Gramanya

Gramanya (Devanagari:ग्रामण्य,Grāmaṇya) refers to a dispute or discussion related to castes in Maharashtra in the past few centuries that related to supposed violation of the Brahmanical ritual code of behavior.

Overview

Gramanya is a crystallisation of conflicts between two castes of individuals belonging to the same caste, and the same group, about observance of certain religious practices vis-a-vis, other members of the society or of the particular caste group. There are two types of Gramanyas inter-caste, and intra-caste. Records mention that Gramanyas took place in Maharashtra in late 18th and 19th century and various castes were involved in many disputes. There are also recorded instances of Gramanyas between Saraswats and the Chitpawans, CKPs and Chitpawans, Pathare Prabhus and the Chitpawans and the Shukla Yujurvedi Deshastha Brahmins and the Chitpawans. The intra-caste disputes involved the supposed violation of the Brahmanical ritual code of behavior. The disputes between the Marathas and the Brahmins happened in and 19th and 20th centuries. The disputes between Daivadnya and Brahmins happened in the 19th century. These disputes between castes were common in Maharashtra. Verdicts of Gramanyas were given by arbitrators(religious councils or religious leaders) that decided the ritual status of the caste.[1][2][3][4]

Citations
  1. Gokhale, Sandhya (2008). The Chitpwans. Shubhi Publications. p. 204. The jati disputes were not a rare occurrence in Maharashtra. There are recorded instances of disputes between jatis such as Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhus and the Chitpawans, Pathare Prabhus and the Chitpawans, Saraswats and the Chitpawans and Shukla Yajurvedi and the Chitpawans. These intra-caste dispute involving the supposed violation of the Brahmanical ritual code of behavior was called Gramanya in Marathi.
  2. Israel, Milton; Narendra K. Wagle (1987), Religion and society in Maharashtra, p. 145-171
  3. Israel, Milton; Narendra K. Wagle (1987), Religion and society in Maharashtra, p. 148
  4. V. Gupchup, Vijaya (1983), Bombay: social change, 1813–1857, p. 172

Further reading
  • Thākare, Keśava Sitārāma (1919) (in Marāṭhī), Grāmaṇyācā sādyanta itihāsa arthāta nokarśāhīce banḍa, Mumbai
gollark: I guess if it was actually totally indistinguishable that might require running a human mind somewhere which would maybe count.
gollark: However, it seems pretty orthogonal to consciousness.
gollark: I know of this.
gollark: That seems kind of silly.
gollark: It would be difficult if they could touch the computer-dog.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.