New York Public Service Commission

The New York Public Service Commission is the public utilities commission of the New York state government that regulates and oversees the electric, gas, water, and telecommunication industries in New York as part of the Department of Public Service. The department's regulations are compiled in title 16 of the New York Codes, Rules and Regulations. The current chairman of the Commission and chief executive of the Department is John B. Rhodes. His term began on June 21, 2017 and runs through February 1, 2021. [1]

New York State Public Service Commission
Commission overview
Formed1907
JurisdictionNew York
Headquarters3 Madison Ave, Albany, NY 12223
Employees556 (2017)
Annual budget$101.4 million (2017)
Commission executive
  • John B. Rhodes, Chairman
Key document
Websitewww.dps.ny.gov

Organization

The Public Service Commission consist of five members, each appointed by the Governor of New York with the advice and consent of the New York State Senate for a term of six years or to complete an unexpired term of a member.[2] A commissioner is designated as chairman by the Governor to serve in such capacity at the pleasure of the Governor or until their term as commissioner expires.[2] No more than three commissioners may be members of the same political party.[2] The Public Service Commission is within the Department of Public Service,[3][2] and the chairman is the chief executive officer of the Department.[3]

In 2017, the Public Service Commission and the Department of Public Service were appropriated $101.4 million[4] from the state budget and employed 556 people. The payroll totaled $44,195,996 and a commissioner was not listed among the top 25 salary earners.[5] Engineering staff who are licensed professional engineers do not produce stamped engineering plans.[6] The commission has employed and been influenced by an array of interesting personnel: a former Weather Underground member, political insiders, and industry insiders - including an at least one industry insider whose parent was an employee of the commission.[7][8][9][10][11][12] Nora Stanton Blatch Deforest Barney is also among the department's former employees.[13]

History

The Public Service Commission was established in 1907.

Reforming the Energy Vision

In 2014 the Commission and New York Governor Andrew Cuomo initiated Reforming the Energy Vision.[14] Reforming the Energy Vision (commonly abbreviated as REV) is a set of multi-year regulatory proceedings and policy initiatives. The end goals of REV include reducing carbon emissions from the electric sector and opening up new markets in New York state for emerging energy technologies.[15] The affected utilities in the state of New York include Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, National Grid, New York State Electric & Gas Corporation, and Orange and Rockland Utilities. In addition to the core project of utility restructuring, the REV initiative also encompasses a number of other energy programs, some of which were launched before REV itself. These include K-Solar, NY Prize, NY-Sun, BuildSmart NY and the state's Green Bank.[16] Although the state regulates the siting process of utility-scale (25 MW or greater) electric generation in New York via the Board on Electric Generation Siting and the Environment,[17] much of the planning process for utility-scale electric generation is undertaken by the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO), an organization regulated under the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.[18] The NYISO maintains an interconnection queue where it may be possible to calculate the success rate of utility-scale electric generation and merchant transmission proposals.[19]

In 2016, the Public Service Commission adopted a Clean Energy Standard, to assist in achieving the state's target of obtaining 50% of its electricity from renewable and nuclear sources by 2030, which will see customer bills increase to support these sources. A particular aim was to support three nuclear plants, Ginna, James A. FitzPatrick and Nine Mile Point that had become uneconomic; the support for nuclear is expected to cost $1 billion in the first two years.[20][21]

Rate cases

The commission's regulatory oversight extends to the approval of retail consumer rate increase (or decrease) requests from the electric, water, steam, and local natural gas distribution utilities it regulates. The commission approves (or denies) these rate requests because each utility operates as a monopoly service provider in its retail region. This is a process which offers the public an opportunity to comment. Utilities determine when they wish to file for a new case. The commission uses a standard of reasonability - or how a reasonable person would judge - to assess the public need for proposed levels of capital expenditures, operating expenditures and other spending. Regulated utilities are publicly-traded companies, and must also provide returns for shareholders. These returns are argued for in these rate cases, and a return on equity of around 10 percent is normal.

Electric power facilities siting

Transmission facilities siting

For the incumbent electric utility companies and the merchant transmission developers that it regulates, the commission must issue a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and Public Need prior to the operation and construction of an electric transmission line - a "major utility transmission facility" - in the state. This is pursuant to Article VII of the Public Service Law. The process provides for public notification and participation. This certificate provides detail on the final routing of a transmission line, the public need for the line, the probable environmental impact of the line, among other details. After this certificate is granted, the utility or developer then files an Environmental Management and Construction Plan that the commission also must approve prior to construction.[22][23] It may require many years for a project, depending upon the level of controversy, to proceed through the Article VII siting process, although it may take only 6 months to construct. The certification process can take even longer if routing occurs through municipalities that are charged with managing a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4). Final state certification requires approval from the local MS4 municipality in accordance with its MS4 plan.[24]

Part 102 siting

There are some instances when electric transmission lines can be built without going through the Article VII transmission facilities siting process. The Public Service Law defines a "major utility transmission facility" as an electric transmission line operating at greater than 125-kilovolts (kV) and longer than 1-mile in length, or an electric transmission line operating at greater than 100-kV (and less than 125-kV) and greater than 10 miles in length. It does not extend this definition to transmission facilities located wholly underground in cities with a population of greater than 125,000 people or to facilities approved in relation to FERC-certified hydroelectric facilities.[25] Notably, Part 102 of the Public Service Law, for example, allows for the 60-day review of a 115-kV transmission line with a length of less than 10 miles, without a formal response from the commission.[26] Part 102 filing has enabled certain utilities to maintain their infrastructure without being burdened with the financial and time constraints of Article VII filings.

Generation facilities siting

Electric generation facilities siting in New York is the responsibility of a multi-agency board called the Siting Board on Electric Generation Siting and the Environment. It reviews and certifies projects with proposed capabilities of 25 MWs or greater.[27] Its board members are the heads of the Public Service Commission, the Department of Health, the Department of Environmental Conservation, NYSERDA, and the Empire State Development Corporation.[28] The generation siting process in New York is still fairly young - the Article 10 statutes passed into law in 2011 by Governor Andrew Cuomo.[29] Prior to the Article 10 regulations, Public Service Law Section 68 acted as a gap regulation after the expiration of the Article X - not "10" - process in the early 2000s.[30]

Local community response and participation

The local community response to proposed electric facilities siting depends largely upon the notification process to local land owners. The Article VII and Article 10 regulations call for fairly wide notification. The Article 10 process, notably, invites local community members to serve as Siting Board members. Many of the comments posted by local community members reflect NIMBY positions or appeals to a perceived health threat from low-frequency electric and magnetic fields. As of 2018, a large number of proposed wind turbine facilities located in Western and Upstate New York are being processed under the Article 10 regulations, and the impacts of astroturfing and the rate at which the commission staff can process the amount of these projects has yet to be determined.

Service disruptions

The commission is empowered with various tools to monitor and investigate utility service disruptions. Their response to events that cause or have the potential to cause service disruptions has historically depended upon media coverage, administrative agendas, the number of customers impacted, and the severity to which customers are impacted. Prior to large storms and other weather disturbances, the commission will send staff to the State Office of Emergency Management bunker located in the New York State Police headquarters to report on electric outage numbers during the event. This bunker is usually staffed 24 hours a day for the duration of an event, and utility company staff may also be present. The GIS software that commission staff uses to report outage information to SOEM staff aggregates freely available outage numbers from each utility website in real-time.

gollark: C has very weak types; stuff will arbitrarily be coerced into other stuff half the time, and it has no generics.
gollark: You're forgetting that Rust has somewhat more stuff going on than "safer C". It also ACTUALLY HAS A TYPE SYSTEM, unlike C.
gollark: Remote function calls, basically.
gollark: Does anyone else prefer RPC-type APIs over REST?
gollark: Remove the battery?

See also

References
  1. "Chair: John B. Rhodes". www3.dps.ny.gov.
  2. Public Service Law § 4
  3. Public Service Law § 3
  4. "Annual Report State Fiscal Year 2017-2018" (PDF). www3.dps.ny.gov. p. 28. Retrieved November 30, 2018.
  5. "Seethroughny Payroll Page". Retrieved October 17, 2018.
  6. "NYSPSC DMM Search". Retrieved October 18, 2018.
  7. "Report on the Investigation of Two Allegations Relating to the Public Service Commission" (PDF). February 2008. p. 112. Retrieved October 18, 2018.
  8. "Wilson Center Bio". Retrieved November 7, 2018.
  9. PAUL L. MONTGOMERY (October 25, 1981). "LAST OF RADICAL LEADERS ELUDED POLICE 11 YEARS". Retrieved November 7, 2018.
  10. "WOH Attn Bio". Retrieved November 8, 2018.
  11. Robert Gavin (March 24, 2018). "Corruption Trial Bruises Powerful Law Firm". Retrieved November 8, 2018.
  12. "NG Obit". Retrieved November 8, 2018.
  13. Harackiewicz, Frances J.; Chevalier, Lizette R.; Palmer, Stan C. (August 6, 2001). "Notable Engineers: A Project Book" (PDF). www.ineer.org. p. 6B7-6. Retrieved August 23, 2019.
  14. "14-M-0101: Reforming the Energy Vision (REV)". .dps.ny.gov. 2014-11-07. Retrieved 2018-08-14.
  15. "REV in 2016: The year that could transform utility business models in New York".
  16. "White paper" (PDF). www.ny.gov. March 2016.
  17. http://www3.dps.ny.gov/W/PSCWeb.nsf/All/1392EC6DD904BBC285257F4E005BE810?OpenDocument
  18. "NYISO website". Retrieved October 17, 2018.
  19. "NYISO Planning Documents". Retrieved October 17, 2018.
  20. Campbell, Jon (1 August 2016). "NY OKs energy plan with nuclear bailout". Democrat and Chronicle. Rochester. Retrieved 7 March 2017.
  21. Campbell, Jon (6 March 2017). "Decision-makers skip N.Y. nuclear bailout hearing". Democrat and Chronicle. Rochester. Retrieved 7 March 2017.
  22. "Article VII Flow Chart" (PDF). Retrieved November 8, 2018.
  23. "PSL Section 121". Retrieved November 8, 2018.
  24. "NYSDEC MS4 Description". Retrieved November 8, 2018.
  25. "PSL Section 120 Definitions". Retrieved November 8, 2018.
  26. "PSL Part 102" (PDF). Retrieved November 8, 2018.
  27. "Siting Board Page on DPS Website". Retrieved November 8, 2018.
  28. "Siting Board Info Page". Retrieved November 8, 2018.
  29. "Article 10 DPS Page". Retrieved November 8, 2018.
  30. "PSL Section 68". Retrieved November 8, 2018.

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.