Felbrigg
Felbrigg is a small village just south of Cromer in Norfolk, England.[2] The Danish name means a 'plank bridge'.[3]
| Felbrigg | |
|---|---|
.JPG) Felbrigg village sign, showing Felbrigg Hall | |
  Felbrigg Location within Norfolk | |
| Area | 6.30 km2 (2.43 sq mi) |
| Population | 193 (2011 census[1]) |
| • Density | 31/km2 (80/sq mi) |
| OS grid reference | TG2040 |
| • London | 136 miles (219 km) |
| Civil parish |
|
| District | |
| Shire county | |
| Region | |
| Country | England |
| Sovereign state | United Kingdom |
| Post town | NORWICH |
| Postcode district | NR11 |
| Dialling code | 01263 |
| Police | Norfolk |
| Fire | Norfolk |
| Ambulance | East of England |
| UK Parliament | |
Historians believe that the original village was clustered around its Perpendicular church, St Margaret's Church, Felbrigg, in the grounds of Felbrigg Hall, a Jacobean mansion built in the early 17th century, a mile to the east of the present village.
In the church are 14th-century monumental brasses of Sir Simon de Felbrigge and his wife, the original Lord of the Manor here.[3]
Notes
- "Parish population 2011". Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 2 September 2015.
- OS Explorer Map 24 (Edition A 1997) – Norfolk Coast Central. ISBN 0-319-21726-4.
- Maddison, John (2004) [1995]. "Felbrigg and its owners". Felbrigg Hall (New ed.). Warrington: National Trust. p. 34. ISBN 1-84359-101-4.
gollark: I mean, sure, but to continue making somewhat unrelated meta-level claims, almost regardless of how much that's actually happening there'll still be a few people complaining about it.
gollark: The important thing is probably... quantitative data about the amounts and change of each?
gollark: Regardless of what's actually happening with news, you can probably dredge up a decent amount of examples of people complaining about being too censored *and* the other way round.
gollark: With the butterfly-weather-control example that's derived from, you can't actually track every butterfly and simulate the air movements resulting from this (yet, with current technology and algorithms), but you can just assume some amount of random noise (from that and other sources) which make predictions about the weather unreliable over large time intervals.
gollark: That seems nitpicky, the small stuff is still *mostly* irrelevant because you can lump it together or treat it as noise.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.