China Railways HXD3

HXD3 is an electric locomotive built in Mainland China by CNR Dalian Locomotives.

HXD3
Type and origin
Power typeElectric
DesignerToshiba
BuilderToshiba, CNR Dalian, CNR Datong(HXD38xxx), CNR Beijing Feb.7th
ModelDJ3
Build date2003 (SSJ3)
2006-
Total produced1 (SSJ3)
1040 (HXD3)
Specifications
Configuration:
  UICCo'Co'
Gauge1,435 mm (4 ft 8 12 in)
Axle load23 t (22.6 long tons; 25.4 short tons) / 25 t (24.6 long tons; 27.6 short tons)
Loco weight138 t (136 long tons; 152 short tons) / 150 t (150 long tons; 170 short tons)
Electric system/s25 kV 50 Hz AC Catenary
Current pickup(s)Pantograph
Traction motorsYJ85A x6
TransmissionVoith SET-553
Performance figures
Maximum speed132 km/h (82 mph) (Test)
120 km/h (75 mph) (Service)
Power output7,200 kW (9,700 hp)
Tractive effort520 kN (120,000 lbf) / 570 kN (130,000 lbf) (starting)
370 kN (83,000 lbf) (continuous) @ 70 km/h (43 mph)
370 kN (83,000 lbf) (braking) from 70 km/h (43 mph) to 10 km/h (6.2 mph)
Career
NumbersHXD30001-HXD30890
HXD38001-HXD38150
NicknamesMonkey
LocalePeople's Republic of China

The locomotive is designed for hauling 5,000t freight trains on main lines. It was jointly developed by CNR Dalian Locomotives and Toshiba.

The first prototype (SSJ3-0001) was rolled out from Dalian and underwent testing on the loop track of Beijing CARS in 2004.

Dalian commenced mass production of the locomotive in 2004 with an order of 60 pieces by the Ministry of Railways (MOR). The first mass-produced locomotive was rolled out in 2006. MOR later increased the order from 60 to 240, than to 640, and finally to 1040 locomotives.

Most locomotives were allocated on Jinghu Railway and Jingguang Railway on freight schedules.

gollark: Do cloud providers start stuff that much faster than generic VPS ones? All the VPS providers I've used can manage initialisation in a few minutes.
gollark: But it still seems like a big price delta given that, like you said, they have ridiculous economies of scale.
gollark: I have an old tower server which costs maybe £5/month to run, which provides ~4x the CPU/RAM and ~10x the disk I'd get from a cloud provider at similar pricing, plus I could install a spare GPU when I wanted that. This is a very extreme case since I am entirely ignoring my time costs on managing it and don't have as much redundancy as them.(Edit: also terrible internet connectivity, and colocation would be expensive)
gollark: Possibly also that you can hire fewer sysadmins? But I'm not sure they're that expensive if you have a lot of developers anyway.
gollark: I think the argument for cloud is mostly that it's much faster to scale than "have a bunch of servers in your office", but it seems like you pay an insane amount for that.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.