Toothlessness

Toothlessness or edentulism is the condition of having no teeth. In organisms that naturally have teeth, it is the result of tooth loss.

A toothless man drawn by Leonardo da Vinci

Organisms that never possessed teeth can also be described as edentulous, such as members of the former zoological classification order of Edentata, which included anteaters and sloths, all of which possess no anterior teeth and either no or poorly developed posterior teeth.

In naturally dentate species, edentulism is more than just the simple presence or absence of teeth; it is biochemically complex, because the teeth, jaws, and oral mucosa are not static objects; they are dynamic (changing over time). Processes such as bone remodeling (loss and gain of bone tissue) in the jaws and inflammation of soft tissue in response to the oral microbiota are clinically important for edentulous people. For example, bone resorption in the jaw is frequently how the teeth were able to detach in the first place; the jaw in an edentulous area undergoes further resorption even after the teeth are gone; and insertion of dental implants can elicit new bone formation, leading to osseointegration. Meanwhile, bacteria and yeasts of the oral cavity and the immune system of their host create an immensely complicated and constantly changing interplay that presents clinically as gingivitis, caries, stomatitis, and other periodontal pathology.

Signs and symptoms

For people, the relevance and functionality of teeth can be easily taken for granted, but a closer examination of their considerable significance will demonstrate how they are actually very important. Among other things, teeth serve to:

Let us not forget the psychological impact of tooth loss either: Tooth loss has been show to generally lower a patient's Quality of Life, with this compromised oral function leading to decreased self-esteem and a decline is psychological well-being. Patients may be embarrassed to smile, eat and talk.[1]

In conclusion, tooth loss has a vast impact on general and psychological health. So Dental practitioners should do their utmost to prevent it through prevention, education and finally treatment.[1]

Facial support and aesthetics

When an individual's mouth is at rest, the teeth in the opposing jaws are nearly touching; there is what is referred to as a "freeway space" of roughly 2–3 mm. However, this distance is partially maintained as a result of the teeth limiting any further closure past the point of maximum intercuspidation. When there are no teeth present in the mouth, the natural vertical dimension of occlusion is lost and the mouth has a tendency to overclose. This causes the cheeks to exhibit a "sunken-in" appearance and wrinkle lines to form at the commissures. Additionally, the anterior teeth, when present, serve to properly support the lips and provide for certain aesthetic features, such as an acute nasiolabial angle. Loss of muscle tone and skin elasticity due to old age, when most individuals begin to experience edentulism, tend to further exacerbate this condition.

The tongue, which consists of a very dynamic group of muscles, tends to fill the space it is allowed, and in the absence of teeth, will broaden out.[2] This makes it initially difficult to fabricate both complete dentures and removable partial dentures for patients exhibiting complete and partial edentulism, respectively; however, once the space is "taken back" by the prosthetic teeth, the tongue will return to a narrower body.

Vertical dimension of occlusion

As stated, the position of maximal closure in the presence of teeth is referred to as maximum intercuspidation, and the vertical jaw relationship in this position is referred to as the vertical dimension of occlusion. With the loss of teeth, there is a decrease in this vertical dimension, as the mouth is allowed to overclose when there are no teeth present to block further upward movement of the mandible towards the maxilla. This may contribute, as explained above, to a sunken-in appearance of the cheeks, because there is now "too much" cheek than is needed to extend from the maxilla to the mandible when in an overclosed position. If this situation is left untreated for many years, the muscles and tendons of the mandible and the TMJ may manifest with altered tone and elasticity.

Pronunciation

The teeth play a major role in speech. Some letter sounds require the lips and/or tongue to make contact with teeth for proper pronunciation of the sound, and lack of teeth will obviously affect the way in which an edentulous individual can pronounce these sounds.

For example, the consonant sounds of the English language s, z, j, and x are achieved with tooth-to-tooth contact; d, n, l, t, and th are achieved with tongue-to-tooth contact; the fricatives f and v are achieved through lip-to-tooth contact. These sounds are very difficult to properly enunciate for the edentulous individual.

Preservation of alveolar ridge height

The green line indicates the faciolingual dimensions of a newly edentulous ridge, while the blue line indicates these dimensions after the occurrence of very severe resorption.

The alveolar ridges are columns of bone that surround and anchor the teeth and run the entire length, mesiodistally, of both the maxillary and mandibular dental arches. The alveolar bone is unique in that it exists for the sake of the teeth that it retains; when the teeth are absent, the bone slowly resorbs. The maxilla resorbs in a superioposterior direction, and the mandible resorbs in an inferioanterior direction, thus eventually converting an individual's occlusal scheme from a Class I to a Class III. Loss of teeth alters the form of the alveolar bone in 91% of cases.[3]

In addition to this resorption of bone in the vertical and anterioposterior dimensions, the alveolus also resorbs faciolingually, thus diminishing the width of the ridge. What initially began as a sort of tall, broad, bell curve-shaped ridge (in the faciolingual dimension) eventually becomes a short, narrow, stumpy sort of what doesn't even appear to be a ridge. Resorption is exacerbated by pressure on the bone; thus, long-term complete denture wearers will experience more drastic reductions to their ridges that non-denture wearers. Those individuals who do wear dentures can decrease the amount of bone loss by retaining some tooth roots in the form of overdenture abutments or have implants placed. Note that the depiction above shows a very excessive change and that this many take many years of denture wear to achieve.

Ridge resorption may also alter the form of the ridges to less predictable shapes, such as bulbous ridges with undercuts or even sharp, thin, knife-edged ridges, depending of which of many possible factors influenced the resorption.

Bone loss with missing teeth, partials and complete dentures is progressive. According to Wolff's law, bone is stimulated, strengthened and continually renewed directly by a tooth or an implant. Teeth and implants provide this direct stimulation which develops stronger bone around them.

A 1970 research study of 1012 patients by Jozewicz showed denture wearers had a significantly higher rate of bone loss. Tallgren's 25-year study in 1972 also showed denture wearers have continued bone loss over the years. The biting force on the gum tissue irritates the bone and it melts away with a decrease in volume and density. Carlsson's 1967 study showed a dramatic bone loss during the first year after a tooth extraction which continues over the years, even without a denture or partial on it.

Effects on jawline and facial structure due to complete edentulism

The longer people are missing teeth, wear dentures or partials, the less bone they have in their jaws. This may result in decreased ability to chew food well, a decreased quality of life, social insecurity and decreasing esthetics because of a collapsing of the lower third of their face.

The bone loss also results in a significant decrease in chewing force, prompting many denture and partial wearers to avoid certain kinds of food. Food collecting under the appliance takes their enjoyment out of eating so they make their grocery and restaurant choices by what they can eat. There are several reports that correlate the quality and length of peoples lives with their ability to chew.

Dental implant studies from 1977 by Branemark and countless others show dental implants stop this progressive loss and stabilize the bone over the long term. Implanted teeth provide a stable, effective tooth replacement that feels natural. They also provide an improved ability to chew comfortably and for those missing many teeth an improved sense of well being. Dental implants have become the standard for replacing missing teeth in dentistry.

Masticatory efficiency

Physiologically, teeth provide for greater chewing ability. They allow us to masticate food thoroughly, increasing the surface area necessary to allow for the enzymes present in the saliva, as well as in the stomach and intestines, to digest our food. Chewing also allows food to be prepared into small boli that are more readily swallowed than haphazard chunks of considerable size. For those who are even partially endentulous, it may become extremely difficult to chew food efficiently enough to swallow comfortably, although this is entirely dependent upon which teeth are lost. When an individual loses enough posterior teeth to make it difficult to chew, he or she may need to cut their food into very small pieces and learn how to make use of their anterior teeth to chew. If enough posterior teeth are missing, this will not only affect their chewing abilities, but also their occlusion; posterior teeth, in a mutually protected occlusion, help to protect the anterior teeth and the vertical dimension of occlusion and, when missing, the anterior teeth begin to bear a greater amount of force for which they are structurally prepared. Thus, loss of posterior teeth will cause the anterior teeth to splay. This can be prevented by obtaining dental prostheses, such as removable partial dentures, bridges or implant-supported crowns. In addition to reestablishing a protected occlusion, these prostheses can greatly improve one's chewing abilities.

As a consequence of a lack of certain nutrition due to altered eating habits, various health problems can occur, from the mild to the extreme. Lack of certain vitamins (A, E and C) and low levels of riboflavin and thiamin can produce a variety of conditions, ranging from constipation, weight loss, arthritis and rheumatism. There are more serious conditions such as heart disease and Parkinson's disease and even to the extreme, certain types of Cancer. Treatments include changing approaches to eating such as cutting food in advance to make eating easier and less likely to avoid as well as consumer health products such as multivitamins and multi-minerals specifically designed to support the nutritional issues experienced by denture wearers.

Numerous studies linking edentulism with instances of disease and medical conditions have been reported. In a cross-sectional study, Hamasha and others found significant differences between edentulous and dentate individuals with respect to rates of atherosclerotic vascular disease, heart failure, ischemic heart disease and joint disease.[4]

Cause

Edentulism is a condition which can have multiple causes. In exceedingly rare cases, toothlessness may result from the teeth not developing in the first place (anodontia).[5] However, in most cases it is as a result of permanent tooth extraction in adulthood.[5] This may or may not be due to dental caries, periodontal disease (gum disease), trauma or other pathology of the face and mouth (i.e. cysts, tumours).[5] In those under 45 years of age, dental caries is considered to be the main cause of toothlessness, whereas periodontal disease is the primary cause of tooth loss in older age groups.[6]

Replacing missing teeth

There are three main ways in which missing teeth can be replaced:

  • Bridges: Used to replace 1 or a few missing teeth. False teeth are supported by the remaining, adjacent natural teeth.
    • Advantages:
      • They are fixed, they do not require removal on a frequent basis. Therefore, they are easily maintained.
      • Can be cleaned by normal brushing procedures.
      • Unlike dentures, they do not require skill in their use. They will not move about.[7]
    • Disadvantages:
      • They generally require the preparation of adjacent teeth. This is destructive, and not required for the placement of a denture.
      • They have a higher rate of failure than either Dentures or Implants.[7]
  • Dentures: False teeth are mounted onto an acrylic base. These may be partial (to replace some missing teeth) or complete (where all the natural teeth are missing).[8] Dentures may be removable, or fixed in the mouth by dental implants.
    • Advantages:
      • This is the least expensive option for the replacement of teeth.
      • The least invasive, no surgery needed (usually).
    • Disadvantages:
      • Quite often rely solely on the mucosa for support, do not tend to be as stable as the other options.
      • Very difficult to keep clean and can exacerbate any oral hygiene issues.
      • They are difficult to learn to use. Quite often require complex muscular control to hold them in place.
      • Not as efficient as other options. Foods such as apples and nuts will often have to be avoided.[9]
  • Dental Implants: To replace a single tooth, a screw (the implant) is placed into the jaw bone, onto which a false tooth is screwed onto. Implants can also be used to support bridges or dentures.[10]
    • Advantages:
      • They are much more realistic than the other options. Have similar efficiency and aesthetics to an actual tooth.
      • They do not require the destruction of the adjacent teeth like bridges.
      • These last 5-8 times longer than both bridges and dentures. Despite the initial higher cost, it pays off in the long term.
      • Much easier to maintain, with oral hygiene procedures being rather similar to an actual tooth.[11]
    • Disadvantages:
      • Cost: they are very expensive. A single implant will cost between £2000-3000 on average.
      • Surgery: Their placement requires quite invasive surgery. With surgery comes risks (e.g. infection, swelling, bleeding).[12]
      • Replacement: The actual implant itself rarely requires replacement, but the actual abutment, or tooth sitting on top of the implant will. This needs replacing on average every 10–15 years.
      • Time: Once an implant has been placed, the tooth replacement does not occur immediately. Implants take time for bone integration. The majority require 3 to 6 months before the final restoration is placed.[13]

Clinical classification

A classification system has been developed by the American College of Prosthodontists. The classification are based on diagnostic findings, which is used to help practitioners determine appropriate treatments for patients.

The diagnostic criteria used to classify edentulism are:

There are four categories which are Class I, II, III and IV.

  • Class I: Minimally compromised

This class is most likely to be successfully treated with complete dentures. The characteristics include:

  • Residual bone height of 21mm or more measured at the lowest vertical height of the mandible shown on a panoramic radiograph.
  • Residual ridge morphology resists horizontal and vertical movement of the denture base
  • Location of muscle attachments that arc conducive to denture base stability and retention
  • Class I maxillomandibular relationship.
  • Class II: Moderately compromised

This class is distinguished by the continued degradation of the denture‐supporting anatomy. It is also characterised by specific patient management and lifestyle considerations as well as systemic disease interactions. Characteristics include:

  • Residual bone height of 16 to 20mrn measured at the lowest vertical height of the mandible on a panoramic radiograph.
  • Residual ridge morphology that does not show horizontal and vertical movement of the denture base.
  • Location of muscle attachments with limited influence on denture base stability and retention.
  • Class I maxillomandibular relationship.
  • Minor modifiers, psychosocial considerations, mild systemic disease with oral manifestaion.
  • Class III: Substantially compromised

This classification level is where surgical revision of supporting structures is needed to allow for adequate prosthodontic function.

  • Residual alveolar bone height of 11 to 15mm measured at the least vertical height of the mandible on a panoramic radiograph.
  • Residual ridge morphology has minimum influence to resist horizontal or vertical movement of the denture base.
  • Location of muscle attachments with moderate influence on denture base stability and retention.
  • Class I, II or III maxillomandibular relationship.

The conditions that need preprosthetic surgery include:

  1. minor soft tissue procedures
  2. minor hard tissue procedures including alveoloplasty
  3. simple implant placement, no augmentation required
  4. multiple extractions leading to complete edentulism for immediate denture placement.
  • Class IV: Severely compromised

This classification level depicts the most debilitated edentulous condition. Surgical reconstruction is al- most always indicated but cannot always be accom- plished because of the patient's health, preferences, dental history, and financial considerations. When surgical revision is not an option, prosthodontic techniques of a specialized nature must be used to achieve an adequate treatment outcome.

  • Residual vertical bone height of 10mm or less measured at the least vertical height of the man- dible on a panoramic radiograph.
  • Residual ridge offers no resistance to horizontal or vertical movement.
  • Muscle attachment location that can be expected to have significant influence on denture base stability and retention.
  • Class I, II, or III maxillomandibular relationships.
  • History of paresthesia or dysesthesia.

Major conditions requiring preprosthetic surgery

  1. complex implant placement, augmentation required
  2. surgical correction of dentofacial deformities
  3. hard tissue augmentation required
  4. major soft tissue revision required, i.e., vestibular extensions with or without soft tissue grafting.[14]

Epidemiology
Disability-adjusted life year for edentulism per 100,000 inhabitants in 2004.[15]
  no data
  less than 30
  30–35
  35–40
  40–45
  45–50
  50–60
  60–65
  65–70
  70–75
  75–80
  80–85
  more than 85

Edentulism affects approximately 158 million people globally as of 2010 (2.3% of the population).[16] It is more common in women at 2.7% compared to the male rate of 1.9%.[16]

A cross-sectional analysis of data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) from 14 European countries (Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland) and Israel showed substantial variation in the age-standardized mean numbers of natural teeth amongst people aged 50 years and older, ranging from 14.3 teeth (Estonia) to 24.5 teeth (Sweden). The oral health goal of retaining at least 20 teeth at age 80 years was achieved by 25% of the population or less in most countries. A target concerning edentulism (≤15% in population aged 65–74 years) was reached in Sweden, Switzerland, Denmark, France, and Germany. Tooth replacement practices varied especially for a number of up to five missing teeth which were more likely to be replaced in Austria, Germany, Luxembourg, and Switzerland than in Israel, Denmark, Estonia, Spain, and Sweden.[17]

The prevalence of Kennedy Class III partial denture was predominant among younger population of 21-30 year and 31–40 years, whereas in group III between 41 and 50 years Class I was predominant. It can be stated that the need for prosthodontics care is expected to increase with age, and hence, more efforts should be made for improving dental education and motivation among patients.[18]

Edentulism occurs more often in people from the lower end of the socioeconomic scale.[19][20][21]

Society and culture

It is estimated that tooth loss results in worldwide productivity losses in the size of about US$63 billion yearly.[22]

gollark: Shrink Windows a lot?
gollark: 512GB is enough for anyone™ and costs about, what, £60? Maybe more with ongoing supply chain implosions.
gollark: NVMe SSDs also don't cost that much more nowadays.
gollark: SSDs are also fairly cheap.
gollark: I don't believe in it.

References
  1. Emami E, de Souza RF, Kabawat M, Feine JS (2013). "The impact of edentulism on oral and general health". International Journal of Dentistry. 2013: 498305. doi:10.1155/2013/498305. PMC 3664508. PMID 23737789.
  2. Mack A (1971). Full Dentures. Bristol: Wright. p. 11. ISBN 978-0723602996. The resulting tightness of the lips and oral musculature leads to difficulty in placing teeth in the neutral zone – that is, a zone where there is equality of pressure acting on the polish surfaces of the denture
  3. Abrams H, Kopczyk RA, Kaplan AL (February 1987). "Incidence of anterior ridge deformities in partially edentulous patients". The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 57 (2): 191–4. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(87)90145-4. PMID 3470510.
  4. Hutton B, Feine J, Morais J (March 2002). "Is there an association between edentulism and nutritional state?". Journal (Canadian Dental Association). 68 (3): 182–7. PMID 11911815.
  5. Jahangiri, L., Choi, M., Moghadam, M. and Jawad, S. (2015). Interventions for missing teeth: Removable prostheses for the edentulous mandible. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2).
  6. Papapanou, P. N. Periodontal diseases: epidemiology. Annals of periodontology/the American Academy of Periodontology 1, 1–36, doi: 10.1902/annals.1996.1.1.1 (1996).
  7. Bhutani D (2017-10-16). "Dental Bridges - Advantages and Disadvantages". News-Medical.net. Retrieved 2019-02-12.
  8. "Dental treatments". nhs.uk. 2018-04-26. Retrieved 2019-02-10.
  9. Stevens SF (12 February 2019). "Dental Implants compared to Dentures and Bridges" (PDF).
  10. American Dental Association (ADA) Division of Science (June 2015). "FOR THE PATIENT. Bridges, implants, and dentures". Journal of the American Dental Association. 146 (6): 490. doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2015.04.004. PMID 26025833.
  11. Spadafora D (2017-01-24). "Six Key Advantages Of Dental Implants Over Dentures". Dale F. Spadafora, DMD, MAGD. Retrieved 2019-02-12.
  12. Friedman E (2015-08-25). "Advantages and Disadvantages of Dental Implants". Friedman Dental Group. Retrieved 2019-02-12.
  13. Amin RA. "Disadvantages of Dental Implants: The Cons". Retrieved 2019-02-12.
  14. McGarry, Thomas J.; Nimmo, Arthur; Skiba, James F.; Ahlstrom, Robert H.; Smith, Christopher R.; Koumjian, Jack H.; Arbree, Nancy S. (2002). "Classification system for partial edentulism". Journal of Prosthodontics. 11 (3): 181–193. doi:10.1053/jopr.2002.126094. ISSN 1532-849X.
  15. "Mortality and Burden of Disease Estimates for WHO Member States in 2002". World Health Organization. 2002.
  16. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. (December 2012). "Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010". Lancet. 380 (9859): 2163–96. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2. PMC 6350784. PMID 23245607.
  17. Stock C, Jürges H, Shen J, Bozorgmehr K, Listl S (June 2016). "A comparison of tooth retention and replacement across 15 countries in the over-50s". Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 44 (3): 223–31. doi:10.1111/cdoe.12209. PMID 26706945.
  18. Fayad MI, Baig MN, Alrawaili AM (December 2016). "Prevalence and pattern of partial edentulism among dental patients attending College of Dentistry, Aljouf University, Saudi Arabia". Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. 6 (Suppl 3): S187–S191. doi:10.4103/2231-0762.197189. PMC 5285593. PMID 28217535.
  19. Watt RG, List S, Peres M, Heilmann A, eds. (2015). Social inequalities in oral health: from evidence to action (PDF). ISBN 9780952737766.
  20. Shen J, Listl S (January 2018). "Investigating social inequalities in older adults' dentition and the role of dental service use in 14 European countries". The European Journal of Health Economics. 19 (1): 45–57. doi:10.1007/s10198-016-0866-2. PMC 5773639. PMID 28064379.
  21. Matsuyama Y, Jürges H, Listl S (January 2019). "The Causal Effect of Education on Tooth Loss: Evidence From United Kingdom Schooling Reforms". American Journal of Epidemiology. 188 (1): 87–95. doi:10.1093/aje/kwy205. PMID 30203091.
  22. Listl S, Galloway J, Mossey PA, Marcenes W (October 2015). "Global Economic Impact of Dental Diseases". Journal of Dental Research. 94 (10): 1355–61. doi:10.1177/0022034515602879. PMID 26318590.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.