Christine Sinicki

Christine M. Sinicki (born March 28, 1960) is a Democratic Party member of the Wisconsin State Assembly, representing the 20th Assembly District since her election in 1998.[1][2]

Christine Sinicki
Member of the Wisconsin State Assembly
from the 20th district
Assumed office
January 3, 1999
Preceded byTim Carpenter
Personal details
Born (1960-03-28) March 28, 1960
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Political partyDemocratic
ResidenceMilwaukee, Wisconsin
OccupationState Representative

Background

Born in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Sinicki was raised in the Bay View neighborhood and is a graduate of Bay View High School. After graduation, Sinicki worked as a waitress until becoming manager of a small business in Bay View. She is a former member of the Parents-Teachers Association and served as president of the PTA. Sinicki served on the Milwaukee Public School Board from 1991 to 1998. Sinicki has served in the Wisconsin Assembly since 1999.[3]

2016 election

Sinicki was re-elected over Meyer on August 8, 2016, receiving 3,530 votes to Meyers' 2,374, for a margin of 60%-40%.[4]

On August 8, 2016, Sinicki was granted a temporary restraining order against Meyer's husband, Michael Meyer, following a confrontation in Humboldt Park. When Sinicki did not pursue a permanent restraining order, the matter was dismissed by the court on August 19, 2016.[5][6]

gollark: So basically, the "god must exist because the universe is complex" thing ignores the fact that it... isn't really... and that gods would be pretty complex too, and does not answer any questions usefully because it just pushes off the question of why things exist to why *god* exists.
gollark: To randomly interject very late, I don't agree with your reasoning here. As far as physicists can tell, while pretty complex and hard for humans to understand, relative to some other things the universe runs on simple rules - you can probably describe the way it works in maybe a book's worth of material assuming quite a lot of mathematical background. Which is less than you might need for, say, a particularly complex modern computer system. You know what else is quite complex? Gods. They are generally portrayed as acting fairly similarly to humans (humans like modelling other things as basically-humans and writing human-centric stories), and even apart from that are clearly meant to be intelligent agents of some kind. Both of those are complicated - the human genome is something like 6GB, a good deal of which probably codes for brain things. As for other intelligent things, despite having tons of data once trained, modern machine learning things are admittedly not very complex to *describe*, but nobody knows what an architecture for general intelligence would look like.
gollark: https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/348702212110680064/896356765267025940/FB_IMG_1633757163544.jpg
gollark: https://isotropic.org/papers/chicken.pdf
gollark: Frankly, go emit muon neutrinos.

References


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.