McCord Bend, Missouri

McCord Bend is a village in Stone County, Missouri, United States. The population was 297 at the 2010 census. It is part of the Branson, Missouri Micropolitan Statistical Area.

McCord Bend, Missouri
Village
Location of McCord Bend, Missouri
Coordinates: 36°47′14″N 93°30′14″W
CountryUnited States
StateMissouri
CountyStone
Area
 • Total0.32 sq mi (0.84 km2)
 • Land0.29 sq mi (0.76 km2)
 • Water0.03 sq mi (0.08 km2)
Elevation
968 ft (295 m)
Population
 • Total297
 • Estimate 
(2019)[3]
299
 • Density1,020.48/sq mi (393.81/km2)
Time zoneUTC-6 (Central (CST))
 • Summer (DST)UTC-5 (CDT)
FIPS code29-44829[4]
GNIS feature ID1669611[5]

Geography

McCord Bend is located at 36°47′14″N 93°30′14″W (36.787284, -93.503906).[6]

According to the United States Census Bureau, the village has a total area of 0.32 square miles (0.83 km2), of which 0.29 square miles (0.75 km2) is land and 0.03 square miles (0.08 km2) is water.[7]

Demographics
Historical population
CensusPop.%±
2000292—
20102971.7%
Est. 2019299[3]0.7%
U.S. Decennial Census[8]

2010 census

As of the census[2] of 2010, there were 297 people, 114 households, and 78 families living in the village. The population density was 1,024.1 inhabitants per square mile (395.4/km2). There were 155 housing units at an average density of 534.5 per square mile (206.4/km2). The racial makeup of the village was 96.0% White, 0.3% African American, 0.7% Native American, 0.3% Asian, and 2.7% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 2.7% of the population.

There were 114 households, of which 31.6% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 53.5% were married couples living together, 11.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 3.5% had a male householder with no wife present, and 31.6% were non-families. 27.2% of all households were made up of individuals, and 9.7% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.61 and the average family size was 3.19.

The median age in the village was 41.3 years. 24.2% of residents were under the age of 18; 8.9% were between the ages of 18 and 24; 21.7% were from 25 to 44; 28.9% were from 45 to 64; and 16.5% were 65 years of age or older. The gender makeup of the village was 48.8% male and 51.2% female.

2000 census

As of the census[4] of 2000, there were 292 people, 115 households, and 84 families living in the village. The population density was 1,033.0 people per square mile (402.6/km2). There were 155 housing units at an average density of 548.3 per square mile (213.7/km2). The racial makeup of the village was 96.92% White, 1.03% Native American, 0.34% Asian, and 1.71% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 1.03% of the population.

There were 115 households, out of which 27.0% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 57.4% were married couples living together, 13.9% had a female householder with no husband present, and 26.1% were non-families. 21.7% of all households were made up of individuals, and 11.3% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.54 and the average family size was 2.94.

In the village, the population was spread out, with 24.7% under the age of 18, 7.2% from 18 to 24, 24.3% from 25 to 44, 26.4% from 45 to 64, and 17.5% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 40 years. For every 100 females, there were 102.8 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 93.0 males.

The median income for a household in the village was $27,143, and the median income for a family was $28,750. Males had a median income of $25,625 versus $17,500 for females. The per capita income for the village was $11,703. About 24.7% of families and 25.5% of the population were below the poverty line, including 46.8% of those under the age of eighteen and 8.9% of those 65 or over.

gollark: And can't self-replicate.
gollark: Meanwhile, solar panels are 20% efficient, or something like that, but don't provide conveniently storable energy.
gollark: I think it's constrained by CO2 input, actually? Not sure.
gollark: It's something like 2% efficient overall.
gollark: Clearly, the solution is to overhaul photosynthesis to be less bad.

References
  1. "2019 U.S. Gazetteer Files". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved July 26, 2020.
  2. "U.S. Census website". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved 2012-07-08.
  3. "Population and Housing Unit Estimates". United States Census Bureau. May 24, 2020. Retrieved May 27, 2020.
  4. "U.S. Census website". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved 2008-01-31.
  5. "US Board on Geographic Names". United States Geological Survey. 2007-10-25. Retrieved 2008-01-31.
  6. "US Gazetteer files: 2010, 2000, and 1990". United States Census Bureau. 2011-02-12. Retrieved 2011-04-23.
  7. "US Gazetteer files 2010". United States Census Bureau. Archived from the original on January 12, 2012. Retrieved 2012-07-08.
  8. "Census of Population and Housing". Census.gov. Retrieved June 4, 2015.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.