Ismail Samani

Abū Ibrāhīm Ismā'īl ibn Aḥmad (Persian: ابو ابراهیم اسماعیل بن احمد سامانی‎; May 849 – 24 November 907),[1] better known simply as Ismail Samani (اسماعیل سامانی), and also known as Isma'il ibn Ahmad (اسماعیل بن احمد), was the Samanid amir of Transoxiana (892–907) and Khorasan (900–907). His reign saw the emergence of the Samanids as a powerful force.[2] He was the son of Ahmad ibn Asad and a descendant of Saman Khuda, the eponymous ancestor of the Samanid dynasty who renounced Zoroastrianism and embraced Islam.[3]

Ismail Samani
اسماعیل سامانی
Statue of Isma'il in Dushanbe, Tajikistan
Amir of the Samanid Empire
ReignAugust 892 – 24 November 907
PredecessorNasr I
SuccessorAhmad Samani
BornMay 849
Farghana
Died24 November 907
Bukhara
Burial
Samanid Mausoleum, Bukhara
IssueAhmad Samani
DynastySamanids
FatherAhmad ibn Asad
ReligionSunni Islam

Background

Although the Samanids were Persian speakers of Iranian stock, their original language and origin is uncertain. They were native to Balkh, which suggests that they came from a Bactrian background.[4] The family itself claimed to be the descendants of the Parthian Mihran family, one of the Seven Great Houses of Iran during the pre-Islamic Sasanian era.[5] However, this was possibly a mere attempt to enhance their lineage.[6] They may have been originally of Hephthalite descent,[lower-alpha 1] due to one of their coins resembling that of the same style of the Hephthalites, instead of the Sasanians.[6] Regardless, the Samanid royal family both spoke and advocated Persian, probably part of their aim to spread the belief that their rule was a continuum of the Sasanian Empire.[6]

Early life
See also: Samanid Civil War of 888

Ismail was born in Farghana in 849—he was the son of Ahmad ibn Asad, and had a brother named Nasr I, who ascended the Samanid throne in 864/5. During Nasr's reign, Ismail was sent to take control of Bukhara, which had been devastated by looting on the part of forces from Khwarezm. The citizens of the city welcomed Ismail, seeing him as someone who could bring stability.

Soon afterwards, a disagreement over where tax money should be distributed caused a falling out between Nasr and Ismail. A struggle ensued, in which Ismail proved victorious. Although he took effective control of the state, he did not formally overthrow his brother, instead remaining in Bukhara. He did so because Nasr had been the one to whom the Caliph had given the formal investiture of Transoxiana; in the caliph's eyes, Nasr was the only legitimate ruler of the region. Furthermore, the Saffarids of Sistan had claims on Transoxiana; the overthrow of Nasr would have given the Saffarids a pretext for invading. Ismail therefore continued to formally recognize Nasr as ruler until the latter's death in August 892, at which point he officially took power.

Reign

Consolidation of power in Transoxiana and Khorasan
Map of Khorasan and its surrounding regions

Ismail was active to the north and east, steadily spreading Samanid influence as well as solidifying his control over other areas including Kirman, Sistan and Kabul.[9] Ismail was successful in establishing economic and commercial development and organized a powerful army.[10] It was said that he made his capital Bukhara into one of Islam's most glorious cities,[11] as Ismail attracted scholars, artists, and doctors of law into the region.[12] The first translation of the Qur'an into Persian was completed during Samanid rule. Sunni theology greatly cultivated during Ismail's reign, as numerous mosques and madrassas were built.[13]

In 893, Ismail took the city of Talas, the capital of the Karluk Turks, taking large numbers of slaves and livestock. In addition, a Nestorian church was converted into a mosque.[14] He also brought an end to the Principality of Ushrusana, extending Samanid control over the Syr Darya river.[15] Ismail and other Samanid rulers propagated Islam amongst the inhabitants and as many as 30,000 tents of Turks came to profess Islam. During his reign he subjugated numerous regional states to the east, directly incorporating some within his boundaries and retaining the local rulers of others as vassals. Khwarezm to the north was partitioned; the southern part remained autonomous under its Afrighid rulers, while the northern part was governed by a Samanid official. Another campaign in 903 further secured the Samanid boundaries. These campaigns kept the heart of his state safe from Turkish raids, and allowed Muslim missionaries to expand their activities in the region.

Even after his brother Nasr's death, Ismail's rule in Bukhara was not formally recognized by the caliph at that point. As a result, the Saffarid ruler 'Amr-i Laith himself asked the caliph for the investiture of Transoxiana. The caliph, Al-Mu'tadid, however, sent Ismail a letter urging him to fight Amr-i Laith and the Saffarids whom the caliph considered usurpers. According to the letter, the caliph stated that he prayed for Ismail, who the caliph considered the rightful ruler of Khorasan.[16] The letter had a profound effect on Ismail, as he was determined to oppose the Saffarids.

The two sides fought in Balkh, northern Afghanistan during the spring of 900. During battle, Ismail was significantly outnumbered as he came out with 20,000 horsemen against Amr's 70,000-strong cavalry.[17] Ismail's horsemen were ill-equipped with most having wooden stirrups while some had no shields or lances. Amr-i Laith's cavalry on the other hand, were fully equipped with weapons and armor. Despite fierce fighting, Amr was captured as some of his troops switched sides and joined Ismail.[18] Ismail wished to ransom him to the Saffarids, but they refused, so he sent 'Amr to the caliph, who blamed 'Amr's conduct[19] in the matter and then invested Ismail with Khorasan, Tabaristan, Ray, and Isfahan.

Conquest of northern Iran
Map of northern Iran

Ismail decided to take advantage of the caliph's grant by sending an army to Tabaristan, which was then controlled by the Zaydids under Muhammad ibn Zayd. Muhammad and his army met the Samanid army under Muhammad ibn Harun al-Sarakhsi at Gurgan, and in the ensuing battle, the Samanids prevailed, and the severely wounded Muhammad was captured. He died on the next day, 3 October 900 (or in August, according to Abu'l-Faraj).[20][21][22] His corpse was decapitated, and his head was sent to Ismail at the Samanid court at Bukhara.

As Muhammad's son and designated heir Zayd was also captured and sent to Bukhara, the Zaydid leaders agreed to name Zayd's infant son al-Mahdi as their ruler, but dissension broke out among their ranks: one of them proclaimed himself for the Abbasids instead, and his troops attacked and massacred the Zaydid supporters. Instead, the Samanids took over the province.[21] The Samanid conquest brought along a restoration of Sunni Islam in the province.

However, Ismail's general Muhammad ibn Harun shortly revolted, forcing Ismail to send an army under his son Ahmad Samani and cousin Abu'l-Abbas Abdullah into northern Persia in 901, including Tabaristan, forcing Muhammad to flee to Daylam. The Samanid army also managed to conquer several other cities including Ray and Qazvin, though subsequent rulers lost the territory to the Daylamites and Kurds.[15] Ismail then appointed his cousin Abu'l-Abbas Abdullah as the governor of Tabaristan.

Although Ismail continued to send gifts to the caliph, as was customary, he neither paid tribute or taxes. For all intents and purposes he was an independent ruler, although he never took any title higher than that of amir.

Death

After a long sickness Ismail died on 24 November 907[23] and was succeeded by his son Ahmad Samani. Ismail gave enormous amounts of booty and riches to others, and kept nothing.[24]

Legacy
Picture of the Samanid Mausoleum, the burial site of Ismail.
Samanid Mausoleum's Lake.

Ismail is known in history as a competent general and a strong ruler; many stories about him are written in Arabic and Persian sources. Furthermore, because of his campaigns in the north, his empire was so safe from enemy incursions that the defences of Bukhara and Samarkand went unused. However, this later had consequences; at the end of the dynasty, the earlier strong, but now crumbling walls, were greatly missed by the Samanids, who were constantly under attack by the Karakhanids and other enemies.[25]

According to a Bukharian historian writing in 943, Ismail:

Was indeed worthy and right for padishahship. He was an intelligent, just, compassionate person, one possessing reason and prescience...he conducted affairs with justice and good ethics. Whoever tyrannized people he would punish...In affairs of state he was always impartial.[24]

The celebrated scholar Nizam al-Mulk, in his famous work, Siyasatnama, stated that Ismail:

Was extremely just, and his good qualities were many. He had pure faith in God (to Him be power and glory) and he was generous to the poor – to name only one of his notable virtues.[26]

With the end of Soviet dominion in Central Asia, Ismail's legacy was rediscovered and rehabilitated. The Somoni currency of Tajikistan is named after Ismail, and he is featured on the obverse of the 100 Somoni banknote. Also, the highest mountain in Tajikistan (and in the former Soviet Union) is named after Ismail. The mountain was formerly known as "Stalin Peak" and "Communism Peak" but was subsequently changed to the Ismoil Somoni Peak.

gollark: This is why we should replace inconsistent and hard to render maths notation with glorious S-expressions.
gollark: ... what even
gollark: There was some nice elegant explanation I forgot. IIRC it's something to do with the derivative of e^x being equal to itself.
gollark: I assume you're doing binomial distributions if whatever A-level spec you do is similar to mine, which it probably is, in which case I don't think they cover anything more advanced than trial and error/look at a table for that. Although it's probably <=/>= instead of = 0.02, as there's no guarantee that there is any x satisfying the = version.
gollark: It *also* matters how it's distributed.

See also

Notes
  1. The Hephthalites were a tribal group that was most prominent of the "Iranian Huns".[7] In the second half of the 5th-century, they controlled Tukharistan/Bactria and also seemingly chunks of southern Transoxiana.[8]

References
  1. The book of government, or, Rules for kings: the Siyar al-Muluk, or, Siyasat-nama of Nizam al-Mulk, Niẓām al-Mulk, Hubert Darke, pg. 156
  2. Sen, Sailendra (2013). A Textbook of Medieval Indian History. Primus Books. p. 62. ISBN 978-9-38060-734-4.
  3. Encyclopaedic Survey of Islamic Culture, pg. 84 Mohammad Taher
  4. Foltz 2019, p. 66.
  5. Foltz 2019, pp. 66–67.
  6. Foltz 2019, p. 67.
  7. Rezakhani 2017, p. 145.
  8. Daryaee & Rezakhani 2017, p. 163.
  9. Tabaḳāt-i-nāsiri: a general history of the Muhammadan dynastics of Asia, pg. 1, By Minhāj Sirāj Jūzjānī
  10. The historical, social and economic setting, By M.S. Asimov, pg. 78
  11. Atlas of the year 1000, By John Man, pg. 78
  12. A history of Persia, Volume 2, By Sir Percy Molesworth Sykes, pg. 90
  13. Muslim reformist political thought: revivalists, modernists and free will By Sarfraz Khan, p. 11
  14. The Samanids, R.N. Frye, The Cambridge History of Iran, Vol.4, ed. R. N. Frye, (Cambridge University Press, 1999), 138.
  15. ESMĀʿĪL, b. Aḥmad b. Asad SĀMĀNĪ, ABŪ EBRĀHĪM , C. Edmund Bosworth, Encyclopaedia Iranica
  16. The book of government, or, Rules for kings: the Siyar al-Muluk, or, Siyasat-nama of Nizam al-Mulk, Niẓām al-Mulk, Hubert Darke, pp. 18–19
  17. History of Islam (Vol 3) By Akbar Shah Najeebabadi, pg. 330
  18. Ibn Khallikan's biographical dictionary By Ibn Khallikān, pg.329
  19. Ibn Khallikan's biographical dictionary By Ibn Khallikān, pg.328
  20. The Encyclopedia of Islam, New Edition, Volume VII, pp. 417–418
  21. Madelung (1993), pp. 595–597
  22. Madelung (1975), p. 207
  23. Tabaqat-i Nasiri by Minhaj-i-Siraj, pg. 104, Lahore Sangmil Publications 2004
  24. The modern Uzbeks: from the fourteenth century to the present : a cultural history, by Edward Allworth, pg. 19
  25. Frye 1975, p. 140.
  26. The book of government, or, Rules for kings: the Siyar al-Muluk, or, Siyasat-nama of Nizam al-Mulk, Niẓām al-Mulk, Hubert Darke, pg. 14

Sources
Preceded by
Nasr I		 Amir of the Samanids
892–907		 Succeeded by
Ahmad Samani
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.