Synthetic diamond

Synthetic diamond (also referred to as laboratory-grown diamond, laboratory-created diamond, or cultured diamond) is a diamond made of the same material as natural diamonds—pure carbon, crystallized in an isotropic 3D form.[1]

Synthetic diamonds of various colors grown by the high-pressure high-temperature technique

Synthetic diamond are different from natural diamond created by geological processes and imitation diamond made of non-diamond material. Numerous claims of diamond synthesis were documented between 1879 and 1928; most of those attempts were carefully analyzed but none were confirmed. In the 1940s, systematic research began in the United States, Sweden and the Soviet Union to grow diamonds using CVD diamond (chemical vapor deposition) and HPHT diamond (high-pressure high-temperature) processes. The first reproducible synthesis was reported around 1955. Those two processes still dominate the production of synthetic diamond. A third method, known as detonation synthesis, entered the diamond market in the late 1990s. In this process, nanometer-sized diamond grains are created in a detonation of carbon-containing explosives. A fourth method, treating graphite with high-power ultrasound, has been demonstrated in the laboratory, but currently has no commercial application.

The properties of synthetic diamond depend on the details of the manufacturing processes; however, some synthetic diamonds (whether formed by HPHT or CVD) have properties such as hardness, thermal conductivity and electron mobility that are superior to those of most naturally formed diamonds. Synthetic diamond is widely used in abrasives, in cutting and polishing tools and in heat sinks. Electronic applications of synthetic diamond are being developed, including high-power switches at power stations, high-frequency field-effect transistors and light-emitting diodes. Synthetic diamond detectors of ultraviolet (UV) light or high-energy particles are used at high-energy research facilities and are available commercially. Because of its unique combination of thermal and chemical stability, low thermal expansion and high optical transparency in a wide spectral range, synthetic diamond is becoming the most popular material for optical windows in high-power CO2 lasers and gyrotrons. It is estimated that 98% of industrial grade diamond demand is supplied with synthetic diamonds.[2]

In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission has indicated that the terms laboratory-grown, laboratory-created, and [manufacturer-name]-created "would more clearly communicate the nature of the stone".[1] Both CVD and HPHT diamonds can be cut into gems and various colors can be produced: clear white, yellow, brown, blue, green and orange. The advent of synthetic gems on the market created major concerns in the diamond trading business, as a result of which special spectroscopic devices and techniques have been developed to distinguish synthetic and natural diamonds.

History

Moissan trying to create synthetic diamonds using an electric arc furnace

After the 1797 discovery that diamond was pure carbon,[3][4] many attempts were made to convert various cheap forms of carbon into diamond.[5][6] The earliest successes were reported by James Ballantyne Hannay in 1879[7] and by Ferdinand Frédéric Henri Moissan in 1893. Their method involved heating charcoal at up to 3500 °C with iron inside a carbon crucible in a furnace. Whereas Hannay used a flame-heated tube, Moissan applied his newly developed electric arc furnace, in which an electric arc was struck between carbon rods inside blocks of lime.[8] The molten iron was then rapidly cooled by immersion in water. The contraction generated by the cooling supposedly produced the high pressure required to transform graphite into diamond. Moissan published his work in a series of articles in the 1890s.[5][9]

Many other scientists tried to replicate his experiments. Sir William Crookes claimed success in 1909.[10] Otto Ruff claimed in 1917 to have produced diamonds up to 7 mm in diameter,[11] but later retracted his statement.[12] In 1926, Dr. J Willard Hershey of McPherson College replicated Moissan's and Ruff's experiments,[13][14] producing a synthetic diamond; that specimen is on display at the McPherson Museum in Kansas.[15] Despite the claims of Moissan, Ruff, and Hershey, other experimenters were unable to reproduce their synthesis.[16][17]

The most definitive replication attempts were performed by Sir Charles Algernon Parsons. A prominent scientist and engineer known for his invention of the steam turbine, he spent about 40 years (1882–1922) and a considerable part of his fortune trying to reproduce the experiments of Moissan and Hannay, but also adapted processes of his own.[18] Parsons was known for his painstakingly accurate approach and methodical record keeping; all his resulting samples were preserved for further analysis by an independent party.[19] He wrote a number of articles—some of the earliest on HPHT diamond—in which he claimed to have produced small diamonds.[20] However, in 1928, he authorized Dr. C. H. Desch to publish an article[21] in which he stated his belief that no synthetic diamonds (including those of Moissan and others) had been produced up to that date. He suggested that most diamonds that had been produced up to that point were likely synthetic spinel.[16]

GE diamond project

A belt press produced in the 1980s by KOBELCO

In 1941, an agreement was made between the General Electric (GE), Norton and Carborundum companies to further develop diamond synthesis. They were able to heat carbon to about 3,000 °C (5,430 °F) under a pressure of 3.5 gigapascals (510,000 psi) for a few seconds. Soon thereafter, the Second World War interrupted the project. It was resumed in 1951 at the Schenectady Laboratories of GE, and a high-pressure diamond group was formed with Francis P. Bundy and H. M. Strong. Tracy Hall and others joined the project later.[22]

The Schenectady group improved on the anvils designed by Percy Bridgman, who received a Nobel Prize for his work in 1946. Bundy and Strong made the first improvements, then more were made by Hall. The GE team used tungsten carbide anvils within a hydraulic press to squeeze the carbonaceous sample held in a catlinite container, the finished grit being squeezed out of the container into a gasket. The team recorded diamond synthesis on one occasion, but the experiment could not be reproduced because of uncertain synthesis conditions,[23] and the diamond was later shown to have been a natural diamond used as a seed.[24]

Hall achieved the first commercially successful synthesis of diamond on December 16, 1954, and this was announced on February 15, 1955. His breakthrough was using a "belt" press, which was capable of producing pressures above 10 GPa (1,500,000 psi) and temperatures above 2,000 °C (3,630 °F).[25] The press used a pyrophyllite container in which graphite was dissolved within molten nickel, cobalt or iron. Those metals acted as a "solvent-catalyst", which both dissolved carbon and accelerated its conversion into diamond. The largest diamond he produced was 0.15 mm (0.0059 in) across; it was too small and visually imperfect for jewelry, but usable in industrial abrasives. Hall's co-workers were able to replicate his work, and the discovery was published in the major journal Nature.[26][27] He was the first person to grow a synthetic diamond with a reproducible, verifiable and well-documented process. He left GE in 1955, and three years later developed a new apparatus for the synthesis of diamond—a tetrahedral press with four anvils—to avoid violating a U.S. Department of Commerce secrecy order on the GE patent applications.[24][28]

Later developments

An independent diamond synthesis was achieved on February 16, 1953 in Stockholm by ASEA (Allmänna Svenska Elektriska Aktiebolaget), one of Sweden's major electrical manufacturing companies. Starting in 1949, ASEA employed a team of five scientists and engineers as part of a top-secret diamond-making project code-named QUINTUS. The team used a bulky split-sphere apparatus designed by Baltzar von Platen and Anders Kämpe.[22][29] Pressure was maintained within the device at an estimated 8.4 GPa for an hour. A few small diamonds were produced, but not of gem quality or size. The work was not reported until the 1980s.[30] During the 1980s, a new competitor emerged in Korea, a company named Iljin Diamond; it was followed by hundreds of Chinese enterprises. Iljin Diamond allegedly accomplished diamond synthesis in 1988 by misappropriating trade secrets from GE via a Korean former GE employee.[31][32]

A scalpel with single-crystal synthetic diamond blade

Synthetic gem-quality diamond crystals were first produced in 1970 by GE, then reported in 1971. The first successes used a pyrophyllite tube seeded at each end with thin pieces of diamond. The graphite feed material was placed in the center and the metal solvent (nickel) between the graphite and the seeds. The container was heated and the pressure was raised to about 5.5 GPa. The crystals grow as they flow from the center to the ends of the tube, and extending the length of the process produces larger crystals. Initially, a week-long growth process produced gem-quality stones of around 5 mm (1 carat or 0.2 g), and the process conditions had to be as stable as possible. The graphite feed was soon replaced by diamond grit because that allowed much better control of the shape of the final crystal.[27][33]

The first gem-quality stones were always yellow to brown in color because of contamination with nitrogen. Inclusions were common, especially "plate-like" ones from the nickel. Removing all nitrogen from the process by adding aluminium or titanium produced colorless "white" stones, and removing the nitrogen and adding boron produced blue ones.[34] Removing nitrogen also slowed the growth process and reduced the crystalline quality, so the process was normally run with nitrogen present.

Although the GE stones and natural diamonds were chemically identical, their physical properties were not the same. The colorless stones produced strong fluorescence and phosphorescence under short-wavelength ultraviolet light, but were inert under long-wave UV. Among natural diamonds, only the rarer blue gems exhibit these properties. Unlike natural diamonds, all the GE stones showed strong yellow fluorescence under X-rays.[35] The De Beers Diamond Research Laboratory has grown stones of up to 25 carats (5.0 g) for research purposes. Stable HPHT conditions were kept for six weeks to grow high-quality diamonds of this size. For economic reasons, the growth of most synthetic diamonds is terminated when they reach a mass of 1 carat (200 mg) to 1.5 carats (300 mg).[36]

In the 1950s, research started in the Soviet Union and the US on the growth of diamond by pyrolysis of hydrocarbon gases at the relatively low temperature of 800 °C. This low-pressure process is known as chemical vapor deposition (CVD). William G. Eversole reportedly achieved vapor deposition of diamond over diamond substrate in 1953, but it was not reported until 1962.[37][38] Diamond film deposition was independently reproduced by Angus and coworkers in 1968[39] and by Deryagin and Fedoseev in 1970.[40][41] Whereas Eversole and Angus used large, expensive, single-crystal diamonds as substrates, Deryagin and Fedoseev succeeded in making diamond films on non-diamond materials (silicon and metals), which led to massive research on inexpensive diamond coatings in the 1980s.[42]

From 2013 reports emerged of a rise in undisclosed synthetic melee diamonds (small round diamonds typically used to frame a central diamond or embellish a band)[43] being found in set jewelry and within diamond parcels sold in the trade.[44] Due to the relatively low cost of diamond melee, as well as relative lack of universal knowledge for identifying large quantities of melee[45] efficiently, not all dealers have made an effort to test diamond melee to correctly identify whether it is of natural or man-made origin. However, international laboratories are now beginning to tackle the issue head-on, with significant improvements in synthetic melee identification being made.[46]

Manufacturing technologies

There are several methods used to produce synthetic diamonds. The original method uses high pressure and high temperature (HPHT) and is still widely used because of its relatively low cost. The process involves large presses that can weigh hundreds of tons to produce a pressure of 5 GPa at 1500 °C. The second method, using chemical vapor deposition (CVD), creates a carbon plasma over a substrate onto which the carbon atoms deposit to form diamond. Other methods include explosive formation (forming detonation nanodiamonds) and sonication of graphite solutions.[47][48][49]

High pressure, high temperature

Schematic of a belt press

In the HPHT method, there are three main press designs used to supply the pressure and temperature necessary to produce synthetic diamond: the belt press, the cubic press and the split-sphere (BARS) press. Diamond seeds are placed at the bottom of the press. The internal part of press is heated above 1400 °C and melts the solvent metal. The molten metal dissolves the high purity carbon source, which is then transported to the small diamond seeds and precipitates, forming a large synthetic diamond.[50]

The original GE invention by Tracy Hall uses the belt press wherein the upper and lower anvils supply the pressure load to a cylindrical inner cell. This internal pressure is confined radially by a belt of pre-stressed steel bands. The anvils also serve as electrodes providing electric current to the compressed cell. A variation of the belt press uses hydraulic pressure, rather than steel belts, to confine the internal pressure.[50] Belt presses are still used today, but they are built on a much larger scale than those of the original design.[51]

The second type of press design is the cubic press. A cubic press has six anvils which provide pressure simultaneously onto all faces of a cube-shaped volume.[52] The first multi-anvil press design was a tetrahedral press, using four anvils to converge upon a tetrahedron-shaped volume.[53] The cubic press was created shortly thereafter to increase the volume to which pressure could be applied. A cubic press is typically smaller than a belt press and can more rapidly achieve the pressure and temperature necessary to create synthetic diamond. However, cubic presses cannot be easily scaled up to larger volumes: the pressurized volume can be increased by using larger anvils, but this also increases the amount of force needed on the anvils to achieve the same pressure. An alternative is to decrease the surface area to volume ratio of the pressurized volume, by using more anvils to converge upon a higher-order platonic solid, such as a dodecahedron. However, such a press would be complex and difficult to manufacture.[52]

Schematic of a BARS system

The BARS apparatus is claimed to be the most compact, efficient, and economical of all the diamond-producing presses. In the center of a BARS device, there is a ceramic cylindrical "synthesis capsule" of about 2 cm3 in size. The cell is placed into a cube of pressure-transmitting material, such as pyrophyllite ceramics, which is pressed by inner anvils made from cemented carbide (e.g., tungsten carbide or VK10 hard alloy).[54] The outer octahedral cavity is pressed by 8 steel outer anvils. After mounting, the whole assembly is locked in a disc-type barrel with a diameter about 1 meter. The barrel is filled with oil, which pressurizes upon heating, and the oil pressure is transferred to the central cell. The synthesis capsule is heated up by a coaxial graphite heater and the temperature is measured with a thermocouple.[55]

Chemical vapor deposition

Free-standing single-crystal CVD diamond disc

Chemical vapor deposition is a method by which diamond can be grown from a hydrocarbon gas mixture. Since the early 1980s, this method has been the subject of intensive worldwide research. Whereas the mass-production of high-quality diamond crystals make the HPHT process the more suitable choice for industrial applications, the flexibility and simplicity of CVD setups explain the popularity of CVD growth in laboratory research. The advantages of CVD diamond growth include the ability to grow diamond over large areas and on various substrates, and the fine control over the chemical impurities and thus properties of the diamond produced. Unlike HPHT, CVD process does not require high pressures, as the growth typically occurs at pressures under 27 kPa.[47][56]

The CVD growth involves substrate preparation, feeding varying amounts of gases into a chamber and energizing them. The substrate preparation includes choosing an appropriate material and its crystallographic orientation; cleaning it, often with a diamond powder to abrade a non-diamond substrate; and optimizing the substrate temperature (about 800 °C) during the growth through a series of test runs. The gases always include a carbon source, typically methane, and hydrogen with a typical ratio of 1:99. Hydrogen is essential because it selectively etches off non-diamond carbon. The gases are ionized into chemically active radicals in the growth chamber using microwave power, a hot filament, an arc discharge, a welding torch, a laser, an electron beam, or other means.

During the growth, the chamber materials are etched off by the plasma and can incorporate into the growing diamond. In particular, CVD diamond is often contaminated by silicon originating from the silica windows of the growth chamber or from the silicon substrate.[57] Therefore, silica windows are either avoided or moved away from the substrate. Boron-containing species in the chamber, even at very low trace levels, also make it unsuitable for the growth of pure diamond.[47][56][58]

Detonation of explosives

Electron micrograph (TEM) of detonation nanodiamond

Diamond nanocrystals (5 nm in diameter) can be formed by detonating certain carbon-containing explosives in a metal chamber. These nanocrystals are called "detonation nanodiamonds". During the explosion, the pressure and temperature in the chamber become high enough to convert the carbon of the explosives into diamond. Being immersed in water, the chamber cools rapidly after the explosion, suppressing conversion of newly produced diamond into more stable graphite.[59] In a variation of this technique, a metal tube filled with graphite powder is placed in the detonation chamber. The explosion heats and compresses the graphite to an extent sufficient for its conversion into diamond.[60] The product is always rich in graphite and other non-diamond carbon forms and requires prolonged boiling in hot nitric acid (about 1 day at 250 °C) to dissolve them.[48] The recovered nanodiamond powder is used primarily in polishing applications. It is mainly produced in China, Russia and Belarus and started reaching the market in bulk quantities by the early 2000s.[61]

Ultrasound cavitation

Micron-sized diamond crystals can be synthesized from a suspension of graphite in organic liquid at atmospheric pressure and room temperature using ultrasonic cavitation. The diamond yield is about 10% of the initial graphite weight. The estimated cost of diamond produced by this method is comparable to that of the HPHT method; the crystalline perfection of the product is significantly worse for the ultrasonic synthesis. This technique requires relatively simple equipment and procedures, but it has only been reported by two research groups, and has no industrial use. Numerous process parameters, such as preparation of the initial graphite powder, the choice of ultrasonic power, synthesis time and the solvent, are not yet optimized, leaving a window for potential improvement of the efficiency and reduction of the cost of the ultrasonic synthesis.[49][62]

Properties

Traditionally, the absence of crystal flaws is considered to be the most important quality of a diamond. Purity and high crystalline perfection make diamonds transparent and clear, whereas its hardness, optical dispersion (luster), and chemical stability (combined with marketing), make it a popular gemstone. High thermal conductivity is also important for technical applications. Whereas high optical dispersion is an intrinsic property of all diamonds, their other properties vary depending on how the diamond was created.[63]

Crystallinity

Diamond can be one single, continuous crystal or it can be made up of many smaller crystals (polycrystal). Large, clear and transparent single-crystal diamonds are typically used as gemstones. Polycrystalline diamond (PCD) consists of numerous small grains, which are easily seen by the naked eye through strong light absorption and scattering; it is unsuitable for gems and is used for industrial applications such as mining and cutting tools. Polycrystalline diamond is often described by the average size (or grain size) of the crystals that make it up. Grain sizes range from nanometers to hundreds of micrometers, usually referred to as "nanocrystalline" and "microcrystalline" diamond, respectively.[64]

Hardness

Synthetic diamond is the hardest known material,[65] where hardness is defined as resistance to indentation. The hardness of synthetic diamond depends on its purity, crystalline perfection and orientation: hardness is higher for flawless, pure crystals oriented to the [111] direction (along the longest diagonal of the cubic diamond lattice).[66] Nanocrystalline diamond produced through CVD diamond growth can have a hardness ranging from 30% to 75% of that of single crystal diamond, and the hardness can be controlled for specific applications. Some synthetic single-crystal diamonds and HPHT nanocrystalline diamonds (see hyperdiamond) are harder than any known natural diamond.[65][67][68]

Impurities and inclusions

Every diamond contains atoms other than carbon in concentrations detectable by analytical techniques. Those atoms can aggregate into macroscopic phases called inclusions. Impurities are generally avoided, but can be introduced intentionally as a way to control certain properties of the diamond. Growth processes of synthetic diamond, using solvent-catalysts, generally lead to formation of a number of impurity-related complex centers, involving transition metal atoms (such as nickel, cobalt or iron), which affect the electronic properties of the material.[69][70]

For instance, pure diamond is an electrical insulator, but diamond with boron added is an electrical conductor (and, in some cases, a superconductor),[71] allowing it to be used in electronic applications. Nitrogen impurities hinder movement of lattice dislocations (defects within the crystal structure) and put the lattice under compressive stress, thereby increasing hardness and toughness.[72]

Thermal conductivity

Unlike most electrical insulators, pure diamond is an excellent conductor of heat because of the strong covalent bonding within the crystal. The thermal conductivity of pure diamond is the highest of any known solid. Single crystals of synthetic diamond enriched in 12
C
(99.9%), isotopically pure diamond, have the highest thermal conductivity of any material, 30 W/cm·K at room temperature, 7.5 times higher than that of copper. Natural diamond's conductivity is reduced by 1.1% by the 13
C
naturally present, which acts as an inhomogeneity in the lattice.[73]

Diamond's thermal conductivity is made use of by jewelers and gemologists who may employ an electronic thermal probe to separate diamonds from their imitations. These probes consist of a pair of battery-powered thermistors mounted in a fine copper tip. One thermistor functions as a heating device while the other measures the temperature of the copper tip: if the stone being tested is a diamond, it will conduct the tip's thermal energy rapidly enough to produce a measurable temperature drop. This test takes about 2–3 seconds.[74]

Applications

Machining and cutting tools

Diamonds in an angle grinder blade

Most industrial applications of synthetic diamond have long been associated with their hardness; this property makes diamond the ideal material for machine tools and cutting tools. As the hardest known naturally occurring material, diamond can be used to polish, cut, or wear away any material, including other diamonds. Common industrial applications of this ability include diamond-tipped drill bits and saws, and the use of diamond powder as an abrasive.[75] These are by far the largest industrial applications of synthetic diamond. While natural diamond is also used for these purposes, synthetic HPHT diamond is more popular, mostly because of better reproducibility of its mechanical properties. Diamond is not suitable for machining ferrous alloys at high speeds, as carbon is soluble in iron at the high temperatures created by high-speed machining, leading to greatly increased wear on diamond tools compared to alternatives.[76]

The usual form of diamond in cutting tools is micron-sized grains dispersed in a metal matrix (usually cobalt) sintered onto the tool. This is typically referred to in industry as polycrystalline diamond (PCD). PCD-tipped tools can be found in mining and cutting applications. For the past fifteen years, work has been done to coat metallic tools with CVD diamond, and though the work shows promise, it has not significantly replaced traditional PCD tools.[77]

Thermal conductor

Most materials with high thermal conductivity are also electrically conductive, such as metals. In contrast, pure synthetic diamond has high thermal conductivity, but negligible electrical conductivity. This combination is invaluable for electronics where diamond is used as a heat sink for high-power laser diodes, laser arrays and high-power transistors. Efficient heat dissipation prolongs the lifetime of those electronic devices, and the devices' high replacement costs justify the use of efficient, though relatively expensive, diamond heat sinks.[78] In semiconductor technology, synthetic diamond heat spreaders prevent silicon and other semiconducting devices from overheating.[79]

Optical material

Diamond is hard, chemically inert, and has high thermal conductivity and a low coefficient of thermal expansion. These properties make diamond superior to any other existing window material used for transmitting infrared and microwave radiation. Therefore, synthetic diamond is starting to replace zinc selenide as the output window of high-power CO2 lasers[80] and gyrotrons. Those synthetic polycrystalline diamond windows are shaped as disks of large diameters (about 10 cm for gyrotrons) and small thicknesses (to reduce absorption) and can only be produced with the CVD technique.[81][82] Single crystal slabs of dimensions of length up to approximately 10 mm are becoming increasingly important in several areas of optics including heatspreaders inside laser cavities, diffractive optics and as the optical gain medium in Raman lasers.[83] Recent advances in the HPHT and CVD synthesis techniques have improved the purity and crystallographic structure perfection of single-crystalline diamond enough to replace silicon as a diffraction grating and window material in high-power radiation sources, such as synchrotrons.[84][85] Both the CVD and HPHT processes are also used to create designer optically transparent diamond anvils as a tool for measuring electric and magnetic properties of materials at ultra high pressures using a diamond anvil cell.[86]

Electronics

Synthetic diamond has potential uses as a semiconductor,[87] because it can be doped with impurities like boron and phosphorus. Since these elements contain one more or one fewer valence electron than carbon, they turn synthetic diamond into p-type or n-type semiconductor. Making a p–n junction by sequential doping of synthetic diamond with boron and phosphorus produces light-emitting diodes (LEDs) producing UV light of 235 nm.[88] Another useful property of synthetic diamond for electronics is high carrier mobility, which reaches 4500 cm2/(V·s) for electrons in single-crystal CVD diamond.[89] High mobility is favourable for high-frequency operation and field-effect transistors made from diamond have already demonstrated promising high-frequency performance above 50 GHz.[90][91] The wide band gap of diamond (5.5 eV) gives it excellent dielectric properties. Combined with the high mechanical stability of diamond, those properties are being used in prototype high-power switches for power stations.[92]

Synthetic diamond transistors have been produced in the laboratory. They remain functional at much higher temperatures than silicon devices, and are resistant to chemical and radiation damage. While no diamond transistors have yet been successfully integrated into commercial electronics, they are promising for use in exceptionally high-power situations and hostile non-oxidizing environments.[93][94]

Synthetic diamond is already used as radiation detection device. It is radiation hard and has a wide bandgap of 5.5 eV (at room temperature). Diamond is also distinguished from most other semiconductors by the lack of a stable native oxide. This makes it difficult to fabricate surface MOS devices, but it does create the potential for UV radiation to gain access to the active semiconductor without absorption in a surface layer. Because of these properties, it is employed in applications such as the BaBar detector at the Stanford Linear Accelerator[95] and BOLD (Blind to the Optical Light Detectors for VUV solar observations).[96][97] A diamond VUV detector recently was used in the European LYRA program.

Conductive CVD diamond is a useful electrode under many circumstances.[98] Photochemical methods have been developed for covalently linking DNA to the surface of polycrystalline diamond films produced through CVD. Such DNA modified films can be used for detecting various biomolecules, which would interact with DNA thereby changing electrical conductivity of the diamond film.[99] In addition, diamonds can be used to detect redox reactions that cannot ordinarily be studied and in some cases degrade redox-reactive organic contaminants in water supplies. Because diamond is mechanically and chemically stable, it can be used as an electrode under conditions that would destroy traditional materials. As an electrode, synthetic diamond can be used in waste water treatment of organic effluents[100] and the production of strong oxidants.[101]

Gemstones

Colorless gem cut from diamond grown by chemical vapor deposition

Synthetic diamonds for use as gemstones are grown by HPHT[36] or CVD[102] methods, and represented approximately 2% of the gem-quality diamond market as of 2013.[103] However, there are indications that the market share of synthetic jewelry-quality diamonds may grow as advances in technology allows for larger higher-quality synthetic production on a more economic scale.[104] They are available in yellow, pink, green, orange and blue, and to a lesser extent colorless (or white). The yellow color comes from nitrogen impurities in the manufacturing process, while the blue color comes from boron.[34] Other colors, such as pink or green, are achievable after synthesis using irradiation.[105][106] Several companies also offer memorial diamonds grown using cremated remains.[107]

Gem-quality diamonds grown in a lab can be chemically, physically and optically identical to naturally occurring ones. The mined diamond industry has undertaken legal, marketing and distribution countermeasures to protect its market from the emerging presence of synthetic diamonds.[108][109] Synthetic diamonds can be distinguished by spectroscopy in the infrared, ultraviolet, or X-ray wavelengths. The DiamondView tester from De Beers uses UV fluorescence to detect trace impurities of nitrogen, nickel or other metals in HPHT or CVD diamonds.[110]

At least one maker of laboratory-grown diamonds has made public statements about being "committed to disclosure" of the nature of its diamonds, and laser-inscribed serial numbers on all of its gemstones.[102] The company web site shows an example of the lettering of one of its laser inscriptions, which includes both the words "Gemesis created" and the serial number prefix "LG" (laboratory grown).[111]

In May 2015, a record was set for an HPHT colorless diamond at 10.02 carats. The faceted jewel was cut from a 32.2-carat stone that was grown within 300 hours.[112]

Traditional diamond mining has led to human-rights abuses in Africa and elsewhere. The 2006 Hollywood movie Blood Diamond helped to publicize the problem. Consumer demand for synthetic diamonds has been increasing, albeit from a small base, as customers look for stones which are ethically sound, and are cheaper.[113]

According to a report from the Gem & Jewellery Export Promotional Council, synthetic diamonds accounted for 0.28% of diamond produced for use as gem stones in 2014.[114] Lab diamond jewellery is sold in the United States by brands including Pure Grown Diamonds (formerly known as Gemesis) and Lab Diamonds Direct; and in the UK by Nightingale online jewellers.[115]

Around 2016, the price of synthetic diamond gemstones (e.g., 1 carat stones) began dropping "precipitously", by roughly 30% in one year, and became clearly lower than that for mined diamonds.[116] As of 2017, synthetic diamonds sold as jewelry were typically selling for 15–20% less than natural equivalents, and the relative price was expected to decline further as production economics improve.[117]

In May 2018, the large worldwide diamond company De Beers announced that they would introduce a new jewelry brand called "Lightbox" that features synthetic diamonds.[118]

In July 2018, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission approved a substantial revision to its Jewelry Guides, with changes that impose new rules on how the trade can describe diamonds and diamond simulants.[119] The revised guides were substantially contrary to what had been advocated in 2016 by De Beers.[118][120][121] The new guidelines remove the word "natural" from the definition of "diamond", thus including lab-grown diamonds within the scope of the definition of "diamond". The revised guide further states that "If a marketer uses 'synthetic' to imply that a competitor's lab-grown diamond is not an actual diamond, ... this would be deceptive."[1][120]

The De Beers Lightbox brand entered the market starting in September 2018. De Beers had previously limited its synthetic diamond production to industrial applications.[118][122] As of November 2018, the brand's website describes the diamonds as costing $200 for a quarter carat stone, $400 for a half carat, and $800 for a full carat. These prices are far lower than most previous offerings  about one-tenth of the price of similar mined diamonds and less than one-fourth the price of synthetic diamonds offered for sale in May 2018 by another producer, Diamond Foundry.[123] However, Lightbox does not offer stones for sale without them being mounted in a setting (which adds somewhat to the price), and the brand only offers relatively low quality settings (sterling silver, rose gold plated, or 10K gold settings, not high-carat solid gold or platinum) and only offers settings for earrings and necklaces, not rings.[124] The website emphasizes pink and blue stones, although colorless stones are also offered. The website's FAQ page says the lab-grown diamonds are "neither as valuable or precious" as natural stones.[124] The Lightbox branded jewelry is promoted as being "for lighter moods and lighter moments, like birthdays and beach days and just because days", and the items are provided in what The New York Times called "candy-colored cardboard gift boxes".[124] The Lightbox jewelry is offered for sale only directly through the website, although the site says that some partner sales locations will be added in 2019.[124]

gollark: Why do people post long serious bits of text on, of all things, images on Instagram or whatever?
gollark: In my opinion school is mostly kind of terrible.
gollark: > resisting gives the cops no right to kill an otherwise unarmed person<@528315825803755559> I agree. I'd really expect higher standards of not arbitrarily killing people. The UK seems to have this problem... less, at least?
gollark: Then you are not an idiot. You win a melon! 🍈
gollark: Anyone who disagrees with me is always an idiot.

See also

References

  1. 16 C.F.R. Part 23: Guides For The Jewelry, Precious Metals, and Pewter Industries: Federal Trade Commission Letter Declining To Amend The Guides With Respect To Use Of The Term "Cultured", U.S. Federal Trade Commission, July 21, 2008.
  2. Zimnisky, Paul (January 22, 2013). "The state of 2013 global rough diamond supply". Resource Investor. Archived from the original on January 28, 2013. Retrieved February 4, 2013.
  3. Tennant, Smithson (1797). "On the nature of the diamond". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 87: 123–127. doi:10.1098/rstl.1797.0005.
  4. Spear and Dismukes, p. 309
  5. Spear and Dismukes, pp. 23, 512-513
  6. As early as 1828, investigators claimed to have synthesized diamonds:
    • Procès-verbaux des séances de l'Académie (Académie des sciences) [Minutes of the meetings of the [French] Academy of Sciences], November 3, 1828, volume 9, page 137: "Il est donné lecture d'une lettre de M. Gannal qui communique quelques recherches sur l'action du phosphore mis en contact avec le carbure de soufre pur, et sur le produit des ses espériences qui ont offert des propriétés semblables à celles de particules de diamant." (There was given a reading of a letter from Mr. Gannal, who communicated some investigations into the action of phosphorus placed in contact with pure carbon disulfide, and into the product of his experiments, which have presented properties similar to those of particles of diamond.)
    • "Artificial production of real diamonds", Mechanics' Magazine, 10 (278): 300–301 (December 6, 1828).
    • Procès-verbaux des séances de l'Académie (Académie des sciences), November 10, 1828, volume 9, page 140: "M. Arago communique une note de M. Cagniard de Latour, par laquelle ce physician déclare qu'il a de son côté réussi à faire cristalliser le carbone par des méthodes différentes de celles de M. Gannal, et qu'un paquet cacheté qu'il a déposé au Secrétariat en 1824 contient le détail de ses premiers procédés. M. Arago annonce qu'il connaît une autre personne qui est arrivée à des résultats semblables, et M. Gay-Lussac fait connaître que M. Gannal lui avait parlé depuis plus de huit ans de ses tentatives." (Mr. Arago communicated a note from Mr. Cagniard de Latour, in which this physicist states that he has, on his part, succeeded in making carbon crystallize by methods different from those of Mr. Gannal, and that a sealed packet which he deposited with the Secretary in 1824 contains the details of his initial procedures. Mr. Arago announced that he knew another person who had arrived at similar results, and Mr. Gay-Lussac announced that Mr. Ganal had spoken to him eight years ago about his attempts.)
    • Procès-verbaux des séances de l'Académie (Académie des sciences), December 1, 1828, volume 9, page 151: "M. Thenard donne lecture du procès verbal des expériences faites le 26 Novembre 1828 sur la Poudre présentée comme diamant artificiel, par M. Cagniard de Latour." (Mr. Thenard gave a reading of the minutes of experiments made on November 26, 1828 on the powder presented as artificial diamond by Mr. Cagniard de Latour.)
  7. Hannay, J. B. (1879). "On the Artificial Formation of the Diamond". Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 30 (200–205): 450–461. doi:10.1098/rspl.1879.0144. JSTOR 113601.
  8. Royère, C. (1999). "The electric furnace of Henri Moissan at one hundred years: connection with the electric furnace, the solar furnace, the plasma furnace?". Annales Pharmaceutiques Françaises. 57 (2): 116–30. PMID 10365467.
  9. Moissan, H. (1894). "Nouvelles expériences sur la reproduction du diamant". Comptes Rendus. 118: 320–326.
  10. Crookes, William (1909). Diamonds. London and New York's Harper Brothers. pp. 140 ff.
  11. Ruff, O. (1917). "Über die Bildung von Diamanten". Zeitschrift für Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie. 99 (1): 73–104. doi:10.1002/zaac.19170990109.
  12. Nassau, K. (1980). Gems made by Man. Chilton Book Co. pp. 12–25. ISBN 978-0-8019-6773-3.
  13. Hershey, J. Willard (2004). The Book of Diamonds: Their Curious Lore, Properties, Tests and Synthetic Manufacture. Kessinger Publishing. pp. 123–130. ISBN 978-1-4179-7715-4.
  14. Hershey, J. Willard (1940). Book of Diamonds. Heathside Press, New York. pp. 127–132. ISBN 978-0-486-41816-2.
  15. "Science". mcphersonmuseum.com. Archived from the original on January 12, 2016. Retrieved January 12, 2016.
  16. Lonsdale, K. (1962). "Further Comments on Attempts by H. Moissan, J. B. Hannay and Sir Charles Parsons to Make Diamonds in the Laboratory". Nature. 196 (4850): 104–106. Bibcode:1962Natur.196..104L. doi:10.1038/196104a0.
  17. O'Donoghue, p. 473
  18. Feigelson, R. S. (2004). 50 years progress in crystal growth: a reprint collection. Elsevier. p. 194. ISBN 978-0-444-51650-3.
  19. Barnard, pp. 6–7
  20. Parson, C. A. (1907). "Some notes on carbon at high temperatures and pressures". Proceedings of the Royal Society. 79a (533): 532–535. Bibcode:1907RSPSA..79..532P. doi:10.1098/rspa.1907.0062. JSTOR 92683.
  21. Desch, C. H. (1928). "The Problem of Artificial Production of Diamonds". Nature. 121 (3055): 799–800. Bibcode:1928Natur.121..799C. doi:10.1038/121799a0.
  22. Hazen, R. M. (1999). The diamond makers. Cambridge University Press. pp. 100–113. ISBN 978-0-521-65474-6.
  23. O'Donoghue, p. 474
  24. Bovenkerk, H. P.; Bundy, F. P.; Chrenko, R. M.; Codella, P. J.; Strong, H. M.; Wentorf, R. H. (1993). "Errors in diamond synthesis". Nature. 365 (6441): 19. Bibcode:1993Natur.365...19B. doi:10.1038/365019a0.
  25. Hall, H. T. (1960). "Ultra-high pressure apparatus" (PDF). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 31 (2): 125. Bibcode:1960RScI...31..125H. doi:10.1063/1.1716907. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 8, 2014.
  26. Bundy, F. P.; Hall, H. T.; Strong, H. M.; Wentorf, R. H. (1955). "Man-made diamonds" (PDF). Nature. 176 (4471): 51–55. Bibcode:1955Natur.176...51B. doi:10.1038/176051a0. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 8, 2014.
  27. Bovenkerk, H. P.; Bundy, F. P.; Hall, H. T.; Strong, H. M.; Wentorf, R. H. (1959). "Preparation of diamond" (PDF). Nature. 184 (4693): 1094–1098. Bibcode:1959Natur.184.1094B. doi:10.1038/1841094a0. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 8, 2014.
  28. Barnard, pp. 40–43
  29. Liander, H. & Lundblad, E. (1955). "Artificial diamonds". ASEA Journal. 28: 97.
  30. Barnard, pp. 31–33
  31. General Electric v. Sung, 843 F. Supp. 776: "granting production injunction against Iljin Diamond" cited in Epstein, M. A. (1998). Epstein on intellectual property. Aspen Publishers Online. p. 121. ISBN 978-0-7355-0319-9.
  32. Hannas, W. C. (2003). The writing on the wall. University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 76–77. ISBN 978-0-8122-3711-5.
  33. O'Donoghue, p. 320
  34. Burns, R. C.; Cvetkovic, V.; Dodge, C. N.; Evans, D. J. F.; Rooney, Marie-Line T.; Spear, P. M.; Welbourn, C. M. (1990). "Growth-sector dependence of optical features in large synthetic diamonds". Journal of Crystal Growth. 104 (2): 257–279. Bibcode:1990JCrGr.104..257B. doi:10.1016/0022-0248(90)90126-6.
  35. Barnard, p. 166
  36. Abbaschian, Reza; Zhu, Henry; Clarke, Carter (2005). "High pressure-high temperature growth of diamond crystals using split sphere apparatus". Diam. Rel. Mater. 14 (11–12): 1916–1919. Bibcode:2005DRM....14.1916A. doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2005.09.007.
  37. Spear and Dismukes, pp. 25–26
  38. Eversole, W. G. (April 17, 1962) "Synthesis of diamond" U.S. Patent 3,030,188
  39. Angus, John C.; Will, Herbert A.; Stanko, Wayne S. (1968). "Growth of Diamond Seed Crystals by Vapor Deposition". J. Appl. Phys. 39 (6): 2915. Bibcode:1968JAP....39.2915A. doi:10.1063/1.1656693.
  40. Spear and Dismukes, p. 42
  41. Deryagin, B. V.; Fedoseev, D. V. (1970). "Epitaxial Synthesis of Diamond in the Metastable Region". Russian Chemical Reviews. 39 (9): 783–788. Bibcode:1970RuCRv..39..783D. doi:10.1070/RC1970v039n09ABEH002022.
  42. Spear and Dismukes, pp. 265–266
  43. "Melee Diamonds: Tiny Diamonds, Big Impact". April 11, 2017.
  44. "Industry worries about undisclosed synthetic melee". JCKOnline. jckonline.com. Retrieved May 10, 2015.
  45. "Diamond Melee definition". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved May 10, 2015.
  46. "Swiss lab introduces melee identifier". National Jeweler. National Jeweler. Archived from the original on September 10, 2015. Retrieved May 10, 2015.
  47. Werner, M; Locher, R (1998). "Growth and application of undoped and doped diamond films". Rep. Prog. Phys. 61 (12): 1665–1710. Bibcode:1998RPPh...61.1665W. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/61/12/002.
  48. Osawa, E (2007). "Recent progress and perspectives in single-digit nanodiamond". Diamond and Related Materials. 16 (12): 2018–2022. Bibcode:2007DRM....16.2018O. doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2007.08.008.
  49. Galimov, É. M.; Kudin, A. M.; Skorobogatskii, V. N.; Plotnichenko, V. G.; Bondarev, O. L.; Zarubin, B. G.; Strazdovskii, V. V.; Aronin, A. S.; Fisenko, A. V.; Bykov, I. V.; Barinov, A. Yu. (2004). "Experimental Corroboration of the Synthesis of Diamond in the Cavitation Process". Doklady Physics. 49 (3): 150–153. Bibcode:2004DokPh..49..150G. doi:10.1134/1.1710678.
  50. "HPHT synthesis". International Diamond Laboratories. Archived from the original on May 1, 2009. Retrieved May 5, 2009.
  51. Barnard, p. 150
  52. Ito, E. (2007). G. Schubert (ed.). Multianvil cells and high-pressure experimental methods, in Treatise of Geophysics. 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam. pp. 197–230. ISBN 978-0-8129-2275-2.
  53. Hall, H. T. (1958). "Ultrahigh-Pressure Research: At ultrahigh pressures new and sometimes unexpected chemical and physical events occur". Science. 128 (3322): 445–9. Bibcode:1958Sci...128..445H. doi:10.1126/science.128.3322.445. JSTOR 1756408. PMID 17834381.
  54. Loshak, M. G. & Alexandrova, L. I. (2001). "Rise in the efficiency of the use of cemented carbides as a matrix of diamond-containing studs of rock destruction tool". Int. J. Refractory Metals and Hard Materials. 19: 5–9. doi:10.1016/S0263-4368(00)00039-1.
  55. Pal'Yanov, N.; Sokol, A.G.; Borzdov, M.; Khokhryakov, A.F. (2002). "Fluid-bearing alkaline carbonate melts as the medium for the formation of diamonds in the Earth's mantle: an experimental study". Lithos. 60 (3–4): 145–159. Bibcode:2002Litho..60..145P. doi:10.1016/S0024-4937(01)00079-2.
  56. Koizumi, S.; Nebel, C. E. & Nesladek, M. (2008). Physics and Applications of CVD Diamond. Wiley VCH. p. 50; 200–240. ISBN 978-3-527-40801-6.
  57. Barjon, J.; Rzepka, E.; Jomard, F.; Laroche, J.-M.; Ballutaud, D.; Kociniewski, T.; Chevallier, J. (2005). "Silicon incorporation in CVD diamond layers". Physica Status Solidi A. 202 (11): 2177–2181. Bibcode:2005PSSAR.202.2177B. doi:10.1002/pssa.200561920.
  58. Kopf, R. F., ed. (2003). State-of-the-Art Program on Compound Semiconductors XXXIX and Nitride and Wide Bandgap Semiconductors for Sensors, Photonics and Electronics IV: proceedings of the Electrochemical Society. The Electrochemical Society. p. 363. ISBN 978-1-56677-391-1.
  59. Iakoubovskii, K.; Baidakova, M.V.; Wouters, B.H.; Stesmans, A.; Adriaenssens, G.J.; Vul', A.Ya.; Grobet, P.J. (2000). "Structure and defects of detonation synthesis nanodiamond" (PDF). Diamond and Related Materials. 9 (3–6): 861–865. Bibcode:2000DRM.....9..861I. doi:10.1016/S0925-9635(99)00354-4.
  60. Decarli, P.; Jamieson, J. (June 1961). "Formation of Diamond by Explosive Shock". Science. 133 (3467): 1821–1822. Bibcode:1961Sci...133.1821D. doi:10.1126/science.133.3467.1821. PMID 17818997.
  61. Dolmatov, V. Yu. (2006). "Development of a rational technology for synthesis of high-quality detonation nanodiamonds". Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry. 79 (12): 1913–1918. doi:10.1134/S1070427206120019.
  62. Khachatryan, A.Kh.; Aloyan, S.G.; May, P.W.; Sargsyan, R.; Khachatryan, V.A.; Baghdasaryan, V.S. (2008). "Graphite-to-diamond transformation induced by ultrasonic cavitation". Diam. Relat. Mater. 17 (6): 931–936. Bibcode:2008DRM....17..931K. doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2008.01.112.
  63. Spear and Dismukes, pp. 308–309
  64. Zoski, Cynthia G. (2007). Handbook of Electrochemistry. Elsevier. p. 136. ISBN 978-0-444-51958-0.
  65. Blank, V.; Popov, M.; Pivovarov, G.; Lvova, N.; Gogolinsky, K.; Reshetov, V. (1998). "Ultrahard and superhard phases of fullerite C60: comparison with diamond on hardness and wear" (PDF). Diamond and Related Materials. 7 (2–5): 427–431. Bibcode:1998DRM.....7..427B. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.520.7265. doi:10.1016/S0925-9635(97)00232-X. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 21, 2011.
  66. Neves, A. J. & Nazaré, M. H. (2001). Properties, Growth and Applications of Diamond. IET. pp. 142–147. ISBN 978-0-85296-785-0.
  67. Sumiya, H. (2005). "Super-hard diamond indenter prepared from high-purity synthetic diamond crystal". Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76 (2): 026112–026112–3. Bibcode:2005RScI...76b6112S. doi:10.1063/1.1850654.
  68. Yan, Chih-Shiue; Mao, Ho-Kwang; Li, Wei; Qian, Jiang; Zhao, Yusheng; Hemley, Russell J. (2005). "Ultrahard diamond single crystals from chemical vapor deposition". Physica Status Solidi A. 201 (4): R25. Bibcode:2004PSSAR.201R..25Y. doi:10.1002/pssa.200409033.
  69. Larico, R.; Justo, J. F.; Machado, W. V. M.; Assali, L. V. C. (2009). "Electronic properties and hyperfine fields of nickel-related complexes in diamond". Phys. Rev. B. 79 (11): 115202. arXiv:1208.3207. Bibcode:2009PhRvB..79k5202L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.79.115202.
  70. Assali, L. V. C.; Machado, W. V. M.; Justo, J. F. (2011). "3d transition metal impurities in diamond: electronic properties and chemical trends". Phys. Rev. B. 84 (15): 155205. arXiv:1307.3278. Bibcode:2011PhRvB..84o5205A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.84.155205.
  71. Ekimov, E. A.; Sidorov, V. A.; Bauer, E. D.; Mel'Nik, N. N.; Curro, N. J.; Thompson, J. D.; Stishov, S. M. (2004). "Superconductivity in diamond" (PDF). Nature. 428 (6982): 542–5. arXiv:cond-mat/0404156. Bibcode:2004Natur.428..542E. doi:10.1038/nature02449. PMID 15057827.
  72. Catledge, S. A.; Vohra, Yogesh K. (1999). "Effect of nitrogen addition on the microstructure and mechanical properties of diamond films grown using high-methane concentrations". Journal of Applied Physics. 86 (1): 698. Bibcode:1999JAP....86..698C. doi:10.1063/1.370787.
  73. Wei, Lanhua; Kuo, P.; Thomas, R.; Anthony, T.; Banholzer, W. (1993). "Thermal conductivity of isotopically modified single crystal diamond". Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (24): 3764–3767. Bibcode:1993PhRvL..70.3764W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.3764. PMID 10053956.
  74. Wenckus, J. F. (December 18, 1984) "Method and means of rapidly distinguishing a simulated diamond from natural diamond" U.S. Patent 4,488,821
  75. Holtzapffel, C. (1856). Turning And Mechanical Manipulation. Holtzapffel. pp. 176–178. ISBN 978-1-879335-39-4.
  76. Coelho, R.T.; Yamada, S.; Aspinwall, D.K.; Wise, M.L.H. (1995). "The application of polycrystalline diamond (PCD) tool materials when drilling and reaming aluminum-based alloys including MMC". International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 35 (5): 761–774. doi:10.1016/0890-6955(95)93044-7.
  77. Ahmed, W.; Sein, H.; Ali, N.; Gracio, J.; Woodwards, R. (2003). "Diamond films grown on cemented WC-Co dental burs using an improved CVD method". Diamond and Related Materials. 12 (8): 1300–1306. Bibcode:2003DRM....12.1300A. doi:10.1016/S0925-9635(03)00074-8.
  78. Sakamoto, M.; Endriz, J. G. & Scifres, D. R. (1992). "120 W CW output power from monolithic AlGaAs (800 nm) laser diode array mounted on diamond heatsink". Electronics Letters. 28 (2): 197–199. Bibcode:1992ElL....28..197S. doi:10.1049/el:19920123.
  79. Ravi, Kramadhati V. et al. (August 2, 2005) "Diamond-silicon hybrid integrated heat spreader" U.S. Patent 6,924,170
  80. Harris, D. C. (1999). Materials for infrared windows and domes: properties and performance. SPIE Press. pp. 303–334. ISBN 978-0-8194-3482-1.
  81. "The diamond window for a milli-wave zone high power electromagnetic wave output". New Diamond. 15: 27. 1999. ISSN 1340-4792.
  82. Nusinovich, G. S. (2004). Introduction to the physics of gyrotrons. JHU Press. p. 229. ISBN 978-0-8018-7921-0.
  83. Mildren, Richard P.; Sabella, Alexander; Kitzler, Ondrej; Spence, David J.; McKay, Aaron M. (2013). "Ch. 8 Diamond Raman Laser Design and Performance". In Mildren, Rich P.; Rabeau, James R. (eds.). Optical Engineering of Diamond. Wiley. pp. 239–276. doi:10.1002/9783527648603.ch8. ISBN 978-352764860-3.
  84. Khounsary, Ali M.; Smither, Robert K.; Davey, Steve; Purohit, Ankor (1992). Khounsary, Ali M (ed.). "Diamond Monochromator for High Heat Flux Synchrotron X-ray Beams". Proc. SPIE. High Heat Flux Engineering. 1739: 628–642. Bibcode:1993SPIE.1739..628K. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.261.1970. doi:10.1117/12.140532. Archived from the original on September 17, 2008. Retrieved May 5, 2009.
  85. Heartwig, J.; et al. (September 13, 2006). "Diamonds for Modern Synchrotron Radiation Sources". European Synchrotron Radiation Facility. Retrieved May 5, 2009.
  86. Jackson, D. D.; Aracne-Ruddle, C.; Malba, V.; Weir, S. T.; Catledge, S. A.; Vohra, Y. K. (2003). "Magnetic susceptibility measurements at high pressure using designer diamond anvils". Rev. Sci. Instrum. (Submitted manuscript). 74 (4): 2467. Bibcode:2003RScI...74.2467J. doi:10.1063/1.1544084.
  87. Denisenko, A.; Kohn, E. (2005). "Diamond power devices. Concepts and limits". Diamond and Related Materials. 14 (3–7): 491–498. Bibcode:2005DRM....14..491D. doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2004.12.043.
  88. Koizumi, S.; Watanabe, K; Hasegawa, M; Kanda, H (2001). "Ultraviolet Emission from a Diamond pn Junction". Science. 292 (5523): 1899–901. Bibcode:2001Sci...292.1899K. doi:10.1126/science.1060258. PMID 11397942.
  89. Isberg, J.; Hammersberg, J; Johansson, E; Wikström, T; Twitchen, DJ; Whitehead, AJ; Coe, SE; Scarsbrook, GA (2002). "High Carrier Mobility in Single-Crystal Plasma-Deposited Diamond". Science. 297 (5587): 1670–2. Bibcode:2002Sci...297.1670I. doi:10.1126/science.1074374. PMID 12215638.
  90. Russell, S. A. O.; Sharabi, S.; Tallaire, A.; Moran, D. A. J. (October 1, 2012). "Hydrogen-Terminated Diamond Field-Effect Transistors With Cutoff Frequency of 53 GHz". IEEE Electron Device Letters. 33 (10): 1471–1473. Bibcode:2012IEDL...33.1471R. doi:10.1109/LED.2012.2210020.
  91. Ueda, K.; Kasu, M.; Yamauchi, Y.; Makimoto, T.; Schwitters, M.; Twitchen, D. J.; Scarsbrook, G. A.; Coe, S. E. (July 1, 2006). "Diamond FET using high-quality polycrystalline diamond with fT of 45 GHz and fmax of 120 GHz". IEEE Electron Device Letters. 27 (7): 570–572. Bibcode:2006IEDL...27..570U. doi:10.1109/LED.2006.876325.
  92. Isberg, J.; Gabrysch, M.; Tajani, A. & Twitchen, D.J. (2006). "High-field Electrical Transport in Single Crystal CVD Diamond Diodes". Advances in Science and Technology. 48: 73–76. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.48.73.
  93. Railkar, T. A.; Kang, W. P.; Windischmann, Henry; Malshe, A. P.; Naseem, H. A.; Davidson, J. L.; Brown, W. D. (2000). "A critical review of chemical vapor-deposited (CVD) diamond for electronic applications". Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences. 25 (3): 163–277. Bibcode:2000CRSSM..25..163R. doi:10.1080/10408430008951119.
  94. Salisbury, David (August 4, 2011) "Designing diamond circuits for extreme environments", Vanderbilt University Research News. Retrieved May 27, 2015.
  95. Bucciolini, M.; Borchi, E; Bruzzi, M; Casati, M; Cirrone, P; Cuttone, G; Deangelis, C; Lovik, I; Onori, S; Raffaele, L.; Sciortino, S. (2005). "Diamond dosimetry: Outcomes of the CANDIDO and CONRADINFN projects". Nuclear Instruments and Methods A. 552 (1–2): 189–196. Bibcode:2005NIMPA.552..189B. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2005.06.030.
  96. "Blind to the Optical Light Detectors". Royal Observatory of Belgium. Retrieved May 5, 2009.
  97. Benmoussa, A; Soltani, A; Haenen, K; Kroth, U; Mortet, V; Barkad, H A; Bolsee, D; Hermans, C; Richter, M; De Jaeger, J C; Hochedez, J F (2008). "New developments on diamond photodetector for VUV Solar Observations". Semiconductor Science and Technology. 23 (3): 035026. Bibcode:2008SeScT..23c5026B. doi:10.1088/0268-1242/23/3/035026.
  98. Panizza, M. & Cerisola, G. (2005). "Application of diamond electrodes to electrochemical processes". Electrochimica Acta. 51 (2): 191–199. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2005.04.023.
  99. Nebel, C.E.; Uetsuka, H.; Rezek, B.; Shin, D.; Tokuda, N.; Nakamura, T. (2007). "Inhomogeneous DNA bonding to polycrystalline CVD diamond". Diamond and Related Materials. 16 (8): 1648–1651. Bibcode:2007DRM....16.1648N. doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2007.02.015.
  100. Gandini, D. (2000). "Oxidation of carbonylic acids at boron-doped diamond electrodes for wastewater treatment". Journal of Applied Electrochemistry. 20 (12): 1345–1350. Bibcode:1988JApEl..18..410W. doi:10.1023/A:1026526729357.
  101. Michaud, P.-A. (2000). "Preparation of peroxodisulfuric acid using Boron-Doped Diamond thin film electrodes". Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters. 3 (2): 77. doi:10.1149/1.1390963.
  102. Yarnell, Amanda (February 2, 2004). "The Many Facets of Man-Made Diamonds". Chemical & Engineering News. 82 (5): 26–31. doi:10.1021/cen-v082n005.p026.
  103. "How High Quality Synthetic Diamonds Will Impact the Market". Kitco. July 12, 2013. Retrieved August 1, 2013.
  104. Zimnisky, Paul (February 10, 2015). "Global Rough Diamond Production Estimated to Hit Over 135M Carats in 2015". Kitco Commentary. Kitco.
  105. Walker, J. (1979). "Optical absorption and luminescence in diamond". Rep. Prog. Phys. 42 (10): 1605–1659. Bibcode:1979RPPh...42.1605W. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.467.443. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/42/10/001.
  106. Collins, A.T.; Connor, A.; Ly, C-H.; Shareef, A.; Spear, P.M. (2005). "High-temperature annealing of optical centers in type-I diamond". Journal of Applied Physics. 97 (8): 083517–083517–10. Bibcode:2005JAP....97h3517C. doi:10.1063/1.1866501.
  107. "Memorial Diamonds Deliver Eternal Life". Reuters. June 23, 2009. Archived from the original on October 17, 2012. Retrieved August 8, 2009.
  108. "De Beers pleads guilty in price fixing case". Associated Press via NBC News. July 13, 2004. Retrieved May 27, 2015.
  109. Pressler, Margaret Webb (July 14, 2004). "DeBeers Pleads to Price-Fixing: Firm Pays $10 million, Can Fully Reenter U.S." Washington Post. Retrieved November 26, 2008.
  110. O'Donoghue, p. 115
  111. Laboratory Grown Diamond Report for Gemesis diamond, International Gemological Institute, 2007. Retrieved May 27, 2015.
  112. Company Grows 10 Carat Synthetic Diamond. Jckonline.com (May 27, 2015). Retrieved on September 1, 2015.
  113. Murphy, Hannah; Biesheuvel, Thomas; Elmquist, Sonja (August 27, 2015) "Want to Make a Diamond in Just 10 Weeks? Use a Microwave", Businessweek.
  114. "Synthetic Diamonds – Promoting Fair Trade" (PDF). gjepc.org. The Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council. Retrieved February 12, 2016.
  115. "Shine Bright Like a Diamond: Nightingales". oneandother.com. One&Other. Archived from the original on February 15, 2016. Retrieved February 12, 2016.
  116. Fried, Michael (January 20, 2017). "Why Lab Created Diamonds are a Poor Value Purchase". The Diamond Pro. Retrieved November 19, 2018.
  117. Zimnisky, Paul (January 9, 2017). "A New Diamond Industry". Mining Journal (London). The Mining Journal (trade magazine).
  118. Kottasová, Ivana (May 29, 2018). "De Beers admits defeat over man-made diamonds". CNN. Retrieved May 30, 2018.
  119. "FTC Approves Final Revisions to Jewelry Guides". U.S. Federal Trade Commission. July 24, 2018.
  120. Payne, Jason (July 25, 2018). "Orwell's '1984,' De Beers' Lobbying, & the New FTC Lab Diamond Guidelines".
  121. "DPA Petition on Proposed Revisions to the Guides for the Jewelry, Precious Metals and Pewter Industries" (PDF). De Beers Technologies UK. May 2016. Retrieved August 21, 2018.
  122. Garrahan, Rachel (September 1, 2018). "De Beers U-turn on lab-grown diamonds divides industry". Financial Times. Retrieved September 1, 2018.
  123. Gibson, Kate (May 30, 2018). "De Beers man-made diamonds for retail sale after years of resistance". CBS News. Retrieved November 20, 2018.
  124. "Lightbox Laboratory Grown Diamonds". (official website). De Beers. Retrieved November 20, 2018.

Bibliography

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.