZDF.[78] Human rights lawyer Allison Cole warned that official inaction could trigger an investigation by the International Criminal Court and urged the New Zealand Government to investigate the matter.[79] Similarly, Amnesty International New Zealand has called for the New Zealand Government to hold an independent inquiry to determine whether New Zealand forces had committed war crimes. Amnesty International also organized an online petition calling for an inquiry.[7][69]

Conservative blogger Matthew Hooton advocated an independent inquiry investigate the book's claims.[80] Meanwhile, the left-wing blogs No Right Turn and Martyn Bradbury's The Daily Blog denounced the NZSAS and incumbent National Government as war criminals.[81][82] By contrast, the conservative investigative journalist and online magazine Investigate editor Ian Wishart claimed that Hager and Stephenson were running a failed smear campaign against the New Zealand Defence Force.[83] In addition, critically acclaimed New Zealand film director, producer, and screenwriter Peter Jackson has also called for an inquiry into Hager and Stephenson's allegations.[84]

Official responses and calls for an inquiry

In response to the book, the NZDF issued a press statement asserting that it stood by its 20 April 2011 statement. The press statement claimed that a joint Afghan government–ISAF investigation found that allegations of civilian casualties were "unfounded" and asserted that NZ forces had abided by the "rules of engagement."[85][69] On 26 March 2017, the Chief of Defence Lieutenant-General Tim Keating issued a statement claiming that the events of Operation Burnham had occurred in Tirgiran village, and not in Naik and Khak Khuday Dad as claimed by Hager and Stephenson. Keating defended the conduct of NZSAS forces and attributed civilian casualties to a gunsight malfunction on a Coalition helicopter.[86][4] The following day, Keating held a press conference to rebut Hager and Stephenson's allegations.[87]

While former Prime Minister John Key publicly defended the work of the NZSAS in Afghanistan, the-then Labour Party leader and Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little remarked that Hit & Run raised serious allegations that put the Defence Force's reputation at stake and urged the government to hold a comprehensive review.[69] A spokesperson for the Attorney-General Chris Finlayson also stood by the NZDF's report.[68][69] On 27 March, Prime Minister Bill English stated that it would be unlikely that the New Zealand Government would be holding a public inquiry into the NZSAS's actions at Operation Burnham due to alleged "major inaccuracies" in Hager and Stephenson's Hit & Run book.[88]

In response to Keating's press release, several lawyers representing the Afghan villagers responded that "Tirgiran Village" did not exist and clarified that Tirgiran was the name of the valley that included Naik and Khak Khuday Dad villages.[89] The authors Hager and Stephenson also admitted getting the exact location of the villages wrong but defended their book's account of Operation Burnham including the names of the village.[90] In late March 2017, the Tirgiran Valley villagers' lawyers McLeod, Rodney Harrison, and Deborah Manning requested that the New Zealand Government undertake a formal inquiry into the events at Naik and Khak Khuday Dad villages. Their request was rebuffed by Prime Minister English, who regarded the timing as suspicious due to the lead-up to the 2017 general election.[91]

Following the 2017 general election, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Defence Minister Ron Mark of the new Labour-led coalition government announced that they would be holding an inquiry into the allegations raised by Hit & Run. The Labour Party and its coalition partners, New Zealand First and the Green Party had supported calls for an inquiry into Operation Burnham. Jacinda also indicated that she was prepared to follow United Nations recommendations on the matter. In response, the now-opposition National Party's Defence Spokesperson Mark Mitchell criticized the Prime Minister for undermining the credibility and legitimacy of the NZDF.[92][93] In response to further media Official Information Act requests, the New Zealand Defence Force released an info pack on presenting its version of the events of Operation Burnham on 14 March 2018.[2] In this package, the NZDF confirmed that the location of an Afghan village mentioned in Hit & Run was the same place where Operation Burnham had taken place. It also acknowledged that civilian casualties may have occurred during the operation as a result of a helicopter malfunction but asserted that the term unfounded was intended to address the suggestion it was responsible for civilian casualties. In response, Hager regarded this development as a vindication of his and Stephenson's account.[5][6]

On 19 March 2018, the NZDF acknowledged that photos from Hit & Run were from the same location where Operation Burnham had taken place.[32][5][33] Public attention by the media was also drawn when the Group Hit & Run Inquiry Campaign delivered a petition to calling for an inquiry into the actions of the New Zealand Defense Force in Afghanistan in 2010.[94] This delivery of 3,908 signatures on the petition gained significant notoriety as it was delivered Parliament in a coffin.[95]

On 9 April, the Chief Ombudsman Peter Boshier found that the NZDF was justified in withholding most of the information requested in response to Operation Burnham. However, Boshier also ordered the NZDF to release four more briefing papers relating to the NZSAS operation and information about the insurgents killed. He also took issue with the NZDF for not being "more responsive" in releasing information.[96][97] On 11 April, Attorney-General David Parker announced that the New Zealand Government would be holding an inquiry into Operation Burnham and the allegations in Hit & Run.[1][9] Hit & Run co-author Stephenson welcomed the planned inquiry but suggested that the inclusion of unseen video footage of armed individuals could "muddy the waters."[98]

Government inquiry

In late December 2018, the New Zealand Government confirmed that they would be holding an inquiry into Operation Burnham but that most of the proceedings would be secret. The inquiry will be headed by former Prime Minister Sir Geoffrey Palmer and former Solicitor-General Sir Terence Arnold. The inquiry will examine the combat operation but much of the evidence will not be made public on safety grounds.[10][11]

On 13 March 2019, Deborah Manning, one of the Afghan villagers' lawyers, filed for a judicial review of the decision not to have an open inquiry of Operation Burnham. Manning argued that the inquiry should focus on the victims and survivors of the NZSAS operation. Manning's criticisms of the proceedings have been echoed by author Nicky Hager, who criticised the secrecy around the government inquiry into Operation Burnham.[99][100][101]

On 17 June 2019, spy watchdog Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Cheryl Gwyn criticized the country's spy agencies NZSIS and the Government Communications Security Bureau for failing to provide more than 100,000 emails to the inquiry into Operation Burnham.[102] On 18 June, it was reported that the Afghan villagers had withdrawn from the Operation Burnham inquiry. Their lawyer Deborah Manning stated that the villagers were disillusioned with the process and had lost all confidence in the inquiry, particularly the death of three-year old Fatima.[103][104]

On 20 June 2019, Hit and Run co-author Jon Stephenson backtracked on a key claim in the book that no insurgents had been present in Naik village during the NZSAS raid. Stephenson had interviewed two insurgent commanders Qari Miraj and Maulawi Naimatullah, who claimed they were within the vicinity of the village during that raid. This contradicted the villagers' testimony that no insurgents had been present in the two Afghan villages during the raid. Both Naimatullah and Miraj said their involvement in the ambush of the PRT convoy that killed O'Donnell but both strenuously denied that insurgents were present at Khak Khuday Dad, the first village allegedly attacked by NZSAS forces.[105][106] In response to this report, co-author Hager and the villagers' lawyer Manning stated that the new information confirmed their allegation that the NZSAS killed six civilians and injured 15 in the raids.[107]

On 16 September 2019, the former Defence Force chief Sir Jerry Mateparae admitted that earlier briefings made to the-then Defence Minister Jonathan Coleman had been inaccurate. Mateparae's initial report differed from an ISAF report which had been found in a safe in the Defence Force's headquarters following Stephenson's inquiry into Operation Burnham in 2014. Matepare stated that he did not know how the report had gotten there but denied that the Defence Force had engaged in a cover-up.[108][109][110]

On 31 July 2020, Attorney General David Parker released the Burnham Inquiry's report, which concluded that the NZ Defence Force did not plot to cover up casualties as alleged by Hager and Stephenson. The Inquiry found that a child had been killed in Operation Burnham but that the military operation was justified under international law. While four people were killed, the inquiry was unable to determine whether they were civilians or insurgents. Air Marshall Short, the chief of the Defence Force, apologised on behalf of the Defence Force for providing inaccurate information but welcomed the inquiry's finding that New Zealand military personnel conformed to the rules of engagement and international humanitarian law.[111][112] The inquiry also found that the insurgent Qari Miraj, who had been captured by the NZSAS for his role in the attack claiming Lieutenant O'Donnell's life, had been assaulted by an NZSAS soldier while being detained. Miraj was subsequently handed over to Afghanistan's National Directorate of Security.[112] Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern issued a statement that the findings did not affect her briefings with the Defence Force but said that it was important to address "major failings" in the communication between the Defence Force and New Zealand Government. Ardern also credited Hager and Stephenson with initiating a process to improve communications between the Government and Defence Force. By contrast, Amnesty International New Zealand executive director Meg de Ronde described the inquiry's findings as "disturbing" and said that they raised questions about the integrity of the Defence Force.[113]

gollark: So you care a nonzero amount. Good, good.
gollark: Those are just types of rock, not all rocks.
gollark: Also name all supercontinents and explain the Great Unconformity.
gollark: Natural ≠ good.
gollark: You know geology? Name all rocks.

References
  1. Parker, David. "Approval for Inquiry into Operation Burnham". Scoop. New Zealand Government. Archived from the original on 19 April 2018. Retrieved 11 April 2018.
  2. "Operation Burnham information pack" (PDF). New Zealand Defence Force. Retrieved 11 April 2018.
  3. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. backcover,14-136.
  4. Fisher, David (29 March 2017). "NZSAS raid: Errors emerge in location and names of Hit & Run villages". New Zealand Herald. Archived from the original on 31 January 2020. Retrieved 15 November 2017.
  5. Broughton, Cate (13 March 2018). "Defence Force admits book location right, but denies civilian casualties". Stuff. Archived from the original on 30 June 2020. Retrieved 22 March 2018.
  6. Jones, Nicholas (13 March 2018). "Hit & Run raid: Defence Force acknowledges 'confusion' on civilian casualty statements". New Zealand Herald. Archived from the original on 8 August 2018. Retrieved 22 March 2018.
  7. Edwards, Bryce (22 March 2017). "Political Roundup: The hardest hitting responses to Nicky Hager's book 'Hit and run". New Zealand Herald. Archived from the original on 8 August 2020. Retrieved 15 November 2017.
  8. Sachdeva, Sam (27 March 2017). "Bill English says SAS inquiry unlikely after Defence Force attacks Hit and Run 'inaccuracies". Stuff. Archived from the original on 14 November 2019. Retrieved 15 November 2017.
  9. "Government to hold inquiry on Operation Burnham after allegations in book Hit & Run". 1 News. 11 April 2018. Archived from the original on 30 June 2020. Retrieved 24 April 2018.
  10. "Govt inquiry into Operation Burnham will be mostly secret". Radio New Zealand. 21 December 2018. Archived from the original on 12 February 2019. Retrieved 13 March 2019.
  11. Fisher, David (21 December 2018). "Some public hearings on Operation Burnham mission but secrecy will govern the NZSAS inquiry". New Zealand Herald. Archived from the original on 6 February 2019. Retrieved 13 March 2019.
  12. Rolfe, Jim. "Armed forces – Partnerships and international deployment". Te Ara: The Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Ministry for Culture and Heritage. Archived from the original on 6 February 2020. Retrieved 12 April 2018.
  13. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 9-11.
  14. Crosby 2009, p. 351-390.
  15. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 11-12.
  16. "1 NZSAS Regt Selection Course" (PDF). New Zealand Army News. April 2012. p. 2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 January 2020. Retrieved 17 June 2013.
  17. Stephenson, Jon; Hubbard, Anthony (24 January 2010). "Key 'broke pledge' on Kiwis in battle". Stuff. Archived from the original on 13 April 2018. Retrieved 7 July 2013.
  18. "Job well done NZSAS" (Press release). New Zealand Defence Force. Retrieved 16 June 2013.
  19. Friberg, John (29 August 2016). "Crisis Response Unit (CRU) – CT Special Unit of the Afghan Police". SOF News. Retrieved 13 April 2018.
  20. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 24.
  21. Howe, Jonathon; Forbes, Michael (11 August 2010). "Soldier Tim O'Donnell killed in Afghanistan". Manawatu Standard. Stuff and The Dominion Post. Retrieved 12 April 2018.
  22. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 16-18.
  23. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 18-26.
  24. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 27-31.
  25. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 26.
  26. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 32-33, 36.
  27. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 32–35, 40.
  28. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 36–37.
  29. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 38–40.
  30. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 30–31.
  31. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 41–45.
  32. "NZDF confirms photos in 'Hit & Run' was where Operation Burnham took place". New Zealand Herald. 20 March 2018. Retrieved 23 May 2018.
  33. "NZDF confirms 'Hit & Run' photos were right". Newstalk ZB. 20 March 2018. Retrieved 23 May 2018.
  34. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 41-42.
  35. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 126-127, 50–68.
  36. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 130.
  37. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 126-127.
  38. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 51.
  39. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 53.
  40. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 62.
  41. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 56, 62.
  42. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 56-57.
  43. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 126-127; 53.
  44. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 49.
  45. Hager and Stephenson 2017, p. 45, "Appendices: Numerous insurgents killed and weapons recovered," p.134.
  46. "Numerous insurgents killed and weapons recovered". Hit and Run website. Retrieved 15 April 2018.
  47. "Six civilians killed in operation by international forces," Pajhwok News Agency, 23 August 2010, translated from Dari, cited in Hager and Stephenson, pp 77–78.
  48. Filkins, Dexter (24 August 2010). "New Case of Civilian Deaths Investigated in Afghanistan". New York Times. Retrieved 18 April 2018.
  49. Bashir Ahmad Ghazal, "People of Baghlan, in demonstrations, call for punishment of international forces," Azari Radio, 28 August 2010, translated from Dari, in Hager and Stephenson, p.78.
  50. Hager and Stephenson, 2017 & "Appendices: Joint assessment team confirms possibility of civilian casualties in Baghlan," p.134.
  51. "Joint assessment team confirms possibility of civilian casualties in Baghlan". Hit and Run website. Retrieved 18 April 2018.
  52. Hager and Stephenson, 2017 & pp. 78–79.
  53. Television New Zealand (21 April 2011). "Minister Confirms Lethal SAS Counter Attack In Afghanistan". Scoop. Retrieved 18 April 2018.
  54. Shipman, Charlotte (20 April 2011). "Deadly retaliation by Kiwi SAS troops revealed". Newshub (formerly 3 News). New Zealand Press Association. Retrieved 18 April 2018.
  55. "NZDF operations in Bamyan Province on 22 August 2010". New Zealand Defence Force. Retrieved 18 April 2018.
  56. Hager and Stephenson, 2017 & pp. 99–101.
  57. "Native Affairs - Collateral Damage". Maori Television. 30 June 2014. Retrieved 21 April 2018.
  58. "Key rejects claims civilians killed in SAS raid". Newshub. 30 June 2016. Retrieved 21 April 2018.
  59. Hager and Stephenson, 2017 & pp. 75–77, 79–81.
  60. Hager and Stephenson, 2017 & pp. 82-89.
  61. Hager and Stephenson, 2017 & pp. 90–91, 124–125.
  62. Hager and Stephenson, 2017 & pp. 125, 92–93.
  63. "Taliban leader linked to Bamiyan attacks killed". New Zealand Herald. APNZ. 26 November 2012. Retrieved 18 April 2018.
  64. "Defence Force speaks out about Abdullah Kalta death". Radio New Zealand. 27 November 2012. Retrieved 18 April 2018.
  65. Theunissen, Matthew (3 April 2013). "Afghanistan war costs top $300m". New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 18 April 2018.
  66. "New Zealand withdraws Afghan troops". Belfast Telegraph. 5 April 2013. Retrieved 18 April 2018.
  67. Hager and Stephenson 2017, pp. 95–96.
  68. "New Hager book is Hit & Run: The New Zealand SAS in Afghanistan and the Meaning of Honour". The Spinoff. 21 March 2017. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  69. Small, Vernon (22 March 2017). "New book claims John Key gave green light to deadly SAS raid in Afghanistan". Stuff.co.nz. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  70. "Hit and Run homepage". Hit and Run. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  71. Bruce, Greg (8 April 2017). "The life that Nicky built: Who is the real Nicky Hager?". New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  72. Macdonald, Nikki (1 April 2017). "National Portrait: Nicky Hager - investigative journalist". Stuff.co.nz. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  73. Hager and Stephenson 2005, pp. 238–241.
  74. "Journalist settles three-year defamation battle against New Zealand Defence Force". Stuff.co.nz. 1 October 2015. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  75. Fisher, David (22 March 2017). "David Fisher: Grim assertions - if true - spell serious betrayal of public trust". New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  76. McLauchlan, Danyl (22 March 2017). "Hit & Run: A depressingly credible account of blunder, bloodshed and cover-up". The Spinoff. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  77. Watkins, Tracy (22 March 2017). "Claims of blood on New Zealand's hands need answers". Stuff.co.nz. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  78. Geddis, Andrew (21 March 2017). "Fatima was three. Was she killed in our name?". The Spinoff. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  79. Cole, Allison (22 March 2017). "Could New Zealand Face the International Criminal Court for War Crimes in Afghanistan?". Vice Media. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  80. "It's an absolute no-brainer that the Prime Minister should announce an inquiry into the Hager-Stephenson allegations". National Business Review. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  81. "War criminals must be punished". No Right Turn. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  82. Bradbury, Martyn. "John Key – you have to tell NZ if you committed a war crime". The Daily Blog. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  83. Wishart, Ian (30 March 2017). "Hager's Hit and Run takes another direct hit from NZDF fire as NZSAS story takes new turn". Investigate. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  84. Jackson, Peter (4 April 2017). "Editorial: Rules of engagement". New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  85. "NZDF Response To Book". New Zealand Defence Force. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  86. "NZDF Statement on Hager/Stephenson book". New Zealand Defence Force. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  87. "Rebuttal of the book Hit and Run". New Zealand Defence Force. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  88. Sachdeva, Sam (27 March 2017). "Bill English says SAS inquiry unlikely after Defence Force attacks Hit and Run 'inaccuracies". Stuff.co.nz. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  89. Manhire, Toby (29 March 2017). "Tirgiran locals: 'Tirgiran is not a village, and therefore "Tirgiran Village" does not exist'". The Spinoff. Retrieved 15 November 2017.
  90. "Hit & Run: NZDF's village doesn't exist - lawyers". Radio New Zealand. 29 March 2017. Retrieved 15 November 2017.
  91. Patterson, Jane (28 March 2017). "Afghan villagers' lawyers formally call for inquiry". Radio New Zealand. Retrieved 15 November 2017.
  92. Cheng, Derek (9 November 2017). "Defence Minister Ron Mark requests briefing on Hit & Run issues". New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 24 April 2018.
  93. Russell, Alexia (8 November 2017). "Government planning to investigate Hit and Run claims". Newstalk ZB. Retrieved 24 April 2018.
  94. Moir, Jo (13 March 2018). "Petition delivered to Parliament in a coffin calling for full inquiry into Hit and Run allegations". Stuff.co.nz. Retrieved 23 May 2018.
  95. "Coffin-clad petition delivered to MP". The Dominion Post; PressReader.com. 14 March 2018. Retrieved 23 May 2018.
  96. Mitchell, Mark (9 April 2018). "Hit and Run: Chief Ombudsman backs information being withheld on Operation Burnham". New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 24 April 2018.
  97. "Operation Burnham: Final Opinion released". Scoop. Office of the Ombudsman. Retrieved 11 April 2018.
  98. Moir, Jo; Cooke, Henry (11 April 2018). "Author Jon Stephenson pleased with inquiry, but queries Govt 'muddying waters'". Stuff.co.nz. Retrieved 24 April 2018.
  99. "Lawyers for Afghan villagers affected by NZSAS raid to file in High Court over decision to hold closed inquiry". 1 News. 13 March 2019. Archived from the original on 13 March 2019. Retrieved 13 March 2019.
  100. "New legal action taken against 'Hit and Run' inquiry". Radio New Zealand. 13 March 2019. Archived from the original on 13 March 2019. Retrieved 13 March 2019.
  101. Vance, Andrea (13 March 2019). "Key 'Hit & Run' players lose faith in Government inquiry into SAS raids". Stuff. Archived from the original on 13 March 2019. Retrieved 13 March 2019.
  102. "Operation Burnham inquiry: GCSB failed to hand over more than 100,000 emails". Radio New Zealand. 17 June 2019. Retrieved 18 June 2019.
  103. "Operation Burnham Inquiry: 'Disillusioned, worn down' Afghan villagers pull out". New Zealand Herald. 18 June 2019. Retrieved 18 June 2019.
  104. "Afghan villagers pull out of Operation Burnham inquiry". Radio New Zealand. 18 June 2019. Retrieved 18 June 2019.
  105. Stephenson, Jon (20 June 2019). "Insurgent leaders admit they were in Afghanistan village raided during NZ SAS's Operation Burnham". Stuff. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  106. McCulloch, Craig (20 June 2019). "Operation Burnham: Hit & Run author backtracks on key claim". Radio New Zealand. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  107. Manch, Thomas (20 June 2019). "New insurgent leader claims 'changes nothing' for Operation Burnham, co-author Nicky Hager says". Stuff. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  108. Jancic, Boris (16 September 2019). "Defence Force denies Afghanistan deaths cover-up; questions over hidden report". New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 16 September 2019.
  109. Mitchell, Jonathan (16 September 2019). "Operation Burnham inquiry: Misleading statements and briefings come to light". Radio New Zealand. Retrieved 16 September 2019.
  110. Cocker, Grace (16 September 2019). "Operation Burnham inquiry: New Zealand Defence Force says there was no 'cover up'". Newshub. Retrieved 16 September 2019.
  111. "Operation Burnham report: NZDF 'deeply sorry' for misleading ministers and public". Radio New Zealand. 31 July 2020. Archived from the original on 31 July 2020. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
  112. Manch, Thomas (31 July 2020). "Operation Burnham inquiry: Child was likely killed, SAS soldiers misled, prisoner was tortured". Stuff. Archived from the original on 31 July 2020. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
  113. Small, Zane (31 July 2020). "Jacinda Ardern recognises 'major failings' in Defence Force over Operation Burnham findings". Newshub. Archived from the original on 31 July 2020. Retrieved 31 July 2020.

Further reading

External sources
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.