Kitne Pakistan

Kitne Pakistan (translation: How Many Pakistan?[3]) is a 2000 Hindi novel by Kamleshwar, noted 20th-century Hindi writer, a pioneer of the Nayi Kahani ("New Story") movement of the 1950s, and later screenwriter for Hindi cinema.[4] The novel combines allegory and realism, and deals with a vast expanse of human history, as it follows the rise of sectarianism, nationalism, Hindutva and communalism, raising questions about the true motives of the people who make decisions on the behalf and for common people, who throughout the history have borne the brunt of their decision. It witnesses the violence, separation and bloodshed in the aftermath of partition of India in 1947 and examines the nature and futility of divisive politics and religion.[3][5][6]

Kitne Pakistan
AuthorKamleshwar
Original titleकितने पाकिस्तान
CountryIndia
LanguageHindi
Subjectpartition of India
Genrehistorical novel
Published2000 by Rajpal & Sons, Delhi [1]
Pages361 pages [2]
AwardsSahitya Akademi Award (2003)
ISBN8170283205 (2000 ed.)
OCLC44951976
891.433
LC ClassPK2098.K26
Preceded byNot Flowers of Henna 

It won the 2003 Sahitya Akademi Award for Hindi, given by Sahitya Akademi, India's National Academy of Letters.[7] Today, the novel is considered as author's finest work,[4] and one of the classics of modern Hindi literature.[8]

History

Kamleshwar started working his ambitious novel in May 1990, aiming to understand Partition through allegory and realism.[9]

The first English translation of the novel came in 2001, in an partition anthology Translating partition published by Katha, which also featured works by Saadat Hasan Manto and Bhisham Sahni.[10] This was followed by another translation by Ameena Kazi Ansari, Partitions was published by Penguin Books in 2006,[11] subsequently it was widely anthologised,[3] It has been subject of several critical studies, including Partition stories : mapping community, communalism, and gender (2009) by Vinod K Chopra. In 2013, another study, Kitne Pakistan: sampradayika vimarsha (Dialogue on communalism) of the novel was published by Pratapsingh Rajput.[12]

The novel achieved both popular and critical acclaim, it has been translated into several languages including Marathi and French.[13]

Summary

In a fictional court, various historical characters are brought to the witness's box and asked to narrate their version of history. These historical personalities range from mughal emperors Babur and Aurangzeb, Spanish adventurer Hernando Cortez, Lord Mountbatten, Adolf Hitler and Saddam Hussein, along with political leaders, religious zealots and even scheming Gods of mythology, many are accused of creating innumerable divided nations and people, and a legacy of hatred and distrust. The only arbiter standing for the humanity, is an unnamed abeed, littérateur. He listens to the witnesses, and mulls over the casualties of Kurukshetra, Kargil, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Nazi Germany, East Timor, the Aztec civilization and mythological Greece to Bosnia.

Legacy

In a 2007 interview, poet-lyricist Gulzar with whom Kamleshwar had work in film career, noted about the novel, "I had underlined so many sentences that were potential short stories or film material. There is a description where a handkerchief falls off the bridge; I always used to tell him that I could write a complete short story on this one line only."[14] The novel has also been adapted to a play in 2013.[15]

Translation

  • Partitions, Penguin Books, 2006. ISBN 0-14-400099-7 (Reprint: 2008, ISBN 978-0-14-306370-4)
gollark: I mean, those apply to some narrowly defined things in physics, for limited definitions of "action" and such, but not in general so far as I can tell.
gollark: I don't think so, unless you really stretch the definition most of the time or claim it's metaphorical or something.
gollark: Like "colourless green ideas sleep furiously" and such.
gollark: It's just that stuff like "thought isnt action. so things that started as thought are just concepts in action, the action is still the same action as all other actions, push and pull." and "every action has an equal and opposite reaction" don't seem like... semantically meaningful sentences. I mean, they're... valid sentences, but don't look like they're actually conveying any true useful information.
gollark: Sure?

See also

References

  1. "Book_Details: Kitne Pakistan". Rajpal & Sons. Archived from the original on 17 October 2014. Retrieved 11 October 2014.
  2. "LC Online Catalog - Item Information". Library of Congress. Retrieved 11 October 2014.
  3. Geeti Sen (1997). Crossing Boundaries. Orient Blackswan. pp. 81, 91. ISBN 978-81-250-1341-9.
  4. Kamleshwar (2007). Not Flowers of Henna. Katha. pp. 6, 8. ISBN 978-81-89020-21-7.
  5. Sukrita Paul Kumar (2004). Narrating partition: texts, interpretations, ideas. Indialog Publications. p. 15. ISBN 978-81-87981-62-6.
  6. "अदीबों की अदालत है 'कितने पाकिस्तान'". BBC, Hindi (in Hindi). 29 December 2003. Retrieved 11 October 2014.
  7. "Sahitya Akademi Awards listings". Sahitya Akademi, Official website. Archived from the original on 25 September 2010. Retrieved 11 October 2014.
  8. Sweta Kaushal (15 September 2014). "7 classics of Hindi literature you must read right now - Hindustan Times". Retrieved 11 October 2014.
  9. Nilanjana S Roy (15 August 2006). "Four tales of Partition". Business Standard. Retrieved 11 October 2014.
  10. Makarand Paranjape (9 July 2001). "Book review of 'Translating Partition'". India Today. Retrieved 11 October 2014.
  11. Kamleshwar (2008). Partitions. Penguin Books India. ISBN 978-0-14-306370-4.
  12. Pratapsingh Rajput (2013). Kitane Pākistān: sāmpradāyika vimarśa. ISBN 978-81-89187-15-6.
  13. Harihar Swarup (28 December 2003). "PROFILE: Kamleshwar brings out the truth of life". The Tribune, Chandigarh. Retrieved 11 October 2014.
  14. Gulzar (29 January 2007). "Kamleshwar, Hindi's gem, dies at 75". Indian Express. Retrieved 11 October 2014.
  15. "Founder'S Day: Dikshant students stage 'Kitne Pakistan'". The Tribune, Chandigarh. 29 December 2013. Retrieved 11 October 2014.

Bibliography

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.