Galaxy merger

Galaxy mergers can occur when two (or more) galaxies collide. They are the most violent type of galaxy interaction. The gravitational interactions between galaxies and the friction between the gas and dust have major effects on the galaxies involved. The exact effects of such mergers depend on a wide variety of parameters such as collision angles, speeds, and relative size/composition, and are currently an extremely active area of research. Galaxy mergers are important because the merger rate is a fundamental measurement of galaxy evolution. The merger rate also provides astronomers with clues about how galaxies bulked up over time.[1]

The Mice Galaxies (NGC 4676 A&B) are in the process of merging.

Description

During the merger, stars and dark matter in each galaxy become affected by the approaching galaxy. Toward the late stages of the merger, the gravitational potential (i.e. the shape of the galaxy) begins changing so quickly that star orbits are greatly altered, and lose any trace of their prior orbit. This process is called “violent relaxation”.[2] For example, when two disk galaxies collide they begin with their stars in a orderly rotation in the planes of the two separate disks. During the merger, that ordered motion is transformed into random energy (“thermalized”). The resultant galaxy is dominated by stars that orbit the galaxy in a complicated and random interacting network of orbits, which is what is observed in elliptical galaxies.

NGC 3921 is an interacting pair of disc galaxies in the late stages of its merger.[3]

Mergers are also locations of extreme amounts of star formation.[4] The star formation rate (SFR) during a major merger can reach thousands of solar masses worth of new stars each year, depending on the gas content of each galaxy and its redshift.[5][6] Typical merger SFRs are less than 100 new solar masses per year.[7][8] This is large compared to our Galaxy, which makes only a few new stars each year (~2 new stars).[9] Though stars almost never get close enough to actually collide in galaxy mergers, giant molecular clouds rapidly fall to the center of the galaxy where they collide with other molecular clouds. These collisions then induce condensations of these clouds into new stars. We can see this phenomenon in merging galaxies in the nearby universe. Yet, this process was more pronounced during the mergers that formed most elliptical galaxies we see today, which likely occurred 1–10 billion years ago, when there was much more gas (and thus more molecular clouds) in galaxies. Also, away from the center of the galaxy gas clouds will run into each other producing shocks which stimulate the formation of new stars in gas clouds. The result of all this violence is that galaxies tend to have little gas available to form new stars after they merge. Thus if a galaxy is involved in a major merger, and then a few billion years pass, the galaxy will have very few young stars (see Stellar evolution) left. This is what we see in today's elliptical galaxies, very little molecular gas and very few young stars. It is thought that this is because elliptical galaxies are the end products of major mergers which use up the majority of gas during the merger, and thus further star formation after the merger is quenched.

Galaxy mergers can be simulated in computers, to learn more about galaxy formation. Galaxy pairs initially of any morphological type can be followed, taking into account all gravitational forces, and also the hydrodynamics and dissipation of the interstellar gas, the star formation out of the gas, and the energy and mass released back in the interstellar medium by supernovae. Such a library of galaxy merger simulations can be found on the GALMER website.[10] A study led by Jennifer Lotz of the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, Maryland created computer simulations in order to better understand images taken by the Hubble Telescope.[1] Lotz's team tried to account for a broad range of merger possibilities, from a pair of galaxies with equal masses joining together to an interaction between a giant galaxy and a tiny one. The team also analyzed different orbits for the galaxies, possible collision impacts, and how galaxies were oriented to each other. In all, the group came up with 57 different merger scenarios and studied the mergers from 10 different viewing angles.[1]

One of the largest galaxy mergers ever observed consisted of four elliptical galaxies in the cluster CL0958+4702. It may form one of the largest galaxies in the Universe.[11]

Categories

Galaxy mergers can be classified into distinct groups due to the properties of the merging galaxies, such as their number, their comparative size and their gas richness.

By number

Mergers can be categorized by the number of galaxies engaged in the process:

Binary merger
Two interacting galaxies merge.
Multiple merger
Three or more galaxies merge.

By size

Mergers can be categorized by the extent to which the largest involved galaxy is changed in size or form by the merger:

Minor merger
A merger is minor if one of the galaxies is significantly larger than the other(s). The larger galaxy will often "eat" the smaller, absorbing most of its gas and stars with little other significant effect on the larger galaxy. Our home galaxy, the Milky Way, is thought to be currently absorbing several smaller galaxies in this fashion, such as the Canis Major Dwarf Galaxy, and possibly the Magellanic Clouds. The Virgo Stellar Stream is thought to be the remains of a dwarf galaxy that has been mostly merged with the Milky Way.
Major merger
A merger of two spiral galaxies that are approximately the same size is major; if they collide at appropriate angles and speeds, they will likely merge in a fashion that drives away much of the dust and gas through a variety of feedback mechanisms that often include a stage in which there are active galactic nuclei. This is thought to be the driving force behind many quasars. The end result is an elliptical galaxy, and many astronomers hypothesize that this is the primary mechanism that creates ellipticals.

One study found that large galaxies merged with each other on average once over the past 9 billion years. Small galaxies coalesced with large galaxies more frequently.[1] Note that the Milky Way and the Andromeda Galaxy are predicted to collide in about 4.5 billion years. The expected result of these galaxies merging would be major as they have similar sizes, and will change from two "grand design" spiral galaxies to (probably) a giant elliptical galaxy.

By gas richness

Mergers can be categorized by the degree to which the gas (if any) carried within and around the merging galaxies interacts:

Wet merger
A wet merger is between gas-rich galaxies ("blue" galaxies). Wet mergers typically produce a large amount of star formation, transform disc galaxies into elliptical galaxies and trigger quasar activity.[12]
Dry merger
A merger between gas-poor galaxies ("red" galaxies) is called dry. Dry mergers typically do not greatly change the galaxies' star formation rates, but can play an important role in increasing stellar mass.[12]
Damp merger
A damp merger occurs between the same two galaxy-types mentioned above ("blue" and "red" galaxies), if there is enough gas to fuel significant star formation but not enough to form globular clusters[13]
Mixed merger
A mixed merger occurs when gas-rich and gas-poor galaxies ("blue" and "red" galaxies) merge.

Merger history trees

In the standard cosmological model, any single galaxy is expected to have formed from a few or many successive mergers of dark matter haloes, in which gas cools and forms stars at the centres of the haloes, becoming the optically visible objects historically identified as galaxies during the twentieth century. Modelling the mathematical graph of the mergers of these dark matter haloes and in turn the corresponding star formation was initially treated either by analysing purely gravitational N-body simulations.[14][15] or by using numerical realisations of statistical ("semi-analytical") formulae.[16]

In a 1992 observational cosmology conference in Milan,[14] Roukema, Quinn and Peterson showed the first merger history trees of dark matter haloes extracted from cosmological N-body simulations. These merger history trees were combined with formulae for star formation rates and evolutionary population synthesis, yielding synthetic luminosity functions of galaxies (statistics of how many galaxies are intrinsically bright or faint) at different cosmological epochs.[14][15] Given the complex dynamics of dark matter halo mergers, a fundamental problem in modelling merger history tree is to define when a halo at one time step is a descendant of a halo at the previous time step. Roukema's group chose to define this relation by requiring the halo at the later time step to contain strictly more than 50 percent of the particles in the halo at the earlier time step; this guaranteed that between two time steps, any halo could have at most a single descendant.[17] This galaxy formation modelling method yields rapidly calculated models of galaxy populations with synthetic spectra and corresponding statistical properties comparable with observations.[17]

Independently, Lacey and Cole showed at the same 1992 conference[18] how they used the Press–Schechter formalism combined with dynamical friction to statistically generate Monte Carlo realisations of dark matter halo merger history trees and the corresponding formation of the stellar cores (galaxies) of the haloes.[16] Kauffmann, White and Guiderdoni extended this approach in 1993 to include semi-analytical formulae for gas cooling, star formation, gas reheating from supernovae, and for the hypothesised conversion of disc galaxies into elliptical galaxies.[19] Both the Kauffmann group and Okamoto and Nagashima later took up the N-body simulation derived merger history tree approach.[20][21]

Examples

Some of the galaxies that are in the process of merging or are believed to have formed by merging are:

Merging galaxies
Arp 302 (left); NGC 7752/7753; IIZw96 (right).
NGC 2623 – late stage merging of two galaxies.[22]
Galaxy twistings – possible merger.[23]
Markarian 779 – possible merger.[24]
Ancient galaxy mega-merger (artist concept).[25]
“Flying V” – two galaxies.[26]
gollark: It's not the developers' fault that GMail is stupid.
gollark: Someone can sign up for an account using a differently dotted version of your email, and it'll seem like one which is actually directed to you.
gollark: Or, er, not-really-phishing.
gollark: Because phishing attacks.
gollark: It;s a really stupidisoiasufi feature.

See also

References
  1. "Astronomers Pin Down Galaxy Collision Rate". HubbleSite. 27 October 2011. Retrieved 16 April 2012.
  2. van Albada, T.S. (1982). "[no title cited]". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 201: 939.
  3. "Evolution in slow motion". Space Telscope Science Institute. Retrieved 15 September 2015.
  4. Schweizer, F. (2005). de Grijs, R.; González-Delgado, R.M. (eds.). [no presentation title cited]. Starbursts: From 30 Doradus to Lyman Break Galaxies; Cambridge, UK; 6–10 September 2004. Astrophysics & Space Science Library. 329. Dordrecht, DE: Springer. p. 143.
  5. Ostriker, Eve C.; Shetty, Rahul (2012). "Maximally star-forming galactic disks I. Starburst regulation via feedback-driven turbulence". The Astrophysical Journal. 731 (1): 41. arXiv:1102.1446. Bibcode:2011ApJ...731...41O. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/731/1/41. S2CID 2584335. 41.
  6. Brinchmann, J.; et al. (2004). "The physical properties of star-forming galaxies in the low-redshift Universe". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 351 (4): 1151–1179. arXiv:astro-ph/0311060. Bibcode:2004MNRAS.351.1151B. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07881.x. S2CID 12323108.
  7. Moster, Benjamin P.; et al. (2011). "The effects of a hot gaseous halo in galaxy major mergers". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 415 (4): 3750–3770. arXiv:1104.0246. Bibcode:2011MNRAS.415.3750M. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18984.x. S2CID 119276663.
  8. Hirschmann, Michaela; et al. (2012). "Galaxy formation in semi-analytic models and cosmological hydrodynamic zoom simulations". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 419 (4): 3200–3222. arXiv:1104.1626. Bibcode:2012MNRAS.419.3200H. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19961.x. S2CID 118710949.
  9. Chomiuk, Laura; Povich, Matthew S. (2011). "Toward a Unification of Star Formation Rate Determinations in the Milky Way and Other Galaxies". The Astronomical Journal. 142 (6): 197. arXiv:1110.4105. Bibcode:2011AJ....142..197C. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/6/197. S2CID 119298282. 197.
  10. "Galaxy merger library". 27 March 2010. Retrieved 27 March 2010.
  11. "Galaxies clash in four-way merger". BBC News. 6 August 2007. Retrieved 7 August 2007.
  12. Lin, Lihwal; et al. (July 2008). "The Redshift Evolution of Wet, Dry, and Mixed Galaxy Mergers from Close Galaxy Pairs in the DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey". The Astrophysical Journal. 681 (232): 232–243. arXiv:0802.3004. Bibcode:2008ApJ...681..232L. doi:10.1086/587928. S2CID 18628675.
  13. Forbes, Duncan A.; et al. (April 2007). "Damp Mergers: Recent Gaseous Mergers without Significant Globular Cluster Formation?". The Astrophysical Journal. 659 (1): 188–194. arXiv:astro-ph/0612415. Bibcode:2007ApJ...659..188F. doi:10.1086/512033. S2CID 15213247.
  14. Roukema, Boudewijn F.; Quinn, Peter J.; Peterson, Bruce A. (January 1993). "Spectral Evolution of Merging/Accreting Galaxies". Observational Cosmology. ASP Conference Series. 51. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. p. 298. Bibcode:1993ASPC...51..298R.
  15. Roukema, Boudewijn F.; Yoshii, Yuzuru (November 1993). "The Failure of Simple Merging Models to Save a Flat, Omega0=1 Universe". The Astrophysical Journal. IOP Publishing. 418: L1. Bibcode:1993ApJ...418L...1R. doi:10.1086/187101.
  16. Lacey, Cedric; Cole, Shaun (June 1993). "Merger rates in hierarchical models of galaxy formation". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Oxford University Press. 262 (3): 627–649. Bibcode:1993MNRAS.262..627L. doi:10.1093/mnras/262.3.627.
  17. Roukema, Boudewijn F.; Quinn, Peter J.; Peterson, Bruce A.; Rocca-Volmerange, Brigitte (December 1997). "Merging History Trees of Dark Matter Haloes: a Tool for Exploring Galaxy Formation Models". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 292 (4): 835–852. arXiv:astro-ph/9707294. Bibcode:1997MNRAS.292..835R. doi:10.1093/mnras/292.4.835. S2CID 15265628.
  18. Lacey, Cedric; Cole, Shaun (January 1993). "Merger Rates in Hierarchical Models of Galaxy Formation" (PDF). Observational Cosmology. ASP Conference Series. 51. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. p. 192. Bibcode:1993ASPC...51..192L.
  19. Kauffmann, Guinevere; White, Simon D.M.; Guiderdoni, Bruno (September 1993). "Clustering of galaxies in a hierarchical universe - II. Evolution to high redshift". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. IOP Publishing. 264: 201. Bibcode:1993MNRAS.264..201K. doi:10.1093/mnras/264.1.201.
  20. Kauffmann, Guinevere; Kolberg, Jörg M.; Diaferio, Antonaldo; White, Simon D.M. (August 1999). "Clustering of galaxies in a hierarchical universe - II. Evolution to high redshift". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 307 (3): 529–536. arXiv:astro-ph/9809168. Bibcode:1999MNRAS.307..529K. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02711.x. S2CID 17636817.
  21. Okamoto, Takashi; Nagashima, Masahiro (January 2001). "Morphology-Density Relation for Simulated Clusters of Galaxies in Cold Dark Matter-dominated Universes". The Astrophysical Journal. 547 (1): 109–116. arXiv:astro-ph/0004320. Bibcode:2001ApJ...547..109O. doi:10.1086/318375. S2CID 6011298.
  22. "A glimpse of the future". www.spacetelescope.org. Retrieved 16 October 2017.
  23. "Galactic glow worm". ESA/Hubble. Retrieved 27 March 2013.
  24. "Transforming Galaxies". Picture of the Week. ESA/Hubble. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  25. "Ancient Galaxy Megamergers - ALMA and APEX discover massive conglomerations of forming galaxies in early Universe". www.eso.org. Retrieved 26 April 2018.
  26. "Cosmic "flying V" of merging galaxies". ESA/Hubble Picture of the Week. Retrieved 12 February 2013.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.