Istishab

Istishab (Arabic: استصحاب‎ transl. continuity) is an Islamic term used in the jurisprudence to denote the principle of the presumption of continuity.[1] It is derived from an Arabic word suhbah meaning accompany.[2] It is one of the fundamental principles of the legal deduction that presumes the continuation of a fact. It is based on probability and can be applied in the absence of other proofs.[3]

Part of a series on Islam
Usul al-Fiqh
Fiqh
Ahkam

Istishab, an initiative of ash-Shafii,[4] is the rationalistic principle of extracting a legal solution according to which changes are not considered to occur until clear signs of these changes are apparent. It serves as the basis for many legal rulings such as the presumption of innocence—the person is regarded as innocent unless proven guilty. Malik ibn Anas and ash-Shafii regarded it to be a proof until it is contradicted.[5] Several classical jurists differed over this principle with some Hanafi jurists refusing to regard it as an evidence.[6][7] It is now widely employed by the contemporaries scholars with the exception of Hanbali scholars.[8][9]

Definition

Ibn al-Qayyim defined it as[10]

The continuation of what is established or the negation of what does not exist, i.e. it is the judgement, negative or positive, continues until there is evidence of a change of state. This continuance is not proved by positive evidence, but by the absence of the existence of new evidence.

Al-Qarafi expressed it as the validity of the former state in the following words.

Istishab means the belief that the past or present matter must be assumed to remain as it is in the present or future.

Types

Istishab is divided into several types. The majority of the scholars agree upon three types.[11]

Presumption of the original absence

It is the absence of any Shariah norms on an adult Muslim, until their legitimacy is established. An example is the absence of the mandatory sixth prayer for a Muslim, the resumption of the person's innocence in a crime, etc. Islamic theologians are unanimous regarding the validity of this type.[12]

Basis in everyday life is permissibility

The overwhelming majority of jurists believe that the basis in useful everyday things is permissibility and in harmful things is prohibition. For example, a certain type of food is allowed until a Sharia argument is established, proving its prohibition.

Presumption of existence before evidence is available

If there are Sharia texts with respect to any norm, backed up by the Istishab, then statements about the abolition of this rule will not be accepted until they are backed up by evidence. An example is the continued ownership of property rights. The application to terminate property will not be accepted until evidence is submitted supporting these statements. Another example is the validity of the ablution, which will not invalidated on the mere basis of doubt.

gollark: Well, I made a thing which converts them to horrible trees which can be matched against.
gollark: I'm busy making a horrible tree thing → FSM converter so I can represent anagrams as regexes.
gollark: Like Macron, except it actually has a "spec".
gollark: I think they mean "exists" as "is a thing which can theoretically be implemented".
gollark: So you might not be able to reach consensus.

References
  1. "Istishab - Oxford Islamic Studies Online". www.oxfordislamicstudies.com. Retrieved 2017-11-30. Islamic legal term for the presumption of continuity, where a situation existing previously is presumed to be continuing at present until the contrary is proven.
  2. Team, Almaany. "ترجمة و معنى استصحاب في قاموس عربي انجليزي" [Meaning of Istishab in English Arabic Almaany Dictionary]. www.almaany.com. Retrieved 2017-11-30.
  3. Ahmad, Abu Umar Faruq (2010). Theory and Practice of Modern Islamic Finance: The Case Analysis from Australia. Universal-Publishers. ISBN 9781599425177.
  4. Sookhdeo, Patrick (2014-06-30). Understanding Islamic Theology. BookBaby. ISBN 9780989290548.
  5. Baamir, Abdulrahman Yahya (2016-04-01). Shari'a Law in Commercial and Banking Arbitration: Law and Practice in Saudi Arabia. Routledge. ISBN 9781317055624.
  6. al-Ḥasan., Muḥammadī, Abū (2002). Mabānī-i istinbāṭ-i ḥuqūq-i Islāmī, yā, Uṣūl-i fiqh (Chāp-i 14 ed.). Tihrān: Muʼassasah-ʼi Intishārāt va Chāp-i Dānishgāh-i Tihrān. ISBN 9640340766. OCLC 54049210.
  7. al-Ḥillī, al-ʿAllāmah (2016-11-10). Foundations of Jurisprudence - An Introduction to Imāmī Shīʿī Legal Theory: Mabādiʾ al-wuṣūl ilā ʿilm al-uṣūl. BRILL. ISBN 9789004311770.
  8. Kamali, Mohammad Hashim (2008-03-17). Shari'ah Law: An Introduction. Oneworld Publications. ISBN 9781780740379.
  9. "Al Qawaaid al Fiqhiyyah - Shakeel Mahate". www.smahate.com. Retrieved 2017-11-30.
  10. "The Eighth Principle: The Principle of Istishab (Presumption of Continuity)". www.iium.edu.my. Retrieved 2017-11-30.
  11. Gleave, Robert (2000). Inevitable Doubt: Two Theories of Shīʻī Jurisprudence. BRILL. ISBN 9004115951.
  12. al-Ḥillī, al-ʿAllāmah (2016-11-10). Foundations of Jurisprudence - An Introduction to Imāmī Shīʿī Legal Theory: Mabādiʾ al-wuṣūl ilā ʿilm al-uṣūl. BRILL. ISBN 9789004311770.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.