Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts

Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts is a monthly peer-reviewed scientific journal covering all aspects of environmental science. It is published by the Royal Society of Chemistry and Kris McNeill is the editor-in-chief. The journal was established in 1999 as the Journal of Environmental Monitoring and obtained its current title in 2013.

Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
DisciplineEnvironmental science
LanguageEnglish
Edited bySam Keltie
Publication details
Former name(s)
Journal of Environmental Monitoring
History1999-present
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (United Kingdom)
FrequencyMonthly
2.6 (2016)
Standard abbreviations
ISO 4Environ. Sci.: Process. Impacts
Indexing
ISSN2050-7887 (print)
2050-7895 (web)
LCCN2013243138
OCLC no.844721788
Links

Article types

The journal publishes full research papers, communications, perspectives, critical reviews, frontier reviews, tutorial reviews, comments, and highlights.

Abstracting and indexing

The journal is abstracted and indexed in Analytical Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts Service, Embase/Excerpta Medica, Elsevier BIOBASE, Current Awareness in Biological Sciences, Index Medicus/MEDLINE/PubMed, CAB International, VINITI Database RAS, Science Citation Index, Current Contents/Agriculture, Biology & Environmental Sciences, Current Contents/Physical, Chemical & Earth Sciences, The Zoological Record, and BIOSIS Previews. According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2014 impact factor of 2.171.[1]

Sister journals

The Royal Society of Chemistry publishes 2 other journals in the Environmental Science portfolio: Environmental Science: Nano was established in 2014[2] and Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology in 2015.[3]

gollark: I'm not against them, I'm against what they're doing.
gollark: If it's something there's any interest in, of course.
gollark: At best, as Wojbie said, you can make it annoying for people, but then one person will do it and share how.
gollark: You just *cannot* give people access to a thing in one way and expect them to not be able to access it in some other way. Basically every DRM scheme - which this really sounds like - has *failed, inevitably*.
gollark: As Grim Reaper said: if there is *any* important data there or something, *people will get it out* eventually.

See also

References
  1. "Journal of Environmental Monitoring". 2014 Journal Citation Reports. Web of Science (Science ed.). Thomson Reuters. 2015.
  2. "Environmental Science: Nano". Royal Society of Chemistry.
  3. "Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology". Royal Society of Chemistry.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.