Hyolitha

Hyoliths are animals with small conical shells, known as fossils from the Palaeozoic Era. They are lophophorates, a group which includes the brachiopods.

Hyolitha Temporal range: Fortunian to end Permian, 536–251.9 Ma[1][2][3] PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg N
Hyolithes cerops, Spence Shale, Idaho (Middle Cambrian)
Scientific classification
Kingdom:	Animalia
Clade:	Lophophorata
Clade:	Brachiozoa
Class:	†Hyolitha Marek, 1963
Orders
See text.

Morphology

The shell is typically one to four centimeters in length, triangular or elliptical in cross section. Some species have rings or stripes. It comprises two parts: the main conical shell (previously referred to as a ‘conch’) and a cap-like operculum. Some also had two curved supports known as helens[4] They are calcareous – probably aragonitic[5] All of these structures grew by marginal accretion.

Shell microstructure

The orthothecid shell has an internal layer with a microstructure of transverse bundles, and an external layer comprising longitudinal bundles.[5]

Helens

Some hyoliths had helens, long structures that taper as they coil gently in a logarithmic spiral in a ventral direction.[5][4] The helens had an organic-rich central core surrounded by concentric laminae of calcite. They grew by the addition of new material at their base, on the cavity side, leaving growth lines.[5]

They were originally described by Walcott as separate fossils under the genus name Helenia, (Walcott's wife was named Helena and his daughter Helen); Bruce Runnegar adopted the name helen when they were recognized as part of the hyolith organism.[5] Encrusting organisms have been found on helens, and also on both sides of the main shell, all of which are therefore supposed to have been raised above the sea bed. The helens have been interpreted as props that supported the feeding organ, the lophophore, above the sea bed.[4]

Operculum

The operculum closes over the aperture of the shell, leaving (in hyolithids) two gaps through which the helens can protrude.[5] It comprises two parts: the cardinal shield, a flat region at the top of the shell; and the conical shield, the bottom part, which is more conical.[5] The inside of the shell bears a number of protrusions, notably the dorsal cardinal processes and the radially-arranged clavicles.[5]

Soft tissues

The soft tissues of the mid-Cambrian hyolith Haplophrentis, from the Burgess Shale and Spence Shale Lagerstätten include a gullwing-shaped band below the operculum. This band is interpreted as a lophophore, a feeding organ with a central mouth; it bears 12 to 16 tentacles. From the mouth a muscular pharynx leads to a gut, which loops back and exits beyond the crown of tentacles. Next the gut are a pair of large kidney-shaped organs of uncertain nature. Under the operculum are muscles. The thin body wall circumscribes the interior of the shell, except the apex.[4]

Taxonomy

Hyoliths from the Middle Ordovician of northern Estonia; these are internal molds.

The hyoliths are divided into two orders, the Hyolithida and the Orthothecida.

Hyolitha have dorso-ventrally differentiated opercula, with the ventral surface of the shell extending forwards to form a shelf termed the ligula.[5]

The Orthothecida are somewhat more problematic, and probably contain a number of non-hyoliths simply because they are so difficult to identify with confidence, especially if their operculum is absent.[5] They have a straight (planar) opening, sometimes with a notch on the bottom side, and sealed with an operculum that has no ligula, clavicles, furrow or rooflets.[6]

Hyptiotheca is an unusual hyolithid, in that it lacks clavicles.[6]

Orthothecids fall into two groups: one, the orthothecida sensu stricto,[7] is kidney or heart shaped in cross-section due to a longitudinal groove on its ventral surface, and its opercula bear cardinal processes; the other has a rounded cross-section and often lacks cardinal processes, making them difficult to distinguish from other cornet-shaped calcareous organisms.[6] All were sessile and benthic; some may have been filter feeders.[7]

Phylogenetic position

Haplophrentis carinatus from the Stephen Formation, Burgess Shale (Middle Cambrian), Burgess Pass, British Columbia, Canada.

Because hyoliths are extinct and do not obviously resemble any extant group, it has long been unclear which living group they are most closely related to. They have been supposed to be molluscs; or to belong to their own phylum in an unspecified part of the tree of life.[8] Their grade of organization was historically considered to be of the 'mollusc-annelid-sipunculid' level,[9] consistent with a Lophotrochozoan affinity, and comparison was primarily drawn with the molluscs or sipunculids.[9][10] Older studies (predating the Lophotrochozoan concept) consider hyoliths to represent a stem lineage of the clade containing (Mollusca + Annelida + Arthropoda).[3]

A secure classification at last became possible in 2017, on the basis of Burgess Shale specimens that preserve lophophores. This diagnostic characteristic demonstrates an affinity with the Lophophorata, a group that contains Brachiopoda, Bryozoa (perhaps), and Phoronida.[4]

Ecology

Hyolithids were benthic (bottom-dwellers), using their helens as stilts to hold the opening of their shells above the sea floor.[4] Orthothecids did not have helens, but are presumed to have been sessile and benthic.

In the Cambrian, their global distribution shows no sign of provinciality, suggesting a long-lived planktonic larval life stage (reflected by their protoconchs); but by the Ordovician distinct assemblages were becoming evident.[6]

Some orthothecids are preserved in vertical [life] orientation, suggesting a sessile suspension-feeding habit; hyolithids tend to be flat on the bottom, and their shape and the occurrence of epibionts are consistent with a sessile suspension feeding habit via orientation relative to passive currents.[11]

Occurrence

The first hyolith fossils appeared about 540 million years ago in the Purella antiqua Zone of the Nemakit-Daldynian Stage of Siberia and in its analogue the Paragloborilus subglobosus–Purella squamulosa Zone of the Meishucunian Stage of China. Hyolith abundance and diversity attain a maximum in the Cambrian, followed by a progressive decline up to their Permian extinction.[2][12]

References

1. Kouchinsky, A.; Bengtson, S.; Runnegar, B.; Skovsted, C.; Steiner, M.; Vendrasco, M. (March 2012). "Chronology of early Cambrian biomineralization". Geological Magazine. 149 (2): 221–251. doi:10.1017/S0016756811000720.
2. Malinky, J. M. (2009). "Permian Hyolithida from Australia: The Last of the Hyoliths?". Journal of Paleontology. 83: 147–152. doi:10.1666/08-094R.1.
3. Runnegar, Bruce; Pojeta, John; Morris, Noel J.; Taylor, John D.; Taylor, Michael E.; McClung, Graham (1975). "Biology of the Hyolitha". Lethaia. 8 (2): 181. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1975.tb01311.x.
4. Moysiuk, Joseph; Smith, Martin R.; Caron, Jean-Bernard (11 January 2017). "Hyoliths are Palaeozoic lophophorates" (PDF). Nature. 541 (7637): 394–397. doi:10.1038/nature20804. PMID 28077871.
5. Mus, M. Martí; Bergström, J. (September 2007). "Skeletal Microstructure of Helens, Lateral Spines of Hyolithids". Palaeontology. 50 (5): 1231–1243. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2007.00700.x.
6. Malinky, J.M.; Skovsted, C.B. (2004). "Hyoliths and small shelly fossils from the Lower Cambrian of North−East Greenland". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 49 (4): 551–578.
7. Malinky, J. M. (2009). "First Occurrence of Orthotheca Novák, 1886 (Hyolitha, Early Devonian) in North America". Journal of Paleontology. 83 (4): 588–596. doi:10.1666/08-164R.1.
8. Malinky, John M. (2009). "Permian Hyolithida from Australia: The Last of the Hyoliths?". Journal of Paleontology. 83 (1): 147–152. doi:10.1666/08-094R.1. JSTOR 29739075.
9. Runnegar, B. (January 1980). "Hyolitha: Status of the phylum". Lethaia. 13: 21–25. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1980.tb01025.x.
10. Kouchinsky, A. V. (2000). "Skeletal microstructures of hyoliths from the Early Cambrian of Siberia". Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology. 24 (2): 65–81. doi:10.1080/03115510008619525.
11. Kouchinsky, A.V. (2000). "Mollusks, hyoliths, stenothecoids and coeloscleritophorans". In A. Yu. Zhuravlev; R. Riding (eds.). The Ecology of the Cambrian Radiation. The Critical Moments and Perspectives in Earth History and Paleobiology. Columbia University Press. pp. 326–349. doi:10.7312/zhur10612-015. ISBN 978-0231505161.
12. Steiner, M.; Li, G.; Qian, Y.; Zhu, M.; Erdtmann, B. D. (2007). "Neoproterozoic to Early Cambrian small shelly fossil assemblages and a revised biostratigraphic correlation of the Yangtze Platform (China)". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 254 (1–2): 67. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.03.046.