Civil religion

Civil religion, also referred to as a civic religion,[1] is the implicit religious values of a nation, as expressed through public rituals, symbols (such as the national flag), and ceremonies on sacred days and at sacred places (such as monuments, battlefields, or national cemeteries). It is distinct from churches, although church officials and ceremonies are sometimes incorporated into the practice of civil religion.[2] Countries described as having a civil religion include France,[3] South Korea,[1] the former Soviet Union,[4] and the United States.[5][6][7] As a concept, it originated in French political thought and became a major topic for U.S. sociologists since its use by Robert Bellah in 1960.

Origin of term

Jean-Jacques Rousseau coined the term in chapter 8, book 4 of The Social Contract (1762), to describe what he regarded as the moral and spiritual foundation essential for any modern society. For Rousseau, civil religion was intended simply as a form of social cement, helping to unify the state by providing it with sacred authority. In his book, Rousseau outlines the simple dogmas of the civil religion:

  1. deity
  2. afterlife
  3. the reward of virtue and the punishment of vice
  4. the exclusion of religious intolerance[8]

The Italian historian Emilio Gentile has studied the roots and development of the concept and proposed a division of two types of religions of politics: a civil religion and a political religion.[9]

Sociology of religion
The Washington National Cathedral in Washington, DC, is often used for state funerals for political leaders.

In the sociology of religion, civil religion is the folk religion of a nation or a political culture.

Civil religion stands somewhat above folk religion in its social and political status, since by definition it suffuses an entire society, or at least a segment of a society; and is often practiced by leaders within that society. On the other hand, it is somewhat less than an establishment of religion, since established churches have official clergy and a relatively fixed and formal relationship with the government that establishes them. Civil religion is usually practiced by political leaders who are laypeople and whose leadership is not specifically spiritual.

Examples

Such civil religion encompasses such things as:[10]

  • the invocation of God in political speeches and public monuments;
  • the quotation of religious texts on public occasions by political leaders;
  • the veneration of past political leaders;
  • the use of the lives of these leaders to teach moral ideals;
  • the veneration of veterans and casualties of a nation's wars;
  • religious gatherings called by political leaders;
  • the use of religious symbols on public buildings;
  • the use of public buildings for worship;
  • founding myths and other national myths

and similar religious or quasi-religious practices.

Practical political philosophy
The Arc de Triomphe in Paris commemorates those who died in France's wars.

Professional commentators on political and social matters writing in newspapers and magazines sometimes use the term civil religion or civic religion to refer to ritual expressions of patriotism of a sort practiced in all countries, not always including religion in the conventional sense of the word.

Among such practices are the following:[10]

  • crowds singing the national anthem at certain public gatherings;
  • parades or display of the national flag on certain patriotic holidays;
  • reciting oaths of allegiance (like the pledges of allegiance found in countries such as the Bahamas, the Philippines, and South Korea);
  • ceremonies concomitant to the inauguration of a president or the coronation of a monarch;
  • retelling exaggerated, one-sided, and simplified mythologized tales of national founders and other great leaders or great events (e.g., battles, mass migrations) in the past (in this connection, see also romantic nationalism);
  • monuments commemorating great leaders of the past or historic events;
  • monuments to dead soldiers or annual ceremonies to remember them;
  • expressions of reverence for the state, the predominant national racial/ethnic group,[1] the national constitution, or the monarch;
  • expressions of solidarity with people perceived as being national kindred but residing in a foreign country or a foreign country perceived as being similar enough to the nation to warrant admiration and/or loyalty;[1]
  • expressions of hatred towards another country or foreign ethnic group perceived as either currently being an enemy of the state and/or as having wronged and slighted the nation in the past;[1]
  • public display of the coffin of a recently deceased political leader.

Relation between the two conceptions

These two conceptions (sociological and political) of civil religion substantially overlap. In Britain, where church and state are constitutionally joined, the monarch's coronation is an elaborate religious rite celebrated by the Archbishop of Canterbury. In France, secular ceremonies are separated from religious observances to a greater degree than in most countries. In the United States, a president being inaugurated is told by the Constitution to choose between saying "I do solemnly swear..." (customarily followed by "so help me God", although those words are not Constitutionally required) and saying "I do solemnly affirm..." (in which latter case no mention of God would be expected).

History

Prehistory and classical antiquity
The emperor Marcus Aurelius, his head ritually covered, conducts a public sacrifice at the Temple of Jupiter

Practically all the ancient and prehistoric reigns suffused politics with religion. Often the leaders, such as the Pharaoh or the Chinese Emperor were considered manifestations of a Divinity. Tribal world-view was often Pantheistic, the tribe being an extension of its surrounding nature and the leaders having roles and symbols derived from the animal hierarchy and significant natural phenomena (such as storm).

The religion of the Athenian polis was a secular polytheism focused on the Olympian Gods and was celebrated in the civic festivals. Religion was a matter of state and the Athenian Ecclesia deliberated on matters of religion. Atheism and the introduction of foreign gods were forbidden in Athens and punishable by death. For example, the Athenian ecclesia charged that Socrates worshiped gods other than those sanctioned by the polis and condemned him to death.

Rome also had a civil religion, whose first Emperor Augustus officially attempted to revive the dutiful practice of classical paganism. Greek and Roman religion were essentially local in character; the Roman Empire attempted to unite its disparate territories by inculcating an ideal of Roman piety, and by a syncretistic identifying of the gods of conquered territories with the Greek and Roman pantheon. In this campaign, Augustus erected monuments such as the Ara Pacis, the Altar of Peace, showing the Emperor and his family worshiping the gods. He also encouraged the publication of works such as Virgil's Æneid, which depicted "pious Æneas", the legendary ancestor of Rome, as a role model for Roman religiosity. Roman historians such as Livy told tales of early Romans as morally improving stories of military prowess and civic virtue. The Roman civil religion later became centered on the person of the Emperor through the Imperial cult, the worship of the genius of the Emperor.[11]

Rousseau and Durkheim

The phrase civil religion was first discussed extensively by Jean-Jacques Rousseau in his 1762 treatise The Social Contract. Rousseau defined civil religion as a group of religious beliefs he believed to be universal, and which he believed governments had a right to uphold and maintain: belief in a deity; belief in an afterlife in which virtue is rewarded and vice punished; and belief in religious tolerance. He said the dogmas of civil religion should be simple, few in number, and stated in precise words without interpretations or commentaries.[12] Beyond that, Rousseau affirmed that individuals' religious opinions should be beyond the reach of governments. For Rousseau civil religion was to be constructed and imposed from the top down as an artificial source of civic virtue.[13]

Wallace studies Émile Durkheim (1858–1917), the French sociologist who analysed civil religion, especially in comparative terms, and stressed that the public schools are critical in implementing civil religion. Although he never used the term he laid great stress on the concept.[14]

Examples

Australia

Writing in 1965 on the fiftieth anniversary of the 1915 Landing at Anzac Cove, Australian historian Geoffrey Serle noted: "Two generations of Australians have had it drummed in from rostrum and pulpit that we became a nation on 25 April 1915 or at least during the First World War." This date is now commemorated as Anzac Day.[15]

Michael Gladwin has argued that for Australians Anzac Day "functions as a kind of alternative religion, or 'civil religion', with its own sense of the mystical, transcendent and divine," while Carolyn Holbrook has observed that after 1990 Anzac Day commemoration was "repackaged" as a protean "story of national genesis" that could flexibly accommodate a wide spectrum of Australians. According to Gladwin, "The emphasis of Anzac Day is no longer on military skills but rather values of unpretentious courage, endurance, sacrifice in the midst of suffering, and mateship. Anzac Day provides universally recognised symbols and rituals to enshrine transcendent elements of Australia's historical experience, making it a quasi-religion, or at least a 'civil religion'."[16]

France

Secular states in Europe by the late 19th century were building civil religion based on their recent histories. In France's case, Baylac argues, the French government:

encouraged a veritable state religion, worshiping the flag and multiplying the national holidays and commemorative monuments. ... July 14 became a national holiday in 1882; the centennial of the French Revolution was celebrated in 1889. In Italy, the secular state multiplied the celebrations: State holidays, King and Queen's birthdays, pilgrimage of 1884 to the tomb of Victor-Emmanuel II. A patriotic ideology was created.[3]

South Korea

In contemporary South Korea, the predominating civil religion has been described as consisting of anti-Japanese sentiment coupled with a pan-Korean racial nationalism.[1] This has been criticized by some scholars as being detrimental to South Korean national security as it encourages North Korean provocations against the country in the guise that South Koreans will not adequately defend their country's security as they feel a certain racial and ethnic solidarity with North Korea.[1] One scholar argued that South Korea should retire this sort of racialized civil religion for one more rooted in civic principles, like was found in West Germany during the 20th century.[1]

Soviet Union
Statue of Lenin at Dubna, Russia, built in 1937; it is 25 metres tall

The Soviet Union made Marxism–Leninism into a civil religion, with sacred texts and many statues of Marx, Lenin, and Stalin.[4] Stalin personally supervised the cult of Lenin and his own cult, which took advantage of the historic semi-religious adulation Russian peasants had shown toward the tsars.[17] The Lenin icons were put into storage when communism fell in 1991. The Stalin statues had been removed in the 1950s and mention of him was erased from encyclopedias and history books. However under Vladimir Putin in the 21st century the memory of Stalin has been partly rehabilitated in search of a strong leader who made the nation powerful. For example, school textbooks were rewritten to portray "the mass terror of the Stalin years as essential to the country's rapid modernization in the face of growing German and Japanese military threats, and amid the inaction or duplicity of the Western democracies."[18]

United States
Main article: American civil religion

Civil religion is an important component of public life in America, especially at the national level for its celebration of nationalism. Sociologists report that its "feast days" are Thanksgiving, Veterans Day, and Memorial Day. Its rituals include salutes to the flag and singing "God Bless America".[7] Soldiers and veterans play a central role of standing ready to sacrifice their lives to preserve the nation. Bellah noted the veneration of veterans.[10] The historian Conrad Cherry called the Memorial Day ceremonies "a modern cult of the dead" and says that it "affirms the civil religious tenets."[19]

American Revolution
Further information: Commemoration of the American Revolution

The American Revolution was the main source of the civil religion that has shaped patriotism ever since. According to the sociologist Robert Bellah:

Behind the civil religion at every point lie biblical archetypes: Exodus, Chosen People, Promised Land, New Jerusalem, and Sacrificial Death and Rebirth. But it is also genuinely American and genuinely new. It has its own prophets and its own martyrs, its own sacred events and sacred places, its own solemn rituals and symbols. It is concerned that America be a society as perfectly in accord with the will of God as men can make it, and a light to all nations.[20]

Albanese argues that the American Revolution was the main source of the non-denominational American civil religion that has shaped patriotism and the memory and meaning of the nation's birth ever since. Battles are not central (as they are for the Civil War) but rather certain events and people have been celebrated as icons of certain virtues (or vices). As historians have noted, the Revolution produced a Moses-like leader (George Washington), prophets (Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine) and martyrs (Boston Massacre, Nathan Hale), as well as devils (Benedict Arnold), sacred places (Valley Forge, Bunker Hill), rituals (Boston Tea Party), emblems (the new flag), sacred holidays (July 4) and a holy scripture whose every sentence is carefully studied and applied in current law cases (the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights).[21]

Although "God" is not mentioned in the Constitution of the United States of America, mention is specifically made of "Nature's God" in the opening sentence of the Declaration of Independence.[11]

Historiography
The Christian flag displayed alongside the flag of the United States next to the pulpit in a church in California. Note the eagle and cross finials on the flag poles.

In the 1960s and 1970s, scholars such as Robert N. Bellah and Martin E. Marty studied civil religion as a cultural phenomenon, attempting to identify the actual tenets of civil religion in the United States, or to study civil religion as a phenomenon of cultural anthropology. Within this American context, Marty wrote that Americans approved of "religion in general" without being particularly concerned about the content of that faith, and attempted to distinguish "priestly" and "prophetic" roles within the practice of American civil religion, which he preferred to call the public theology.[22] In the 1967 essay "Civil Religion in America", Bellah wrote that civil religion in its priestly sense is "an institutionalized collection of sacred beliefs about the American nation." Bellah describes the prophetic role of civil religion as challenging "national self-worship" and calling for "the subordination of the nation to ethical principles that transcend it in terms of which it should be judged."[20] Bellah identified the American Revolution, the Civil War, and the Civil Rights Movement as three decisive historical events that impacted the content and imagery of civil religion in the United States.

The application of the concept of civil religion to the United States was in large part the work of sociologist Robert Bellah. He identified an elaborate system of practices and beliefs arising from America's unique historic experience and religiosity. Civil religion in the US was originally Protestant but brought in Catholics and Jews after World War II. Having no association with any religious sect, civil religion was used in the 1960s to justify civil rights legislation. Americans ever since the colonial era talk of their obligation both collective and individual to carry out God's will on earth. George Washington was a sort of high priest, and the documents of the Founding Fathers have been treated as almost sacred texts. With the Civil War, says Bellah, came a new theme of death, sacrifice and rebirth, as expressed through Memorial Day rituals. Unlike France, the American civil religion was never anticlerical or militantly secular.[20]

Current issues

This assertive civil religion of the United States is an occasional cause of political friction between the US and Europe, where the literally religious form of civil religion has largely faded away in recent decades. In the United States, civil religion is often invoked under the name of "Judeo-Christian ethics", a phrase originally intended to be maximally inclusive of the several religions practiced in the United States, assuming that these faiths all share the same values. Alvin J. Schmidt argues that since the 1700s, expressions of civil religion in the United States have shifted from a deistic to a polytheistic stance.[23]

Some scholars have argued that the American flag can be seen as a main totem of a national cult,[24] while others have argued that modern punishment is a form of civil religion.[25] Arguing against mob violence and lynching, Abraham Lincoln declared in his 1838 Lyceum speech that the Constitution and the laws of the United States ought to become the "political religion" of each American.[26]

gollark: t!help
gollark: t!loot
gollark: t!fish
gollark: <@!340622484674052096>
gollark: <@!340622484674052096>

See also

References

Citations
  1. Myers, Brian Reynolds (2017). "What North Korea Wants". Reuters War College. Soundcloud. Retrieved 2 November 2018. The South needs to retire the conventional civic religion here, which is anti-Japanese pan-Korean nationalism in favor of a collective identification of civic principles.
  2. Wimberley & Swatos 1998.
  3. Baylac, M.-H. (1997). Histoire 1ère (in French). Paris: Bordas. p. 134. Quoted in Lindaman & Ward 2013, p. 148.
  4. Tumarkin 1983.
  5. Haberski, Jr., Raymond (2018). "Civil Religion in America". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Religion. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.013.441. ISBN 9780199340378.
  6. Fait, Stefano (11 September 2001). "Civil Religion". Middle Tennessee State University | Middle Tennessee State University. Retrieved 16 October 2019.
  7. Bruce & Yearley 2006, p. 34.
  8. Bellah 1967; Juergensmeyer 2003, p. 245; Meyer-Dinkgrafe 2004, p. 30; Shanks 2000, p. 29.
  9. Gentile 2006.
  10. Bellah 1992.
  11. O'Donovan 1996.
  12. Beiner 1993.
  13. Demerath & Williams 1985.
  14. Wallace 1977.
  15. Serle, Geoffrey (1965). "The Digger Tradition and Australian Nationalism". Meanjin. Vol. 24 no. 2. p. 149. ISSN 0025-6293.
  16. "Anzac Day as Australia's alternative religion?". Charles Sturt University. 21 April 2016. Retrieved 25 June 2020.
  17. Plamper 2012.
  18. Sherlock, Thomas (2011). "Confronting the Stalinist Past: The Politics of Memory in Russia" (PDF). The Washington Quarterly. Vol. 34 no. 2. p. 97. ISSN 1530-9177. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 February 2018. Retrieved 25 February 2018.
  19. Wilsey 2015, p. 24.
  20. Bellah 1967.
  21. Albanese 1977.
  22. Marty 1989, p. 295.
  23. Schmidt 2004.
  24. Marvin and Ingle (1996). "Blood Sacrifice and the Nation: Revisiting Civil Religion" Archived 28 August 2005 at the Wayback Machine.
  25. SpearIt 2013.
  26. Address Before the Young Men's Lyceum of Springfield, Illinois January 27, 1838

Sources
Albanese, Catherine L. (1977). Sons of the Fathers: The Civil Religion of the American Revolution.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Beiner, Ronald (1993). "Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Rousseau on Civil Religion". The Review of Politics. 55 (4): 617–638. doi:10.1017/S0034670500018027. ISSN 1748-6858. JSTOR 1407609.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Bellah, Robert N. (1967). "Civil Religion in America". Dædalus. 96 (1): 1–21. ISSN 0011-5266. Archived from the original on 6 March 2005. Retrieved 25 October 2004.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
 ———  (1992). Broken Covenant: American Civil Religion in a Time of Trial (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-04199-5.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Bruce, Steve; Yearley, Steven (2006). The SAGE Dictionary of Sociology. London: SAGE Publications. ISBN 978-1-4462-3854-7.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Demerath, Nicholas Jay, III; Williams, Rhys H. (1985). "Civil Religion in an Uncivil Society". The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 480: 154–166. doi:10.1177/0002716285480001013. ISSN 0002-7162. JSTOR 1045342.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Gentile, Emilio (2006) [2001]. Politics as Religion. Translated by Staunton, George. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-11393-7.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Juergensmeyer, Mark (2003). Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence (3rd ed.). Berkeley, California: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-24011-7.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Lindaman, Dana; Ward, Kyle Roy (2013). History Lessons: How Textbooks from Around the World Portray U.S. History. The New Press. ISBN 978-1-59558-575-2.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Marty, Martin E. (1989). Religion and Republic: The American Circumstance.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Meyer-Dinkgrafe, Daniel (2004). European Culture in a Changing World: Between Nationalism and Globalism. London: Cambridge Scholars Press. ISBN 978-1-904303-33-6.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
O'Donovan, Oliver (1996). The Desire of the Nations: Rediscovering the Roots of Political Theology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Plamper, Jan (2012). The Stalin Cult: A Study in the Alchemy of Power.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Schmidt, Alvin J. (2004). "Polytheism: The New Face of American Civil Religion" (PDF). In Adams, David L.; Schurb, Ken (eds.). The Anonymous God: The Church Confronts Civil Religion and American Society. St. Louis, Missouri: Concordia Publishing House. pp. 193–217. ISBN 978-0-7586-0819-2. Retrieved 25 February 2018.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Shanks, Andrew (2000). God and Modernity: A New and Better Way to Do Theology. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-22188-7.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
SpearIt (2013). "Legal Punishment as Civil Ritual: Making Cultural Sense of Harsh Punishment". Mississippi Law Journal. 82 (1). SSRN 2232897.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Tumarkin, Nina (1983). Lenin Lives! The Lenin Cult in Soviet Russia. Harvard University Press.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Wallace, Ruth A. (1977). "Emile Durkheim and the Civil Religion Concept". Review of Religious Research. 18 (3): 287–290. doi:10.2307/3510218. ISSN 0034-673X. JSTOR 3510218.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Wilsey, John D. (2015). American Exceptionalism and Civil Religion: Reassessing the History of an Idea. Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press. ISBN 978-0-8308-9929-6.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Wimberley, Ronald C.; Swatos, William H., Jr. (1998). "Civil Religion". In Swatos, William H., Jr. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Religion and Society. Walnut Creek, California: AltaMira Press. pp. 94–96. ISBN 978-0-7619-8956-1. Archived from the original on 1 September 2006. Retrieved 25 February 2018 – via Hartford Seminary.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)

Further reading
Chapp, Christopher B. (2012). Religious Rhetoric and American Politics; The Endurance of Civil Religion in Electoral Campaigns. Cornell University Press.
Davis, Amos Prosser (2011). "International Civil Religion: Respecting Religious Diversity while Promoting International Cooperation", U.C. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review <http://works.bepress.com/amos_davis/>.
Hostetler, Michael J. (2002). "Joe Lieberman at Fellowship Chapel: Civil Religion Meets Self-Disclosure". Journal of Communication and Religion. 25 (2): 148–165.
Marty, Martin E. (1976). A Nation of Behavers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-50892-4.
Reagan, Ronald. "Remarks at the Baptist Fundamentalism Annual Convention, April 13, 1984". The American Presidency Project. Retrieved 25 February 2018.
Remillard, Arthur (2011). Southern Civil Religions: Imagining the Good Society in the Post-Reconstruction Era. University of Georgia Press. ISBN 978-0-8203-4139-2.
Resnicoff, Arnold E. (2009). "Prayers That Hurt: Public Prayer in Interfaith Settings" (PDF). Curtana. Seabeck, Washington: Scriptorium Novum Press. 1 (1): 25–36. ISSN 2150-5853. Retrieved 25 February 2018.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.