Occupational rehabilitation

Occupational rehabilitation is the science and practices of returning injured workers to a level of daily work activities that is appropriate to their functional and cognitive capacity related to their position of which may be influenced by the severity of a worker's injuries.

Professionals involved
Occupational therapists[1][2]
The role of occupational therapists in the workplace is to facilitate individuals’ ability to return to work. Occupational therapists assist their clients in reaching their maximum level of function with the aim of meeting the physical and emotional demands of their job. Occupational therapists are also qualified to make recommendations to employers on how to downgrade job demands to meet the functional status of an employee in order to prevent further injury during occupational rehabilitation. Individual functional capacity evaluations are used to screen for person-environment fit. Industrial occupational therapists use a collaborative approach involving the workers and employers to encourage a supportive work environment that empowers the worker to reach productivity and other work related goals.[1] Occupational therapy interventions in occupational rehabilitation include developing assertiveness; communication and interpersonal skills; controlling anger; and stress management.[1]
Occupational psychology
Physiotherapists[2]
Kinesiologist
Occupational physicians[2]
Vocational rehabilitation

For common mental disorders
See also: Psychiatric rehabilitation

Many workers have an increased risk of developing common mental disorders (CMDs) in the workplace due to job stressors such as job insecurity, bullying or psychological harassment, low social support at work, employee perceptions of fairness in the workplace, and an imbalance between job demands and rewards. These CMDs may include anxiety disorders, alcohol dependence, addiction-related disorders, suicidal ideation, and depression [3]

Approaches

A symptom of CMDs is having disorganized and deteriorated habits. Therefore, during work rehabilitation, occupational therapists and/or other rehabilitation professionals often use a graded environment, intentionally eliminating barriers to increase individuals’ performance and self-esteem. An integrative approach, based on the three key disciplines of medicine, public health, and psychology, is being utilized by occupational therapists to reduce job stressors and improve the psychological well-being of employees with CMDs.[3] The purpose of an integrative approach is to prevent further harm to the employee and to learn how to manage the illness through health promotion, occupational psychology, positive psychology management, psychiatry, and occupational medicine.[3]

Cognitive work hardening programs administered by occupational therapists using the Canadian Model of Client-Centered Enablement (CMCE) improve return to work outcomes of employees suffering from depression. Cognitive work hardening incorporates meaningful occupations or work tasks that are graded to fit individual needs within an environment that is supportive in order to improve self-worth. Cognitive work hardening programs are individualized to promote interpersonal communication and coping skills within a real-life work setting.[4]

The Stimulating Healthy Participation and Relapse Prevention (SHARP) approach is used for individuals with CMDs who experience many sick absences from work. The SHARP approach encompasses five steps including: listing positive and negative situations encountered in the workplace; solutions to negative situations or problems; support need for solutions; planning how to implement solutions; and evaluation of implementation [5]

gollark: Framing it as "we must defeat these enemies who do things which are bad" seems like it could lead to problems.
gollark: Also, I feel like framing all problems/issues/whatever as conflicts/"wars" is... unhelpful.
gollark: That's bizarre.
gollark: Er, because people... have problems... which exist... in the short-term?
gollark: Just magically improve things.

References
  1. Keough, Jeremy L.; Fisher, Thomas F. (2001). "Occupational-psychosocial perceptions influencing return to work and functional performance of injured workers". Work. 16 (2): 101–110. PMID 12441463. (subscription required)
  2. Hoefsmit, Nicole; Houkes, Inge; Nijhuis, Frans J.N. (December 2012). "Intervention characteristics that facilitate return to work after sickness absence: a systematic literature review". Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 22 (4): 462–77. doi:10.1007/s10926-012-9359-z. PMC 3484272. PMID 22476607.
  3. LaMontagne, Anthony D.; Martin, Angela; Page, Kathryn M.; Reavley, Nicola J.; Noblet, Andrew J.; Milner, Allison J.; Keegel, Tessa; Smith, Peter M. (9 May 2014). "Workplace mental health: developing an integrated intervention approach". BMC Psychiatry. 14: 131. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-14-131. PMC 4024273. PMID 24884425.
  4. Wisenthal, Adeena; Krupa, Terry (2013). "Cognitive work hardening: a return-to-work intervention for people with depression". Work. 45 (4): 423–430. doi:10.3233/wor-131635. PMID 23676328. (subscription required)
  5. Arends, Iris; Bultmann, Ute; Nielsen, Karina; van Rhenen, Willem; de Boer, Michiel R.; van der Klink, Jac J.L. (January 2014). "Process evaluation of a problem solving intervention to prevent recurrent sickness absence in workers with common mental disorders". Social Science & Medicine. 100: 123–132. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.10.041. PMID 24444847. (subscription required)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.