Climate Change Performance Index

The Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI) is an instrument designed by the German environmental and development organisation Germanwatch e.V. to enhance transparency in international climate politics. On the basis of standardised criteria, the index evaluates and compares the climate protection performance of 57 countries and the European Union (EU) (Status 2020), which are together responsible for more than 90% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The Climate Change Performance Index was first published in 2005 and an updated version is presented at the UN Climate Change Conference annually. Germanwatch publishes the index in cooperation with the NewClimate Institute and Climate Action Network International and with financial support from Barthel Foundation.[1] The most important results are available in German, English, French and Spanish.

Methodology

In 2017, the underlying methodology of the CCPI was revised and adapted to the new climate policy framework of the Paris Agreement from 2015. The CCPI was extended in order to include the measurement of a country’s progress towards the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and the country’s 2030 targets. The national performances are assessed based on 14 indicators in the following four categories:

1. GHG emissions (weighting 40%)

2. Renewable energy (weighting 20%)

3. Energy use (weighting 20%)

4. Climate policy (weighting 20%)

The three categories “GHG emissions”, “Renewable energy” and “Energy use” are each defined by four equally weighted indicators: 1) current level, 2) recent developments (5-year trend), 3) 2°C compatibility of the current performance and 4) 2°C compatibility of 2030 target. These twelve indicators are complemented by two indicators, measuring the country's performance regarding its national climate policy framework and implementation as well as regarding international climate diplomacy in the category "Climate Policy". The data for the “Climate policy” category is assessed annually in a comprehensive research study. Its basis is the performance rating by climate change experts from non-governmental organisations, universities and think tanks within the countries that are evaluated. In a questionnaire, they give a rating on the most important measures of their governments. The results are rated as very high, high, medium, low or very low.[2]

Results

The most recent results illustrate the main regional differences in climate protection efforts and performance within the 57 evaluated countries and the EU. According to the CCPI, none of the countries has yet achieved a performance across all indicators that can be qualified as very high, because no country fulfills the requirements to limit global warming to well below 2°C, as agreed in the Paris Agreement. This is why the first three places in the final ranking remain unoccupied. In the index for 2020, Sweden led the ranking, followed by Denmark and Morocco. The last three ranks were taken by the United States of America, Saudi Arabia and Chinese Taipei.

2019 results
RankCountryScore
1--
2--
3--
4 Sweden76.28
5 Morocco70.48
6 Lithuania70.47
7 Latvia68.31
8 United Kingdom65.92
9  Switzerland65.42
10 Malta65.06
11 India62.93
12 Norway62.80
13 Finland62.61
14 Croatia62.39
15 Denmark61.96
16 European Union (28)60.65
17 Portugal60.54
18 Ukraine60.09
19 Luxembourg59.92
20 Romania59.42
21 France59.30
22 Brazil59.29
23 Italy58.69
24 Egypt57.49
25 Mexico56.82
26 Slovak Republic56.61
27 Germany55.18
28 Netherlands54.11
29 Belarus53.31
30 Greece50.86
31 Belgium50.63
32 Czech Republic49.73
33 China49.60
34 Argentina49.01
35 Spain48.97
36 Austria48.78
37 Thailand48.71
38 Indonesia48.68
39 South Africa48.25
40 Bulgaria48.11
41 Poland47.59
42 Hungary46.79
43 Slovenia44.90
44 New Zealand44.61
45 Estonia44.37
46 Cyprus44.34
47 Algeria42.10
48 Ireland40.84
49 Japan40.63
50 Turkey40.22
51 Malaysia38.08
52 Russia37.59
53 Kazakhstan36.47
54 Canada34.26
55 Australia31.27
56 Chinese Taipei28.80
57 Korea28.53
58 Iran23.94
59 United States18.82
60 Saudi Arabia8.82

2020 results
RankCountryScore
1--
2--
3--
4 Sweden75.77
5 Denmark71.14
6 Morocco70.63
7 United Kingdom69.80
8 Lithuania66.22
9 India66.02
10 Finland63.25
11 Chile62.88
12 Norway61.14
13 Luxembourg60.91
14 Malta60.60
15 Latvia60.75
16  Switzerland60.61
17 Ukraine60.60
18 France57.90
19 Egypt57.53
20 Croatia56.97
21 Brazil55.82
22 European Union (28)55.82
23 Germany55.78
24 Romania54.85
25 Portugal54.10
26 Italy53.92
27 Slovak Republic52.69
28 Greece52.59
29 Netherlands50.89
30 China48.16
31 Estonia48.05
32 Mexico47.01
33 Thailand46.76
34 Spain46.03
35 Belgium45.73
36 South Africa45.67
37 New Zealand45.67
38 Austria44.74
39 Indonesia44.65
40 Belarus44.18
41 Ireland44.04
42 Argentina43.77
43 Czech Republic42.93
44 Slovenia41.91
45 Cyprus41.66
46 Algeria41.45
47 Hungary41.17
48 Turkey40.76
49 Bulgaria40.12
50 Poland39.98
51 Japan39.03
52 Russia37.85
53 Malaysia34.21
54 Kazakhstan33.39
55 Canada31.01
56 Australia30.75
57 Iran28.41
58 Korea26.75
59 Chinese Taipei23.33
60 Saudi Arabia23.03
61 United States18.60
gollark: If you have a datagram socket thing, then the behavior will be different.
gollark: If you have a *stream*, you can safely write one byte at once (although this may be less efficient), and it's basically the same as writing in batches.
gollark: Which I think has some effects on the most efficient way to write/read them, hence more differences in treatment versus files.
gollark: I mean, an important implementation detail.
gollark: TCP packets are an implementation detail - you have an actual stream.

References
  1. Burck, Jan; Hagen, Ursula; Höhne, Niklas; Nascimento, Leonardo; Bals, Christoph (10 December 2019). "The Climate Change Performance Index 2020" (PDF). Germanwatch. Retrieved 26 April 2020.
  2. Burck, Jan; Hagen, Ursula; Bals, Christoph; Helling, Violeta; Höhne, Niklas; Nascimento, Leonardo (10 December 2019). "Background and Methodology" (PDF). Germanwatch. Retrieved 28 January 2020.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.